|
Donald Trump, by Daniel Silk on Nov 20, 2018 9:27:36 GMT 1, I think so many countries right or wrongly rely on America, and the current situation is making countries and people across the World re-evaluate USA’s so-called position as a superpower. The World is developing fast and Countries are starting to stand on their own two feet and be more independent. Of course that can create instability, but in general I think it’s good for the World, but not good for America.
I think so many countries right or wrongly rely on America, and the current situation is making countries and people across the World re-evaluate USA’s so-called position as a superpower. The World is developing fast and Countries are starting to stand on their own two feet and be more independent. Of course that can create instability, but in general I think it’s good for the World, but not good for America.
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
Posts • 9,841
Likes • 9,460
December 2010
|
Donald Trump, by .dappy on Nov 20, 2018 11:18:30 GMT 1, ... in Finland, 2 hours of raking is mandatory per day ...
#rakeamericagreatagain
http://instagram.com/p/BqXxSZphaUA
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 20, 2018 11:28:06 GMT 1, Moron. I feel for ya. It must be a sorry state to walk around afraid of everything and everyone. Your sources are crap. Your opinions are empty. Your statements are false. Again, I feel for ya. I get the impression that all Trump supporters walk around in constant fear of the 'other'. Trump himself encourages this sort of mindset. It then means he, the great white saviour, can come along and save them all from those evil Mexicans, democrats, mainstream media, trans people, climate change scientists etc. etc. It really is like some kind of religious cult. They are living in a Trumpian bubble. They have been brainwashed by Trump's lies so much that they can't see how complete bollocks it all is.
Moron. I feel for ya. It must be a sorry state to walk around afraid of everything and everyone. Your sources are crap. Your opinions are empty. Your statements are false. Again, I feel for ya. I get the impression that all Trump supporters walk around in constant fear of the 'other'. Trump himself encourages this sort of mindset. It then means he, the great white saviour, can come along and save them all from those evil Mexicans, democrats, mainstream media, trans people, climate change scientists etc. etc. It really is like some kind of religious cult. They are living in a Trumpian bubble. They have been brainwashed by Trump's lies so much that they can't see how complete bollocks it all is.
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
Posts • 1,766
Likes • 1,852
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Chris JL on Nov 20, 2018 12:23:46 GMT 1, Moron. I feel for ya. It must be a sorry state to walk around afraid of everything and everyone. Your sources are crap. Your opinions are empty. Your statements are false. Again, I feel for ya. I get the impression that all Trump supporters walk around in constant fear of the 'other'. Trump himself encourages this sort of mindset. It then means he, the great white saviour, can come along and save them all from those evil Mexicans, democrats, mainstream media, trans people, climate change scientists etc. etc. It really is like some kind of religious cult. They are living in a Trumpian bubble. They have been brainwashed by Trump's lies so much that they can't see how complete bollocks it all is.
Actually your impression is quite right it seems in the data.
Sides, Tesler & Vavreck (3 highly regarded researchers) have done probably the best scientific analysis of the Trump electoral phenomenon. They found that the key element that brought Trump to us has been his skilful leveraging of racial and ethnic identities and tensions, and the fears related to race, immigration, and religion. Btw: they also find that the Russian interference was probably not a major factor (but this does not make it less illegal obviously).
Their book is definitively worth reading: press.princeton.edu/titles/11084.html
(And btw a lesson from this is that racist lies should not go unanswered - something that I believe too often the media fails to do for the fear of sounding partisan... but facts aren’t partisan.)
Moron. I feel for ya. It must be a sorry state to walk around afraid of everything and everyone. Your sources are crap. Your opinions are empty. Your statements are false. Again, I feel for ya. I get the impression that all Trump supporters walk around in constant fear of the 'other'. Trump himself encourages this sort of mindset. It then means he, the great white saviour, can come along and save them all from those evil Mexicans, democrats, mainstream media, trans people, climate change scientists etc. etc. It really is like some kind of religious cult. They are living in a Trumpian bubble. They have been brainwashed by Trump's lies so much that they can't see how complete bollocks it all is. Actually your impression is quite right it seems in the data. Sides, Tesler & Vavreck (3 highly regarded researchers) have done probably the best scientific analysis of the Trump electoral phenomenon. They found that the key element that brought Trump to us has been his skilful leveraging of racial and ethnic identities and tensions, and the fears related to race, immigration, and religion. Btw: they also find that the Russian interference was probably not a major factor (but this does not make it less illegal obviously). Their book is definitively worth reading: press.princeton.edu/titles/11084.html(And btw a lesson from this is that racist lies should not go unanswered - something that I believe too often the media fails to do for the fear of sounding partisan... but facts aren’t partisan.)
|
|
dogstar
New Member
Posts • 665
Likes • 811
October 2017
|
Donald Trump, by dogstar on Nov 22, 2018 17:19:12 GMT 1,
Jesus. Fücking. Christ.
Jesus. Fücking. Christ.
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 22, 2018 17:55:51 GMT 1, Jesus. Fücking. Christ. This clearly proves Trump's total lack of knowledge on the subject and his inability to look at the empirical evidence. Does he know anything at all about anthropomorphic climate change? Anything at all? The guy's a f***ing idiot!
Jesus. Fücking. Christ. This clearly proves Trump's total lack of knowledge on the subject and his inability to look at the empirical evidence. Does he know anything at all about anthropomorphic climate change? Anything at all? The guy's a f***ing idiot!
|
|
|
Masong
Junior Member
Posts • 2,204
Likes • 2,842
Member is Online
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Masong on Nov 22, 2018 18:07:07 GMT 1, Jesus. Fücking. Christ.
Blasphemy is worse than stupidity
Jesus. Fücking. Christ. Blasphemy is worse than stupidity
|
|
🙈 🙉 🙊
New Member
Posts • 122
Likes • 110
February 2018
|
Donald Trump, by 🙈 🙉 🙊 on Nov 22, 2018 18:18:44 GMT 1, Jesus. Fücking. Christ. Blasphemy is worse than stupidity 🙄
Jesus. Fücking. Christ. Blasphemy is worse than stupidity 🙄
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 22, 2018 18:21:47 GMT 1, Jesus. Fücking. Christ. Blasphemy is worse than stupidity Of course it isn't - especially when we are talking about the president of the U.S.
Jesus. Fücking. Christ. Blasphemy is worse than stupidity Of course it isn't - especially when we are talking about the president of the U.S.
|
|
Masong
Junior Member
Posts • 2,204
Likes • 2,842
Member is Online
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Masong on Nov 22, 2018 18:27:20 GMT 1, Blasphemy is worse than stupidity Of course it isn't - especially when we are talking about the president of the U.S.
So blasphemy is ok?
Blasphemy is worse than stupidity Of course it isn't - especially when we are talking about the president of the U.S. So blasphemy is ok?
|
|
mojo
Junior Member
Posts • 2,146
Likes • 3,612
May 2014
|
Donald Trump, by mojo on Nov 22, 2018 18:57:41 GMT 1,
|
|
Dive Jedi
Junior Member
Posts • 6,180
Likes • 9,426
October 2015
|
Donald Trump, by Dive Jedi on Nov 22, 2018 19:03:19 GMT 1, Jesus. Fücking. Christ. Blasphemy is worse than stupidity If there was a god, he would disagree….
Jesus. Fücking. Christ. Blasphemy is worse than stupidity If there was a god, he would disagree….
|
|
|
Donald Trump, by amsterdam9697 on Nov 22, 2018 19:18:18 GMT 1, Moron. I feel for ya. It must be a sorry state to walk around afraid of everything and everyone. Your sources are crap. Your opinions are empty. Your statements are false. Again, I feel for ya. Spoken like a true loser Top of the morning to you as well, Chuckles.
P.S. Why are you such an asshole? Completely negative. You literally have nothing good to saying about anything or anyone on this entire forum. I can only imagine... you must be a hoot to party with.
Moron. I feel for ya. It must be a sorry state to walk around afraid of everything and everyone. Your sources are crap. Your opinions are empty. Your statements are false. Again, I feel for ya. Spoken like a true loser Top of the morning to you as well, Chuckles. P.S. Why are you such an asshole? Completely negative. You literally have nothing good to saying about anything or anyone on this entire forum. I can only imagine... you must be a hoot to party with.
|
|
irl1
Full Member
Posts • 9,274
Likes • 9,381
December 2017
|
Donald Trump, by irl1 on Nov 22, 2018 19:45:51 GMT 1, Forget about Trump for the day that's in it
Happy thanksgiving to all in the States
Forget about Trump for the day that's in it Happy thanksgiving to all in the States
|
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 22, 2018 20:06:06 GMT 1, Of course it isn't - especially when we are talking about the president of the U.S. So blasphemy is ok? Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them.
Of course it isn't - especially when we are talking about the president of the U.S. So blasphemy is ok? Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them.
|
|
Masong
Junior Member
Posts • 2,204
Likes • 2,842
Member is Online
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Masong on Nov 22, 2018 20:24:22 GMT 1, Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them.
I’m pretty sure that there are some religions that would strongly disagree.
Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them. I’m pretty sure that there are some religions that would strongly disagree.
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 22, 2018 20:32:10 GMT 1, Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them. I’m pretty sure that there are some religions that would strongly disagree.
LOL, yeah you maybe right
Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them. I’m pretty sure that there are some religions that would strongly disagree. LOL, yeah you maybe right
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 22, 2018 20:37:10 GMT 1, Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them. I think saying some things are fine as it's a turn of phrase
to use it to insult people on purpose just to get a response maybe not so fine
Quick question, how would you challenge faith?
Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them. I think saying some things are fine as it's a turn of phrase to use it to insult people on purpose just to get a response maybe not so fine Quick question, how would you challenge faith?
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 22, 2018 20:45:06 GMT 1, Top of the morning to you as well, Chuckles. P.S. Why are you such an asshole? Completely negative. You literally have nothing good to saying about anything or anyone on this entire forum. I can only imagine... you must be a hoot to party with. You, on the other hand, are a positive sweetheart!
Top of the morning to you as well, Chuckles. P.S. Why are you such an asshole? Completely negative. You literally have nothing good to saying about anything or anyone on this entire forum. I can only imagine... you must be a hoot to party with. You, on the other hand, are a positive sweetheart!
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
Posts • 1,766
Likes • 1,852
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Chris JL on Nov 23, 2018 2:30:03 GMT 1, Jesus. Fücking. Christ.
🤦♂️ what a dangerous moron...
Today’s global weather map (red=hot): overall 1.2C above preindustrial levels
Jesus. Fücking. Christ. 🤦♂️ what a dangerous moron... Today’s global weather map (red=hot): overall 1.2C above preindustrial levels
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 23, 2018 2:49:26 GMT 1, Haha you gotta give it to the man, he knows how to troll the left.
In other news, I don't have the flu so flu season is officially over!
Haha you gotta give it to the man, he knows how to troll the left.
In other news, I don't have the flu so flu season is officially over!
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 23, 2018 11:20:41 GMT 1, Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them. I think saying some things are fine as it's a turn of phrase to use it to insult people on purpose just to get a response maybe not so fine Quick question, how would you challenge faith? Insulting a faith and insulting people are two different things. I try and be nice to all people, including Christians and Muslims, but I don't feel that means I should smile sweetly about their belief systems and say "that's nice". If someone says they believe in magical beings and invisible lands in the sky then I will laugh and say I think that's superstitious nonsense and that there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If someone asks me why I am an atheist, I will normally say because there is no evidence to the contrary. Or, if I am feeling cheeky, I will simply say "...because I am an adult".
Yes, blasphemy is absolutely fine. It is showing lack of reverence to someone's beliefs. Why shouldn't people do that? In fact, I would go further and say it should be compulsory. All beliefs should be challenged and if found to be wanting then it is the duty of right-minded people to speak out against them. I think saying some things are fine as it's a turn of phrase to use it to insult people on purpose just to get a response maybe not so fine Quick question, how would you challenge faith? Insulting a faith and insulting people are two different things. I try and be nice to all people, including Christians and Muslims, but I don't feel that means I should smile sweetly about their belief systems and say "that's nice". If someone says they believe in magical beings and invisible lands in the sky then I will laugh and say I think that's superstitious nonsense and that there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If someone asks me why I am an atheist, I will normally say because there is no evidence to the contrary. Or, if I am feeling cheeky, I will simply say "...because I am an adult".
|
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 23, 2018 13:28:46 GMT 1, I thought this was quite interesting.
Where Americans find most meaning... www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-46306037
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
Posts • 1,766
Likes • 1,852
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Chris JL on Nov 23, 2018 15:26:24 GMT 1, I think saying some things are fine as it's a turn of phrase to use it to insult people on purpose just to get a response maybe not so fine Quick question, how would you challenge faith? Insulting a faith and insulting people are two different things. I try and be nice to all people, including Christians and Muslims, but I don't feel that means I should smile sweetly about their belief systems and say "that's nice". If someone says they believe in magical beings and invisible lands in the sky then I will laugh and say I think that's superstitious nonsense and that there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If someone asks me why I am an atheist, I will normally say because there is no evidence to the contrary. Or, if I am feeling cheeky, I will simply say "...because I am an adult".
Don’t wanna pull your leg... but I will 😊: the only belief you can support with the observable reality is being agnostic - formally, we can neither prove nor disprove any of the mystical hocus pocus. Basically, being an atheist means being a believer (in the sense of believing in an unverifiable truth). But probably I don’t make any sense (I’m taking a break from working on proving a theorem, so I’m clearly brain damaged at the moment).
I think saying some things are fine as it's a turn of phrase to use it to insult people on purpose just to get a response maybe not so fine Quick question, how would you challenge faith? Insulting a faith and insulting people are two different things. I try and be nice to all people, including Christians and Muslims, but I don't feel that means I should smile sweetly about their belief systems and say "that's nice". If someone says they believe in magical beings and invisible lands in the sky then I will laugh and say I think that's superstitious nonsense and that there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If someone asks me why I am an atheist, I will normally say because there is no evidence to the contrary. Or, if I am feeling cheeky, I will simply say "...because I am an adult". Don’t wanna pull your leg... but I will 😊: the only belief you can support with the observable reality is being agnostic - formally, we can neither prove nor disprove any of the mystical hocus pocus. Basically, being an atheist means being a believer (in the sense of believing in an unverifiable truth). But probably I don’t make any sense (I’m taking a break from working on proving a theorem, so I’m clearly brain damaged at the moment).
|
|
Leo Boyd
Artist
Junior Member
Posts • 1,468
Likes • 2,072
June 2016
|
Donald Trump, by Leo Boyd on Nov 23, 2018 15:59:10 GMT 1, Haha you gotta give it to the man, he knows how to troll the left. In other news, I don't have the flu so flu season is officially over! Well I suppose everyone has to have one talent?
Haha you gotta give it to the man, he knows how to troll the left. In other news, I don't have the flu so flu season is officially over! Well I suppose everyone has to have one talent?
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 23, 2018 16:54:09 GMT 1, Insulting a faith and insulting people are two different things. I try and be nice to all people, including Christians and Muslims, but I don't feel that means I should smile sweetly about their belief systems and say "that's nice". If someone says they believe in magical beings and invisible lands in the sky then I will laugh and say I think that's superstitious nonsense and that there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If someone asks me why I am an atheist, I will normally say because there is no evidence to the contrary. Or, if I am feeling cheeky, I will simply say "...because I am an adult". Don’t wanna pull your leg... but I will 😊: the only belief you can support with the observable reality is being agnostic - formally, we can neither prove nor disprove any of the mystical hocus pocus. Basically, being an atheist means being a believer (in the sense of believing in an unverifiable truth). But probably I don’t make any sense (I’m taking a break from working on proving a theorem, so I’m clearly brain damaged at the moment). Whilst, strictly speaking, you are correct, I do have a problem with that line of thinking, as it seems to suggest that theism and atheism are somehow on an equal footing when that is simply not the case. The evidence suggests that God does not exist; not that maybe he does and maybe he doesn't. There is no evidence for God's existence, none whatsoever.
Insulting a faith and insulting people are two different things. I try and be nice to all people, including Christians and Muslims, but I don't feel that means I should smile sweetly about their belief systems and say "that's nice". If someone says they believe in magical beings and invisible lands in the sky then I will laugh and say I think that's superstitious nonsense and that there is no evidence to support such beliefs. If someone asks me why I am an atheist, I will normally say because there is no evidence to the contrary. Or, if I am feeling cheeky, I will simply say "...because I am an adult". Don’t wanna pull your leg... but I will 😊: the only belief you can support with the observable reality is being agnostic - formally, we can neither prove nor disprove any of the mystical hocus pocus. Basically, being an atheist means being a believer (in the sense of believing in an unverifiable truth). But probably I don’t make any sense (I’m taking a break from working on proving a theorem, so I’m clearly brain damaged at the moment). Whilst, strictly speaking, you are correct, I do have a problem with that line of thinking, as it seems to suggest that theism and atheism are somehow on an equal footing when that is simply not the case. The evidence suggests that God does not exist; not that maybe he does and maybe he doesn't. There is no evidence for God's existence, none whatsoever.
|
|
lorraballs
New Member
Posts • 214
Likes • 198
September 2012
|
Donald Trump, by lorraballs on Nov 23, 2018 18:37:40 GMT 1, Don’t wanna pull your leg... but I will 😊: the only belief you can support with the observable reality is being agnostic - formally, we can neither prove nor disprove any of the mystical hocus pocus. Basically, being an atheist means being a believer (in the sense of believing in an unverifiable truth). But probably I don’t make any sense (I’m taking a break from working on proving a theorem, so I’m clearly brain damaged at the moment). Whilst, strictly speaking, you are correct, I do have a problem with that line of thinking, as it seems to suggest that theism and atheism are somehow on an equal footing when that is simply not the case. The evidence suggests that God does not exist; not that maybe he does and maybe he doesn't. There is no evidence for God's existence, none whatsoever. Strictly speaking they are incorrect. Atheism is not a belief. Theism is a belief in gods. Atheism is a lack of belief.
Don’t wanna pull your leg... but I will 😊: the only belief you can support with the observable reality is being agnostic - formally, we can neither prove nor disprove any of the mystical hocus pocus. Basically, being an atheist means being a believer (in the sense of believing in an unverifiable truth). But probably I don’t make any sense (I’m taking a break from working on proving a theorem, so I’m clearly brain damaged at the moment). Whilst, strictly speaking, you are correct, I do have a problem with that line of thinking, as it seems to suggest that theism and atheism are somehow on an equal footing when that is simply not the case. The evidence suggests that God does not exist; not that maybe he does and maybe he doesn't. There is no evidence for God's existence, none whatsoever. Strictly speaking they are incorrect. Atheism is not a belief. Theism is a belief in gods. Atheism is a lack of belief.
|
|
lorraballs
New Member
Posts • 214
Likes • 198
September 2012
|
Donald Trump, by lorraballs on Nov 24, 2018 0:11:15 GMT 1, Additionally, if you posit an argument it is up to you to provide evidence. For instance, if you allege unicorns exist, it is up to you to provide evidence they exist, not mine to prove they do not. The burden of proof falls on the party that makes the claim. I don’t mean to sound cunty but this is pretty basic stuff. Good luck with the theorem. Took 358 years to prove Fermat’s.
Additionally, if you posit an argument it is up to you to provide evidence. For instance, if you allege unicorns exist, it is up to you to provide evidence they exist, not mine to prove they do not. The burden of proof falls on the party that makes the claim. I don’t mean to sound cunty but this is pretty basic stuff. Good luck with the theorem. Took 358 years to prove Fermat’s.
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
Posts • 9,841
Likes • 9,460
December 2010
|
Donald Trump, by .dappy on Nov 24, 2018 0:26:26 GMT 1, ... new fleet, aircraft carriers ... let's run them off steam engines 💁🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
... new fleet, aircraft carriers ... let's run them off steam engines 💁🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 0:58:13 GMT 1, Whilst, strictly speaking, you are correct, I do have a problem with that line of thinking, as it seems to suggest that theism and atheism are somehow on an equal footing when that is simply not the case. The evidence suggests that God does not exist; not that maybe he does and maybe he doesn't. There is no evidence for God's existence, none whatsoever. Strictly speaking they are incorrect. Atheism is not a belief. Theism is a belief in gods. Atheism is a lack of belief. Atheism is as much as a believe as theism, one believes that God does not exist, one believes that God does exist. You are refering to Agnosticism, a view where you state 'it's unknowable'.
Whilst, strictly speaking, you are correct, I do have a problem with that line of thinking, as it seems to suggest that theism and atheism are somehow on an equal footing when that is simply not the case. The evidence suggests that God does not exist; not that maybe he does and maybe he doesn't. There is no evidence for God's existence, none whatsoever. Strictly speaking they are incorrect. Atheism is not a belief. Theism is a belief in gods. Atheism is a lack of belief. Atheism is as much as a believe as theism, one believes that God does not exist, one believes that God does exist. You are refering to Agnosticism, a view where you state 'it's unknowable'.
|
|