BKBOI
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,882
๐๐ป 1,694
January 2013
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by BKBOI on Jun 15, 2016 14:25:30 GMT 1, Change is hard to accept. On other note, I know that there are so many Dolk collectors who frequent this forum. Anyone bought a piece from this show? Please share with the community why you love the new works released by Dolk and why you think it deserves to be part of your Dolk collection.
Change is hard to accept. On other note, I know that there are so many Dolk collectors who frequent this forum. Anyone bought a piece from this show? Please share with the community why you love the new works released by Dolk and why you think it deserves to be part of your Dolk collection.
|
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Daniel Silk on Jun 15, 2016 14:39:26 GMT 1, when i read these threads critiquing artist selection of work for release or critiquing their new body of work i start to think 'what if the internet chat board system had been around in previous generations.' imagine your critique say of Warhol's camouflage series or duchamp's The Fountain. or closer in what were your thoughts on FAILE's pieces of FAILE - so many critiqued and said it was the end ..etc. the future is pretty hard to predict and its just so easy to have an opinion and type it out quickly. i get that .. i suppose i even encourage it.. just keep it civil - and here's my opinion. any artist working hard, putting themselves and their work out there for critique, and trying to be successful and relevant deserves at least your respect. There is truth in this. When the impressionists first exhibited, critics and the wealthy turned up mostly to slate the work.
Sadly some feel differently -
when i read these threads critiquing artist selection of work for release or critiquing their new body of work i start to think 'what if the internet chat board system had been around in previous generations.' imagine your critique say of Warhol's camouflage series or duchamp's The Fountain. or closer in what were your thoughts on FAILE's pieces of FAILE - so many critiqued and said it was the end ..etc. the future is pretty hard to predict and its just so easy to have an opinion and type it out quickly. i get that .. i suppose i even encourage it.. just keep it civil - and here's my opinion. any artist working hard, putting themselves and their work out there for critique, and trying to be successful and relevant deserves at least your respect. There is truth in this. When the impressionists first exhibited, critics and the wealthy turned up mostly to slate the work. I agree. Sadly some feel differently - |
|
smokinfish
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 181
๐๐ป 216
May 2016
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by smokinfish on Jun 15, 2016 17:10:21 GMT 1, The email I got from the gallery:
The Limited edition is signed and numbered and each edition is a original artwork. The content is the same as the Standard Edition, but the cover of the book is in a matt black finish with a unique metallic lacquered aluminum scratched/keyed painting by Dolk on front. Edition of 75. Price: 20.000 NOK + shipping.
The Standard Edition is 500 NOK + shipping.
The email I got from the gallery:
The Limited edition is signed and numbered and each edition is a original artwork. The content is the same as the Standard Edition, but the cover of the book is in a matt black finish with a unique metallic lacquered aluminum scratched/keyed painting by Dolk on front. Edition of 75. Price: 20.000 NOK + shipping.
The Standard Edition is 500 NOK + shipping.
|
|
mutatis
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 671
๐๐ป 492
July 2013
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by mutatis on Jun 15, 2016 17:18:01 GMT 1, What follows tends to suggest that they know it's steep:
"For those of you who are serious about purchasing the Limited Edition I can take reservation, but I want to have this in writing as soon as possible (just reply to this Email)."
What follows tends to suggest that they know it's steep:
"For those of you who are serious about purchasing the Limited Edition I can take reservation, but I want to have this in writing as soon as possible (just reply to this Email)."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Coach on Jun 18, 2016 20:53:26 GMT 1, I very much like the look of this work.
I very much like the look of this work.
|
|
|
|
Fะฏ
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,264
๐๐ป 9,252
May 2013
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Fะฏ on Jun 18, 2016 21:08:55 GMT 1, I very much like the look of this work.
Really?
Looks a bit crap. Be honest.
I take it rip off is referring to the prices of the new book and art
I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of the new book and art |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Deleted on Jun 18, 2016 21:45:24 GMT 1, I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art
Interesting
very interesting
got me thinking, who was the guy that slashed the canvas for the 4th dimension or whatever?
is it all about the look? ommmmmmmmmm
I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art Interesting very interesting got me thinking, who was the guy that slashed the canvas for the 4th dimension or whatever? is it all about the look? ommmmmmmmmm |
|
batemanz
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 173
๐๐ป 216
November 2014
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by batemanz on Jun 18, 2016 21:49:31 GMT 1, I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art
Nothing here to flip FR move along.....
REVIEW and some pics : DOLK part two Rip Off:
howartyoutoday.com/2016/06/18/review-dolk-part-two-rip-off/
|
|
generalist
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 12
๐๐ป 17
September 2013
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by generalist on Jun 18, 2016 21:50:37 GMT 1,
|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,524
September 2013
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Poster Bob on Jun 18, 2016 21:57:43 GMT 1, The new Sandra Chevrier print will be out next week. Act like a cocky p*ick then.
I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art
The new Sandra Chevrier print will be out next week. Act like a cocky p*ick then. I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art |
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Coach on Jun 18, 2016 21:59:32 GMT 1, I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art
Yes. But then I am fond of abstract art.
If you're not, you're not.
But it certainly doesn't look crap to me.
I'd like to see it in person.
I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art Yes. But then I am fond of abstract art. If you're not, you're not. But it certainly doesn't look crap to me. I'd like to see it in person. |
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Daniel Silk on Jun 18, 2016 22:03:29 GMT 1, Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art Yes. But then I am fond of abstract art. If you're not, you're not. But it certainly doesn't look crap to me. I'd like to see it in person.
Really need to see that type of work close up and also within a space.
Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art Yes. But then I am fond of abstract art. If you're not, you're not. But it certainly doesn't look crap to me. I'd like to see it in person. Yeah, it's very hard to judge work like that just from a few photos online. Really need to see that type of work close up and also within a space. |
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,233
๐๐ป 2,471
March 2009
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Ottomatik on Jun 18, 2016 23:32:03 GMT 1, I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of the new book and art
I very much like the look of this work. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of the new book and art |
|
|
|
smokinfish
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 181
๐๐ป 216
May 2016
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by smokinfish on Jun 19, 2016 0:45:57 GMT 1, Some pictures from Dolk's Rip 
Some pictures from Dolk's Rip I really like this one. I'm willing to bet it's more impressive in person. The mirror like finish on that black is some really nice paint work. |
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,233
๐๐ป 2,471
March 2009
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Ottomatik on Jun 19, 2016 1:29:25 GMT 1, Some pictures from Dolk's Ripย I really like this one. I'm willing to bet it's more impressive in person. The mirror like finish on that black is some really nice paint work.
I don't think that's 'paint work,' I think it's the type of paint.
Some pictures from Dolk's Ripย I really like this one. I'm willing to bet it's more impressive in person. The mirror like finish on that black is some really nice paint work. I don't think that's 'paint work,' I think it's the type of paint. |
|
Sanscript
Artist
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 115
๐๐ป 71
November 2013
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Sanscript on Jun 19, 2016 7:43:57 GMT 1, Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art Yes. But then I am fond of abstract art. If you're not, you're not. But it certainly doesn't look crap to me. I'd like to see it in person.
I think this is what art is about, it impacts on our lives.
This is also the fascination with abstract art, it has the power to cause emotional responses. When the famous Russian painter Kazimir Malevich painted and displayed his black square in 1915 (or maybe 1913), people went nuts. That black square was hugely controversial and changed the direction of art at that point in time.
We still see this today, when people vandalise the work of Barnett Newman - its an emotive response to an abstract shape. I have seen one of the large Newman pieces in NY, and I have to say that I just stopped and stared and felt like I was going to fall into it, I found myself getting closer and closer, wanting to touch it. It was all I could see. It's crazy that a red rectangle can entrap the viewer, or anger them to a point of violence.
Thats the trick that minimalist art plays on us.
Personally, I'm not sure if I like these Dolk works, but it has caused discussion. Maybe the discussion is the point, not the art itself?
Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art Yes. But then I am fond of abstract art. If you're not, you're not. But it certainly doesn't look crap to me. I'd like to see it in person. I think this is what art is about, it impacts on our lives. This is also the fascination with abstract art, it has the power to cause emotional responses. When the famous Russian painter Kazimir Malevich painted and displayed his black square in 1915 (or maybe 1913), people went nuts. That black square was hugely controversial and changed the direction of art at that point in time. We still see this today, when people vandalise the work of Barnett Newman - its an emotive response to an abstract shape. I have seen one of the large Newman pieces in NY, and I have to say that I just stopped and stared and felt like I was going to fall into it, I found myself getting closer and closer, wanting to touch it. It was all I could see. It's crazy that a red rectangle can entrap the viewer, or anger them to a point of violence. Thats the trick that minimalist art plays on us. Personally, I'm not sure if I like these Dolk works, but it has caused discussion. Maybe the discussion is the point, not the art itself? |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Deleted on Jun 19, 2016 10:06:01 GMT 1, RIP DOLKS career.
RIP DOLKS career.
|
|
11
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,855
๐๐ป 6,735
February 2011
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by 11 on Jun 19, 2016 11:14:24 GMT 1, There is truth in this. When the impressionists first exhibited, critics and the wealthy turned up mostly to slate the work. I agree. Sadly some feel differently -
thats nothing short of hilarious - I challenged you for pushing dirty hans and now you want to take it out of context and try and pretend it had different meaning
Lmbfao
There is truth in this. When the impressionists first exhibited, critics and the wealthy turned up mostly to slate the work. I agree. Sadly some feel differently - thats nothing short of hilarious - I challenged you for pushing dirty hans and now you want to take it out of context and try and pretend it had different meaning Lmbfao |
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Daniel Silk on Jun 19, 2016 12:16:11 GMT 1, I agree. Sadly some feel differently - thats nothing short of hilarious - I challenged you for pushing dirty hans and now you want to take it out of context and try and pretend it had different meaning Lmbfao
So be clear what your trying to tell me? Coz when you use worlds like "level of quality control" it sounds like you feel like the forum should have some kind or censorship so people can't post about Artists that don't meet some kind of standards.
I agree. Sadly some feel differently - thats nothing short of hilarious - I challenged you for pushing dirty hans and now you want to take it out of context and try and pretend it had different meaning Lmbfao "Pushing dirty hans"? I just started a thread about that Artist. So be clear what your trying to tell me? Coz when you use worlds like "level of quality control" it sounds like you feel like the forum should have some kind or censorship so people can't post about Artists that don't meet some kind of standards. |
|
11
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,855
๐๐ป 6,735
February 2011
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by 11 on Jun 19, 2016 13:15:38 GMT 1, thats nothing short of hilarious - I challenged you for pushing dirty hans and now you want to take it out of context and try and pretend it had different meaning Lmbfao "Pushing dirty hans"? I just started a thread about that Artist. So be clear what your trying to tell me? Coz when you use worlds like "level of quality control" it sounds like you feel like the forum should have some kind or censorship so people can't post about Artists that don't meet some kind of standards.
As I recall, after posting Dirty Hans you then went on to ridicule JJ Adams who the former was based upon so all seems very contradictory.
This was in the period when you had suspended replies on for sale threads and, even when FG's were trying to advise you to the contrary you chose to ignore that and started posting anything and everything you could find on Google that had a tag 'Urban Art'. It was at that point i raised the concern that Dirty Hans was represented by a gallery that you had previously banned and by presenting such artists you (intentionally or not) were validating their art and their associates. At the time it was a discussion but you chose to remove my Guardianship rather than discuss it any further.
Perhaps I mis-read it entirely and you just wanted to set up artists so you could then ridicule them, which again was something I thought you yourself wanted to discourage?.
thats nothing short of hilarious - I challenged you for pushing dirty hans and now you want to take it out of context and try and pretend it had different meaning Lmbfao "Pushing dirty hans"? I just started a thread about that Artist. So be clear what your trying to tell me? Coz when you use worlds like "level of quality control" it sounds like you feel like the forum should have some kind or censorship so people can't post about Artists that don't meet some kind of standards. Censorship? not at all. My argument was always founded on the basis that as the founder, and FG's in the position they were in, some care should be taken not to appear to back poor artists. Members can freely raise and post about what they wanted but my belief, and one i understood is held by many others, is that as a senior member that is looked up to by the community you have a duty to the newbies not to encourage them to buy into sub-standard work.....and why use my comment but not quote or tag me ? As I recall, after posting Dirty Hans you then went on to ridicule JJ Adams who the former was based upon so all seems very contradictory. This was in the period when you had suspended replies on for sale threads and, even when FG's were trying to advise you to the contrary you chose to ignore that and started posting anything and everything you could find on Google that had a tag 'Urban Art'. It was at that point i raised the concern that Dirty Hans was represented by a gallery that you had previously banned and by presenting such artists you (intentionally or not) were validating their art and their associates. At the time it was a discussion but you chose to remove my Guardianship rather than discuss it any further. Perhaps I mis-read it entirely and you just wanted to set up artists so you could then ridicule them, which again was something I thought you yourself wanted to discourage?. |
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Daniel Silk on Jun 19, 2016 13:27:49 GMT 1, "Pushing dirty hans"? I just started a thread about that Artist. So be clear what your trying to tell me? Coz when you use worlds like "level of quality control" it sounds like you feel like the forum should have some kind or censorship so people can't post about Artists that don't meet some kind of standards. Censorship? not at all. My argument was always founded on the basis that as the founder, and FG's in the position they were in, some care should be taken not to appear to back poor artists. Members can freely raise and post about what they wanted but my belief, and one i understood is held by many others, is that as a senior member that is looked up to by the community you have a duty to the newbies not to encourage them to buy into sub-standard work.....and why use my comment but not quote or tag me ? As I recall, after posting Dirty Hans you then went on to ridicule JJ Adams who the former was based upon so all seems very contradictory. This was in the period when you had suspended replies on for sale threads and, even when FG's were trying to advise you to the contrary you chose to ignore that and started posting anything and everything you could find on Google that had a tag 'Urban Art'. It was at that point i raised the concern that Dirty Hans was represented by a gallery that you had previously banned and by presenting such artists you (intentionally or not) were validating their art and their associates. At the time it was a discussion but you chose to remove my Guardianship rather than discuss it any further. Perhaps I mis-read it entirely and you just wanted to set up artists so you could then ridicule them, which again was something I thought you yourself wanted to discourage?.
When you say "poor artists" and "sub-standard work" in your mind how is that judged?
"Pushing dirty hans"? I just started a thread about that Artist. So be clear what your trying to tell me? Coz when you use worlds like "level of quality control" it sounds like you feel like the forum should have some kind or censorship so people can't post about Artists that don't meet some kind of standards. Censorship? not at all. My argument was always founded on the basis that as the founder, and FG's in the position they were in, some care should be taken not to appear to back poor artists. Members can freely raise and post about what they wanted but my belief, and one i understood is held by many others, is that as a senior member that is looked up to by the community you have a duty to the newbies not to encourage them to buy into sub-standard work.....and why use my comment but not quote or tag me ? As I recall, after posting Dirty Hans you then went on to ridicule JJ Adams who the former was based upon so all seems very contradictory. This was in the period when you had suspended replies on for sale threads and, even when FG's were trying to advise you to the contrary you chose to ignore that and started posting anything and everything you could find on Google that had a tag 'Urban Art'. It was at that point i raised the concern that Dirty Hans was represented by a gallery that you had previously banned and by presenting such artists you (intentionally or not) were validating their art and their associates. At the time it was a discussion but you chose to remove my Guardianship rather than discuss it any further. Perhaps I mis-read it entirely and you just wanted to set up artists so you could then ridicule them, which again was something I thought you yourself wanted to discourage?. So when you talk about a "level of quality control" how in effect does that work? Can you put it together into some kind of rule or explain how its enforced and by who? When you say "poor artists" and "sub-standard work" in your mind how is that judged? |
|
|
|
|
|
11
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,855
๐๐ป 6,735
February 2011
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by 11 on Jun 19, 2016 14:34:35 GMT 1, Daniel Silk - are you really not able to decipher what is relevant, original or has genuine potential? Does derivative trite work from artists that just photoshop images based on other popular imagery, rightfully get an equal footing here. Is the UAA brand one of scathing attacks and ridicule as I always thought we were trying to get beyond that
As I said, members can post what they like and should do so to gauge opinion or advice but as a senior member you should be able to decipher between the two and offer some (objective) quality feeds. If you can't see that then there's noting I can say to make you see otherwise but I genuinely thought UAA was better than that
Daniel Silk - are you really not able to decipher what is relevant, original or has genuine potential? Does derivative trite work from artists that just photoshop images based on other popular imagery, rightfully get an equal footing here. Is the UAA brand one of scathing attacks and ridicule as I always thought we were trying to get beyond that As I said, members can post what they like and should do so to gauge opinion or advice but as a senior member you should be able to decipher between the two and offer some (objective) quality feeds. If you can't see that then there's noting I can say to make you see otherwise but I genuinely thought UAA was better than that
|
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Daniel Silk on Jun 19, 2016 15:25:12 GMT 1, Daniel Silk - are you really not able to decipher what is relevant, original or has genuine potential? Does derivative trite work from artists that just photoshop images based on other popular imagery, rightfully get an equal footing here. Is the UAA brand one of scathing attacks and ridicule as I always thought we were trying to get beyond that As I said, members can post what they like and should do so to gauge opinion or advice but as a senior member you should be able to decipher between the two and offer some (objective) quality feeds. If you can't see that then there's noting I can say to make you see otherwise but I genuinely thought UAA was better than that
I prefer to run this as a forum with everyone equal in having the same freedoms to create threads and posts about whatever they like or don't like.
Daniel Silk - are you really not able to decipher what is relevant, original or has genuine potential? Does derivative trite work from artists that just photoshop images based on other popular imagery, rightfully get an equal footing here. Is the UAA brand one of scathing attacks and ridicule as I always thought we were trying to get beyond that As I said, members can post what they like and should do so to gauge opinion or advice but as a senior member you should be able to decipher between the two and offer some (objective) quality feeds. If you can't see that then there's noting I can say to make you see otherwise but I genuinely thought UAA was better than that Sorry, but the (UAA) Urban Art Association doesn't have any kind of collective opinion or agenda on Artists or Galleries, and my posts are made by me in my real name Daniel Silk. I prefer to run this as a forum with everyone equal in having the same freedoms to create threads and posts about whatever they like or don't like. |
|
phoj
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 145
๐๐ป 76
August 2014
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by phoj on Jun 19, 2016 15:27:00 GMT 1, I really think you are deliberately trying to miss the point here Silky, and it shows.
I really think you are deliberately trying to miss the point here Silky, and it shows.
|
|
dreadnatty
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,431
๐๐ป 6,992
February 2013
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by dreadnatty on Jun 19, 2016 15:28:49 GMT 1, There is truth in this. When the impressionists first exhibited, critics and the wealthy turned up mostly to slate the work. I agree. Sadly some feel differently -
There is truth in this. When the impressionists first exhibited, critics and the wealthy turned up mostly to slate the work. I agree. Sadly some feel differently - Why wouldnt you tag the member with the above screenshot? |
|
|
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Daniel Silk on Jun 19, 2016 15:32:45 GMT 1, I really think you are deliberately trying to miss the point here Silky, and it shows.  sorry, can you explain it better to me please?
I really think you are deliberately trying to miss the point here Silky, and it shows. I must be missing the point then sorry, can you explain it better to me please? |
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by Cornish Crayon on Jun 19, 2016 15:33:45 GMT 1, The new Sandra Chevrier print will be out next week. Act like a cocky p*ick then. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art
Nah FR is done with Sandra now, he has milked it dry, in fact milked it so hard and fast, everybody on here has noticed, he will go into the next thing .......... In fact maybe Daniel silk should take note if FR hasn't latched onto Cartrain then surely Cartrain really is shit.
Just saying
The new Sandra Chevrier print will be out next week. Act like a cocky p*ick then. Really? Looks a bit crap. Be honest. I take it rip off is referring to the prices of thr new book and art Nah FR is done with Sandra now, he has milked it dry, in fact milked it so hard and fast, everybody on here has noticed, he will go into the next thing .......... In fact maybe Daniel silk should take note if FR hasn't latched onto Cartrain then surely Cartrain really is shit. Just saying |
|
11
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,855
๐๐ป 6,735
February 2011
|
Dolk Rip On / Rip Off May 24th , by 11 on Jun 19, 2016 15:36:58 GMT 1, Daniel Silk - are you really not able to decipher what is relevant, original or has genuine potential? Does derivative trite work from artists that just photoshop images based on other popular imagery, rightfully get an equal footing here. Is the UAA brand one of scathing attacks and ridicule as I always thought we were trying to get beyond that As I said, members can post what they like and should do so to gauge opinion or advice but as a senior member you should be able to decipher between the two and offer some (objective) quality feeds. If you can't see that then there's noting I can say to make you see otherwise but I genuinely thought UAA was better than that Sorry, but the (UAA) Urban Art Association doesn't have any kind of collective opinion or agenda on Artists or Galleries, and my posts are made by me in my real name Daniel Silk. I prefer to run this as a forum with everyone equal in having the same freedoms to create threads and posts about whatever they like or don't like.
Daniel Silk - are you really not able to decipher what is relevant, original or has genuine potential? Does derivative trite work from artists that just photoshop images based on other popular imagery, rightfully get an equal footing here. Is the UAA brand one of scathing attacks and ridicule as I always thought we were trying to get beyond that As I said, members can post what they like and should do so to gauge opinion or advice but as a senior member you should be able to decipher between the two and offer some (objective) quality feeds. If you can't see that then there's noting I can say to make you see otherwise but I genuinely thought UAA was better than that Sorry, but the (UAA) Urban Art Association doesn't have any kind of collective opinion or agenda on Artists or Galleries, and my posts are made by me in my real name Daniel Silk. I prefer to run this as a forum with everyone equal in having the same freedoms to create threads and posts about whatever they like or don't like. I really wish that was true.... And shouldn't all guards be using their real names by now? |
|
sorry, can you explain it better to me please?
