Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 16:02:47 GMT 1,
Am probably too naive and too honest but to me people submitting pieces to PCO when in doubt were (1) already in possession of a piece they bought and then presumably victim of a fraud or (2) people checking legitimacy of a piece before buying.
Anyhow, to me people building up a story to get something authenticated is far fetched although i fully realize that with existing prices fraudsters are ready for anything
There you go. I was going to say - the only way they could retain art is if its pre-agreed and outlined before someone sends it in. Hard to prove someone has "knowingly summitted" fake artwork unless they have a history for this kind of thing. I think its easer to prove someone knowingly submitted a fake work of art for the purposes of commercial gain, then it is to pursue a legal challenge for not returning the work the owner. This wont be the first time that PCO would have done that either. By applying for a CoA you are in essence applying for a Certificate of Sale, therefore PCO will take the position that if any work submitted for a CoA is with the intention to sell. Let's put another interesting spin on this, if it is legit and PCO will have the original owners name on file and they reach out to the original to confirm that he/him/she/her sold it to the person who sold it for £5 at a car boot sale, what do you think he/she/him/her say? Either way he wont be getting it back. I think the OP knows this and is laying the foundation to do a greed grab and run. 8 posts in 6 years and no other history. Anyone want to know the lottery numbers for next week?
Am probably too naive and too honest but to me people submitting pieces to PCO when in doubt were (1) already in possession of a piece they bought and then presumably victim of a fraud or (2) people checking legitimacy of a piece before buying. Anyhow, to me people building up a story to get something authenticated is far fetched although i fully realize that with existing prices fraudsters are ready for anything There you go. I was going to say - the only way they could retain art is if its pre-agreed and outlined before someone sends it in. Hard to prove someone has "knowingly summitted" fake artwork unless they have a history for this kind of thing. I think its easer to prove someone knowingly submitted a fake work of art for the purposes of commercial gain, then it is to pursue a legal challenge for not returning the work the owner. This wont be the first time that PCO would have done that either. By applying for a CoA you are in essence applying for a Certificate of Sale, therefore PCO will take the position that if any work submitted for a CoA is with the intention to sell. Let's put another interesting spin on this, if it is legit and PCO will have the original owners name on file and they reach out to the original to confirm that he/him/she/her sold it to the person who sold it for £5 at a car boot sale, what do you think he/she/him/her say? Either way he wont be getting it back. I think the OP knows this and is laying the foundation to do a greed grab and run. 8 posts in 6 years and no other history. Anyone want to know the lottery numbers for next week? |
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by FЯ on Nov 19, 2020 16:09:21 GMT 1, By applying for a CoA you are in essence applying for a Certificate of Sale, therefore PCO will take the position that if any work submitted for a CoA is with the intention to sell. that is not the case at all.
certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it.
loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance.
if they give it back you can still sell it, its not some banksy law
By applying for a CoA you are in essence applying for a Certificate of Sale, therefore PCO will take the position that if any work submitted for a CoA is with the intention to sell. that is not the case at all. certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it. loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance. if they give it back you can still sell it, its not some banksy law |
|
|
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Lroy on Nov 19, 2020 16:11:02 GMT 1, that is not the case at all. certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it. loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance. if they give it back you can still sell it, its not some banksy law Yes, if they sell it's half the price then. With the risk to buy a fake
that is not the case at all. certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it. loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance. if they give it back you can still sell it, its not some banksy law Yes, if they sell it's half the price then. With the risk to buy a fake
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 16:18:20 GMT 1, So - its as simple as this.
Possessing any fake piece of art is totally legal unless you are trying to pass it of as genuine when you know its a fake.
It is totally illegal for any authentication body to damage / deface / refuse to send artwork back unless it has previously been agreed by both parties that they will do this.
If an authentication body was to damage / deface artwork without prior consent from the party that submitted, this would be considered criminal damage. It's that simple.
In the the case of PC - they clearly outline what they do with fake artwork.
Fraud:
If someone with no previous convictions or marks on their record that would be considered relevant to be raised in court was being convicted of selling a single piece of fake artwork - it would be incredibly difficult to prove they had done so. It's unlikely the CPS would even consider the case.
Look at it this way.
Mark has no criminal record or known criminal associations.
Mark knocks out a fake Banksy canvas.
Mark has an elaborate story about how he came across this canvas (car boot sale, cash sale etc) (something that is extremely hard to prove otherwise)
Mark tries to sell canvas as genuine.
Its then on the police to prove that Mark was knowingly selling a fake canvas.
Almost impossible in the circumstances that I have outlined above.
So - its as simple as this.
Possessing any fake piece of art is totally legal unless you are trying to pass it of as genuine when you know its a fake.
It is totally illegal for any authentication body to damage / deface / refuse to send artwork back unless it has previously been agreed by both parties that they will do this.
If an authentication body was to damage / deface artwork without prior consent from the party that submitted, this would be considered criminal damage. It's that simple.
In the the case of PC - they clearly outline what they do with fake artwork.
Fraud:
If someone with no previous convictions or marks on their record that would be considered relevant to be raised in court was being convicted of selling a single piece of fake artwork - it would be incredibly difficult to prove they had done so. It's unlikely the CPS would even consider the case.
Look at it this way.
Mark has no criminal record or known criminal associations.
Mark knocks out a fake Banksy canvas.
Mark has an elaborate story about how he came across this canvas (car boot sale, cash sale etc) (something that is extremely hard to prove otherwise)
Mark tries to sell canvas as genuine.
Its then on the police to prove that Mark was knowingly selling a fake canvas.
Almost impossible in the circumstances that I have outlined above.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 16:18:53 GMT 1, that is not the case at all. certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it. loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance.
pestcontroloffice.com/terms.asp
4. Street art (that is, an artwork which may or may not have been created by the Artist in a public space and/or has subsequently been removed from the public space) and any other works which are not intended to be for commercial purposes, as solely determined by PCO, are not eligible for authentication by PCO
In essence works that are made commercial purposes, ie sold, are eligible for CoA's. I am not disagreeing with you from a general point of view about CoA's, but the ones issued by Banksy are only for commercial works. If I bought directly from the artist and I have provenance, I have no intention to sell, why would I need a CoA, again that is a point of view PCO would take, hence why they ask in an application, do you intend to sell, irrespective to when. Example, if this piece gets a CoA its worth £1m+, no CoA, you wouldn't even give them £5. Sorry to ramble on, and labour the point, that is why PCO will not issue CoA's for new works for 2 years at least, that is to restrict people from selling flipping
that is not the case at all. certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it. loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance. As a general point yes I would agree with you, but what PCO do is, they put caveats into their CoA's, and quite a few of us are familiar with this caveat. pestcontroloffice.com/terms.asp4. Street art (that is, an artwork which may or may not have been created by the Artist in a public space and/or has subsequently been removed from the public space) and any other works which are not intended to be for commercial purposes, as solely determined by PCO, are not eligible for authentication by PCO In essence works that are made commercial purposes, ie sold, are eligible for CoA's. I am not disagreeing with you from a general point of view about CoA's, but the ones issued by Banksy are only for commercial works. If I bought directly from the artist and I have provenance, I have no intention to sell, why would I need a CoA, again that is a point of view PCO would take, hence why they ask in an application, do you intend to sell, irrespective to when. Example, if this piece gets a CoA its worth £1m+, no CoA, you wouldn't even give them £5. Sorry to ramble on, and labour the point, that is why PCO will not issue CoA's for new works for 2 years at least, that is to restrict people from selling flipping |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 16:35:52 GMT 1, So - its as simple as this. Possessing any fake piece of art is totally legal unless you are trying to pass it of as genuine when you know its a fake. It is totally illegal for any authentication body to damage / deface / refuse to send artwork back unless it has previously been agreed by both parties that they will do this. If an authentication body was to damage / deface artwork without prior consent from the party that submitted, this would be considered criminal damage. It's that simple. In the the case of PC - they clearly outline what they do with fake artwork. Fraud: If someone with no previous convictions or marks on their record that would be considered relevant to be raised in court was being convicted of selling a single piece of fake artwork - it would be incredibly difficult to prove they had done so. It's unlikely the CPS would even consider the case. Look at it this way. Mark has no criminal record or known criminal associations. Mark knocks out a fake Banksy canvas. Mark has an elaborate story about how he came across this canvas (car boot sale, cash sale etc) (something that is extremely hard to prove otherwise) Mark tries to sell canvas as genuine. Its then on the police to prove that Mark was knowingly selling a fake canvas. Almost impossible in the circumstances that I have outlined above.
Because the artist retains copyright to all of his images, and if he deems a work of art to be fake, he has the right to destroy it in order to protect that copyright. The artists rights will alway supersede the rights of the person who, knowingly or unknowingly, submits fake works of art that infringe on that copyright.
Interesting debate anyway
So - its as simple as this. Possessing any fake piece of art is totally legal unless you are trying to pass it of as genuine when you know its a fake. It is totally illegal for any authentication body to damage / deface / refuse to send artwork back unless it has previously been agreed by both parties that they will do this. If an authentication body was to damage / deface artwork without prior consent from the party that submitted, this would be considered criminal damage. It's that simple. In the the case of PC - they clearly outline what they do with fake artwork. Fraud: If someone with no previous convictions or marks on their record that would be considered relevant to be raised in court was being convicted of selling a single piece of fake artwork - it would be incredibly difficult to prove they had done so. It's unlikely the CPS would even consider the case. Look at it this way. Mark has no criminal record or known criminal associations. Mark knocks out a fake Banksy canvas. Mark has an elaborate story about how he came across this canvas (car boot sale, cash sale etc) (something that is extremely hard to prove otherwise) Mark tries to sell canvas as genuine. Its then on the police to prove that Mark was knowingly selling a fake canvas. Almost impossible in the circumstances that I have outlined above. Sorry you are wrong again. Because the artist retains copyright to all of his images, and if he deems a work of art to be fake, he has the right to destroy it in order to protect that copyright. The artists rights will alway supersede the rights of the person who, knowingly or unknowingly, submits fake works of art that infringe on that copyright. Interesting debate anyway |
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 16:39:17 GMT 1, So - its as simple as this. Possessing any fake piece of art is totally legal unless you are trying to pass it of as genuine when you know its a fake. It is totally illegal for any authentication body to damage / deface / refuse to send artwork back unless it has previously been agreed by both parties that they will do this. If an authentication body was to damage / deface artwork without prior consent from the party that submitted, this would be considered criminal damage. It's that simple. In the the case of PC - they clearly outline what they do with fake artwork. Fraud: If someone with no previous convictions or marks on their record that would be considered relevant to be raised in court was being convicted of selling a single piece of fake artwork - it would be incredibly difficult to prove they had done so. It's unlikely the CPS would even consider the case. Look at it this way. Mark has no criminal record or known criminal associations. Mark knocks out a fake Banksy canvas. Mark has an elaborate story about how he came across this canvas (car boot sale, cash sale etc) (something that is extremely hard to prove otherwise) Mark tries to sell canvas as genuine. Its then on the police to prove that Mark was knowingly selling a fake canvas. Almost impossible in the circumstances that I have outlined above. Sorry you are wrong again. Because the artist retains copyright to all of his images, and if he deems a work of art to be fake, he can destroy it in order to protect that copyright. His rights will alway supersede the rights of the person who submits, knowingly or unknowingly fake works of art that infringe on his copyright. Interesting debate anyway
Totally incorrect. Didn't realize that Banksy has copyrighted his work.
So - its as simple as this. Possessing any fake piece of art is totally legal unless you are trying to pass it of as genuine when you know its a fake. It is totally illegal for any authentication body to damage / deface / refuse to send artwork back unless it has previously been agreed by both parties that they will do this. If an authentication body was to damage / deface artwork without prior consent from the party that submitted, this would be considered criminal damage. It's that simple. In the the case of PC - they clearly outline what they do with fake artwork. Fraud: If someone with no previous convictions or marks on their record that would be considered relevant to be raised in court was being convicted of selling a single piece of fake artwork - it would be incredibly difficult to prove they had done so. It's unlikely the CPS would even consider the case. Look at it this way. Mark has no criminal record or known criminal associations. Mark knocks out a fake Banksy canvas. Mark has an elaborate story about how he came across this canvas (car boot sale, cash sale etc) (something that is extremely hard to prove otherwise) Mark tries to sell canvas as genuine. Its then on the police to prove that Mark was knowingly selling a fake canvas. Almost impossible in the circumstances that I have outlined above. Sorry you are wrong again. Because the artist retains copyright to all of his images, and if he deems a work of art to be fake, he can destroy it in order to protect that copyright. His rights will alway supersede the rights of the person who submits, knowingly or unknowingly fake works of art that infringe on his copyright. Interesting debate anyway Totally incorrect. Didn't realize that Banksy has copyrighted his work. |
|
tab1
Full Member
🗨️ 8,519
👍🏻 3,679
September 2011
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by tab1 on Nov 19, 2020 16:52:26 GMT 1, Few hmvs canvases up next!
Few hmvs canvases up next!
|
|
GMA
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,962
👍🏻 2,994
October 2015
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by GMA on Nov 19, 2020 16:52:39 GMT 1, certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it. loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance. As a general point yes I would agree with you, but what PCO do is, they put caveats into their CoA's, and quite a few of us are familiar with this caveat. pestcontroloffice.com/terms.asp4. Street art (that is, an artwork which may or may not have been created by the Artist in a public space and/or has subsequently been removed from the public space) and any other works which are not intended to be for commercial purposes, as solely determined by PCO, are not eligible for authentication by PCO In essence works that are made commercial purposes, ie sold, are eligible for CoA's. I am not disagreeing with you from a general point of view about CoA's, but the ones issued by Banksy are only for commercial works. If I bought directly from the artist and I have provenance, I have no intention to sell, why would I need a CoA, again that is a point of view PCO would take, hence why they ask in an application, do you intend to sell, irrespective to when. Example, if this piece gets a CoA its worth £1m+, no CoA, you wouldn't even give them £5. Sorry to ramble on, and labour the point, that is why PCO will not issue CoA's for new works for 2 years at least, that is to restrict people from selling flipping
I would say if you own one of his prints, or any piece of work by him and it is eligible for a COA it would be best to get it, that way you're in their system as the owner.
certificates are to prove authenticity, not to give permission to sell it. loads of prints sell without them. coa is also used for insurance. As a general point yes I would agree with you, but what PCO do is, they put caveats into their CoA's, and quite a few of us are familiar with this caveat. pestcontroloffice.com/terms.asp4. Street art (that is, an artwork which may or may not have been created by the Artist in a public space and/or has subsequently been removed from the public space) and any other works which are not intended to be for commercial purposes, as solely determined by PCO, are not eligible for authentication by PCO In essence works that are made commercial purposes, ie sold, are eligible for CoA's. I am not disagreeing with you from a general point of view about CoA's, but the ones issued by Banksy are only for commercial works. If I bought directly from the artist and I have provenance, I have no intention to sell, why would I need a CoA, again that is a point of view PCO would take, hence why they ask in an application, do you intend to sell, irrespective to when. Example, if this piece gets a CoA its worth £1m+, no CoA, you wouldn't even give them £5. Sorry to ramble on, and labour the point, that is why PCO will not issue CoA's for new works for 2 years at least, that is to restrict people from selling flipping I would say if you own one of his prints, or any piece of work by him and it is eligible for a COA it would be best to get it, that way you're in their system as the owner. |
|
Rubberneck
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 1,433
October 2018
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Rubberneck on Nov 19, 2020 16:53:15 GMT 1, that is not the case at all. OK why not?
you..can you tell me if it is it real..
that is not the case at all. OK why not? ...I’ve bought this at a car boot, I’ve checked online forums and been advised to submit to you..can you tell me if it is it real.. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 17:20:50 GMT 1, ...I’ve bought this at a car boot, I’ve checked online forums and been advised to submit to you..can you tell me if it is it real..
The OP knows the game, and doesn't need 10 pages of other peoples opinions, granted 2 of those pages are mine. Provenance is always critical, and the provenance on this piece has more holes in it then a roof tillers nail bag
...I’ve bought this at a car boot, I’ve checked online forums and been advised to submit to you..can you tell me if it is it real.. Reasonable if the OP didnt know what he bought or what to do it with. But....."I spent all of 5 seconds looking at it before asking how much she wanted?" The OP knows the game, and doesn't need 10 pages of other peoples opinions, granted 2 of those pages are mine. Provenance is always critical, and the provenance on this piece has more holes in it then a roof tillers nail bag |
|
Nordicstar
New Member
🗨️ 575
👍🏻 490
September 2018
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Nordicstar on Nov 19, 2020 18:13:54 GMT 1, what if..
(yeah yeah i know, if i had balls i'll be a man)
no seriously, what if, this is real, I mean I honestly think it looks right, something about it smells good.
if it is real , but the car boot story is bull, there could be quite a lot of different reasons, they have wanted kept it hidden, and now want's to "have got their hands on it"
surely PC can identify the canvas, right tone of red and so, what if it is real, but story is kack, what then?
what if..
(yeah yeah i know, if i had balls i'll be a man)
no seriously, what if, this is real, I mean I honestly think it looks right, something about it smells good.
if it is real , but the car boot story is bull, there could be quite a lot of different reasons, they have wanted kept it hidden, and now want's to "have got their hands on it"
surely PC can identify the canvas, right tone of red and so, what if it is real, but story is kack, what then?
|
|
Nordicstar
New Member
🗨️ 575
👍🏻 490
September 2018
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Nordicstar on Nov 19, 2020 18:20:25 GMT 1, I don't know what would be more strange, a mini canvas from a up coming artist no one heard of, at that time, with a motive of an ape telling us to keep it real, for an price of £ 150
or someone making a copy just about that same time, or just a couple years later,
it's almost like people were psychic, looking at Banksys shit is is unbelivable that he made it
I don't know what would be more strange, a mini canvas from a up coming artist no one heard of, at that time, with a motive of an ape telling us to keep it real, for an price of £ 150
or someone making a copy just about that same time, or just a couple years later,
it's almost like people were psychic, looking at Banksys shit is is unbelivable that he made it
|
|
mojo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,188
👍🏻 3,711
May 2014
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by mojo on Nov 19, 2020 18:38:19 GMT 1, I think that we can conclude from this thread that setting up Pest Control was one of Banksy's best ideas ever. Can you imagine the nightmare of convincing potential buyers that it really is real without them?
I would imagine by now they would possibly know where most of the work is, particularly originals.
I think that we can conclude from this thread that setting up Pest Control was one of Banksy's best ideas ever. Can you imagine the nightmare of convincing potential buyers that it really is real without them?
I would imagine by now they would possibly know where most of the work is, particularly originals.
|
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 19, 2020 21:19:12 GMT 1, My theory is this: The piece is indeed real and the poster knows this. He's had the piece on the backburner for awhile and has now decided to get a PC cert as he is looking to raise funds for whatever. The forum post and "backstory" is very newsworthy and will end up in almost all tabloids and will most likely go international. Great PR for when he is trying to sell. Will probably get many direct offers and miss out the auction house fees. OR It is indeed a fake. Who knows.
My theory is this: The piece is indeed real and the poster knows this. He's had the piece on the backburner for awhile and has now decided to get a PC cert as he is looking to raise funds for whatever. The forum post and "backstory" is very newsworthy and will end up in almost all tabloids and will most likely go international. Great PR for when he is trying to sell. Will probably get many direct offers and miss out the auction house fees. OR It is indeed a fake. Who knows. |
|
Schooner
New Member
🗨️ 41
👍🏻 46
November 2020
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Schooner on Nov 20, 2020 1:55:09 GMT 1, The twists and turns on this thread are amazing.. Let's keep it real and await PC's verdict shall we.
The twists and turns on this thread are amazing.. Let's keep it real and await PC's verdict shall we.
|
|
ricardob
New Member
🗨️ 451
👍🏻 250
March 2008
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by ricardob on Nov 20, 2020 4:06:53 GMT 1, Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs?
Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs?
|
|
|
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Lroy on Nov 20, 2020 7:38:46 GMT 1, 150 £ was quite a lot back in the past.
And the simple quidam would not buy a monk amongst other monk’as the car boot fair , as this, just to put it in a cave...
This ex never heard then ig Banksy and rats and monks ? C’monn
But I can be wrong.
If we go at this kind of event, it’s because we know a little in Art. Otherwise we would go to Dismaland or other A-B-Musement Park.
Just talking earlier and I don't care a bit 
150 £ was quite a lot back in the past. And the simple quidam would not buy a monk amongst other monk’as the car boot fair , as this, just to put it in a cave... This ex never heard then ig Banksy and rats and monks ? C’monn But I can be wrong. If we go at this kind of event, it’s because we know a little in Art. Otherwise we would go to Dismaland or other A-B-Musement Park. Just talking earlier and I don't care a bit |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 20, 2020 8:23:23 GMT 1, Surely no one here will be stupid enough to buy this without first waiting for the PC COA? If they do, I worry more about the state of this forum than first thought. It’s like any scam most people won’t fall for it, you just need one person who thinks it may be legit and offers say £10-20k on a punt.
Anyone who tries to buy it without PC COA in the hope of getting a Banksy original for £20k, well, I won't be crying about them losing their money.
Surely no one here will be stupid enough to buy this without first waiting for the PC COA? If they do, I worry more about the state of this forum than first thought. It’s like any scam most people won’t fall for it, you just need one person who thinks it may be legit and offers say £10-20k on a punt. Anyone who tries to buy it without PC COA in the hope of getting a Banksy original for £20k, well, I won't be crying about them losing their money. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 20, 2020 8:24:10 GMT 1, Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs?
tldr: Everyone's an expert
Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs? tldr: Everyone's an expert |
|
|
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Lroy on Nov 20, 2020 10:28:36 GMT 1, It’s like any scam most people won’t fall for it, you just need one person who thinks it may be legit and offers say £10-20k on a punt. Anyone who tries to buy it without PC COA in the hope of getting a Banksy original for £20k, well, I won't be crying about them losing their money.
It’s like any scam most people won’t fall for it, you just need one person who thinks it may be legit and offers say £10-20k on a punt. Anyone who tries to buy it without PC COA in the hope of getting a Banksy original for £20k, well, I won't be crying about them losing their money. That is wahd I hace said earlier, but you spedak better english than me, and some condescending members on here ignore my comments. They are God, I could understand. |
|
|
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Baker Dave 76 on Nov 20, 2020 12:39:38 GMT 1, Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs?
It's a bit like this year 2020 starts of good ends up everyone losing there shit...
Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs? It's a bit like this year 2020 starts of good ends up everyone losing there shit... |
|
|
|
Lazarus II
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,804
👍🏻 2,429
August 2019
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Lazarus II on Nov 20, 2020 14:45:47 GMT 1, Bloke buys canvas in car boot sale, not sure if its authentic or not, willing to trade for a PS5 even if it proves to be genuine.
Bloke buys canvas in car boot sale, not sure if its authentic or not, willing to trade for a PS5 even if it proves to be genuine.
|
|
axel
New Member
🗨️ 80
👍🏻 49
November 2019
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by axel on Nov 20, 2020 15:41:44 GMT 1, ok, let's put in another light:
How many of you would have bought it for a fiver? If yes, why? if no, why?
Personally: for 5 quid, I would buy the lottery ticket if the piece would seems reasonably doubtful. Worst case scenario it's a nice gift for "that" friend of mine who didn't bought banksy when he could have done and now is dying inside lol
ok, let's put in another light:
How many of you would have bought it for a fiver? If yes, why? if no, why?
Personally: for 5 quid, I would buy the lottery ticket if the piece would seems reasonably doubtful. Worst case scenario it's a nice gift for "that" friend of mine who didn't bought banksy when he could have done and now is dying inside lol
|
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Deleted on Nov 25, 2020 20:49:06 GMT 1, I call bollocks.
I call bollocks.
|
|
|
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by stillborncrisps on Nov 26, 2020 1:58:03 GMT 1, I (and a few others) questioned earlier why, if it's genuine, the car boot seller's ex hadn't been trying to get this back for the last 10 years (at least!). One explanation I've just thought of is, perhaps the ex died years ago.
I (and a few others) questioned earlier why, if it's genuine, the car boot seller's ex hadn't been trying to get this back for the last 10 years (at least!). One explanation I've just thought of is, perhaps the ex died years ago.
|
|
duffer31
New Member
🗨️ 382
👍🏻 359
November 2016
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by duffer31 on Nov 26, 2020 6:06:10 GMT 1, I’m going to the wrong car boot sales.
I’m going to the wrong car boot sales.
|
|
pjc
New Member
🗨️ 354
👍🏻 271
July 2020
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by pjc on Dec 18, 2020 18:47:20 GMT 1, oh no...
|
|
|
|
Banksy Keep It Real small canvas, by Johnny Bravo on Dec 18, 2020 18:55:05 GMT 1, Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs? Mostly garbage. UAA has a lot of illiterate/ dyslexiac members.
So don't worry you haven't missed much.
Can someone please describe the last 10 pages in a couple of paragraphs? Mostly garbage. UAA has a lot of illiterate/ dyslexiac members.
So don't worry you haven't missed much. Hahaha |
|
