|
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by Studio*Sly on Apr 24, 2018 22:18:20 GMT 1, Mr. Sly’s dead famous series is an ongoing project. The images depicted are inspired by his favorite songs from musical icons. The artwork starts from a vision, turning every lyric into a visual story for all of us to experience. The art work depicts musical icons throughout generational eras such as Audrey Hepburn, Blondie, David Bowie, Elton John, John Lennon, The Beatles, Marilyn Monroe, and Mick Jagger with the objective of these icons retaining their legendary iconic status throughout time. All artwork is restored and manipulated using mixed media materials. We now present to you “Dead Famous” by Mr. Sly.
Wednesday 16th & Thursday 17th May 2018 18:00-21:00 Mr Sly & Sebastian Forman
Mr. Sly’s dead famous series is an ongoing project. The images depicted are inspired by his favorite songs from musical icons. The artwork starts from a vision, turning every lyric into a visual story for all of us to experience. The art work depicts musical icons throughout generational eras such as Audrey Hepburn, Blondie, David Bowie, Elton John, John Lennon, The Beatles, Marilyn Monroe, and Mick Jagger with the objective of these icons retaining their legendary iconic status throughout time. All artwork is restored and manipulated using mixed media materials. We now present to you “Dead Famous” by Mr. Sly. Wednesday 16th & Thursday 17th May 2018 18:00-21:00 Mr Sly & Sebastian Forman
|
|
denzil
New Member
🗨️ 703
👍🏻 398
April 2009
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by denzil on Apr 25, 2018 3:31:00 GMT 1, Glad its an Ongoing project Debbie Harry will be too. Elton double happy .not sure about Mick ?
Glad its an Ongoing project Debbie Harry will be too. Elton double happy .not sure about Mick ?
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by Studio*Sly on Apr 25, 2018 17:35:21 GMT 1, Glad its an Ongoing project Debbie Harry will be too. Elton double happy .not sure about Mick ?
Glad its an Ongoing project Debbie Harry will be too. Elton double happy .not sure about Mick ? Hey I’m sure Mick has still got it in him 🤣 |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by moron on Apr 26, 2018 14:59:42 GMT 1, How do you get by regarding copyright?
How do you get by regarding copyright?
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by Studio*Sly on Apr 30, 2018 21:35:58 GMT 1, How do you get by regarding copyright?
How do you get by regarding copyright? Hi, when I am sourcing a image, I completely restore and manipulate the original images, recreating a new work. I have never had any problems with copyright hopefully it stays that way 😊 |
|
|
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by Studio*Sly on Jun 18, 2018 17:52:48 GMT 1, some pictures from my show, thanks everyone who managed to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
brycepen
New Member
🗨️ 477
👍🏻 252
May 2017
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by brycepen on Jun 29, 2018 10:21:42 GMT 1, Copyright law with respect to images can be subjective. The new creation has to be “transformative”, meaning that it’s different enough from the original image/work that it becomes an original creative piece.
Under the precedent established in shepard fairey v. The associated press, I would venture to guess that you are very much in violation of copyright laws with these pieces
Copyright law with respect to images can be subjective. The new creation has to be “transformative”, meaning that it’s different enough from the original image/work that it becomes an original creative piece.
Under the precedent established in shepard fairey v. The associated press, I would venture to guess that you are very much in violation of copyright laws with these pieces
|
|
met
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,797
👍🏻 6,772
June 2009
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by met on Jul 30, 2018 14:01:57 GMT 1, Copyright law with respect to images can be subjective. The new creation has to be “transformative”, meaning that it’s different enough from the original image/work that it becomes an original creative piece. Under the precedent established in shepard fairey v. The associated press, I would venture to guess that you are very much in violation of copyright laws with these pieces
You are confusing legal precedents or have misunderstood the outcome of Shepard Fairey v. The Associated Press.
Rather tragically, no precedent was set.
Fairey's legal position had been very strong. He contended his conduct didn't constitute improper appropriation, and that it was justified regardless by the fair use doctrine.
I believe he would probably have won the case. However, it seems the personal, financial and general legal stakes were too high for him to risk a trial. Especially given he had stupidly (and completely unnecessarily) undermined his credibility through perjury, combined with the destruction and falsification of evidence.
The dispute was settled out of court. But the key point is that neither side surrendered its view of the law.
Copyright law with respect to images can be subjective. The new creation has to be “transformative”, meaning that it’s different enough from the original image/work that it becomes an original creative piece. Under the precedent established in shepard fairey v. The associated press, I would venture to guess that you are very much in violation of copyright laws with these pieces You are confusing legal precedents or have misunderstood the outcome of Shepard Fairey v. The Associated Press. Rather tragically, no precedent was set. Fai rey's legal position had been very strong. He contended his conduct didn't constitute improper appropriation, and that it was justified regardless by the fair use doctrine. I believe he would probably have won the case. However, it seems the personal, financial and general legal stakes were too high for him to risk a trial. Especially given he had stupidly (and completely unnecessarily) undermined his credibility through perjury, combined with the destruction and falsification of evidence. The dispute was settled out of court. But the key point is that neither side surrendered its view of the law. |
|
brycepen
New Member
🗨️ 477
👍🏻 252
May 2017
|
Mr. Sly Dead Famous , by brycepen on Nov 23, 2019 0:30:18 GMT 1, I have been told by reknowned attorneys in copyright law that Shepard Fairey settled out of court because it became clear that he wasn’t going to win. It also didn’t help that he initially denied using the original image in the first place until evidence was found on his computer.
This is all hearsay and legal gossip, but this result was important for copyright attorneys because it informed their decisions about pursuing similar cases. The most liberal interpretation of a transformative piece that set actual legal precedent was one about Koons and a shoe ad I believe.
I have been told by reknowned attorneys in copyright law that Shepard Fairey settled out of court because it became clear that he wasn’t going to win. It also didn’t help that he initially denied using the original image in the first place until evidence was found on his computer.
This is all hearsay and legal gossip, but this result was important for copyright attorneys because it informed their decisions about pursuing similar cases. The most liberal interpretation of a transformative piece that set actual legal precedent was one about Koons and a shoe ad I believe.
|
|
