cyberkid
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,375
👍🏻 2,458
January 2015
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by cyberkid on Aug 13, 2018 12:00:44 GMT 1, back from london. the hirsts are looking great in flesh and i am going for 1-2 pieces. finger crossed.
nice dinner with sircoxson, Sundowner, Zippy, Viking Surfer, bjoern, Danny and Marco.
|
|
bjoern
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,293
👍🏻 569
September 2014
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by bjoern on Aug 13, 2018 12:20:52 GMT 1, It was an exciting release event with beautiful artworks, good drinks & great fun meeting all of you in London! Really hope we all are lucky enough to get selected by HENI.
It was an exciting release event with beautiful artworks, good drinks & great fun meeting all of you in London! Really hope we all are lucky enough to get selected by HENI. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Coach on Aug 13, 2018 12:36:16 GMT 1,
That’s nice. What the forums all about really.
That’s nice. What the forums all about really. |
|
Zippy
Junior Member
🗨️ 6,815
👍🏻 2,640
April 2006
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Zippy on Aug 13, 2018 12:58:17 GMT 1, Great night and good to meet you all and daniel3886 and noirrion
|
|
noirrion
New Member
🗨️ 411
👍🏻 679
September 2013
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by noirrion on Aug 13, 2018 13:51:30 GMT 1, Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again 
Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Aug 13, 2018 14:01:50 GMT 1, 
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff.
People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced.
The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie.
There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output.
He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture.
Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others.
His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish.
This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons.
If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested.
Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to fuck up splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin)
I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition.
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to fuck up splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition. |
|
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Express Post on Aug 13, 2018 14:16:22 GMT 1, The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions.
No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes.
Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again
The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 13, 2018 14:34:42 GMT 1, The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again 
The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again Was this edition shown at an exhibition? I don't know the answer. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by shinkaiser on Aug 13, 2018 14:36:49 GMT 1, The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again
Oh Hi moron, you've finally decided to come out from that rock you were under, ready to deliver more Hirst hating speech. Haven't you realised that no one cares? Give it a rest will you.
The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Can't wait for the H6 release party to see you guys soon again How do you explain H4 then? This came out of the blue. Trust me, H6 is coming. Oh Hi moron, you've finally decided to come out from that rock you were under, ready to deliver more Hirst hating speech. Haven't you realised that no one cares? Give it a rest will you. |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 13, 2018 14:46:53 GMT 1,
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition.
Please name the artists that you respect.
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition. Please name the artists that you respect. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Express Post on Aug 13, 2018 15:02:31 GMT 1, Not current, so doesn't apply.
If no shows, then once a year release average.
The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Was this edition shown at an exhibition? I don't know the answer.
Not current, so doesn't apply. If no shows, then once a year release average. The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Was this edition shown at an exhibition? I don't know the answer. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Express Post on Aug 13, 2018 15:05:03 GMT 1, He had a Veil Paintings show with Gagosian in March 2018. Pay attention.
As for H6, it will happen, but only Heni are best placed to answer when.
The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. How do you explain H4 then? This came out of the blue. Trust me, H6 is coming. Oh Hi moron, you've finally decided to come out from that rock you were under, ready to deliver more Hirst hating speech. Haven't you realised that no one cares? Give it a rest will you.
He had a Veil Paintings show with Gagosian in March 2018. Pay attention. As for H6, it will happen, but only Heni are best placed to answer when. The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. How do you explain H4 then? This came out of the blue. Trust me, H6 is coming. Oh Hi moron, you've finally decided to come out from that rock you were under, ready to deliver more Hirst hating speech. Haven't you realised that no one cares? Give it a rest will you. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Coach on Aug 13, 2018 15:06:05 GMT 1, Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition.
With respect, I don’t agree with much of this.
Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions.
It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc.
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition. With respect, I don’t agree with much of this. Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions. It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc. |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 13, 2018 15:10:54 GMT 1,
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition. With respect, I don’t agree with much of this. Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions. It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc.
I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist.
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition. With respect, I don’t agree with much of this. Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions. It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc. I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist. |
|
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by shinkaiser on Aug 13, 2018 15:18:22 GMT 1, With respect, I don’t agree with much of this. Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions. It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc. I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist.
Look what recently happened with Banksy and the Royal Academy of Arts for example.
With respect, I don’t agree with much of this. Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions. It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc. I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist. Isn't this the case with everyone and every artist though? Look what recently happened with Banksy and the Royal Academy of Arts for example. |
|
Carl Cashman
Artist
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,775
👍🏻 3,147
August 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Carl Cashman on Aug 13, 2018 15:39:56 GMT 1, Did you walk ? 
Did you walk ? |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Coach on Aug 13, 2018 15:40:25 GMT 1, With respect, I don’t agree with much of this. Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions. It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc. I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist.
Of course who the artist is is relevant to any decision to buy a piece of art. An unknown artist may create something that is beautiful, but can not command the same price tag.
My issue with moron’s post is that he assumes to know the motives of others, or assumes that he knows better than they why they are purchasing the artwork.
With respect, I don’t agree with much of this. Many collectors on here have said that they are buying, or are trying to buy one of these editions. It is condescending and rather arrogant to say that they are only doing so because of the marketing and publicity. I’m sure that many on here are able to decide for themselves whether the artwork is something they like, appreciate, wish to hang in their homes etc. I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist. Of course who the artist is is relevant to any decision to buy a piece of art. An unknown artist may create something that is beautiful, but can not command the same price tag. My issue with moron’s post is that he assumes to know the motives of others, or assumes that he knows better than they why they are purchasing the artwork. |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Aug 13, 2018 23:49:31 GMT 1, The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Was this edition shown at an exhibition? I don't know the answer.
The current Heni releases correlates with new bodies of works/exhibitions. No new shows featuring new bodies of work then the likelihood of a further Heni release diminishes. Was this edition shown at an exhibition? I don't know the answer. The original Metalflake paint company made the best color charts with all the candy and flake swatches on the chart a thing of beauty. |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Aug 14, 2018 0:23:38 GMT 1, I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist. Of course who the artist is is relevant to any decision to buy a piece of art. An unknown artist may create something that is beautiful, but can not command the same price tag. My issue with moron’s post is that he assumes to know the motives of others, or assumes that he knows better than they why they are purchasing the artwork.
Fair enough Coach so what makes one worth more than the other?
I disagree that who the artist is is relevant to "any" decision to buy a piece of art.
I don't disagree with moron completely. Would I have purchased h-4 if it weren't a Hirst or even signed? Probably not. I love the image and will hang it, but not enough to purchase if it was created by a starving local artist. Of course who the artist is is relevant to any decision to buy a piece of art. An unknown artist may create something that is beautiful, but can not command the same price tag. My issue with moron’s post is that he assumes to know the motives of others, or assumes that he knows better than they why they are purchasing the artwork.
Fair enough Coach so what makes one worth more than the other? I disagree that who the artist is is relevant to "any" decision to buy a piece of art. |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 14, 2018 0:26:38 GMT 1, Was this edition shown at an exhibition? I don't know the answer. The original Metalflake paint company made the best color charts with all the candy and flake swatches on the chart a thing of beauty.
Was this edition shown at an exhibition? I don't know the answer. The original Metalflake paint company made the best color charts with all the candy and flake swatches on the chart a thing of beauty. So easy to bash artists. Is there anyone that deserves your support? Anyone??? |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Aug 14, 2018 0:46:20 GMT 1, My view on Hirst is he has done it to himself when he publicly stated that he has stolen from others and said fuck them. So now everything he does it's normal the critics and others will judge him by that.
Everyone knows when they see a spot painting say Hirst but have they heard of other artists who did spot paintings decades before? Hirst has hijacked that type of visual art branded it as Hirst. same goes for these veil paintings, when people go to Australia and see paintings by indiginous artists they will think Hirst.
www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-29/indigenous-artists-claim-damien-hirst-paintings-similar-artworks/9592578
Same goes for the African Yoruba bronzes when people see those they will think Hirst. There is a fine line between being inspired by African and other art as was Picasso who made everything with his own hands and others and just blatantly copying the form and look and branding ones name on it and paying others to produce huge reproductions which are publicised in the media as Hirst creations.
Artists are inspired by other artists influenced by styles too. That's normal but it's downright lazy when someone just blatantly copies and re sells it under their own brand and it is heavily promoted by the media as the property of that brand.
I agree with everything in this article below.
www.okayafrica.com/laolu-senbanjo-damien-hirst-nigerian-art/
Francois Morellet, “Blue Green Yellow Orange” 1954
My view on Hirst is he has done it to himself when he publicly stated that he has stolen from others and said fuck them. So now everything he does it's normal the critics and others will judge him by that. Everyone knows when they see a spot painting say Hirst but have they heard of other artists who did spot paintings decades before? Hirst has hijacked that type of visual art branded it as Hirst. same goes for these veil paintings, when people go to Australia and see paintings by indiginous artists they will think Hirst. www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-29/indigenous-artists-claim-damien-hirst-paintings-similar-artworks/9592578 Same goes for the African Yoruba bronzes when people see those they will think Hirst. There is a fine line between being inspired by African and other art as was Picasso who made everything with his own hands and others and just blatantly copying the form and look and branding ones name on it and paying others to produce huge reproductions which are publicised in the media as Hirst creations. Artists are inspired by other artists influenced by styles too. That's normal but it's downright lazy when someone just blatantly copies and re sells it under their own brand and it is heavily promoted by the media as the property of that brand. I agree with everything in this article below. www.okayafrica.com/laolu-senbanjo-damien-hirst-nigerian-art/Francois Morellet, “Blue Green Yellow Orange” 1954 |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 14, 2018 0:49:26 GMT 1, I forget sometimes that people with psychological disorders also have internet access.
I forget sometimes that people with psychological disorders also have internet access.
|
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by moron on Aug 14, 2018 0:54:00 GMT 1, The original Metalflake paint company made the best color charts with all the candy and flake swatches on the chart a thing of beauty. So easy to bash artists. Is there anyone that deserves your support? Anyone???
The original Metalflake paint company made the best color charts with all the candy and flake swatches on the chart a thing of beauty. So easy to bash artists. Is there anyone that deserves your support? Anyone??? Do you actually know the difference between critique and bashing? |
|
nobokov
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,948
👍🏻 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by nobokov on Aug 14, 2018 1:03:58 GMT 1, So easy to bash artists. Is there anyone that deserves your support? Anyone??? Do you actually know the difference between critique and bashing?
So easy to bash artists. Is there anyone that deserves your support? Anyone??? Do you actually know the difference between critique and bashing? Apparently I don't. I thought the answer would've been in that video, but instead I saw found a funny clip. Thanks for sharing. Bye bye you. |
|
blerd
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,350
👍🏻 1,203
November 2016
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by blerd on Aug 14, 2018 10:38:15 GMT 1, Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition.
Koons, Hirst and Brainwash are doing the same thing. It's the old story about selling and marketing a product rather than the product itself. Saatchi was good at it and so are others, hisrt follows saatchi and the art worl revolves around this stuff. People buy into it being great art because the publicity tells them it is great art and because many people dont wan't to left out they join the herd that gets fleeced. The billionaire and mega rich usually new rich which buy big flashy art sculptures to put in their tax deductable collections often are pretentious full of themselves and love big flashy pieces that look like they are movie props from some Chinese kung pow movie. There is nothing fresh or original about Hirsts latest output. He made his name by gimmicks funded and promoted by Saatchi. He stole because he had no originality and went for the flashy stuff to appeal to flashy people. he is still stealing and putting his brand name on it as in ripping off Benin bronze sculpture. Nearly all of his art has been made by some production team or assistants. After all it is all about the ideas and concept isn't it. So he steals from others and gets it mad eby others. His last lot of paintings got panned by all the art critics, as in cheesy Bacon amatuerish. This last lot of paintings have been done by better artists for valid reasons. If an unknown had done these stupidly named set of dotty splodgy paintings, no one would be remotely interested. Hirst has lost his confidence in himself as an artist hence playing safe and painting these splodgies because after all it is virtually impossible to f**kup splodging paint all over a canvas and with the right marketing and oh so pseudo faux de luxe names the Hirstinistas will queue up to buy them because after all mega rich billionaires tax dodgers buy the big flashy Hirst statues etc. Look ma, we made it, I own a Hirst (print on tin) I am looking forward to Hirsts next release, probably in his pink underpants which will be available in an unlimited edition. I can't believe I'm typing this, but I actually agree with much of this. Having said that, please stop now...Pretty please. Ps. the veil paintings are good. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 11:04:15 GMT 1, Isn't all art to do with the name?
If Tracey Emin's drawings were done by an unknown housewife and sold at a local craft fair, she wouldn't get five pounds for them.
Isn't all art to do with the name?
If Tracey Emin's drawings were done by an unknown housewife and sold at a local craft fair, she wouldn't get five pounds for them.
|
|
cnrdvln
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,404
👍🏻 1,489
February 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by cnrdvln on Aug 14, 2018 12:19:23 GMT 1, Both H4 and H5 are huge and colourful and gorgeous in my opinion. If you bought one you're delighted. On any wall they are a statement piece.
If you didn't buy one then you think you dodged a bullet - good for you.
If you bought to flip then good for you there is profit in there (TBC the amount) for sure.
Obtuse metaphysical conversations around what is art are great but can't and should not dilute the pieces being bought at the moment. 👌
Both H4 and H5 are huge and colourful and gorgeous in my opinion. If you bought one you're delighted. On any wall they are a statement piece.
If you didn't buy one then you think you dodged a bullet - good for you.
If you bought to flip then good for you there is profit in there (TBC the amount) for sure.
Obtuse metaphysical conversations around what is art are great but can't and should not dilute the pieces being bought at the moment. 👌
|
|
lg2771
New Member
🗨️ 523
👍🏻 329
December 2017
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by lg2771 on Aug 14, 2018 16:17:30 GMT 1, Both H4 and H5 are huge and colourful and gorgeous in my opinion. If you bought one you're delighted. On any wall they are a statement piece. If you didn't buy one then you think you dodged a bullet - good for you. If you bought to flip then good for you there is profit in there (TBC the amount) for sure. Obtuse metaphysical conversations around what is art are great but can't and should not dilute the pieces being bought at the moment. 👌
The hero we deserve but not the one we need.
Both H4 and H5 are huge and colourful and gorgeous in my opinion. If you bought one you're delighted. On any wall they are a statement piece. If you didn't buy one then you think you dodged a bullet - good for you. If you bought to flip then good for you there is profit in there (TBC the amount) for sure. Obtuse metaphysical conversations around what is art are great but can't and should not dilute the pieces being bought at the moment. 👌 The hero we deserve but not the one we need. |
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Dojo the Dog on Aug 14, 2018 20:37:55 GMT 1, Sorry if this has already been addressed. Has any that applied for a print via the Tate had a response yet?
Sorry if this has already been addressed. Has any that applied for a print via the Tate had a response yet?
|
|
|
|
Damien Hirst H4 • Veils, by Express Post on Aug 14, 2018 20:39:47 GMT 1, They said wait two weeks from time of application for Heni to process and allocate.
Sorry if this has already been addressed. Has any that applied for a print via the Tate had a response yet?
They said wait two weeks from time of application for Heni to process and allocate. Sorry if this has already been addressed. Has any that applied for a print via the Tate had a response yet? |
|
