caruso
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,181
👍🏻 818
August 2017
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by caruso on Sept 6, 2017 11:24:22 GMT 1, Now you're being negative. You can't filter out the flippers, but I refuse to think I am the only one who would actually keep the print for my personal enjoyment and as a long term investment. In my opinion flippers think they are so smart but have in reality a very narrow vision of both art and art investment. Only my point of view. Feel free to resell for twice the price and find 20 years later it is worth 50x.
Now you're being negative. You can't filter out the flippers, but I refuse to think I am the only one who would actually keep the print for my personal enjoyment and as a long term investment. In my opinion flippers think they are so smart but have in reality a very narrow vision of both art and art investment. Only my point of view. Feel free to resell for twice the price and find 20 years later it is worth 50x.
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by oxfordwelshchap on Sept 6, 2017 11:25:33 GMT 1, Dear all, I see many comments, almost either 100% positive or 100% negative. I chose to remain positive. Ok maybe it will not be Pejac, I'm not going to argue with endless posts, my energy is better spent elsewhere. I agree with some of the content and quietly smile at the rest. Most collectors I'm sure have an idea - even rough - of the production mechanisms and work involved, no need to detail the full chain of command. What matters here is that in the midst of a bit of ambient negativity in this forum, WE MANAGED TO GET A LOT OF PEOPLE EXCITED about this. I'm proud of this and it shows there is room to make it happen, again, Pejac or not. So let's get hope back on the menu, remain positive, wait until we hear or not from Max, and if not, explore another idea. People are excited because they think there is a chance of making easy money. Does that surprise you?
I appreciate your input and I doubt this will be successful but I don't think making a quick buck is anyone's motivation here, it's not an attempt to help out pejac and yes we all know the prices his work goes for as you quoted at us earlier. Basically as iv said all he can say is no and if so that's fine, but imagine if he said yes! I'm guessing you would be shouting the thread down to be in line for a print. There is no need to be negative here if it's a yes that's amazing and means we get a print by (in my opinion) one of the best artists around if it's a no then that's that.
Dear all, I see many comments, almost either 100% positive or 100% negative. I chose to remain positive. Ok maybe it will not be Pejac, I'm not going to argue with endless posts, my energy is better spent elsewhere. I agree with some of the content and quietly smile at the rest. Most collectors I'm sure have an idea - even rough - of the production mechanisms and work involved, no need to detail the full chain of command. What matters here is that in the midst of a bit of ambient negativity in this forum, WE MANAGED TO GET A LOT OF PEOPLE EXCITED about this. I'm proud of this and it shows there is room to make it happen, again, Pejac or not. So let's get hope back on the menu, remain positive, wait until we hear or not from Max, and if not, explore another idea. People are excited because they think there is a chance of making easy money. Does that surprise you? I appreciate your input and I doubt this will be successful but I don't think making a quick buck is anyone's motivation here, it's not an attempt to help out pejac and yes we all know the prices his work goes for as you quoted at us earlier. Basically as iv said all he can say is no and if so that's fine, but imagine if he said yes! I'm guessing you would be shouting the thread down to be in line for a print. There is no need to be negative here if it's a yes that's amazing and means we get a print by (in my opinion) one of the best artists around if it's a no then that's that.
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by larryforsyth on Sept 6, 2017 11:33:59 GMT 1, Great idea. Pejac or not, count me in.
Great idea. Pejac or not, count me in.
|
|
londonfx
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,163
👍🏻 707
December 2013
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by londonfx on Sept 6, 2017 11:40:57 GMT 1, Ive run a couple of commissions through the forum and Facebook. And it can be great fun. And a great way to get to know an artist and help them develop exposure to a new audience. And also get to know people on the forum.
It's very very time consuming and you need to be completely on it all the time. If you're OCD and a fan of spreadsheets and lists then you'll be fine.
Ive reached out to many artists in the past regarding commission. Not all reply, those that do are genuinely pleased you've shown an interest in their work.
It can be a mind field trying to nail down an image and appease everyone in the group. By nature youre not going to please everyone and it's about managing the expectation of the group and the artist.
Ive reached out to max about a Pejac commission. And the short of it is that Pejac will not be taking on any commissions. And his work load it pretty hectic.
Ive run a couple of commissions through the forum and Facebook. And it can be great fun. And a great way to get to know an artist and help them develop exposure to a new audience. And also get to know people on the forum.
It's very very time consuming and you need to be completely on it all the time. If you're OCD and a fan of spreadsheets and lists then you'll be fine.
Ive reached out to many artists in the past regarding commission. Not all reply, those that do are genuinely pleased you've shown an interest in their work.
It can be a mind field trying to nail down an image and appease everyone in the group. By nature youre not going to please everyone and it's about managing the expectation of the group and the artist.
Ive reached out to max about a Pejac commission. And the short of it is that Pejac will not be taking on any commissions. And his work load it pretty hectic.
|
|
aymar75
New Member
🗨️ 393
👍🏻 304
January 2014
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by aymar75 on Sept 6, 2017 12:37:13 GMT 1, I think this can be a long debate! If you want to go for it, go for it! I'll be in because the idea is great and you spend energy in it. For pejac seems it is not good. Maybe just choose an artist yourself it will be easier thanks for the time and energy spent and hope it will go through. A great adventure and a good souvenir for the forum users
I think this can be a long debate! If you want to go for it, go for it! I'll be in because the idea is great and you spend energy in it. For pejac seems it is not good. Maybe just choose an artist yourself it will be easier thanks for the time and energy spent and hope it will go through. A great adventure and a good souvenir for the forum users
|
|
Dungle
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,008
👍🏻 5,174
June 2011
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Dungle on Sept 6, 2017 12:56:30 GMT 1, Now you're being negative. You can't filter out the flippers, but I refuse to think I am the only one who would actually keep the print for my personal enjoyment and as a long term investment. In my opinion flippers think they are so smart but have in reality a very narrow vision of both art and art investment. Only my point of view. Feel free to resell for twice the price and find 20 years later it is worth 50x.
How can you say you would want to keep it when you don't even know what it looks like!?
Support an emerging artist should mean finding someone and help them build a fan base not trying to get an exclusive from an already well established artist.
Now you're being negative. You can't filter out the flippers, but I refuse to think I am the only one who would actually keep the print for my personal enjoyment and as a long term investment. In my opinion flippers think they are so smart but have in reality a very narrow vision of both art and art investment. Only my point of view. Feel free to resell for twice the price and find 20 years later it is worth 50x. How can you say you would want to keep it when you don't even know what it looks like!? Support an emerging artist should mean finding someone and help them build a fan base not trying to get an exclusive from an already well established artist.
|
|
|
highflyer
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,350
👍🏻 671
July 2014
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by highflyer on Sept 6, 2017 13:04:24 GMT 1, People are excited because they think there is a chance of making easy money. Does that surprise you? I appreciate your input and I doubt this will be successful but I don't think making a quick buck is anyone's motivation here, it's not an attempt to help out pejac and yes we all know the prices his work goes for as you quoted at us earlier. Basically as iv said all he can say is no and if so that's fine, but imagine if he said yes! I'm guessing you would be shouting the thread down to be in line for a print. There is no need to be negative here if it's a yes that's amazing and means we get a print by (in my opinion) one of the best artists around if it's a no then that's that.
I disagree for most for sure . Yes if there is another Pejac release I would like one.
People are excited because they think there is a chance of making easy money. Does that surprise you? I appreciate your input and I doubt this will be successful but I don't think making a quick buck is anyone's motivation here, it's not an attempt to help out pejac and yes we all know the prices his work goes for as you quoted at us earlier. Basically as iv said all he can say is no and if so that's fine, but imagine if he said yes! I'm guessing you would be shouting the thread down to be in line for a print. There is no need to be negative here if it's a yes that's amazing and means we get a print by (in my opinion) one of the best artists around if it's a no then that's that. I disagree for most for sure . Yes if there is another Pejac release I would like one.
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by oxfordwelshchap on Sept 6, 2017 13:19:45 GMT 1, Ive run a couple of commissions through the forum and Facebook. And it can be great fun. And a great way to get to know an artist and help them develop exposure to a new audience. And also get to know people on the forum. It's very very time consuming and you need to be completely on it all the time. If you're OCD and a fan of spreadsheets and lists then you'll be fine. Ive reached out to many artists in the past regarding commission. Not all reply, those that do are genuinely pleased you've shown an interest in their work. It can be a mind field trying to nail down an image and appease everyone in the group. By nature youre not going to please everyone and it's about managing the expectation of the group and the artist. Ive reached out to max about a Pejac commission. And the short of it is that Pejac will not be taking on any commissions. And his work load it pretty hectic.
To be honest it would have been sensible to ask you what you had done first as I think you're one of the few who have successfully managed to do a commission print. Was the response from Pejac a definate no at any time?
Ive run a couple of commissions through the forum and Facebook. And it can be great fun. And a great way to get to know an artist and help them develop exposure to a new audience. And also get to know people on the forum. It's very very time consuming and you need to be completely on it all the time. If you're OCD and a fan of spreadsheets and lists then you'll be fine. Ive reached out to many artists in the past regarding commission. Not all reply, those that do are genuinely pleased you've shown an interest in their work. It can be a mind field trying to nail down an image and appease everyone in the group. By nature youre not going to please everyone and it's about managing the expectation of the group and the artist. Ive reached out to max about a Pejac commission. And the short of it is that Pejac will not be taking on any commissions. And his work load it pretty hectic. To be honest it would have been sensible to ask you what you had done first as I think you're one of the few who have successfully managed to do a commission print. Was the response from Pejac a definate no at any time?
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by oxfordwelshchap on Sept 6, 2017 13:20:49 GMT 1, Now you're being negative. You can't filter out the flippers, but I refuse to think I am the only one who would actually keep the print for my personal enjoyment and as a long term investment. In my opinion flippers think they are so smart but have in reality a very narrow vision of both art and art investment. Only my point of view. Feel free to resell for twice the price and find 20 years later it is worth 50x. How can you say you would want to keep it when you don't even know what it looks like!? Support an emerging artist should mean finding someone and help them build a fan base not trying to get an exclusive from an already well established artist.
Very valid points!
Now you're being negative. You can't filter out the flippers, but I refuse to think I am the only one who would actually keep the print for my personal enjoyment and as a long term investment. In my opinion flippers think they are so smart but have in reality a very narrow vision of both art and art investment. Only my point of view. Feel free to resell for twice the price and find 20 years later it is worth 50x. How can you say you would want to keep it when you don't even know what it looks like!? Support an emerging artist should mean finding someone and help them build a fan base not trying to get an exclusive from an already well established artist. Very valid points!
|
|
londonfx
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,163
👍🏻 707
December 2013
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by londonfx on Sept 6, 2017 14:03:32 GMT 1, Ive run a couple of commissions through the forum and Facebook. And it can be great fun. And a great way to get to know an artist and help them develop exposure to a new audience. And also get to know people on the forum. It's very very time consuming and you need to be completely on it all the time. If you're OCD and a fan of spreadsheets and lists then you'll be fine. Ive reached out to many artists in the past regarding commission. Not all reply, those that do are genuinely pleased you've shown an interest in their work. It can be a mind field trying to nail down an image and appease everyone in the group. By nature youre not going to please everyone and it's about managing the expectation of the group and the artist. Ive reached out to max about a Pejac commission. And the short of it is that Pejac will not be taking on any commissions. And his work load it pretty hectic. To be honest it would have been sensible to ask you what you had done first as I think you're one of the few who have successfully managed to do a commission print. Was the response from Pejac a definate no at any time?
It wasn't a definitive no from max. It's just they have so much on thier plate at the moment. I asked a few months ago before scattercrow was released. So they were balls deep in that as well.
In my opinion i think it's a pipe dream to get a group commission from an established artist in such demand as Pejac. As they frankly don't need to worry about doing projects like that. As they will always sell releases out
It's nice when artists do commissions "for their fans" amongst their day to day work. But it's really tricky to fit it in the busy diary.
It can happen tho. Ive been in commission with eelus and prefab who both had busy work loads. Who still managed to fit us in.
It all depends on the artist. It's a nice idea to buddy up with an emerging artist. As it'll probably work out cheaper, they'll be more scope for discussion and you'll help build up their profile
Ive run a couple of commissions through the forum and Facebook. And it can be great fun. And a great way to get to know an artist and help them develop exposure to a new audience. And also get to know people on the forum. It's very very time consuming and you need to be completely on it all the time. If you're OCD and a fan of spreadsheets and lists then you'll be fine. Ive reached out to many artists in the past regarding commission. Not all reply, those that do are genuinely pleased you've shown an interest in their work. It can be a mind field trying to nail down an image and appease everyone in the group. By nature youre not going to please everyone and it's about managing the expectation of the group and the artist. Ive reached out to max about a Pejac commission. And the short of it is that Pejac will not be taking on any commissions. And his work load it pretty hectic. To be honest it would have been sensible to ask you what you had done first as I think you're one of the few who have successfully managed to do a commission print. Was the response from Pejac a definate no at any time? It wasn't a definitive no from max. It's just they have so much on thier plate at the moment. I asked a few months ago before scattercrow was released. So they were balls deep in that as well. In my opinion i think it's a pipe dream to get a group commission from an established artist in such demand as Pejac. As they frankly don't need to worry about doing projects like that. As they will always sell releases out It's nice when artists do commissions "for their fans" amongst their day to day work. But it's really tricky to fit it in the busy diary. It can happen tho. Ive been in commission with eelus and prefab who both had busy work loads. Who still managed to fit us in. It all depends on the artist. It's a nice idea to buddy up with an emerging artist. As it'll probably work out cheaper, they'll be more scope for discussion and you'll help build up their profile
|
|
oodles
New Member
🗨️ 1
👍🏻 0
November 2015
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by oodles on Sept 6, 2017 14:09:09 GMT 1, I'm in as well And open to other artists
I'm in as well And open to other artists
|
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,797
👍🏻 6,771
June 2009
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by met on Sept 6, 2017 14:31:20 GMT 1, No offence but I don't think Pejac needs your offers of help. I think the fact so many would definitely want to be involved shows that. If he wanted to do an edition of 25 then I reckon, maybe, just maybe, it'd sell out without the guarantee. If 80 people wanted to be involved, well wait for his next release. I think this idea is more designed to help the buyer not the artist in this case . It's not an offer of help we re seeing if he wants upwards of 50k to do a print commission. If he says no he says no. Never any harm in asking.
"Never any harm in asking." is a platitude.
In this context, it's also a thought-terminating cliché. So I'll challenge it for the sake of discussion.
Depending on the situation, it is my view there sometimes can be harm in asking — at least for the person asking.
Two examples:
1. A possible harm is the waste of one's time and energy. The older one gets, the easier it becomes to appreciate these are both very limited resources. Time and energy spent trying to do one thing could otherwise have been spent (perhaps more productively and rewardingly) elsewhere, such as with family and friends. These two resources should therefore be treated as precious — not allocated to wishful-thinking exercises where the likelihood of success is pretty much zero.
Taking extreme examples to better make the point, would you also contact Andreas Gursky or Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst on the basis that there's "never any harm in asking"?
2. More decidedly in the Pejac case is the possible damage to one's reputation. Asking will have an impact (negative, I believe) on the manner in which the asker is perceived.
I'll put myself in the shoes of Max Ruiz for this thought experiment:
If someone were to approach me with an offer similar to the one being proposed, I'd view them as naive. Worse still, it would make patently clear to me that they were clueless about what I've been trying for years to achieve with Pejac's career.
And so, as a consequence of merely asking, that person would immediately drop in my esteem. With their credibility tainted, I'd be less likely to engage with them going forward. I wouldn't see them as informed or experienced collectors. They would not therefore be serious candidates if I were considering different private collections where future Pejac originals could be placed.
No offence but I don't think Pejac needs your offers of help. I think the fact so many would definitely want to be involved shows that. If he wanted to do an edition of 25 then I reckon, maybe, just maybe, it'd sell out without the guarantee. If 80 people wanted to be involved, well wait for his next release. I think this idea is more designed to help the buyer not the artist in this case . It's not an offer of help we re seeing if he wants upwards of 50k to do a print commission. If he says no he says no. Never any harm in asking. "Never any harm in asking." is a platitude. In this context, it's also a thought-terminating cliché. So I'll challenge it for the sake of discussion. Depending on the situation, it is my view there sometimes can be harm in asking — at least for the person asking. Two examples: 1. A possible harm is the waste of one's time and energy. The older one gets, the easier it becomes to appreciate these are both very limited resources. Time and energy spent trying to do one thing could otherwise have been spent (perhaps more productively and rewardingly) elsewhere, such as with family and friends. These two resources should therefore be treated as precious — not allocated to wishful-thinking exercises where the likelihood of success is pretty much zero. Taking extreme examples to better make the point, would you also contact Andreas Gursky or Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst on the basis that there's "never any harm in asking"? 2. More decidedly in the Pejac case is the possible damage to one's reputation. Asking will have an impact (negative, I believe) on the manner in which the asker is perceived. I'll put myself in the shoes of Max Ruiz for this thought experiment: If someone were to approach me with an offer similar to the one being proposed, I'd view them as naive. Worse still, it would make patently clear to me that they were clueless about what I've been trying for years to achieve with Pe jac's career. And so, as a consequence of merely asking, that person would immediately drop in my esteem. With their credibility tainted, I'd be less likely to engage with them going forward. I wouldn't see them as informed or experienced collectors. They would not therefore be serious candidates if I were considering different private collections where future Pe jac originals could be placed.
|
|
gd79
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,132
👍🏻 1,221
September 2015
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by gd79 on Sept 6, 2017 14:42:05 GMT 1, I'm in for Andreas Gursky
I'm in for Andreas Gursky
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by natstan on Sept 6, 2017 15:00:01 GMT 1, I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible?
Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening.
Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case.
I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible?
Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening.
Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case.
|
|
|
Flashback
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,240
👍🏻 1,149
April 2016
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Flashback on Sept 6, 2017 15:11:32 GMT 1, I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible? Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening. Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case. Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own.
More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc.
I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible? Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening. Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case. Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own. More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc.
|
|
Flashback
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,240
👍🏻 1,149
April 2016
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Flashback on Sept 6, 2017 15:30:45 GMT 1, I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible? Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening. Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case. Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own. More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc. It might actually be more appealing to Max if it was a Suben commission group, with one of them being Pejac at some point. It would mean him being able to showcase some of the other artists he manages.
I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible? Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening. Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case. Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own. More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc. It might actually be more appealing to Max if it was a Suben commission group, with one of them being Pejac at some point. It would mean him being able to showcase some of the other artists he manages.
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by natstan on Sept 6, 2017 15:40:52 GMT 1, I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible? Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening. Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case. Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own. More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc.
Graffiti print is an active gallery on here (or rather, used to). They have the know-how on the production of an edition. They did prints of high quality with several - hate them or love them - high profile artists. And he seems like someone who might actually have the enthusiasm to see this through. Those artists you mentioned are not under his stable, nor does he manages them. He only works with them on a case by case basis if I understand it correctly.
So, enough reasons? I would think it's a more valid scenario (though still close to impossible) than one of us approaching max about this idea. An artist working with a printhouse is more valid than anything else tbh.
I'm not being negative, but the chance of pejac doing such a comission is practically none (prove me wrong though). Why waste time on something which is just impossible? Perhaps, just perhaps, if a printhouse like graffiti print approach max on a collaboration - which might eventually carry a tiny chance of working out into a deal to do something only for the forum - there is a slim chance of a print for the forum happening. Probably far less known artists will be keen on a comission at this point, but then not many members here would want to take part if that's the case. Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own. More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc. Graffiti print is an active gallery on here (or rather, used to). They have the know-how on the production of an edition. They did prints of high quality with several - hate them or love them - high profile artists. And he seems like someone who might actually have the enthusiasm to see this through. Those artists you mentioned are not under his stable, nor does he manages them. He only works with them on a case by case basis if I understand it correctly. So, enough reasons? I would think it's a more valid scenario (though still close to impossible) than one of us approaching max about this idea. An artist working with a printhouse is more valid than anything else tbh.
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by oxfordwelshchap on Sept 6, 2017 15:48:21 GMT 1, It's not an offer of help we re seeing if he wants upwards of 50k to do a print commission. If he says no he says no. Never any harm in asking. "Never any harm in asking." is a platitude. In this context, it's also a thought-terminating cliché. So I'll challenge it for the sake of discussion. Depending on the situation, it is my view there sometimes can be harm in asking — at least for the person asking. Two examples: 1. A possible harm is the waste of one's time and energy. The older one gets, the easier it becomes to appreciate these are both very limited resources. Time and energy spent trying to do one thing could otherwise have been spent (perhaps more productively and rewardingly) elsewhere, such as with family and friends. These two resources should therefore be treated as precious — not allocated to wishful-thinking exercises where the likelihood of success is pretty much zero. Taking extreme examples to better make the point, would you also contact Andreas Gursky or Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst on the basis that there's "never any harm in asking"? 2. More decidedly in the Pejac case is the possible damage to one's reputation. Asking will have an impact (negative, I believe) on the manner in which the asker is perceived. I'll put myself in the shoes of Max Ruiz for this thought experiment: If someone were to approach me with an offer similar to the one being proposed, I'd view them as naive. Worse still, it would make patently clear to me that they were clueless about what I've been trying for years to achieve with Pe jac's career. And so, as a consequence of merely asking, that person would immediately drop in my esteem. With their credibility tainted, I'd be less likely to engage with them going forward. I wouldn't see them as informed or experienced collectors. They would not therefore be serious candidates if I were considering different private collections where future Pe jac originals could be placed.
Well regarding time, it seemed to take approximately 30 seconds to ask. Although I am not yet that old, 30 seconds even to an aged type is not a vast amount of time.
The problem is that some people seem to focus to closely on what others would think about them. I dont think anyone would be 'insulted' by a request to buy their work. Or 'naive' to ask. I think one could say its aloof and demeaning to those you think have no idea about how this works to make broad statements like that. As to credability - to whom and for what, we are not galleries or art dealers (in the main) why does supposed credability matter? All for the sake of discussion though!
It's not an offer of help we re seeing if he wants upwards of 50k to do a print commission. If he says no he says no. Never any harm in asking. "Never any harm in asking." is a platitude. In this context, it's also a thought-terminating cliché. So I'll challenge it for the sake of discussion. Depending on the situation, it is my view there sometimes can be harm in asking — at least for the person asking. Two examples: 1. A possible harm is the waste of one's time and energy. The older one gets, the easier it becomes to appreciate these are both very limited resources. Time and energy spent trying to do one thing could otherwise have been spent (perhaps more productively and rewardingly) elsewhere, such as with family and friends. These two resources should therefore be treated as precious — not allocated to wishful-thinking exercises where the likelihood of success is pretty much zero. Taking extreme examples to better make the point, would you also contact Andreas Gursky or Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst on the basis that there's "never any harm in asking"? 2. More decidedly in the Pejac case is the possible damage to one's reputation. Asking will have an impact (negative, I believe) on the manner in which the asker is perceived. I'll put myself in the shoes of Max Ruiz for this thought experiment: If someone were to approach me with an offer similar to the one being proposed, I'd view them as naive. Worse still, it would make patently clear to me that they were clueless about what I've been trying for years to achieve with Pe jac's career. And so, as a consequence of merely asking, that person would immediately drop in my esteem. With their credibility tainted, I'd be less likely to engage with them going forward. I wouldn't see them as informed or experienced collectors. They would not therefore be serious candidates if I were considering different private collections where future Pe jac originals could be placed. Well regarding time, it seemed to take approximately 30 seconds to ask. Although I am not yet that old, 30 seconds even to an aged type is not a vast amount of time. The problem is that some people seem to focus to closely on what others would think about them. I dont think anyone would be 'insulted' by a request to buy their work. Or 'naive' to ask. I think one could say its aloof and demeaning to those you think have no idea about how this works to make broad statements like that. As to credability - to whom and for what, we are not galleries or art dealers (in the main) why does supposed credability matter? All for the sake of discussion though!
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Theories 123 on Sept 6, 2017 16:08:28 GMT 1, Agree with the previous comments about Pejac, doing a commission piece with a run of at least 50 might not sit too well with his other fans. Plus I imagine it would command a cost greater than the £500 number chucked around at the start of this thread.
My personal opinion would be to focus towards artists that maybe haven't released a print yet or don't yet have gallery backing. If they are on the forum I'd see that as a positive. I've been reading this forum for a few months now and the following could be good candidates? Raffaella Bertolini Eric Pause I also really liked mase7 work, very Pez like, but he seems to have disappeared and I'd assume isn't looking to art for a day job.
Obviously bias suggestions because I like the work personally but you asked...
Agree with the previous comments about Pejac, doing a commission piece with a run of at least 50 might not sit too well with his other fans. Plus I imagine it would command a cost greater than the £500 number chucked around at the start of this thread. My personal opinion would be to focus towards artists that maybe haven't released a print yet or don't yet have gallery backing. If they are on the forum I'd see that as a positive. I've been reading this forum for a few months now and the following could be good candidates? Raffaella BertoliniEric PauseI also really liked mase7 work, very Pez like, but he seems to have disappeared and I'd assume isn't looking to art for a day job. Obviously bias suggestions because I like the work personally but you asked...
|
|
Flashback
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,240
👍🏻 1,149
April 2016
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Flashback on Sept 6, 2017 16:15:47 GMT 1, Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own. More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc. Graffiti print is an active gallery on here (or rather, used to). They have the know-how on the production of an edition. They did prints of high quality with several - hate them or love them - high profile artists. And he seems like someone who might actually have the enthusiasm to see this through. Those artists you mentioned are not under his stable, nor does he manages them. He only works with them on a case by case basis if I understand it correctly. So, enough reasons? I would think it's a more valid scenario (though still close to impossible) than one of us approaching max about this idea. An artist working with a printhouse is more valid than anything else tbh. I know and I was advocating asking GP to be involved. They may not be in their stable but they have an active working relationship with each artist that none of us do, so it would make sense that they approach the artists, rather than any of us.
Same goes with Max for any Suben artist.
GP x Suben isn't going to happen anytime soon IMO.
Don't see why they would want to collaborate when both are successful on their own. More chance of GP doing it themselves with one from their stable like Whatson, Pez, Chevrier etc. Graffiti print is an active gallery on here (or rather, used to). They have the know-how on the production of an edition. They did prints of high quality with several - hate them or love them - high profile artists. And he seems like someone who might actually have the enthusiasm to see this through. Those artists you mentioned are not under his stable, nor does he manages them. He only works with them on a case by case basis if I understand it correctly. So, enough reasons? I would think it's a more valid scenario (though still close to impossible) than one of us approaching max about this idea. An artist working with a printhouse is more valid than anything else tbh. I know and I was advocating asking GP to be involved. They may not be in their stable but they have an active working relationship with each artist that none of us do, so it would make sense that they approach the artists, rather than any of us. Same goes with Max for any Suben artist. GP x Suben isn't going to happen anytime soon IMO.
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by oxfordwelshchap on Sept 6, 2017 16:17:53 GMT 1, Agree with the previous comments about Pejac, doing a commission piece with a run of at least 50 might not sit too well with his other fans. Plus I imagine it would command a cost greater than the £500 number chucked around at the start of this thread. My personal opinion would be to focus towards artists that maybe haven't released a print yet or don't yet have gallery backing. If they are on the forum I'd see that as a positive. I've been reading this forum for a few months now and the following could be good candidates? Raffaella BertoliniEric PauseI also really liked mase7 work, very Pez like, but he seems to have disappeared and I'd assume isn't looking to art for a day job. Obviously bias suggestions because I like the work personally but you asked...
Those are great choices - why dont you ask them?
Agree with the previous comments about Pejac, doing a commission piece with a run of at least 50 might not sit too well with his other fans. Plus I imagine it would command a cost greater than the £500 number chucked around at the start of this thread. My personal opinion would be to focus towards artists that maybe haven't released a print yet or don't yet have gallery backing. If they are on the forum I'd see that as a positive. I've been reading this forum for a few months now and the following could be good candidates? Raffaella BertoliniEric PauseI also really liked mase7 work, very Pez like, but he seems to have disappeared and I'd assume isn't looking to art for a day job. Obviously bias suggestions because I like the work personally but you asked... Those are great choices - why dont you ask them?
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Happy Shopper on Sept 6, 2017 16:30:58 GMT 1, I follow Shelby and Sandy on Instagram... Might be an option because a lot of their originals are commissioned but they've not done many prints. www.instagram.com/shelbyandsandy/
I follow Shelby and Sandy on Instagram... Might be an option because a lot of their originals are commissioned but they've not done many prints. www.instagram.com/shelbyandsandy/
|
|
|
caruso
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,181
👍🏻 818
August 2017
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by caruso on Sept 6, 2017 16:55:53 GMT 1, Simply because a Pejac is a keeper, it is so obvious to me how on Earth do you not guess that?
See my post about short vision flippers.
Also, there is not a print he has released so far I didn't like.
Simply because a Pejac is a keeper, it is so obvious to me how on Earth do you not guess that?
See my post about short vision flippers.
Also, there is not a print he has released so far I didn't like.
|
|
lorraballs
New Member
🗨️ 216
👍🏻 198
September 2012
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by lorraballs on Sept 6, 2017 17:42:46 GMT 1, "Never any harm in asking." is a platitude. In this context, it's also a thought-terminating cliché. So I'll challenge it for the sake of discussion. Depending on the situation, it is my view there sometimes can be harm in asking — at least for the person asking. Two examples: 1. A possible harm is the waste of one's time and energy. The older one gets, the easier it becomes to appreciate these are both very limited resources. Time and energy spent trying to do one thing could otherwise have been spent (perhaps more productively and rewardingly) elsewhere, such as with family and friends. These two resources should therefore be treated as precious — not allocated to wishful-thinking exercises where the likelihood of success is pretty much zero. Taking extreme examples to better make the point, would you also contact Andreas Gursky or Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst on the basis that there's "never any harm in asking"? 2. More decidedly in the Pejac case is the possible damage to one's reputation. Asking will have an impact (negative, I believe) on the manner in which the asker is perceived. I'll put myself in the shoes of Max Ruiz for this thought experiment: If someone were to approach me with an offer similar to the one being proposed, I'd view them as naive. Worse still, it would make patently clear to me that they were clueless about what I've been trying for years to achieve with Pe jac's career. And so, as a consequence of merely asking, that person would immediately drop in my esteem. With their credibility tainted, I'd be less likely to engage with them going forward. I wouldn't see them as informed or experienced collectors. They would not therefore be serious candidates if I were considering different private collections where future Pe jac originals could be placed. Well regarding time, it seemed to take approximately 30 seconds to ask. Although I am not yet that old, 30 seconds even to an aged type is not a vast amount of time. The problem is that some people seem to focus to closely on what others would think about them. I dont think anyone would be 'insulted' by a request to buy their work. Or 'naive' to ask. I think one could say its aloof and demeaning to those you think have no idea about how this works to make broad statements like that. As to credability - to whom and for what, we are not galleries or art dealers (in the main) why does supposed credability matter? All for the sake of discussion though!
I think Met makes a valid and pertinent argument. My argument is even simpler - why on earth would a well established, sell out artist want to do the members of this forum a favour? Can you give me five reasons?
"Never any harm in asking." is a platitude. In this context, it's also a thought-terminating cliché. So I'll challenge it for the sake of discussion. Depending on the situation, it is my view there sometimes can be harm in asking — at least for the person asking. Two examples: 1. A possible harm is the waste of one's time and energy. The older one gets, the easier it becomes to appreciate these are both very limited resources. Time and energy spent trying to do one thing could otherwise have been spent (perhaps more productively and rewardingly) elsewhere, such as with family and friends. These two resources should therefore be treated as precious — not allocated to wishful-thinking exercises where the likelihood of success is pretty much zero. Taking extreme examples to better make the point, would you also contact Andreas Gursky or Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst on the basis that there's "never any harm in asking"? 2. More decidedly in the Pejac case is the possible damage to one's reputation. Asking will have an impact (negative, I believe) on the manner in which the asker is perceived. I'll put myself in the shoes of Max Ruiz for this thought experiment: If someone were to approach me with an offer similar to the one being proposed, I'd view them as naive. Worse still, it would make patently clear to me that they were clueless about what I've been trying for years to achieve with Pe jac's career. And so, as a consequence of merely asking, that person would immediately drop in my esteem. With their credibility tainted, I'd be less likely to engage with them going forward. I wouldn't see them as informed or experienced collectors. They would not therefore be serious candidates if I were considering different private collections where future Pe jac originals could be placed. Well regarding time, it seemed to take approximately 30 seconds to ask. Although I am not yet that old, 30 seconds even to an aged type is not a vast amount of time. The problem is that some people seem to focus to closely on what others would think about them. I dont think anyone would be 'insulted' by a request to buy their work. Or 'naive' to ask. I think one could say its aloof and demeaning to those you think have no idea about how this works to make broad statements like that. As to credability - to whom and for what, we are not galleries or art dealers (in the main) why does supposed credability matter? All for the sake of discussion though! I think Met makes a valid and pertinent argument. My argument is even simpler - why on earth would a well established, sell out artist want to do the members of this forum a favour? Can you give me five reasons?
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by nobokov on Sept 6, 2017 18:04:59 GMT 1, Why not aim a bit higher? Let's try to commission a banksy print.
Why not aim a bit higher? Let's try to commission a banksy print.
|
|
wrigs
New Member
🗨️ 497
👍🏻 417
July 2017
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by wrigs on Sept 6, 2017 18:05:57 GMT 1, Ah the irony... made a living using art as a medium against ideas such as capitalism but now too busy making bucks to talk to the people 😉
Think this in all seriousness as others have pointed out would work much better with up and coming artists. Artists like Dylan Gebbia-Richards used the likes of Hatchfund to get themselves started.
Ah the irony... made a living using art as a medium against ideas such as capitalism but now too busy making bucks to talk to the people 😉
Think this in all seriousness as others have pointed out would work much better with up and coming artists. Artists like Dylan Gebbia-Richards used the likes of Hatchfund to get themselves started.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by nobokov on Sept 6, 2017 18:06:24 GMT 1, Why not aim a bit higher? Let's try to commission a banksy print. Okay, Banksy just shot me down. A WCP commission anyone?
Why not aim a bit higher? Let's try to commission a banksy print. Okay, Banksy just shot me down. A WCP commission anyone?
|
|
yorkie
New Member
🗨️ 867
👍🏻 708
June 2016
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by yorkie on Sept 6, 2017 18:20:48 GMT 1, At the risk of getting flamed ......
we all belong to the UAA and on here we have a number of people who are artist's who regularly advise of what they are doing in terms of work.
There are people on this forum who spend a great deal of time promoting their work and detailing when its available - Leo B, Zanda, Dan K, ABC to name just a few.
So if we go back to what I see the title of this thread is and what I expected this to transpire into - I thought we were looking to support through a commission an artist (or possibly a number) by asking them to produce a print be it limited edition or whatever that a number of us would commit to purchasing BEFORE it was produced to help them get a foot on the ladder.
I know many of the people on this forum have strong opinions on what they like and do not like (and what constitutes good art and bad).... so on the basis that we are an URBAN art association we should be looking for an urban artist that is not 'well known' but that we wish to support by guaranteeing them a print run of lets say 50? at a price that makes it worth their while.
I, like many people on here have many 'known' artist prints - however I also like art from people like Dan, Leo, Zanda, Fake, Coach's talented son, etc..... So my suggestion is that we take a number, commit a few pounds and go with an artist that is also on the UAA and contributes to our association.
That we do this not to make money from the print but to support them.... and that perhaps in years to come we can be proud to have helped them reach some place in the art world to which we believe they should be.
If this is the sentiment for this thread then I am 100% in.
Yorkie
At the risk of getting flamed ......
we all belong to the UAA and on here we have a number of people who are artist's who regularly advise of what they are doing in terms of work.
There are people on this forum who spend a great deal of time promoting their work and detailing when its available - Leo B, Zanda, Dan K, ABC to name just a few.
So if we go back to what I see the title of this thread is and what I expected this to transpire into - I thought we were looking to support through a commission an artist (or possibly a number) by asking them to produce a print be it limited edition or whatever that a number of us would commit to purchasing BEFORE it was produced to help them get a foot on the ladder.
I know many of the people on this forum have strong opinions on what they like and do not like (and what constitutes good art and bad).... so on the basis that we are an URBAN art association we should be looking for an urban artist that is not 'well known' but that we wish to support by guaranteeing them a print run of lets say 50? at a price that makes it worth their while.
I, like many people on here have many 'known' artist prints - however I also like art from people like Dan, Leo, Zanda, Fake, Coach's talented son, etc..... So my suggestion is that we take a number, commit a few pounds and go with an artist that is also on the UAA and contributes to our association.
That we do this not to make money from the print but to support them.... and that perhaps in years to come we can be proud to have helped them reach some place in the art world to which we believe they should be.
If this is the sentiment for this thread then I am 100% in.
Yorkie
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Deleted on Sept 6, 2017 18:56:31 GMT 1, At the risk of getting flamed ...... we all belong to the UAA and on here we have a number of people who are artist's who regularly advise of what they are doing in terms of work. There are people on this forum who spend a great deal of time promoting their work and detailing when its available - Leo B, Zanda, Dan K, ABC to name just a few. So if we go back to what I see the title of this thread is and what I expected this to transpire into - I thought we were looking to support through a commission an artist (or possibly a number) by asking them to produce a print be it limited edition or whatever that a number of us would commit to purchasing BEFORE it was produced to help them get a foot on the ladder. I know many of the people on this forum have strong opinions on what they like and do not like (and what constitutes good art and bad).... so on the basis that we are an URBAN art association we should be looking for an urban artist that is not 'well known' but that we wish to support by guaranteeing them a print run of lets say 50? at a price that makes it worth their while. I, like many people on here have many 'known' artist prints - however I also like art from people like Dan, Leo, Zanda, Fake, Coach's talented son, etc..... So my suggestion is that we take a number, commit a few pounds and go with an artist that is also on the UAA and contributes to our association. That we do this not to make money from the print but to support them.... and that perhaps in years to come we can be proud to have helped them reach some place in the art world to which we believe they should be. If this is the sentiment for this thread then I am 100% in. Yorkie
Yes, this is it, lets do it
Who is in charge, and how much money do you want? and how many people do you need to make it work
I am in
At the risk of getting flamed ...... we all belong to the UAA and on here we have a number of people who are artist's who regularly advise of what they are doing in terms of work. There are people on this forum who spend a great deal of time promoting their work and detailing when its available - Leo B, Zanda, Dan K, ABC to name just a few. So if we go back to what I see the title of this thread is and what I expected this to transpire into - I thought we were looking to support through a commission an artist (or possibly a number) by asking them to produce a print be it limited edition or whatever that a number of us would commit to purchasing BEFORE it was produced to help them get a foot on the ladder. I know many of the people on this forum have strong opinions on what they like and do not like (and what constitutes good art and bad).... so on the basis that we are an URBAN art association we should be looking for an urban artist that is not 'well known' but that we wish to support by guaranteeing them a print run of lets say 50? at a price that makes it worth their while. I, like many people on here have many 'known' artist prints - however I also like art from people like Dan, Leo, Zanda, Fake, Coach's talented son, etc..... So my suggestion is that we take a number, commit a few pounds and go with an artist that is also on the UAA and contributes to our association. That we do this not to make money from the print but to support them.... and that perhaps in years to come we can be proud to have helped them reach some place in the art world to which we believe they should be. If this is the sentiment for this thread then I am 100% in. Yorkie Yes, this is it, lets do it Who is in charge, and how much money do you want? and how many people do you need to make it work I am in
|
|
|
Collective commissioning of emerging artists?, by Howard Johnson on Sept 6, 2017 19:33:22 GMT 1, This is an awesome idea! My suggestion is that you take the charity route as you may have an easier time getting an established artist on board. Whoever is facilitating the commission could arrange for the printing and distribution and simply license an image from the artist. Does anyone run a charitable organization or have an established relationship with a particular artist?
We could jack up the price and all profits beyond production costs could be donated. If we had the right people doing the negotiations I don't see why we couldn't land an artist who has done similar releases in the past like Shepard fairey or John baldessari. Hell, we could probably do a Keith haring run if we pay all the licensing fees. If the organizer takes on all production responsibilities it would seem like win win even for an established artist. Maybe even a set of prints by different artists with a time limit for members to purchase?
This is an awesome idea! My suggestion is that you take the charity route as you may have an easier time getting an established artist on board. Whoever is facilitating the commission could arrange for the printing and distribution and simply license an image from the artist. Does anyone run a charitable organization or have an established relationship with a particular artist?
We could jack up the price and all profits beyond production costs could be donated. If we had the right people doing the negotiations I don't see why we couldn't land an artist who has done similar releases in the past like Shepard fairey or John baldessari. Hell, we could probably do a Keith haring run if we pay all the licensing fees. If the organizer takes on all production responsibilities it would seem like win win even for an established artist. Maybe even a set of prints by different artists with a time limit for members to purchase?
|
|