Bob Dylan originals will look cheap in ten to fifteen. In terms of this scene, look at Americans only. Top of my guess list would be parla

House

Kaws! It will sound funny to most as it may seem his prices have already reached a certain high status but i feel this is just the tip of the iceberg I feel he is quickly approacing murakami status and may very well overtake him in not so many years to come.

I agree with Adam Neate and Jaybo too. I'd definitely add Sickboy and RAE to that list.

Ummm ok that sounds a bit patronising, or is it just me?

Well as long as its not as condescending as your 71st one then I'll be fine.

I'm sure Martib Whatson would be thrilled to hear that he was a 'good kid'.

I'm sure that pole will no doubt be thrilled when it gets removed as well.

I think the whole 'Bob Dylan' thing will be remembered as a lesser chapter of Richard Prince's career. I don't see why one would anticipate it to go through the roof. I don't think anyone collecting Prince is going to rush out and say, "oh, I need one of the 'Bob Dylan' works."

Could be wrong, but there are many, many different series from Prince that I would go after long before this stuff.

Perfect reply. 

Sure, my friend. Post count means nothing, as we all know. I know less than almost everyone on this forum. Just trying to calm things down. Calling him idiotic is not right. I am sure Phage will agree to differ with you. Alls good! 

He was a Logan Hicks wannabe with some of his early stuff, but seemed like a good kid

Read more: urbanartassociation.com/thread/108267/10-years-bought?page=2&scrollTo=1088963#ixzz2bWxvzZyR

This is both inaccurate and as has already been mentioned pretty patronizing. The logan Hicks thing was a bit daft in that Martin did a commercial interior in a LH style. But he as far as I know did not produce work in that style. It was about this time that Martin was doing
His pieces, stencils and style have always been in the vein they are now. It's moved and changed a bit but he isn't a Logan Hicks. The period your talking about was the time that Martin was doing Eternal Reflection.

Which to be fair is not bad for a "good kid". Think in 10 years this will still have a place on my wall.

So to say and imply that Martin is a. LH wannabe is pretty ill informed really. Likewise you have looked it up quoted the post from LH yet you will have seen in the same thread tons of martins work none of which has any resemblance to Logan's fine work. So not sure what axe you guys are grinding.

I do remember this situ and Logan's post which was Kultur remember this situ and Logan's post which was very genuine.

Think the confusion at the time hat caused the problem is this. Note this is my view and understanding not Martins or Logan's for that matter likewise do not know if they have ever discussed it.

This as I understand it. The piece which was a mural in a shop clothes/hairdresser or something. Martin did not sure if he got paid or did as a favor. It wa def in the logan Hicks style etc. however I think he just painted what they wanted and did not regard it as one of his pieces. However it made some site as a new Martin Whatson piece and caused the problem and troubles. His work style of his pieces never changed etc. but it was as I say done as decoration in a shop not on the street or as a Martin Whatson piece.

So he has never been a LH wannabe. Just think he was painting anything he was asked locally and did not regard these as his work/art. Logan jumped off the depend and hence the posts etc. as mentioned it did have an LH style in that it was a street seen of shops at night.
But is actual work as Martin Whatson has not changed in general just progressed. Think he had not accepted that when he painted at that time someone who photo and post.

As say that's my view of what happened no axe to grind with LH or MW.

But he hasn't really though has he. That's the point there are of course individual pieces from Martins early days and Logan's earlier work but they have both gone in different directions and both are great stencilors 

think it will always be a piece of Merit as in its format and particularly canvas and especially the aluminum it is pretty stunning. Eg as mentioned mine will stay on the wall amongst originals of lets say more esteemed artists. Or are you measuring in cash terms only?? Even then would probably gain a decent return.

THat's why I said WAS a Logan Hicks wannabe, not IS ...........think you might want to check there fella I did not quote you as saying IS. Infact the only time I quoted you I said that saying was , was inaccurate. Which you possibly are again here.

Yes but same point he obviously wasn't or he would be. Think he may well have set his sights higher on who he would want to be........

Mate I did not make an investment I just bought a piece which I believe has merit. Not for sale now will it be so it does not matter but sure if it was would do ok.

I have made no mention or comparrison to the number of posts made or how long people have or have not been members as it relevant to your or my opinion.

so cheer up chap