Aug 22, 2015 20:45:48 GMT 1 Dice said:

Not that I care much what critics say but the review of dismaland in the guardian today was very negative which surprised me somewhat

  Jones can write an article which means nothing.

He steered away from mentioning Disney in the article.

So Even Jones plays the team Banksy PR game.

 Jones did not write anything about the 50 plus artists exhibiting and their work which is odd for an art critic who visited the show.

 He tends to play the game when promoting some so called high brow "important" artists who are actually very crap and promoted only because of who they are.

 Maybe he looks at Banksy as art for chavs?

 Sort of witty one liners with simple images that simple people can understand rather than pretentious scribbles and other dumbing down promotion by the likes of Rothko and other pseudo analytic meanigful art.

    There again I do enjoy reading the comments posted under all of these articles about art.

www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2015/aug/21/in-dismaland-banksy-has-created-something-truly-depressing

"Mark Orbell 20h ago    

Banksy is nothing more than a icon, a concept thought up and put into to practise at Art School. Has no one watched the DVD that actually explains how you can create an imaginary. Artist and get the art world to buy into the concept in order serve vested interests. Let's go to auction and buy my own art in order to inflate its market value or even better I'll get my own agent to buy my work. These people should be working in Wall Street not Art world . What's even more disturbing for the past 20 years they have plundered public purse and take Art Council Grants when they can afford to fund the project there selves."

   Reality is people go to see the show and if they feel they got their money's Worth thats all that matters.