telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 20:23:21 GMT 1,
;-)
;-) |
|
pr.yu
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 496
๐๐ป 633
June 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by pr.yu on Sept 21, 2017 20:32:56 GMT 1, ;-)
;-) Now that's just mean. |
|
|
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Buff Monster Fan on Sept 21, 2017 20:46:13 GMT 1, Sharing the pictures with us, or the fact that they're both hidden away in a portfolio? 
Sharing the pictures with us, or the fact that they're both hidden away in a portfolio? |
|
telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 20:47:20 GMT 1, Sharing the pictures with us, or the fact that they're both hidden away in a portfolio?
No room on walls
Sharing the pictures with us, or the fact that they're both hidden away in a portfolio? No room on walls |
|
Laugh Now 10
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 696
๐๐ป 984
February 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Laugh Now 10 on Sept 21, 2017 20:59:21 GMT 1, Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below
image hosting services
Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below Is the pink on canvas or is it a print? Tough to tell.... image hosting services |
|
telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 21:03:35 GMT 1, Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below Is the pink on canvas or is it a print? ย Tough to tell.... image hosting services
Pink \ neon yellow screen print .
Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below Is the pink on canvas or is it a print? ย Tough to tell.... image hosting services[br Pink \ neon yellow screen print . |
|
|
|
Laugh Now 10
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 696
๐๐ป 984
February 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Laugh Now 10 on Sept 21, 2017 21:28:25 GMT 1, [br Pink \ neon yellow screen print .
Can you please clarify your response? Iโm aware of the Pink/Yellow AP edition of 6 but what is this โpink onlyโ NOLA? Is it another AP? An original? Thanks...
[br Pink \ neon yellow screen print . Can you please clarify your response? Iโm aware of the Pink/Yellow AP edition of 6 but what is this โpink onlyโ NOLA? Is it another AP? An original? Thanks... |
|
|
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Buff Monster Fan on Sept 21, 2017 21:37:50 GMT 1, Sharing the pictures with us, or the fact that they're both hidden away in a portfolio? No room on walls
I've got plenty of wall space over at my house if you need some extra room
Sharing the pictures with us, or the fact that they're both hidden away in a portfolio? No room on walls I've got plenty of wall space over at my house if you need some extra room |
|
Pipes
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,438
๐๐ป 2,883
January 2012
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Pipes on Sept 21, 2017 22:08:11 GMT 1, Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below Is the pink on canvas or is it a print? Tough to tell.... image hosting services
The image someone posted (and i re-posted) looks like a print.
Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below Is the pink on canvas or is it a print? Tough to tell.... image hosting servicesThe above image is a canvas I think. The image someone posted (and i re-posted) looks like a print. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Deleted on Sept 21, 2017 22:09:54 GMT 1, ;-)
You have to be crazy to store Banksy prints like that.... I wouldn't be able to sleep at night...
;-) You have to be crazy to store Banksy prints like that.... I wouldn't be able to sleep at night... |
|
Laugh Now 10
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 696
๐๐ป 984
February 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Laugh Now 10 on Sept 21, 2017 22:17:10 GMT 1, The above image is a canvas I think. The image someone posted (and i re-posted) looks like a print.
I think the Pink NOLA Print was made by WCP not POW lol
The above image is a canvas I think. The image someone posted (and i re-posted) looks like a print. I think the Pink NOLA Print was made by WCP not POW lol |
|
Pipes
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,438
๐๐ป 2,883
January 2012
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Pipes on Sept 21, 2017 22:19:10 GMT 1, The above image is a canvas I think. The image someone posted (and i re-posted) looks like a print. I think the Pink NOLA Print was made by WCP not POW lol
The above image is a canvas I think. The image someone posted (and i re-posted) looks like a print. I think the Pink NOLA Print was made by WCP not POW lol Thought it might be - I did already search eBay to check |
|
telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 22:26:43 GMT 1,
many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP)
x
many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP) x |
|
|
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Dexter Bulldog on Sept 21, 2017 22:30:09 GMT 1, many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP) x
How come your nolas have hand torn sides and the two color aps don't?
many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP) x Question How come your nolas have hand torn sides and the two color aps don't? |
|
|
|
telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 22:32:08 GMT 1, many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP) x Question ย How come your nolas have hand torn sides and the two color aps don't?
Not all arches 88
many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP) x Question ย How come your nolas have hand torn sides and the two color aps don't? Not all arches 88 |
|
Black Apple Art
Art Gallery
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,007
๐๐ป 3,971
September 2013
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Black Apple Art on Sept 21, 2017 22:37:56 GMT 1, ;-)
;-) Shame no Signature or #...must mean no COA but nice to look at. |
|
telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 22:39:55 GMT 1, ;-) Shame no Signature or #...must mean no COA but nice to look at.ย
Totally
xx
;-) Shame no Signature or #...must mean no COA but nice to look at.ย Totally xx |
|
Unica
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,076
๐๐ป 1,232
November 2013
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Unica on Sept 21, 2017 22:45:12 GMT 1, ;-)
;-) Beautiful prints but are those printers proofs? The S&S looks off center unless I'm confused, I also don't see the signature or numbers on the photos, maybe you photoshopped them off. |
|
Laugh Now 10
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 696
๐๐ป 984
February 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Laugh Now 10 on Sept 21, 2017 22:48:25 GMT 1, ;-) Beautiful prints but are those printers proofs? The S&S looks off center unless I'm confused, ย I also don't see the signature or numbers on the photos, maybe you photoshopped them off.
Lovely, but the gloves on the S&S are โtoo blueโ. These must be backdoor prints and most likely do not have Pest Controls but lovely nonetheless and would look better framed
;-) Beautiful prints but are those printers proofs? The S&S looks off center unless I'm confused, ย I also don't see the signature or numbers on the photos, maybe you photoshopped them off. Lovely, but the gloves on the S&S are โtoo blueโ. These must be backdoor prints and most likely do not have Pest Controls but lovely nonetheless and would look better framed |
|
telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 22:54:54 GMT 1, Beautiful prints but are those printers proofs? The S&S looks off center unless I'm confused, I also don't see the signature or numbers on the photos, maybe you photoshopped them off. Lovely, but the gloves on the S&S are โtoo blueโ. These must be backdoor prints and most likely do not have Pest Controls but lovely nonetheless and would look better framed
Beautiful prints but are those printers proofs? The S&S looks off center unless I'm confused, I also don't see the signature or numbers on the photos, maybe you photoshopped them off. Lovely, but the gloves on the S&S are โtoo blueโ. These must be backdoor prints and most likely do not have Pest Controls but lovely nonetheless and would look better framed Thanks for the 'expert' advice...... if you're looking for a 'back door' here's one |
|
Laugh Now 10
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 696
๐๐ป 984
February 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Laugh Now 10 on Sept 21, 2017 22:59:07 GMT 1, Lovely, but the gloves on the S&S are โtoo blueโ. These must be backdoor prints and most likely do not have Pest Controls but lovely nonetheless and would look better framed Thanks for the 'expert' advice...... ย if you're looking for a 'back door' here's one ย
that cat is gorgeous! [love those stretch PF too very cool!] x
Lovely, but the gloves on the S&S are โtoo blueโ. These must be backdoor prints and most likely do not have Pest Controls but lovely nonetheless and would look better framed Thanks for the 'expert' advice...... ย if you're looking for a 'back door' here's one ย that cat is gorgeous! [love those stretch PF too very cool!] x |
|
telecine
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 922
๐๐ป 881
October 2008
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by telecine on Sept 21, 2017 23:07:46 GMT 1, Thanks for the 'expert' advice...... if you're looking for a 'back door' here's one that cat is gorgeous! [love those stretch PF too very cool!] x
an A0 original Tesco ...
.... ooh no ground under them and less spray detail ... just like the POW promo pic before it sold
ok kids ... nite nite
Thanks for the 'expert' advice...... if you're looking for a 'back door' here's one that cat is gorgeous! [love those stretch PF too very cool!] x And here's the last 'back door' for tonight ... seeing as you brought up the mucky subject an A0 original Tesco ... .... ooh no ground under them and less spray detail ... just like the POW promo pic before it sold ok kids ... nite nite |
|
|
|
|
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by searchandrescue on Sept 21, 2017 23:13:38 GMT 1, that cat is gorgeous! [love those stretch PF too very cool!] x And here's the last 'back door' for tonight ... seeing as you brought up the mucky subject an A0 original Tesco ... .... ooh no ground under them and less spray detail ... just like the POW promo pic before it sold ok kids ... nite nite
that cat is gorgeous! [love those stretch PF too very cool!] x And here's the last 'back door' for tonight ... seeing as you brought up the mucky subject an A0 original Tesco ... .... ooh no ground under them and less spray detail ... just like the POW promo pic before it sold ok kids ... nite nite nite nite telecine, you dirty wee bugger you! |
|
|
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by searchandrescue on Sept 21, 2017 23:16:47 GMT 1, many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP) x
many many A/P variants (POW ... not f**kingWCP) x plus a cheeky rollie covering over the sig! |
|
illicey
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 80
๐๐ป 128
January 2013
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by illicey on Sept 22, 2017 1:44:55 GMT 1, This is definitely a canvas. Nola pink went unsold in 2009 with an estimate of 60-80k gbp. There is also a Nola orange canvas that sold at a ridiculous 46k gbp in 2011
Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below Is the pink on canvas or is it a print? ย Tough to tell.... image hosting services
This is definitely a canvas. Nola pink went unsold in 2009 with an estimate of 60-80k gbp. There is also a Nola orange canvas that sold at a ridiculous 46k gbp in 2011 Whats that pink one? *edit* post was deleted by OP - image below Is the pink on canvas or is it a print? ย Tough to tell.... image hosting services |
|
Laugh Now 10
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 696
๐๐ป 984
February 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Laugh Now 10 on Sept 22, 2017 1:50:13 GMT 1, This is definitely a canvas. Nola pink went unsold in 2009 with an estimate of 60-80k gbp. There is also a Nola orange canvas that sold at a ridiculous 46k gbp in 2011
thanks so much for that info, itโs appreciated - wow - letโs build a time machine....
This is definitely a canvas. Nola pink went unsold in 2009 with an estimate of 60-80k gbp. There is also a Nola orange canvas that sold at a ridiculous 46k gbp in 2011 thanks so much for that info, itโs appreciated - wow - letโs build a time machine.... |
|
Carl Cashman
Artist
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,775
๐๐ป 3,147
August 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Carl Cashman on Sept 22, 2017 6:59:53 GMT 1, This is definitely a canvas. Nola pink went unsold in 2009 with an estimate of 60-80k gbp. There is also a Nola orange canvas that sold at a ridiculous 46k gbp in 2011 thanks so much for that info, itโs appreciated - wow - letโs build a time machine....
This is definitely a canvas. Nola pink went unsold in 2009 with an estimate of 60-80k gbp. There is also a Nola orange canvas that sold at a ridiculous 46k gbp in 2011 thanks so much for that info, itโs appreciated - wow - letโs build a time machine.... Thats 100% the canvas... look at the size of it |
|
met
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,796
๐๐ป 6,762
June 2009
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by met on Sept 23, 2017 19:32:23 GMT 1,  Obviously not mine!
these are the AP gradient NOLAs, a complete set I believe - wow! The grey actually also has the same gradient at this orange version.
With all due respect, no, it doesnโt.... What makes you say it doesn't? Here is a close up of my grey....Looks gradient to me 
On a street art forum, it may be unnecessarily confusing to advocate certain virtues of bushidล.
How about chivalry, then? The latter might be less contentious and more easily understood.
___________
Laugh Now 10
There was an effort made by @augustg in defending his earlier statement about the gradient (created by dithering) in the rain of the grey NOLA print. You had openly disputed the accuracy of this statement.
Under the circumstances, would you agree that @augustg's follow-up merits a public nod, as a courtesy acknowledgement?
Obviously not mine! these are the AP gradient NOLAs, a complete set I believe - wow! The grey actually also has the same gradient at this orange version. With all due respect, no, it doesnโt.... What makes you say it doesn't? Here is a close up of my grey....Looks gradient to me On a str eet art forum, it may be unnecessarily confusing to advocate certain virtues of bushidล. How about chivalry, then? The latter might be less contentious and more easily understood. ___________ Laugh Now 10 There was an effort made by @augustg in defending his earlier statement about the gradient (created by dithering) in the rain of the grey NOLA print. You had openly disputed the accuracy of this statement. Under the circumstances, would you agree that @augustg's follow-up merits a public nod, as a courtesy acknowledgement? |
|
met
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 2,796
๐๐ป 6,762
June 2009
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by met on Sept 23, 2017 19:48:31 GMT 1,
I would imagine peoples view changes on this subject depending on which side of the fence you are sitting on at that point in time (buyer vs seller mode).
The only thing I would comment on is that clearly the buyer was happy to pay the hammer price plus premium and therefore there could be other buyers prepared to do the same.
You cannot possibly say the seller was necessarily happy to let the work go at the hammer price less fees and therefore there might not be other sellers prepared to let the work go at this price.
Sorry to dig this up again, but I only just saw your response, N. I straddle both sides of this fence, and simply post in these instances to add a bit of perspective and some additional facts of the sales. I certainly agree with you to some extent, but in this sale, the most any buyer was willing to pay was ยฃ10k, and they paid more than any other buyer (in this sale) was willing to pay. I tend to see it as that buyer was willing to pay Christie's ยฃ10k for the print, with all of the protection (and perhaps even prestige) that offers. I dare say they might not be willing to pay the same amount to an unknown internet persona or eBay seller. I see the buyers premium as just that - a premium the buyer pays for buying from such a source. And sellers fees just the same. And their happiness aside, the figure the seller achieved through such a prestigious, far reaching auction, is the figure they achieved. That was the most they could achieve that day using a facility that surely draws a larger number of intending buyers than forum/internet sales. Personally, I don't think a private sale could demand such prices, let alone far higher prices, as is the case with the ยฃ12k - ยฃ14k "valuations" for GR some members were throwing about just last month. These "valuations" tend to come with no facts to back them up, and could easily be coming from biassed sources. (Case in point, someone recently asked for a Trolleys valuation, and someone immediately threw out ยฃ20k, with no evidence to back that up. I asked if there was any history of those prices, and referenced a major sale just 2 months before that achieved ยฃ13.7k with all fees included. I think facts need to be presented in some cases, and the old "I know of 2 sales at this price" doesn't constitute facts, imo) Those are just my thoughts on it, but I completely understand where you're coming from and, as you know, hold what you say in very high regard. I'll get back in my box now.
Loobaz, the exchange of different perspectives between you and Harveyn was an enjoyable read. Thank you for posting.
I myself make distinctions when purchasing โ even if the condition of two prints is the same, and in best case scenarios where no authenticity, ownership or security concerns are weighing on my shoulders.
With secondary market pieces, I don't just acquire the artworks themselves. I'm also buying their history. The story-telling aspect is important to me. Including when that story is not being shared with others, and only staying in my head.
There's a premium I'd be comfortable paying if buying from Christie's, Sotheby's or Phillips, which I generally wouldn't pay to a private seller. [Exceptions do exist when the identity of that seller is of interest, e.g. if they are in some way directly connected with the relevant artist or their career.]
The whole atmosphere at a public auction entertains me. Anyone fascinated by psychology can appreciate this. On occasion, attending a sale can even feel like being part of an event. And memories of events have value in themselves. Separately, although it's a minor pleasure, I do get satisfaction from being able to match up a piece I own with an image and description in a nice catalogue sitting on my bookshelf. A printout of an eBay listing doesn't offer me the same level of satisfaction.
Provenance, along with the entire actual or anticipated buying experience, therefore have an influence on my perception of an artwork's value โ and the price I'm willing to pay for it.
I would imagine peoples view changes on this subject depending on which side of the fence you are sitting on at that point in time (buyer vs seller mode).
The only thing I would comment on is that clearly the buyer was happy to pay the hammer price plus premium and therefore there could be other buyers prepared to do the same.
You cannot possibly say the seller was necessarily happy to let the work go at the hammer price less fees and therefore there might not be other sellers prepared to let the work go at this price.
Sorry to dig this up again, but I only just saw your response, N. I straddle both sides of this fence, and simply post in these instances to add a bit of perspective and some additional facts of the sales. I certainly agree with you to some extent, but in this sale, the most any buyer was willing to pay was ยฃ10k, and they paid more than any other buyer (in this sale) was willing to pay. I tend to see it as that buyer was willing to pay Christie's ยฃ10k for the print, with all of the protection (and perhaps even prestige) that offers. I dare say they might not be willing to pay the same amount to an unknown internet persona or eBay seller. I see the buyers premium as just that - a premium the buyer pays for buying from such a source. And sellers fees just the same. And their happiness aside, the figure the seller achieved through such a prestigious, far reaching auction, is the figure they achieved. That was the most they could achieve that day using a facility that surely draws a larger number of intending buyers than forum/internet sales. Personally, I don't think a private sale could demand such prices, let alone far higher prices, as is the case with the ยฃ12k - ยฃ14k "valuations" for GR some members were throwing about just last month. These "valuations" tend to come with no facts to back them up, and could easily be coming from biassed sources. (Case in point, someone recently asked for a Trolleys valuation, and someone immediately threw out ยฃ20k, with no evidence to back that up. I asked if there was any history of those prices, and referenced a major sale just 2 months before that achieved ยฃ13.7k with all fees included. I think facts need to be presented in some cases, and the old "I know of 2 sales at this price" doesn't constitute facts, imo) Those are just my thoughts on it, but I completely understand where you're coming from and, as you know, hold what you say in very high regard. I'll get back in my box now. , the exchange of different perspectives between you and Harveyn was an enjoyable read. Thank you for posting. I myself make distinctions when purchasing โ even if the condition of two prints is the same, and in best case scenarios where no authenticity, ownership or security concerns are weighing on my shoulders. With secondary market pieces, I don't just acquire the artworks themselves. I'm also buying their history. The story-telling aspect is important to me. Including when that story is not being shared with others, and only staying in my head. There's a premium I'd be comfortable paying if buying from Christie's, Sotheby's or Phillips, which I generally wouldn't pay to a private seller. [Exceptions do exist when the identity of that seller is of interest, e.g. if they are in some way directly connected with the relevant artist or their career.] The whole atmosphere at a public auction entertains me. Anyone fascinated by psychology can appreciate this. On occasion, attending a sale can even feel like being part of an event. And memories of events have value in themselves. Separately, although it's a minor pleasure, I do get satisfaction from being able to match up a piece I own with an image and description in a nice catalogue sitting on my bookshelf. A printout of an eB ay listing doesn't offer me the same level of satisfaction. Provenance, along with the entire actual or anticipated buying experience, therefore have an influence on my perception of an artwork's value โ and the price I'm willing to pay for it. |
|
Laugh Now 10
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 696
๐๐ป 984
February 2017
|
Christie's Art Auctions , by Laugh Now 10 on Sept 23, 2017 19:53:21 GMT 1, Obviously not mine! The grey actually also has the same gradient at this orange version. What makes you say it doesn't? Here is a close up of my grey....Looks gradient to meย On a str eet art forum, it may be unnecessarily confusing to advocate certain virtues of bushidล. How about chivalry, then? The latter might be less contentious and more easily understood. ___________ Laugh Now 10 There was an effort made by @augustg in defending his earlier statement about the gradient (created by dithering) in the rain of the grey NOLA print. You had openly disputed the accuracy of this statement. Under the circumstances, would you agree that @augustg's follow-up merits a public nod, as a courtesy acknowledgement?
maybe I misunderstood his original statement but I PMโd him with my logic supporting my response - which I chose to do in that manner - hope thatโs not breaking any rules, mate
Obviously not mine! The grey actually also has the same gradient at this orange version. What makes you say it doesn't? Here is a close up of my grey....Looks gradient to meย On a str eet art forum, it may be unnecessarily confusing to advocate certain virtues of bushidล. How about chivalry, then? The latter might be less contentious and more easily understood. ___________ Laugh Now 10 There was an effort made by @augustg in defending his earlier statement about the gradient (created by dithering) in the rain of the grey NOLA print. You had openly disputed the accuracy of this statement. Under the circumstances, would you agree that @augustg's follow-up merits a public nod, as a courtesy acknowledgement? maybe I misunderstood his original statement but I PMโd him with my logic supporting my response - which I chose to do in that manner - hope thatโs not breaking any rules, mate |
|
