tab1
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,519
๐๐ป 3,679
September 2011
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by tab1 on Feb 28, 2018 15:24:39 GMT 1, Invaders bubble will soon burst and all will be level and even
Invaders bubble will soon burst and all will be level and even
|
|
oldraver
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 338
๐๐ป 225
September 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by oldraver on Feb 28, 2018 15:56:58 GMT 1,
|
|
theblank
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 87
๐๐ป 144
August 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by theblank on Feb 28, 2018 16:04:06 GMT 1, wow that's unfortunate for buyers if they are unhappy.
wow that's unfortunate for buyers if they are unhappy.
|
|
cizza19
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 215
๐๐ป 118
April 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by cizza19 on Feb 28, 2018 16:09:57 GMT 1, wow that's unfortunate for buyers if they are unhappy. it really isn't as I said the law is there to help people in situations like this - long winded and annoying to do but not like just losing the money
wow that's unfortunate for buyers if they are unhappy. it really isn't as I said the law is there to help people in situations like this - long winded and annoying to do but not like just losing the money
|
|
woodman
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 236
๐๐ป 216
June 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by woodman on Feb 28, 2018 16:18:46 GMT 1, Buyers shouldn't have to being going down the legal route though should they? All CAT has to do is show this so called proof he has - any respectable dealer/member would do that to keep their reputation intact.
This print obviously has a very dodgy past that has been brought to light, and the seller should have to prove that everything is above board and it is legitimate. He knew full well his post this morning would lead to more questions than answers, hence the pathetic cop out line "I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum".
CAT is a liar and basically has defrauded buyers imo, and it is all there in black in white.
Buyers shouldn't have to being going down the legal route though should they? All CAT has to do is show this so called proof he has - any respectable dealer/member would do that to keep their reputation intact.
This print obviously has a very dodgy past that has been brought to light, and the seller should have to prove that everything is above board and it is legitimate. He knew full well his post this morning would lead to more questions than answers, hence the pathetic cop out line "I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum".
CAT is a liar and basically has defrauded buyers imo, and it is all there in black in white.
|
|
rbk
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 196
๐๐ป 168
March 2015
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by rbk on Feb 28, 2018 16:28:05 GMT 1, The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
|
elberto77
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 355
๐๐ป 641
October 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by elberto77 on Feb 28, 2018 16:36:05 GMT 1, CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive
CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,190
๐๐ป 8,545
May 2011
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by iamzero on Feb 28, 2018 16:38:29 GMT 1, Who is the onus on here, CAT or the supplier from State Of Play? I would imagine itโs CAT as he is the retailer?
Who is the onus on here, CAT or the supplier from State Of Play? I would imagine itโs CAT as he is the retailer?
|
|
cizza19
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 215
๐๐ป 118
April 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by cizza19 on Feb 28, 2018 16:39:15 GMT 1, CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive any good lawyer would tell him to honour the week long refund period he put into writing first
CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive any good lawyer would tell him to honour the week long refund period he put into writing first
|
|
zefarrett
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 491
๐๐ป 518
January 2012
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by zefarrett on Feb 28, 2018 16:40:43 GMT 1, Very Trump-esque...
This is all fake news and you should trust me. I wonโt be telling you any sort of evidence at all for why you should trust me, but come on. Isnโt that Obama guy the worst?!
Very Trump-esque...
This is all fake news and you should trust me. I wonโt be telling you any sort of evidence at all for why you should trust me, but come on. Isnโt that Obama guy the worst?!
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by Deleted on Feb 28, 2018 16:40:51 GMT 1, Who is the onus on here, CAT or the supplier from State Of Play? I would imagine itโs CAT as he is the retailer?
The seller !
Who is the onus on here, CAT or the supplier from State Of Play? I would imagine itโs CAT as he is the retailer? The seller !
|
|
theblank
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 87
๐๐ป 144
August 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by theblank on Feb 28, 2018 16:41:51 GMT 1, wow that's unfortunate for buyers if they are unhappy. it really isn't as I said the law is there to help people in situations like this - long winded and annoying to do but not like just losing the money idk organizing a class action effort over the internet with enough people seems like a long shot I guess GL for all involved
wow that's unfortunate for buyers if they are unhappy. it really isn't as I said the law is there to help people in situations like this - long winded and annoying to do but not like just losing the money idk organizing a class action effort over the internet with enough people seems like a long shot I guess GL for all involved
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,190
๐๐ป 8,545
May 2011
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by iamzero on Feb 28, 2018 16:45:34 GMT 1, And then does he have to take issue with the supplier... assuming there is one?
And then does he have to take issue with the supplier... assuming there is one?
|
|
zefarrett
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 491
๐๐ป 518
January 2012
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by zefarrett on Feb 28, 2018 16:51:04 GMT 1, CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive any good lawyer would tell him to honour the week long refund period he put into writing first
Obviously it wouldnโt be using US law, but if it was, it doesnโt matter that he revoked the offer early. There was no option contract to keep the offer open for that whole week. So by him saying the offer is no longer available, itโs been revoked. If someone had already sent the print to them to refund, they would have to refund it.
CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive any good lawyer would tell him to honour the week long refund period he put into writing first Obviously it wouldnโt be using US law, but if it was, it doesnโt matter that he revoked the offer early. There was no option contract to keep the offer open for that whole week. So by him saying the offer is no longer available, itโs been revoked. If someone had already sent the print to them to refund, they would have to refund it.
|
|
|
gd79
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,132
๐๐ป 1,221
September 2015
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by gd79 on Feb 28, 2018 16:53:18 GMT 1, Who is the onus on here, CAT or the supplier from State Of Play? I would imagine itโs CAT as he is the retailer?
It's even more confusing... As the original post was from someone else completely... Who I think is CAT in any case, but under a different guise.
Who is the onus on here, CAT or the supplier from State Of Play? I would imagine itโs CAT as he is the retailer? It's even more confusing... As the original post was from someone else completely... Who I think is CAT in any case, but under a different guise.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by Deleted on Feb 28, 2018 16:53:45 GMT 1, And then does he have to take issue with the supplier... assuming there is one?
Wouldnt really matter how long the supply chain is, the buyer struck a deal with the seller.
And then does he have to take issue with the supplier... assuming there is one? Wouldnt really matter how long the supply chain is, the buyer struck a deal with the seller.
|
|
cizza19
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 215
๐๐ป 118
April 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by cizza19 on Feb 28, 2018 17:04:40 GMT 1, it really isn't as I said the law is there to help people in situations like this - long winded and annoying to do but not like just losing the money idk organizing a class action effort over the internet with enough people seems like a long shot I guess GL for all involved last time I will comment, I just don't like to see people conned out of money (whether that was the sellers original intention or not)
You do not need to do a class action law suit if you are in the UK, just open a small claim against them, if they don't turn up to the hearing the court will side with you
it really isn't as I said the law is there to help people in situations like this - long winded and annoying to do but not like just losing the money idk organizing a class action effort over the internet with enough people seems like a long shot I guess GL for all involved last time I will comment, I just don't like to see people conned out of money (whether that was the sellers original intention or not) You do not need to do a class action law suit if you are in the UK, just open a small claim against them, if they don't turn up to the hearing the court will side with you
|
|
jluhiex
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 402
๐๐ป 223
December 2016
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by jluhiex on Feb 28, 2018 17:13:00 GMT 1, idk organizing a class action effort over the internet with enough people seems like a long shot I guess GL for all involved last time I will comment, I just don't like to see people conned out of money (whether that was the sellers original intention or not) You do not need to do a class action law suit if you are in the UK, just open a small claim against them, if they don't turn up to the hearing the court will side with you Filing the claim is fine. The collection part is hard. Here in the states he could just close up shop and rebrand to avoid paying out any claims.
idk organizing a class action effort over the internet with enough people seems like a long shot I guess GL for all involved last time I will comment, I just don't like to see people conned out of money (whether that was the sellers original intention or not) You do not need to do a class action law suit if you are in the UK, just open a small claim against them, if they don't turn up to the hearing the court will side with you Filing the claim is fine. The collection part is hard. Here in the states he could just close up shop and rebrand to avoid paying out any claims.
|
|
cizza19
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 215
๐๐ป 118
April 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by cizza19 on Feb 28, 2018 17:24:08 GMT 1, last time I will comment, I just don't like to see people conned out of money (whether that was the sellers original intention or not) You do not need to do a class action law suit if you are in the UK, just open a small claim against them, if they don't turn up to the hearing the court will side with you Filing the claim is fine. The collection part is hard. Here in the states he could just close up shop and rebrand to avoid paying out any claims. I believe each one will be flagged as unpaid debt on his personal credit report over here for 5 years should he chose to not pay it
last time I will comment, I just don't like to see people conned out of money (whether that was the sellers original intention or not) You do not need to do a class action law suit if you are in the UK, just open a small claim against them, if they don't turn up to the hearing the court will side with you Filing the claim is fine. The collection part is hard. Here in the states he could just close up shop and rebrand to avoid paying out any claims. I believe each one will be flagged as unpaid debt on his personal credit report over here for 5 years should he chose to not pay it
|
|
woodman
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 236
๐๐ป 216
June 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by woodman on Feb 28, 2018 17:37:17 GMT 1, CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive If he has seen a lawyer, that really does show him up for what he is - just trying to wriggle out of paying back 25 grand to honest buyers.
"At worst it is an unauthorised unsigned edition" - yes so in essence a backdoor print worth about a ยฃ100, that people have paid multiple times over its' true value.
CAT has clearly consulted a lawyer (which we would all do in their position) and has been advised to not communicate about this any further until everything is clear from a legal perspective. IMO this has all been caused by ambiguous answers from the artist. Not that difficult to say authorised/ not authorised.... If I had one I would just keep it. Itโs not a fake, at worst you have an unauthorised unsigned edition with provenance of the same quality and from the same source as the authorised signed version. Pity the gallery since I do believe it was never their intention to deceive If he has seen a lawyer, that really does show him up for what he is - just trying to wriggle out of paying back 25 grand to honest buyers. "At worst it is an unauthorised unsigned edition" - yes so in essence a backdoor print worth about a ยฃ100, that people have paid multiple times over its' true value.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by Deleted on Feb 28, 2018 17:50:35 GMT 1, I have been asked not to comment any further on this thread due to pending Police investigations
Please can this nonsense and speculation end ? I am going to speak with every purchaser if this print on an individual basis and advise.. please can every one else stop getting involved !? To anyone that purchased please get in touch ..
This is crazy and ridiculous!! CAT
I have been asked not to comment any further on this thread due to pending Police investigations
Please can this nonsense and speculation end ? I am going to speak with every purchaser if this print on an individual basis and advise.. please can every one else stop getting involved !? To anyone that purchased please get in touch ..
This is crazy and ridiculous!! CAT
|
|
irl1
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,274
๐๐ป 9,381
December 2017
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by irl1 on Feb 28, 2018 18:08:53 GMT 1, **UPDATE** I have been presented with clear factual evidence from both publisher and artist that these prints are authentic and as described. This thread and entire situation has arisen as a result of alledged blackmail. I, therefore, will not be getting involved and will no longer be able to offer a refund due to legal reasons. It saddens me that this situation has arisen and my reputation has been called into question. The facts have now come to light and I ask that you respect these and my integrity. I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum. Kind regards CAT Hello CAT, having followed this thread, not knowing any members here, and not purchased one. Would you not think the best solution here would be,
1. To refund all the buyers. 2. You save face (no matter who's fault it was). 3. Advertise them for sale again with all the new information you know about them. 4. Everyone's happy and you move on.
This will haunt you for the rest of your life, as no business will survive without trust.
**UPDATE** I have been presented with clear factual evidence from both publisher and artist that these prints are authentic and as described. This thread and entire situation has arisen as a result of alledged blackmail. I, therefore, will not be getting involved and will no longer be able to offer a refund due to legal reasons. It saddens me that this situation has arisen and my reputation has been called into question. The facts have now come to light and I ask that you respect these and my integrity. I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum. Kind regards CAT Hello CAT, having followed this thread, not knowing any members here, and not purchased one. Would you not think the best solution here would be, 1. To refund all the buyers. 2. You save face (no matter who's fault it was). 3. Advertise them for sale again with all the new information you know about them. 4. Everyone's happy and you move on. This will haunt you for the rest of your life, as no business will survive without trust.
|
|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,524
September 2013
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by Poster Bob on Feb 28, 2018 18:09:26 GMT 1, The lack of transparency is crazy and ridiculous.
I have been asked not to comment any further on this thread due to pending Police investigations Please can this nonsense and speculation end ? I am going to speak with every purchaser if this print on an individual basis and advise.. please can every one else stop getting involved !? To anyone that purchased please get in touch .. This is crazy and ridiculous!! CAT
The lack of transparency is crazy and ridiculous. I have been asked not to comment any further on this thread due to pending Police investigations Please can this nonsense and speculation end ? I am going to speak with every purchaser if this print on an individual basis and advise.. please can every one else stop getting involved !? To anyone that purchased please get in touch .. This is crazy and ridiculous!! CAT
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by Deleted on Feb 28, 2018 18:11:23 GMT 1, **UPDATE** I have been presented with clear factual evidence from both publisher and artist that these prints are authentic and as described. This thread and entire situation has arisen as a result of alledged blackmail. I, therefore, will not be getting involved and will no longer be able to offer a refund due to legal reasons. It saddens me that this situation has arisen and my reputation has been called into question. The facts have now come to light and I ask that you respect these and my integrity. I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum. Kind regards CAT Hello CAT, having followed this thread, not knowing any members here, and not purchased one. Would you not think the best solution here would be, 1. To refund all the buyers. 2. You save face (no matter who's fault it was). 3. Advertise them for sale again with all the new information you know about them. 4. Everyone's happy and you move on. This will haunt you for the rest of your life, as no business will survive without trust.ย
**UPDATE** I have been presented with clear factual evidence from both publisher and artist that these prints are authentic and as described. This thread and entire situation has arisen as a result of alledged blackmail. I, therefore, will not be getting involved and will no longer be able to offer a refund due to legal reasons. It saddens me that this situation has arisen and my reputation has been called into question. The facts have now come to light and I ask that you respect these and my integrity. I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum. Kind regards CAT Hello CAT, having followed this thread, not knowing any members here, and not purchased one. Would you not think the best solution here would be, 1. To refund all the buyers. 2. You save face (no matter who's fault it was). 3. Advertise them for sale again with all the new information you know about them. 4. Everyone's happy and you move on. This will haunt you for the rest of your life, as no business will survive without trust.ย
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by Deleted on Feb 28, 2018 18:13:11 GMT 1, **UPDATE** I have been presented with clear factual evidence from both publisher and artist that these prints are authentic and as described. This thread and entire situation has arisen as a result of alledged blackmail. I, therefore, will not be getting involved and will no longer be able to offer a refund due to legal reasons. It saddens me that this situation has arisen and my reputation has been called into question. The facts have now come to light and I ask that you respect these and my integrity. I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum. Kind regards CAT Hello CAT, having followed this thread, not knowing any members here, and not purchased one. Would you not think the best solution here would be, 1. To refund all the buyers. 2. You save face (no matter who's fault it was). 3. Advertise them for sale again with all the new information you know about them. 4. Everyone's happy and you move on. This will haunt you for the rest of your life, as no business will survive without trust.ย
PS you wanna buy a boxset or two ?
**UPDATE** I have been presented with clear factual evidence from both publisher and artist that these prints are authentic and as described. This thread and entire situation has arisen as a result of alledged blackmail. I, therefore, will not be getting involved and will no longer be able to offer a refund due to legal reasons. It saddens me that this situation has arisen and my reputation has been called into question. The facts have now come to light and I ask that you respect these and my integrity. I will be making no further comment on this thread or on the forum. Kind regards CAT Hello CAT, having followed this thread, not knowing any members here, and not purchased one. Would you not think the best solution here would be, 1. To refund all the buyers. 2. You save face (no matter who's fault it was). 3. Advertise them for sale again with all the new information you know about them. 4. Everyone's happy and you move on. This will haunt you for the rest of your life, as no business will survive without trust.ย PS you wanna buy a boxset or two ?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by Deleted on Feb 28, 2018 18:15:15 GMT 1, Exactly !! Which Iโm trying to do but proving impossible with the comments on this forum and behind the scenes ..
Iโm trying to do right by everyone and getting destroyed in the process ..
Exactly !! Which Iโm trying to do but proving impossible with the comments on this forum and behind the scenes ..
Iโm trying to do right by everyone and getting destroyed in the process ..
|
|
tab1
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,519
๐๐ป 3,679
September 2011
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by tab1 on Feb 28, 2018 18:20:49 GMT 1, If buyers paid by PayPal and with in a year can dispute transaction.
Probably the publishers not willing to refund so cat would have to refund his commission and the rest of the publishers share hence with drawing offer?
Quick easy sale has turned into a headache for all? Any actual buyers on here ?๐
If buyers paid by PayPal and with in a year can dispute transaction.
Probably the publishers not willing to refund so cat would have to refund his commission and the rest of the publishers share hence with drawing offer?
Quick easy sale has turned into a headache for all? Any actual buyers on here ?๐
|
|
tab1
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,519
๐๐ป 3,679
September 2011
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by tab1 on Feb 28, 2018 18:25:03 GMT 1, Exactly !! Which Iโm trying to do but proving impossible with the comments on this forum and behind the scenes .. Iโm trying to do right by everyone and getting destroyed in the process ..
As you helped facilitate the offer and advertised the sales and are contactable and present on the forum unfortunately your going to be the focal point You could ask the publishers to open an account to help open communication here and less flak for you? Majority of the sales were placed and executed here?
Exactly !! Which Iโm trying to do but proving impossible with the comments on this forum and behind the scenes .. Iโm trying to do right by everyone and getting destroyed in the process .. As you helped facilitate the offer and advertised the sales and are contactable and present on the forum unfortunately your going to be the focal point You could ask the publishers to open an account to help open communication here and less flak for you? Majority of the sales were placed and executed here?
|
|
tab1
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,519
๐๐ป 3,679
September 2011
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by tab1 on Feb 28, 2018 18:28:02 GMT 1, Hi all - just to confirm these are now all sold pending payment. I'll be sending invoices out to the successful buyers over the next day or so, if you haven't got one already. Many thanks for the level of interest - never seen so many pm's in such a short period of time! looks like they all sold here! Iโm sure if the artist receives a sizeable sum they would be authorised๐
Hi all - just to confirm these are now all sold pending payment. I'll be sending invoices out to the successful buyers over the next day or so, if you haven't got one already. Many thanks for the level of interest - never seen so many pm's in such a short period of time! looks like they all sold here! Iโm sure if the artist receives a sizeable sum they would be authorised๐
|
|
rbk
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 196
๐๐ป 168
March 2015
|
Invader Prisoners Print, by rbk on Feb 28, 2018 18:35:15 GMT 1, Artist resale rights at 4% at least, ยฃ1000.
Artist resale rights at 4% at least, ยฃ1000.
|
|