BKBOI
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,882
👍🏻 1,694
January 2013
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by BKBOI on Mar 25, 2014 20:53:34 GMT 1, 57 shirts accounted for between 26 people on expressobeans.
57 shirts accounted for between 26 people on expressobeans.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 20:55:39 GMT 1, dude was not upfront right away. had he said oh sht, might have actually gotten the wrong message from Banksy when the sht hit the fan, people wouldnt be btching about it. His story changed several times even to the point of saying, that buyers are heartless since we couldnt see past the 35k donation. btching about a shty release is protected by the first amendment here in America. no need to be a philanthropist to earn that right. dude did good for so many people. so did Bernie Madoff. comparing this BNE debacle to Bernie Madoff? Now this thread has definitely run it's course
dude was not upfront right away. had he said oh sht, might have actually gotten the wrong message from Banksy when the sht hit the fan, people wouldnt be btching about it. His story changed several times even to the point of saying, that buyers are heartless since we couldnt see past the 35k donation. btching about a shty release is protected by the first amendment here in America. no need to be a philanthropist to earn that right. dude did good for so many people. so did Bernie Madoff. comparing this BNE debacle to Bernie Madoff? Now this thread has definitely run it's course
|
|
petro
New Member
🗨️ 413
👍🏻 225
January 2014
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by petro on Mar 25, 2014 20:57:51 GMT 1, dude was not upfront right away. had he said oh sht, might have actually gotten the wrong message from Banksy when the sht hit the fan, people wouldnt be btching about it. His story changed several times even to the point of saying, that buyers are heartless since we couldnt see past the 35k donation. btching about a shty release is protected by the first amendment here in America. no need to be a philanthropist to earn that right. dude did good for so many people. so did Bernie Madoff. comparing this BNE debacle to Bernie Madoff? Now this thread has definitely run it's course Agreed. That's pretty insulting to Madoff.
dude was not upfront right away. had he said oh sht, might have actually gotten the wrong message from Banksy when the sht hit the fan, people wouldnt be btching about it. His story changed several times even to the point of saying, that buyers are heartless since we couldnt see past the 35k donation. btching about a shty release is protected by the first amendment here in America. no need to be a philanthropist to earn that right. dude did good for so many people. so did Bernie Madoff. comparing this BNE debacle to Bernie Madoff? Now this thread has definitely run it's course Agreed. That's pretty insulting to Madoff.
|
|
BKBOI
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,882
👍🏻 1,694
January 2013
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by BKBOI on Mar 25, 2014 20:59:00 GMT 1, how do you expect this thread to hit 100 if I dont say things like that.
good for bne that he has raised so much money for charity. wish he would have just came clean right away instead of wasting time on IG continuing to confuse people.
how do you expect this thread to hit 100 if I dont say things like that.
good for bne that he has raised so much money for charity. wish he would have just came clean right away instead of wasting time on IG continuing to confuse people.
|
|
pcant
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,669
👍🏻 681
July 2010
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by pcant on Mar 25, 2014 20:59:30 GMT 1, You must be joking. (sorry, that was in response to the BNE is worse that Madoff claim)
You must be joking. (sorry, that was in response to the BNE is worse that Madoff claim)
|
|
Emile
New Member
🗨️ 833
👍🏻 507
October 2013
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Emile on Mar 25, 2014 21:07:27 GMT 1, Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?! Just got the first two* of three refunds. Issued 2 days ago.
Just be patient. Will definitely come!
Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?! Just got the first two* of three refunds. Issued 2 days ago. Just be patient. Will definitely come!
|
|
|
mikehaspey
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,227
👍🏻 845
July 2013
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by mikehaspey on Mar 25, 2014 21:07:28 GMT 1, Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?!
Yeah same here. Put it in 2 days ago
Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?! Yeah same here. Put it in 2 days ago
|
|
Emile
New Member
🗨️ 833
👍🏻 507
October 2013
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Emile on Mar 25, 2014 21:25:38 GMT 1, Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?! Yeah same here. Put it in 2 days ago Actually just got another refund (second order). They are definitely working through them. I also put them in two days ago. No worries, you'll definitely get it.
Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?! Yeah same here. Put it in 2 days ago Actually just got another refund (second order). They are definitely working through them. I also put them in two days ago. No worries, you'll definitely get it.
|
|
taco
New Member
🗨️ 502
👍🏻 124
February 2007
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by taco on Mar 25, 2014 21:28:12 GMT 1, Did mine this morning and just got it refunded this evening. Only refunded the banksy and not the faile
Did mine this morning and just got it refunded this evening. Only refunded the banksy and not the faile
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 21:34:03 GMT 1, Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?! same here !!!
Still waiting for my refund...anyone else? Says its waiting for sellers response?! same here !!!
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by gatecrasher on Mar 25, 2014 21:57:36 GMT 1, The bigger scam is admitting that you are on expressobeans but not owning a Mondo poster. Mondo releases are like buses. If you miss one, there'll be another one along in 10 minutes.
(Yeh I know it's an old joke)
The bigger scam is admitting that you are on expressobeans but not owning a Mondo poster. Mondo releases are like buses. If you miss one, there'll be another one along in 10 minutes. (Yeh I know it's an old joke)
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,946
👍🏻 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Hairbland on Mar 25, 2014 22:00:49 GMT 1, I am sure the dude sold at least 1000 shirts during the time it was up. I thought I read on more than one place (not here) that it was 500 of each color.
I am sure the dude sold at least 1000 shirts during the time it was up. I thought I read on more than one place (not here) that it was 500 of each color.
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by fattyramone on Mar 25, 2014 22:05:30 GMT 1, For the last time, BNE Organics LLC did not "help the charity." They did damage to it, which is the reason Charity Water has taken legal action against them. BNE is literally costing the charity money at this point. And Charity Water is on our side of the argument, not yours. So stop invoking them as way to justify BNEs t-shirt scam. Some of us actually volunteer time to charity and/or are sustaining members of charitable organizations who don't need a Banksy t-shirt as an impetus to do good. Again you don't know the history. BNE has been raising funds for this charity for a while now. This wasn't the first event. Before that BNE did direct water projects fund raising. He has done a lot more than I ever have and likely a lot more than most on this board have done to improve the lives of the world's poor. The "legal action" the charity is taking is largely a reaction to all the inquiries they have got from people b**ching about their precious banksy t-shirts. BNE screwed up. They have to to protect themselves. They are not claiming BNE withheld funds or wronged the charity directly they are just being cautious until they know the facts, as they should. We don't know all the facts but it seems that he has screwed up. The people here b**ching and going over board are just making things worse. If it comes out that BNE was stealing money then go after him after you have those facts. I'm sure paypal is on top of it and will escalate if need be. I don't think that is the case but who knows? For now we know there is a man who has devoted his life to helping others who screwed up in some way. Just what the screw up was and how stupid it was isn't fully known. I would argue that at this stage a witch hunt isn't required. Get your refund now and move on with your life. Or better yet prove you could do a better job and raise funds for the charity yourself. Let's say he raised $50k a year. go out and do that for 10 years then come back and b**ch.
For the last time, BNE Organics LLC did not "help the charity." They did damage to it, which is the reason Charity Water has taken legal action against them. BNE is literally costing the charity money at this point. And Charity Water is on our side of the argument, not yours. So stop invoking them as way to justify BNEs t-shirt scam. Some of us actually volunteer time to charity and/or are sustaining members of charitable organizations who don't need a Banksy t-shirt as an impetus to do good. Again you don't know the history. BNE has been raising funds for this charity for a while now. This wasn't the first event. Before that BNE did direct water projects fund raising. He has done a lot more than I ever have and likely a lot more than most on this board have done to improve the lives of the world's poor. The "legal action" the charity is taking is largely a reaction to all the inquiries they have got from people b**ching about their precious banksy t-shirts. BNE screwed up. They have to to protect themselves. They are not claiming BNE withheld funds or wronged the charity directly they are just being cautious until they know the facts, as they should. We don't know all the facts but it seems that he has screwed up. The people here b**ching and going over board are just making things worse. If it comes out that BNE was stealing money then go after him after you have those facts. I'm sure paypal is on top of it and will escalate if need be. I don't think that is the case but who knows? For now we know there is a man who has devoted his life to helping others who screwed up in some way. Just what the screw up was and how stupid it was isn't fully known. I would argue that at this stage a witch hunt isn't required. Get your refund now and move on with your life. Or better yet prove you could do a better job and raise funds for the charity yourself. Let's say he raised $50k a year. go out and do that for 10 years then come back and b**ch.
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,946
👍🏻 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Hairbland on Mar 25, 2014 22:14:03 GMT 1, BNE said he received notices of legal action from Charity Water. We don't know what the details of those notices are though. The point is, Charity Water had to pay a legal team to investigate this scam and serve legal notices. And that ain't cheap. BTW calling it a scam if it isn't could been seen as Lible. Maybe you mean Slandre instead?
Slander and libel lawsuits differ in the way that a prima facie case must be proven. In the case of slander, the defendant doesn't have to prove that the statements he made are true; instead the plaintiff has to prove that the defamatory statements made against him are false. In other words, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
In making a prima facie case for libel first, the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was false. This can be difficult to prove, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "libel per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record. Proving falsity in a slander case can be difficult, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "slander per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record.
Second, in both a slander and libel case the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was published by the defendant. Libel cases are easier to prove than slander cases. A perfect example is when a newspaper makes libelous statements. There is a printed copy of the statement, with the authors name usually right under it. Slander, however, does not create the same tangible evidence. Often slander involves a "he said, she said" situation.
BNE said he received notices of legal action from Charity Water. We don't know what the details of those notices are though. The point is, Charity Water had to pay a legal team to investigate this scam and serve legal notices. And that ain't cheap. BTW calling it a scam if it isn't could been seen as Lible. Maybe you mean Slandre instead? Slander and libel lawsuits differ in the way that a prima facie case must be proven. In the case of slander, the defendant doesn't have to prove that the statements he made are true; instead the plaintiff has to prove that the defamatory statements made against him are false. In other words, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
In making a prima facie case for libel first, the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was false. This can be difficult to prove, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "libel per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record. Proving falsity in a slander case can be difficult, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "slander per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record.
Second, in both a slander and libel case the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was published by the defendant. Libel cases are easier to prove than slander cases. A perfect example is when a newspaper makes libelous statements. There is a printed copy of the statement, with the authors name usually right under it. Slander, however, does not create the same tangible evidence. Often slander involves a "he said, she said" situation.
|
|
|
A.R.T.
New Member
🗨️ 630
👍🏻 258
July 2007
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by A.R.T. on Mar 25, 2014 22:14:01 GMT 1, I am sure the dude sold at least 1000 shirts during the time it was up. I thought I read on more than one place (not here) that it was 500 of each color.
BNE stated it was 500 total, not 500 of each color or size.
I am sure the dude sold at least 1000 shirts during the time it was up. I thought I read on more than one place (not here) that it was 500 of each color. BNE stated it was 500 total, not 500 of each color or size.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 22:20:25 GMT 1, Either get a refund or don't. Shiiiiiiiiiiiit !!!.
Either get a refund or don't. Shiiiiiiiiiiiit !!!.
|
|
mmmike
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,421
👍🏻 759
March 2010
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by mmmike on Mar 25, 2014 22:24:19 GMT 1, BTW calling it a scam if it isn't could been seen as Lible. Maybe you mean Slandre instead? Slander and libel lawsuits differ in the way that a prima facie case must be proven. In the case of slander, the defendant doesn't have to prove that the statements he made are true; instead the plaintiff has to prove that the defamatory statements made against him are false. In other words, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
In making a prima facie case for libel first, the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was false. This can be difficult to prove, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "libel per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record. Proving falsity in a slander case can be difficult, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "slander per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record.
Second, in both a slander and libel case the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was published by the defendant. Libel cases are easier to prove than slander cases. A perfect example is when a newspaper makes libelous statements. There is a printed copy of the statement, with the authors name usually right under it. Slander, however, does not create the same tangible evidence. Often slander involves a "he said, she said" situation.
My understanding is the difference is Libel is written and Slander is spoken. But I'm not a Lawyer, just trying to point out the hypocrisy of being loose with one's conduct while attacking someone else's conduct.
BTW calling it a scam if it isn't could been seen as Lible. Maybe you mean Slandre instead? Slander and libel lawsuits differ in the way that a prima facie case must be proven. In the case of slander, the defendant doesn't have to prove that the statements he made are true; instead the plaintiff has to prove that the defamatory statements made against him are false. In other words, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff.
In making a prima facie case for libel first, the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was false. This can be difficult to prove, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "libel per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record. Proving falsity in a slander case can be difficult, especially if evidence has disappeared. For some claims that fall within "slander per se" these are easier to prove. The accusation that one is a criminal can be easily proven false by submitting a lack of a criminal record.
Second, in both a slander and libel case the plaintiff needs to prove that the statement was published by the defendant. Libel cases are easier to prove than slander cases. A perfect example is when a newspaper makes libelous statements. There is a printed copy of the statement, with the authors name usually right under it. Slander, however, does not create the same tangible evidence. Often slander involves a "he said, she said" situation.
My understanding is the difference is Libel is written and Slander is spoken. But I'm not a Lawyer, just trying to point out the hypocrisy of being loose with one's conduct while attacking someone else's conduct.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 22:24:29 GMT 1, I thought I read on more than one place (not here) that it was 500 of each color. BNE stated it was 500 total, not 500 of each color or size.
500 x 60usd = 30k (plus 5 for the other pieces makes his 35k donation)
But if he over sold i would like to know where that money is right now.
I thought I read on more than one place (not here) that it was 500 of each color. BNE stated it was 500 total, not 500 of each color or size. 500 x 60usd = 30k (plus 5 for the other pieces makes his 35k donation) But if he over sold i would like to know where that money is right now.
|
|
zefarrett
New Member
🗨️ 491
👍🏻 518
January 2012
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by zefarrett on Mar 25, 2014 22:27:51 GMT 1, Yup, slander is spoken and libel is written. Much easier to understand it like that.
Yup, slander is spoken and libel is written. Much easier to understand it like that.
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by behaviorist on Mar 25, 2014 22:28:39 GMT 1, BNE stated it was 500 total, not 500 of each color or size. 500 x 60usd = 30k (plus 5 for the other pieces makes his 35k donation) But if he over sold i would like to know where that money is right now. plus 5 for what other pieces?
BNE stated it was 500 total, not 500 of each color or size. 500 x 60usd = 30k (plus 5 for the other pieces makes his 35k donation) But if he over sold i would like to know where that money is right now. plus 5 for what other pieces?
|
|
petro
New Member
🗨️ 413
👍🏻 225
January 2014
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by petro on Mar 25, 2014 22:33:58 GMT 1, This thread get's more hilarious with every post. Thanks for the entertainment, mmmike!
This thread get's more hilarious with every post. Thanks for the entertainment, mmmike!
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by bullysonzx10r on Mar 25, 2014 22:39:55 GMT 1, Wait... So what happened?
Wait... So what happened?
|
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by bullysonzx10r on Mar 25, 2014 22:40:30 GMT 1, I'm joking, I've been painfully following this entire ordeal. I hate myself for giving a shit.
I'm joking, I've been painfully following this entire ordeal. I hate myself for giving a shit.
|
|
annar50
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,957
👍🏻 409
May 2008
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by annar50 on Mar 25, 2014 22:47:22 GMT 1, Official bne board room meeting
Official bne board room meeting
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Deleted on Mar 25, 2014 22:49:14 GMT 1, I think its time to get the Outis thread going again.
this is shite.
I think its time to get the Outis thread going again.
this is shite.
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,946
👍🏻 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Hairbland on Mar 25, 2014 22:50:57 GMT 1, This thread get's more hilarious with every post. Thanks for the entertainment, mmmike! I just got out of the shower, nice hot one, going out in about an hour.
Will check in on the Banksy Comedy Club later.
This thread get's more hilarious with every post. Thanks for the entertainment, mmmike! I just got out of the shower, nice hot one, going out in about an hour. Will check in on the Banksy Comedy Club later.
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Coach on Mar 25, 2014 22:56:28 GMT 1, Either get a refund or don't. Shiiiiiiiiiiiit !!!.
Well said mate. This is getting boring. People have now made their position abundantly clear.
Either get a refund or don't. Shiiiiiiiiiiiit !!!. Well said mate. This is getting boring. People have now made their position abundantly clear.
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by FЯ on Mar 25, 2014 23:12:04 GMT 1, People still talking about it are in denial. just pissed off they did not have a banksy. get over it, go buy something else for £65 and stop moaning.
thanks.
People still talking about it are in denial. just pissed off they did not have a banksy. get over it, go buy something else for £65 and stop moaning.
thanks.
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by My Name is Frank on Mar 25, 2014 23:26:38 GMT 1, It's a right old mess this. Having drawn clear, I sort of feel for BNE, but also think he is just as guilty of pressing buy now like the rest of the people he now claims were the social experiment. He said shep gave him banksy's number (highly unlikely) then later talked of banksy's Facebook, which doesn't exist. Maybe BNE who genuinely wants to do the right thing just got fed shit from someone purporting to be banksy.
If this was the case, fair enough. However for transparency and continuing the path back, BNE REALLY NEEDS TO INSTAGRAM, OR WHATEVER IT IS HE USES,THE PAYPAL PAYMENTS FROM THAT NIGHT. It's the smoking gun, if it says 538 orders, I believe he was scammed, if it shows hundreds or thousands more, then the rabbit hole gets deeper.
BNE can still get out of this with head held semi high. If half the people are telling the truth and donated the money direct, well most of the funds made there way there, but that grey cloud of doubt lingers. I can clearly see both sides and honesty would clear things up, can anyone request the paypal screen grab? I don't get twitter and Instagram and all that shit, maybe ask him to explain it would definitely bring back some trust that BNE is the victim of this sham, prank, dishonest endeavour, scam, fraud or whatever you care to label it.
He needs to post his paypal account from Sunday.
It's a right old mess this. Having drawn clear, I sort of feel for BNE, but also think he is just as guilty of pressing buy now like the rest of the people he now claims were the social experiment. He said shep gave him banksy's number (highly unlikely) then later talked of banksy's Facebook, which doesn't exist. Maybe BNE who genuinely wants to do the right thing just got fed shit from someone purporting to be banksy.
If this was the case, fair enough. However for transparency and continuing the path back, BNE REALLY NEEDS TO INSTAGRAM, OR WHATEVER IT IS HE USES,THE PAYPAL PAYMENTS FROM THAT NIGHT. It's the smoking gun, if it says 538 orders, I believe he was scammed, if it shows hundreds or thousands more, then the rabbit hole gets deeper.
BNE can still get out of this with head held semi high. If half the people are telling the truth and donated the money direct, well most of the funds made there way there, but that grey cloud of doubt lingers. I can clearly see both sides and honesty would clear things up, can anyone request the paypal screen grab? I don't get twitter and Instagram and all that shit, maybe ask him to explain it would definitely bring back some trust that BNE is the victim of this sham, prank, dishonest endeavour, scam, fraud or whatever you care to label it.
He needs to post his paypal account from Sunday.
|
|
|
Banksy+BNE for World Water Day, by Posters And Prints Blog on Mar 25, 2014 23:55:09 GMT 1, This makes Kellum, Rata, HeatHunter... seem like rookies. Haha. F**k ExpressoBeans
Please just make this and end this debacle
This makes Kellum, Rata, HeatHunter... seem like rookies. Haha. F**k ExpressoBeans Please just make this and end this debacle
|
|