sircoxson
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 746
๐๐ป 866
December 2010
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by sircoxson on Jun 28, 2018 15:20:48 GMT 1, Blew his chance? Heโs one of the worlds richest artists. He has a bacon hanging in his tv room ๐ [/quote]Now there's a man who loves his smoked meats.
[/quote]
๐
Blew his chance? Heโs one of the worlds richest artists. He has a bacon hanging in his tv room ๐ [/quote]Now there's a man who loves his smoked meats. [/quote] ๐
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Deleted on Jun 28, 2018 16:23:12 GMT 1, Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks.
Pejac Banksy originals ......
Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks.
Pejac Banksy originals ......
|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,525
September 2013
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Poster Bob on Jun 28, 2018 16:31:10 GMT 1, You may need 10 years before Pejac works good through the roof, if they ever do. If yesterday's results continue, Banksy originals are now in the stratosphere with the exception of undesirable works like Precision Bombing and Lenin on Skates which I wouldn't bother with. If it's profit you're after while minimizing expense, Harland Miller, Stik and David Shrigley originals are extremely undervalued. That said, I question the recent high prices of all three, especially Stik.
Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ......
You may need 10 years before Pejac works good through the roof, if they ever do. If yesterday's results continue, Banksy originals are now in the stratosphere with the exception of undesirable works like Precision Bombing and Lenin on Skates which I wouldn't bother with. If it's profit you're after while minimizing expense, Harland Miller, Stik and David Shrigley originals are extremely undervalued. That said, I question the recent high prices of all three, especially Stik. Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ......
|
|
Express Post
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,330
๐๐ป 2,479
January 2008
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Express Post on Jun 28, 2018 19:14:39 GMT 1, Calleja at the start of the year was a good buy, now primary prices gone up 33%.
Madsaki end of last year was priced ok, now prices doubled at primary. His auction result makes everything look 3-4x.
Guidi has quadrupled in several years, and doubled primary on the secondary market.
Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ......
Calleja at the start of the year was a good buy, now primary prices gone up 33%. Madsaki end of last year was priced ok, now prices doubled at primary. His auction result makes everything look 3-4x. Guidi has quadrupled in several years, and doubled primary on the secondary market. Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ......
|
|
shy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,590
๐๐ป 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by shy on Jun 28, 2018 19:35:35 GMT 1, I totally agree with Posterbob.
Shrigley originals are so undervalued.
Harland Miller originals are out of most people's price range as in canvas for 85k plus plus plus
Stik still good value.
How about Alex Gardner from America. I saw one of the dealers in Instagram mentioning him and my other advisors are brewing over his art too.
I totally agree with Posterbob.
Shrigley originals are so undervalued.
Harland Miller originals are out of most people's price range as in canvas for 85k plus plus plus
Stik still good value.
How about Alex Gardner from America. I saw one of the dealers in Instagram mentioning him and my other advisors are brewing over his art too.
|
|
Rochebm
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 310
๐๐ป 314
May 2014
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Rochebm on Jun 28, 2018 20:59:52 GMT 1, Keep the Hirst. Pejac looks like something youโd see on a cheap graphic T.
Keep the Hirst. Pejac looks like something youโd see on a cheap graphic T.
|
|
|
Express Post
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,330
๐๐ป 2,479
January 2008
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Express Post on Jun 28, 2018 21:02:15 GMT 1, Get ready to feel the wrath of Pejac disciples. Especially the ones that bought the A3 drawings.
Keep the Hirst. Pejac looks like something youโd see on a cheap graphic T.
Get ready to feel the wrath of Pejac disciples. Especially the ones that bought the A3 drawings. Keep the Hirst. Pejac looks like something youโd see on a cheap graphic T.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by moron on Jun 28, 2018 22:23:36 GMT 1, I would take with a pinch of salt, any investment advice on this forum. Hirst is mega wealthy thanks to Saatchi and also thanks to auction house boys, hedge fund managers and dealers working together with Hirst. Cocaine cowboys riding the money horse. Publicity and hype working together too.
It looks to me like Hirst is trying to prove himself to his peers as an artist by painting with his own little hands using a paintbrush and at the same time lacking confidence hence playing safe and painting splodges which are just another way of doing his dot paintings. Which other artists did way before him but Hirst hijacked dot paintings as his creation and it's what he is known for to the blue chip and mega rich collectors who have so much money they buy for the name and never need to re sell.
Personally I would rather paint my own version of the splodge painting and hang it on my wall and impress my friends with when I tell em how I saved 2.5K ,( which some imply is just the same as paintings by other artists before Hirsts efforts ) and not waste the money on a flat print.
The reckoning behind buying Hirst print is all about the name and about making quick money.
The people who sell potential investors these prints are the ones making the money.
If I had between 5 and 10K to spend on a print to collect long term etc as a solid investment. I wouldn't buy any urban artists at that money.
I would on the other hand buy a Picasso ltd edition ceramic or one of the small authenticated drawings Picasso drew quickly and gave away to friends etc.
In other words if investment do not limit yourself to "urban artists"
I would take with a pinch of salt, any investment advice on this forum. Hirst is mega wealthy thanks to Saatchi and also thanks to auction house boys, hedge fund managers and dealers working together with Hirst. Cocaine cowboys riding the money horse. Publicity and hype working together too.
It looks to me like Hirst is trying to prove himself to his peers as an artist by painting with his own little hands using a paintbrush and at the same time lacking confidence hence playing safe and painting splodges which are just another way of doing his dot paintings. Which other artists did way before him but Hirst hijacked dot paintings as his creation and it's what he is known for to the blue chip and mega rich collectors who have so much money they buy for the name and never need to re sell.
Personally I would rather paint my own version of the splodge painting and hang it on my wall and impress my friends with when I tell em how I saved 2.5K ,( which some imply is just the same as paintings by other artists before Hirsts efforts ) and not waste the money on a flat print.
The reckoning behind buying Hirst print is all about the name and about making quick money.
The people who sell potential investors these prints are the ones making the money.
If I had between 5 and 10K to spend on a print to collect long term etc as a solid investment. I wouldn't buy any urban artists at that money.
I would on the other hand buy a Picasso ltd edition ceramic or one of the small authenticated drawings Picasso drew quickly and gave away to friends etc.
In other words if investment do not limit yourself to "urban artists"
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Deleted on Jun 28, 2018 22:47:45 GMT 1, I would take with a pinch of salt, any investment advice on this forum. Hirst is mega wealthy thanks to Saatchi and also thanks to auction house boys, hedge fund managers and dealers working together with Hirst. Cocaine cowboys riding the money horse. Publicity and hype working together too. It looks to me like Hirst is trying to prove himself to his peers as an artist by painting with his own little hands using a paintbrush and at the same time lacking confidence hence playing safe and painting splodges which are just another way of doing his dot paintings. Which other artists did way before him but Hirst hijacked dot paintings as his creation and it's what he is known for to the blue chip and mega rich collectors who have so much money they buy for the name and never need to re sell. Personally I would rather paint my own version of the splodge painting and hang it on my wall and impress my friends with when I tell em how I saved 2.5K ,( which some imply is just the same as paintings by other artists before Hirsts efforts ) and not waste the money on a flat print. The reckoning behind buying Hirst print is all about the name and about making quick money. The people who sell potential investors these prints are the ones making the money. If I had between 5 and 10K to spend on a print to collect long term etc as a solid investment. I wouldn't buy any urban artists at that money. I would on the other hand buy a Picasso ltd edition ceramic or one of the small authenticated drawings Picasso drew quickly and gave away to friends etc. In other words if investment do not limit yourself to "urban artists" Interesting. So many artists!!
I would take with a pinch of salt, any investment advice on this forum. Hirst is mega wealthy thanks to Saatchi and also thanks to auction house boys, hedge fund managers and dealers working together with Hirst. Cocaine cowboys riding the money horse. Publicity and hype working together too. It looks to me like Hirst is trying to prove himself to his peers as an artist by painting with his own little hands using a paintbrush and at the same time lacking confidence hence playing safe and painting splodges which are just another way of doing his dot paintings. Which other artists did way before him but Hirst hijacked dot paintings as his creation and it's what he is known for to the blue chip and mega rich collectors who have so much money they buy for the name and never need to re sell. Personally I would rather paint my own version of the splodge painting and hang it on my wall and impress my friends with when I tell em how I saved 2.5K ,( which some imply is just the same as paintings by other artists before Hirsts efforts ) and not waste the money on a flat print. The reckoning behind buying Hirst print is all about the name and about making quick money. The people who sell potential investors these prints are the ones making the money. If I had between 5 and 10K to spend on a print to collect long term etc as a solid investment. I wouldn't buy any urban artists at that money. I would on the other hand buy a Picasso ltd edition ceramic or one of the small authenticated drawings Picasso drew quickly and gave away to friends etc. In other words if investment do not limit yourself to "urban artists" Interesting. So many artists!!
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Deleted on Jun 28, 2018 22:49:27 GMT 1, I totally agree with Posterbob. Shrigley originals are so undervalued. Harland Miller originals are out of most people's price range as in canvas for 85k plus plus plus Stik still good value. How about Alex Gardner from America. I saw one of the dealers in Instagram mentioning him and my other advisors are brewing over his art too.
You are not in total agreement with Bobby as he not overly enamoured with Stik but seems you are.
I totally agree with Posterbob. Shrigley originals are so undervalued. Harland Miller originals are out of most people's price range as in canvas for 85k plus plus plus Stik still good value. How about Alex Gardner from America. I saw one of the dealers in Instagram mentioning him and my other advisors are brewing over his art too. You are not in total agreement with Bobby as he not overly enamoured with Stik but seems you are.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by moron on Jun 28, 2018 23:00:06 GMT 1, People should have got behind Dr Plip.
His art is great and also witty.
People should have got behind Dr Plip.
His art is great and also witty.
|
|
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Coach on Jun 29, 2018 10:23:54 GMT 1, People should have got behind Dr Plip. His art is great and also witty.
This we agree on.
People should have got behind Dr Plip. His art is great and also witty. This we agree on.
|
|
shy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,590
๐๐ป 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by shy on Jun 29, 2018 12:42:33 GMT 1, You may need 10 years before Pejac works good through the roof, if they ever do. If yesterday's results continue, Banksy originals are now in the stratosphere with the exception of undesirable works like Precision Bombing and Lenin on Skates which I wouldn't bother with. If it's profit you're after while minimizing expense, Harland Miller, Stik and David Shrigley originals are extremely undervalued. That said, I question the recent high prices of all three, especially Stik. Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ...... I concur with my buddy Posterbob
You may need 10 years before Pejac works good through the roof, if they ever do. If yesterday's results continue, Banksy originals are now in the stratosphere with the exception of undesirable works like Precision Bombing and Lenin on Skates which I wouldn't bother with. If it's profit you're after while minimizing expense, Harland Miller, Stik and David Shrigley originals are extremely undervalued. That said, I question the recent high prices of all three, especially Stik. Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ...... I concur with my buddy Posterbob
|
|
dantheman8
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 22
๐๐ป 4
March 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by dantheman8 on Jun 30, 2018 17:15:08 GMT 1, I notice the sothebys auction this week his 2 works, originals of course, blew past estimates, way past them. Im not keen on the investment side of things, does that bode well for his prints as well?
I notice the sothebys auction this week his 2 works, originals of course, blew past estimates, way past them. Im not keen on the investment side of things, does that bode well for his prints as well?
|
|
|
shy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,590
๐๐ป 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by shy on Jun 30, 2018 17:19:37 GMT 1, yes, for sure. Every artists goes through ups and downs. Damien Hirst is a blue chip artist. A definite hold in my books.
I buy art if it appeals to me. If you like it buy it.
The best investment is an investment that you love and cherish. If a piece of art makes you happy then that is an investment in and of itself.
Art is created to enrich one's life. IMO Hirst's artwork is incredible!
yes, for sure. Every artists goes through ups and downs. Damien Hirst is a blue chip artist. A definite hold in my books.
I buy art if it appeals to me. If you like it buy it.
The best investment is an investment that you love and cherish. If a piece of art makes you happy then that is an investment in and of itself.
Art is created to enrich one's life. IMO Hirst's artwork is incredible!
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by nobokov on Jul 1, 2018 0:01:07 GMT 1, Personally, I only love Hirst when his artwork is concerned with death. So if he thinks death is a splattering of lovely pastels and brilliant blues, then he's got another thing coming in the afterlife.
Personally, I only love Hirst when his artwork is concerned with death. So if he thinks death is a splattering of lovely pastels and brilliant blues, then he's got another thing coming in the afterlife.
|
|
shy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,590
๐๐ป 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by shy on Jul 1, 2018 0:51:10 GMT 1, His death pieces are bloody well done!
But I very much admire his spot paintings. It's incredible how much a teeny weeny original sells for!
Christ, You can buy a house outside of London for near the same price
But a Hirst is a Hirst is a Hirst...if you know what I mean!
His death pieces are bloody well done! But I very much admire his spot paintings. It's incredible how much a teeny weeny original sells for! Christ, You can buy a house outside of London for near the same price But a Hirst is a Hirst is a Hirst...if you know what I mean!
|
|
dantheman8
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 22
๐๐ป 4
March 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by dantheman8 on Jul 1, 2018 2:08:18 GMT 1, Great thanks for the info guys, I just didnt know if the price of prints was correlated to the prices of originals thanks for the insights, his originals were getting incredible money.
Great thanks for the info guys, I just didnt know if the price of prints was correlated to the prices of originals thanks for the insights, his originals were getting incredible money.
|
|
shy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,590
๐๐ป 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by shy on Jul 1, 2018 2:28:57 GMT 1, Yes huge money for originals.
Yes huge money for originals.
|
|
JJN
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 157
๐๐ป 69
April 2017
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by JJN on Jul 14, 2018 4:50:10 GMT 1, Don't forget Mr Hirst has The Biggest Collection of original Bankys....
Don't forget Mr Hirst has The Biggest Collection of original Bankys....
|
|
Balboa
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 976
๐๐ป 1,409
November 2007
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Balboa on Jul 14, 2018 7:12:17 GMT 1, Don't forget Mr Hirst has The Biggest Collection of original Bankys....
And what has that got to do with the price of bread?
Don't forget Mr Hirst has The Biggest Collection of original Bankys.... And what has that got to do with the price of bread?
|
|
shy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,590
๐๐ป 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by shy on Jul 14, 2018 7:20:40 GMT 1, i agree, not sure i understand that post?
i agree, not sure i understand that post?
|
|
|
Icesay
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,427
๐๐ป 1,796
March 2010
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Icesay on Jul 15, 2018 18:46:10 GMT 1, i agree, not sure i understand that post?
That's cos your a dick
i agree, not sure i understand that post? That's cos your a dick
|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,891
๐๐ป 5,525
September 2013
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Poster Bob on Jul 15, 2018 21:32:29 GMT 1, It means RESPECT THE NAME, RESPECT THE GAME.
Don't forget Mr Hirst has The Biggest Collection of original Bankys.... And what has that got to do with the price of bread?
It means RESPECT THE NAME, RESPECT THE GAME. Don't forget Mr Hirst has The Biggest Collection of original Bankys.... And what has that got to do with the price of bread?
|
|
shy
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,590
๐๐ป 646
June 2018
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by shy on Jul 16, 2018 3:17:29 GMT 1, I concur with Posterbob. He is always honest an forthright.
I concur with Posterbob. He is always honest an forthright.
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,841
๐๐ป 9,462
December 2010
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by .dappy on Jul 16, 2018 6:36:29 GMT 1, I concur with Posterbob. He is always honest an forthright. ... please stop posting drivel ...
I concur with Posterbob. He is always honest an forthright. ... please stop posting drivel ...
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by moron on Jul 16, 2018 17:01:18 GMT 1, Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ...... If it's all about money just set up a little shop buying scrap gold from desperate people.
Top artists to invest in right now? What do you all think - i've got my couple but I want to see what everyone else thinks. Pejac Banksy originals ...... If it's all about money just set up a little shop buying scrap gold from desperate people.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,711
๐๐ป 1,051
September 2017
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by moron on Jul 16, 2018 17:04:39 GMT 1, There is no buzz around anything Hirst does today. He's an old art fart. His print prices can go up and down. The fact that his latest releases seem to only attract quick flippers shows that many think Hirsts best days are over and long term his prints could be hard to sell to recoup the money as in art bought by people when his prices were high at auction a few years ago.
There is no buzz around anything Hirst does today. He's an old art fart. His print prices can go up and down. The fact that his latest releases seem to only attract quick flippers shows that many think Hirsts best days are over and long term his prints could be hard to sell to recoup the money as in art bought by people when his prices were high at auction a few years ago.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 4,948
๐๐ป 6,901
February 2016
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by nobokov on Jul 16, 2018 17:08:10 GMT 1, There is no buzz around anything Hirst does today. He's an old art fart. His print prices can go up and down. The fact that his latest releases seem to only attract quick flippers shows that many think Hirsts best days are over and long term his prints could be hard to sell to recoup the money as in art bought by people when his prices were high at auction a few years ago. Wasn't there plenty of buzz around last year's Venice spectacle?
There is no buzz around anything Hirst does today. He's an old art fart. His print prices can go up and down. The fact that his latest releases seem to only attract quick flippers shows that many think Hirsts best days are over and long term his prints could be hard to sell to recoup the money as in art bought by people when his prices were high at auction a few years ago. Wasn't there plenty of buzz around last year's Venice spectacle?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Damien Hirst Print As An Investment?, by Deleted on Jul 16, 2018 17:15:13 GMT 1, There is no buzz around anything Hirst does today. He's an old art fart. His print prices can go up and down. The fact that his latest releases seem to only attract quick flippers shows that many think Hirsts best days are over and long term his prints could be hard to sell to recoup the money as in art bought by people when his prices were high at auction a few years ago. Wasn't there plenty of buzz around last year's Venice spectacle?
Yes there was - and like it or hate it, it really was a spectacle on a large scale. I thought it was fantastic. If anyone hasnโt seen the accompanying documentary movie on Netflix you really are missing out.
There is no buzz around anything Hirst does today. He's an old art fart. His print prices can go up and down. The fact that his latest releases seem to only attract quick flippers shows that many think Hirsts best days are over and long term his prints could be hard to sell to recoup the money as in art bought by people when his prices were high at auction a few years ago. Wasn't there plenty of buzz around last year's Venice spectacle? Yes there was - and like it or hate it, it really was a spectacle on a large scale. I thought it was fantastic. If anyone hasnโt seen the accompanying documentary movie on Netflix you really are missing out.
|
|