tcb
New Member
Posts โข 451
Likes โข 349
February 2014
|
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It, by tcb on Jul 4, 2015 13:45:40 GMT 1, Need to let got of my Scott Campbell piece:
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It 2011 Mixed Media laser cut uncut US currency sheets 21 ั
25 ั
6 in. (53.34 x 63.5 x 15.24 cm.) Signed and dated on label Numbered 2/3 COA Framed
PM if interested.
Need to let got of my Scott Campbell piece: Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It 2011 Mixed Media laser cut uncut US currency sheets 21 ั
25 ั
6 in. (53.34 x 63.5 x 15.24 cm.) Signed and dated on label Numbered 2/3 COA Framed PM if interested.
|
|
Cardiff
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,734
Likes โข 1,503
January 2009
|
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It, by Cardiff on Jul 4, 2015 15:14:09 GMT 1, AMAZING piece!
AMAZING piece!
|
|
gilestyas
New Member
Posts โข 78
Likes โข 23
May 2012
|
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It, by gilestyas on Jul 4, 2015 16:40:55 GMT 1, That's awesome!
That's awesome!
|
|
tmccarthy41
New Member
Posts โข 497
Likes โข 87
December 2007
|
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It, by tmccarthy41 on Jul 5, 2015 17:29:47 GMT 1, Very cool
Very cool
|
|
met
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,780
Likes โข 6,695
June 2009
|
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It, by met on Jul 6, 2015 23:12:18 GMT 1,
Would you (or any other forum member who feels the same) mind clarifying why you think so?
Is it the laser-cutting technology that impresses? The design and composition of the piece?
Or the expression "Hit it and quit it"? [I'll concede that does have a nostalgic Beavis & Butthead-style humour to it, like "Fรบck and chuck" or "Pump and dump", but for me it isn't amusing enough to hang on a wall.]
If my tone comes across as aggressive, that isn't my intention. These are genuine questions because I'd like to understand.
I myself don't really see the appeal of the artwork โ or, for that matter, most of Campbell's other laser cuts of US dollar bills.
Would you (or any other forum member who feels the same) mind clarifying why you think so? Is it the laser-cutting technology that impresses? The design and composition of the piece? Or the expression "Hit it and quit it"? [I'll concede that does have a nostalgic Beavis & Butthead-style humour to it, like "Fรบck and chuck" or "Pump and dump", but for me it isn't amusing enough to hang on a wall.] If my tone comes across as aggressive, that isn't my intention. These are genuine questions because I'd like to understand. I myself don't really see the appeal of the artwork โ or, for that matter, most of Campbell's other laser cuts of US dollar bills.
|
|
Cardiff
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,734
Likes โข 1,503
January 2009
|
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It, by Cardiff on Jul 6, 2015 23:51:50 GMT 1, Would you (or any other forum member who feels the same) mind clarifying why you think so? Is it the laser-cutting technology that impresses? The design and composition of the piece? Or the expression "Hit it and quit it"? [I'll concede that does have a nostalgic Beavis & Butthead-style humour to it, like "Fรบck and chuck" or "Pump and dump", but for me it isn't amusing enough to hang on a wall.] If my tone comes across as aggressive, that isn't my intention. These are genuine questions because I'd like to understand. I myself don't really see the appeal of the artwork โ or, for that matter, most of Campbell's other laser cuts of US dollar bills. Fair question...honestly for me, I simply love the aesthetic of his work...always have. I love the 3 dimensional feel and have always read some humorous irony in destroying money to create something beautiful to be sold and bought for a large sum of money and then hung on the wall (actually sounds like a discussion I've had with my wife repeatedly over the years). In this case, I personally don't relate to the "Hit it and quit it" language and as a result, wouldn't necessarily want this on my wall either. Overall, I simply appreciate the way Campbell's pieces are executed and (call me shallow) love the way they look. Sorry I don't have a deeper, more meaningful response.
Would you (or any other forum member who feels the same) mind clarifying why you think so? Is it the laser-cutting technology that impresses? The design and composition of the piece? Or the expression "Hit it and quit it"? [I'll concede that does have a nostalgic Beavis & Butthead-style humour to it, like "Fรบck and chuck" or "Pump and dump", but for me it isn't amusing enough to hang on a wall.] If my tone comes across as aggressive, that isn't my intention. These are genuine questions because I'd like to understand. I myself don't really see the appeal of the artwork โ or, for that matter, most of Campbell's other laser cuts of US dollar bills. Fair question...honestly for me, I simply love the aesthetic of his work...always have. I love the 3 dimensional feel and have always read some humorous irony in destroying money to create something beautiful to be sold and bought for a large sum of money and then hung on the wall (actually sounds like a discussion I've had with my wife repeatedly over the years). In this case, I personally don't relate to the "Hit it and quit it" language and as a result, wouldn't necessarily want this on my wall either. Overall, I simply appreciate the way Campbell's pieces are executed and (call me shallow) love the way they look. Sorry I don't have a deeper, more meaningful response.
|
|
|
met
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,780
Likes โข 6,695
June 2009
|
Scott Campbell - Hit It and Quit It, by met on Jul 7, 2015 0:03:44 GMT 1, Would you (or any other forum member who feels the same) mind clarifying why you think so? Is it the laser-cutting technology that impresses? The design and composition of the piece? Or the expression "Hit it and quit it"? [I'll concede that does have a nostalgic Beavis & Butthead-style humour to it, like "Fรบck and chuck" or "Pump and dump", but for me it isn't amusing enough to hang on a wall.] If my tone comes across as aggressive, that isn't my intention. These are genuine questions because I'd like to understand. I myself don't really see the appeal of the artwork โ or, for that matter, most of Campbell's other laser cuts of US dollar bills. Fair question...honestly for me, I simply love the aesthetic of his work...always have. I love the 3 dimensional feel and have always read some humorous irony in destroying money to create something beautiful to be sold and bought for a large sum of money and then hung on the wall (actually sounds like a discussion I've had with my wife repeatedly over the years). In this case, I personally don't relate to the "Hit it and quit it" language and as a result, wouldn't necessarily want this on my wall either. Overall, I simply appreciate the way Campbell's pieces are executed and (call me shallow) love the way they look. Sorry I don't have a deeper, more meaningful response. Cheers for the considered response.
And very fair comment regarding the ironic appeal of destroying money in order to create artwork, which in turn is sold for (presumably) an even larger sum of money.
Would you (or any other forum member who feels the same) mind clarifying why you think so? Is it the laser-cutting technology that impresses? The design and composition of the piece? Or the expression "Hit it and quit it"? [I'll concede that does have a nostalgic Beavis & Butthead-style humour to it, like "Fรบck and chuck" or "Pump and dump", but for me it isn't amusing enough to hang on a wall.] If my tone comes across as aggressive, that isn't my intention. These are genuine questions because I'd like to understand. I myself don't really see the appeal of the artwork โ or, for that matter, most of Campbell's other laser cuts of US dollar bills. Fair question...honestly for me, I simply love the aesthetic of his work...always have. I love the 3 dimensional feel and have always read some humorous irony in destroying money to create something beautiful to be sold and bought for a large sum of money and then hung on the wall (actually sounds like a discussion I've had with my wife repeatedly over the years). In this case, I personally don't relate to the "Hit it and quit it" language and as a result, wouldn't necessarily want this on my wall either. Overall, I simply appreciate the way Campbell's pieces are executed and (call me shallow) love the way they look. Sorry I don't have a deeper, more meaningful response. Cheers for the considered response. And very fair comment regarding the ironic appeal of destroying money in order to create artwork, which in turn is sold for (presumably) an even larger sum of money.
|
|