scott134
New Member
Posts • 167
Likes • 150
October 2019
|
Bristol protests, by scott134 on Mar 27, 2021 8:08:39 GMT 1, Do you think Banksy will do a piece about what's currently happening in Bristol?
Do you think Banksy will do a piece about what's currently happening in Bristol?
|
|
Wanchope
Junior Member
Posts • 1,338
Likes • 1,146
Member is Online
February 2020
|
Bristol protests, by Wanchope on Mar 27, 2021 8:29:18 GMT 1, Yep! Never fails on the Bristol front
Yep! Never fails on the Bristol front
|
|
startimeash
Junior Member
Posts • 1,277
Likes • 1,731
March 2019
|
Bristol protests, by startimeash on Mar 27, 2021 15:21:23 GMT 1, Wondering if Robert del Naja might do something as well
Wondering if Robert del Naja might do something as well
|
|
scott134
New Member
Posts • 167
Likes • 150
October 2019
|
Bristol protests, by scott134 on Mar 27, 2021 17:00:58 GMT 1, What locations and subject matter? Seems like it would be relatively easy to go along the route of people protesting for the right to protest, and the power of the 'establishment'
What locations and subject matter? Seems like it would be relatively easy to go along the route of people protesting for the right to protest, and the power of the 'establishment'
|
|
oliver21
New Member
Posts • 14
Likes • 0
March 2021
|
Bristol protests, by oliver21 on Mar 27, 2021 17:20:36 GMT 1, What locations and subject matter? Seems like it would be relatively easy to go along the route of people protesting for the right to protest, and the power of the 'establishment' Well said, Agreed upon that. Everything depends on the location and subject.
What locations and subject matter? Seems like it would be relatively easy to go along the route of people protesting for the right to protest, and the power of the 'establishment' Well said, Agreed upon that. Everything depends on the location and subject.
|
|
hnkpnk
Junior Member
Posts • 1,282
Likes • 1,328
July 2011
|
Bristol protests, by hnkpnk on Mar 27, 2021 19:23:15 GMT 1,
|
|
|
Bill Hicks
New Member
Posts • 931
Likes • 1,133
May 2008
|
Bristol protests, by Bill Hicks on Mar 27, 2021 20:54:01 GMT 1, More than 700 of the UK’s leading legal academics have signed a stinging open letter urging Johnson to ditch “draconian” restrictions on the freedom to demonstrate, in one of the largest protests of its kind in decades.
The signatories, who represent a significant proportion of the UK’s legal scholars and include more than 120 professors of law from universities including Oxford, Cambridge, Durham and York, warned of “an alarming extension of state control over legal assembly” from measures in the prime minister’s controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
Scenes of women being forced to the ground and handcuffed while attending a vigil to murder victim Sarah Everard in south London on Saturday vividly highlighted the dangers of extending powers to control protests and public gatherings, they said.
The 300-page bill, which was rushed through its second reading in the Commons this week just days after being published, dramatically extends police powers to clamp down on protests and gives home secretary Patel the power to define the kind of “serious disruption” which could lead to demonstrators being arrested and prosecuted.
Under its terms, individuals could be jailed for up to 10 years for causing “serious annoyance or inconvenience”. Police could impose legally binding restrictions on marches or rallies on the grounds that the noise generated “may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation” or may “have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity of the protest”. And unprecedented new powers could impose controls on protests by a single person.
Letter, published in The Independent, warned that such measures represent “an existential attack on the right to protest”.
Signatories pointed to warnings from the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association that the threshold for imposing conditions on public assemblies in England and Wales is already “too low” and “does not reflect the strict test of necessity and proportionality” in international conventions.
And they expressed “alarm” that the proposed use of so-called Henry VIII powers would allow the home secretary to alter the definition of prosecutable behaviours without parliamentary approval or scrutiny.
More than 700 of the UK’s leading legal academics have signed a stinging open letter urging Johnson to ditch “draconian” restrictions on the freedom to demonstrate, in one of the largest protests of its kind in decades.
The signatories, who represent a significant proportion of the UK’s legal scholars and include more than 120 professors of law from universities including Oxford, Cambridge, Durham and York, warned of “an alarming extension of state control over legal assembly” from measures in the prime minister’s controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
Scenes of women being forced to the ground and handcuffed while attending a vigil to murder victim Sarah Everard in south London on Saturday vividly highlighted the dangers of extending powers to control protests and public gatherings, they said.
The 300-page bill, which was rushed through its second reading in the Commons this week just days after being published, dramatically extends police powers to clamp down on protests and gives home secretary Patel the power to define the kind of “serious disruption” which could lead to demonstrators being arrested and prosecuted.
Under its terms, individuals could be jailed for up to 10 years for causing “serious annoyance or inconvenience”. Police could impose legally binding restrictions on marches or rallies on the grounds that the noise generated “may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation” or may “have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity of the protest”. And unprecedented new powers could impose controls on protests by a single person.
Letter, published in The Independent, warned that such measures represent “an existential attack on the right to protest”.
Signatories pointed to warnings from the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association that the threshold for imposing conditions on public assemblies in England and Wales is already “too low” and “does not reflect the strict test of necessity and proportionality” in international conventions.
And they expressed “alarm” that the proposed use of so-called Henry VIII powers would allow the home secretary to alter the definition of prosecutable behaviours without parliamentary approval or scrutiny.
|
|
|
Bristol protests, by Coach on Mar 27, 2021 21:01:40 GMT 1, More than 700 of the UK’s leading legal academics have signed a stinging open letter urging Johnson to ditch “draconian” restrictions on the freedom to demonstrate, in one of the largest protests of its kind in decades. The signatories, who represent a significant proportion of the UK’s legal scholars and include more than 120 professors of law from universities including Oxford, Cambridge, Durham and York, warned of “an alarming extension of state control over legal assembly” from measures in the prime minister’s controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Scenes of women being forced to the ground and handcuffed while attending a vigil to murder victim Sarah Everard in south London on Saturday vividly highlighted the dangers of extending powers to control protests and public gatherings, they said. The 300-page bill, which was rushed through its second reading in the Commons this week just days after being published, dramatically extends police powers to clamp down on protests and gives home secretary Patel the power to define the kind of “serious disruption” which could lead to demonstrators being arrested and prosecuted. Under its terms, individuals could be jailed for up to 10 years for causing “serious annoyance or inconvenience”. Police could impose legally binding restrictions on marches or rallies on the grounds that the noise generated “may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation” or may “have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity of the protest”. And unprecedented new powers could impose controls on protests by a single person. Letter, published in The Independent, warned that such measures represent “an existential attack on the right to protest”. Signatories pointed to warnings from the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association that the threshold for imposing conditions on public assemblies in England and Wales is already “too low” and “does not reflect the strict test of necessity and proportionality” in international conventions. And they expressed “alarm” that the proposed use of so-called Henry VIII powers would allow the home secretary to alter the definition of prosecutable behaviours without parliamentary approval or scrutiny.
It is a most concerning Act. Limits on the right to peacefully protest should be condemned
More than 700 of the UK’s leading legal academics have signed a stinging open letter urging Johnson to ditch “draconian” restrictions on the freedom to demonstrate, in one of the largest protests of its kind in decades. The signatories, who represent a significant proportion of the UK’s legal scholars and include more than 120 professors of law from universities including Oxford, Cambridge, Durham and York, warned of “an alarming extension of state control over legal assembly” from measures in the prime minister’s controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Scenes of women being forced to the ground and handcuffed while attending a vigil to murder victim Sarah Everard in south London on Saturday vividly highlighted the dangers of extending powers to control protests and public gatherings, they said. The 300-page bill, which was rushed through its second reading in the Commons this week just days after being published, dramatically extends police powers to clamp down on protests and gives home secretary Patel the power to define the kind of “serious disruption” which could lead to demonstrators being arrested and prosecuted. Under its terms, individuals could be jailed for up to 10 years for causing “serious annoyance or inconvenience”. Police could impose legally binding restrictions on marches or rallies on the grounds that the noise generated “may result in serious disruption to the activities of an organisation” or may “have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity of the protest”. And unprecedented new powers could impose controls on protests by a single person. Letter, published in The Independent, warned that such measures represent “an existential attack on the right to protest”. Signatories pointed to warnings from the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association that the threshold for imposing conditions on public assemblies in England and Wales is already “too low” and “does not reflect the strict test of necessity and proportionality” in international conventions. And they expressed “alarm” that the proposed use of so-called Henry VIII powers would allow the home secretary to alter the definition of prosecutable behaviours without parliamentary approval or scrutiny. It is a most concerning Act. Limits on the right to peacefully protest should be condemned
|
|
sgolby
Junior Member
Posts • 1,890
Likes • 2,892
November 2012
|
Bristol protests, by sgolby on Mar 27, 2021 22:36:51 GMT 1, it’s all a power grab by big government, same thing is happening across the pond now under the new “president”.... i use the term loosely as the man is in obvious mental decline n on his way out.... no way he completes a 4yr term still able to answer a live unscripted question.... he can’t even do it now lol
Umm i think you have that wrong buddy. There is no crackdown whatsoever on lawful assembly by the biden administration. PRESIDENT Biden is not at all undertaking a power grab. FACT. If you care to elaborate on what “power grab,” you are referring to, I would be happy to hear you, but please refrain from uninformed statements about his mental ability. He had difficulty with live questions because he has a lifelong stutter. Even at his age and with his handicap, he ran circles around the former president.
it’s all a power grab by big government, same thing is happening across the pond now under the new “president”.... i use the term loosely as the man is in obvious mental decline n on his way out.... no way he completes a 4yr term still able to answer a live unscripted question.... he can’t even do it now lol Umm i think you have that wrong buddy. There is no crackdown whatsoever on lawful assembly by the biden administration. PRESIDENT Biden is not at all undertaking a power grab. FACT. If you care to elaborate on what “power grab,” you are referring to, I would be happy to hear you, but please refrain from uninformed statements about his mental ability. He had difficulty with live questions because he has a lifelong stutter. Even at his age and with his handicap, he ran circles around the former president.
|
|
sgolby
Junior Member
Posts • 1,890
Likes • 2,892
November 2012
|
Bristol protests, by sgolby on Mar 27, 2021 22:39:05 GMT 1, However we can debate that in a different thread.
However we can debate that in a different thread.
|
|
LJCal
Junior Member
Posts • 2,793
Likes • 4,195
December 2019
|
Bristol protests, by LJCal on Mar 27, 2021 22:43:16 GMT 1, I find it funny that people protesting lockdowns or BLM were roundly condemned but people protesting over the police’s role in a murder get a pass. You can’t pick and chose your causes when it comes to the law, this is what this pandemic has been about, scared people being taken advantage of by a crumbling political system desperate to grab hold of any power it can. The rights we enjoy were never given to us by the men with power, they were taken through blood and toil over centuries and we’ve willingly handed back these real freedoms for fake safety during the Islamic terrorism panic and the pandemic.
I find it funny that people protesting lockdowns or BLM were roundly condemned but people protesting over the police’s role in a murder get a pass. You can’t pick and chose your causes when it comes to the law, this is what this pandemic has been about, scared people being taken advantage of by a crumbling political system desperate to grab hold of any power it can. The rights we enjoy were never given to us by the men with power, they were taken through blood and toil over centuries and we’ve willingly handed back these real freedoms for fake safety during the Islamic terrorism panic and the pandemic.
|
|
|
Bristol protests, by That Print Guy on Mar 28, 2021 0:02:17 GMT 1, it’s all a power grab by big government, same thing is happening across the pond now under the new “president”.... i use the term loosely as the man is in obvious mental decline n on his way out.... no way he completes a 4yr term still able to answer a live unscripted question.... he can’t even do it now lol your posts read like talking point memos. I could probably just start writing your responses for you and save you some time.
it’s all a power grab by big government, same thing is happening across the pond now under the new “president”.... i use the term loosely as the man is in obvious mental decline n on his way out.... no way he completes a 4yr term still able to answer a live unscripted question.... he can’t even do it now lol your posts read like talking point memos. I could probably just start writing your responses for you and save you some time.
|
|
|
tab1
Full Member
Posts • 8,519
Likes • 3,678
September 2011
|
Bristol protests, by tab1 on Mar 28, 2021 1:39:01 GMT 1, I find it funny that people protesting lockdowns or BLM were roundly condemned but people protesting over the police’s role in a murder get a pass. You can’t pick and chose your causes when it comes to the law, this is what this pandemic has been about, scared people being taken advantage of by a crumbling political system desperate to grab hold of any power it can. The rights we enjoy were never given to us by the men with power, they were taken through blood and toil over centuries and we’ve willingly handed back these real freedoms for fake safety during the Islamic terrorism panic and the pandemic. People protesting without masks was the actual issue. BLM and police murder protests had masks, anti lockdown tended to not.
Many did not wear masks throughout all the Different protests, any other period in time everyone has the right to publicly protest but we are still in lockdowns and the current rules apply to everyone and these actions of protesting what ever The issueS effects us all in the long run with an increase with transmissions of the virus and a potential to extend the lockdowns Or a third lockdown in November
www.liveleak.com/view?t=9LZRw_1615747319
I find it funny that people protesting lockdowns or BLM were roundly condemned but people protesting over the police’s role in a murder get a pass. You can’t pick and chose your causes when it comes to the law, this is what this pandemic has been about, scared people being taken advantage of by a crumbling political system desperate to grab hold of any power it can. The rights we enjoy were never given to us by the men with power, they were taken through blood and toil over centuries and we’ve willingly handed back these real freedoms for fake safety during the Islamic terrorism panic and the pandemic. People protesting without masks was the actual issue. BLM and police murder protests had masks, anti lockdown tended to not. Many did not wear masks throughout all the Different protests, any other period in time everyone has the right to publicly protest but we are still in lockdowns and the current rules apply to everyone and these actions of protesting what ever The issueS effects us all in the long run with an increase with transmissions of the virus and a potential to extend the lockdowns Or a third lockdown in November www.liveleak.com/view?t=9LZRw_1615747319
|
|
|
LJCal
Junior Member
Posts • 2,793
Likes • 4,195
December 2019
|
Bristol protests, by LJCal on Mar 28, 2021 1:42:00 GMT 1, I find it funny that people protesting lockdowns or BLM were roundly condemned but people protesting over the police’s role in a murder get a pass. You can’t pick and chose your causes when it comes to the law, this is what this pandemic has been about, scared people being taken advantage of by a crumbling political system desperate to grab hold of any power it can. The rights we enjoy were never given to us by the men with power, they were taken through blood and toil over centuries and we’ve willingly handed back these real freedoms for fake safety during the Islamic terrorism panic and the pandemic. People protesting without masks was the actual issue. BLM and police murder protests had masks, anti lockdown tended to not. The laws passed have nothing to do with masks, various sections of extant coronavirus laws banned organised protest outright, and pending legislation about to come into force gives police the powers to break up protests and arrest protestors on highly onerous grounds. The new normal is basically having to live at the whims of a dysfunctional, incompetent and corrupt state whose policy decisions are made for them by a feral press owned by a couple of demon billionaires. Hope everyone feels safe.
I find it funny that people protesting lockdowns or BLM were roundly condemned but people protesting over the police’s role in a murder get a pass. You can’t pick and chose your causes when it comes to the law, this is what this pandemic has been about, scared people being taken advantage of by a crumbling political system desperate to grab hold of any power it can. The rights we enjoy were never given to us by the men with power, they were taken through blood and toil over centuries and we’ve willingly handed back these real freedoms for fake safety during the Islamic terrorism panic and the pandemic. People protesting without masks was the actual issue. BLM and police murder protests had masks, anti lockdown tended to not. The laws passed have nothing to do with masks, various sections of extant coronavirus laws banned organised protest outright, and pending legislation about to come into force gives police the powers to break up protests and arrest protestors on highly onerous grounds. The new normal is basically having to live at the whims of a dysfunctional, incompetent and corrupt state whose policy decisions are made for them by a feral press owned by a couple of demon billionaires. Hope everyone feels safe.
|
|
topboy
New Member
Posts • 121
Likes • 141
February 2020
|
Bristol protests, by topboy on Mar 28, 2021 2:40:00 GMT 1, I thought it was Kill The new Bill and not the old bill.
I thought it was Kill The new Bill and not the old bill.
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
Posts • 8,248
Likes • 9,236
May 2013
|
Bristol protests, by FЯ on Mar 28, 2021 13:18:03 GMT 1, Most protests in the uk start peaceful then the anarchist opportunist twats turn up and pretend there is police brutality at a peaceful demo.
the peaceful protesters are all well gone by then.
Most protests in the uk start peaceful then the anarchist opportunist twats turn up and pretend there is police brutality at a peaceful demo.
the peaceful protesters are all well gone by then.
|
|
tab1
Full Member
Posts • 8,519
Likes • 3,678
September 2011
|
Bristol protests, by tab1 on Mar 28, 2021 13:46:20 GMT 1, so what r they protesting about??? The UK government has brought in legislation to ban group protests in the street as a measure to combat the spread of the coronavirus...and people aren't happy. The Brits are a grumpy rebellious lot - nearly as bad as the yanks.
If that was the case, the uk already has temporary laws in place to combat mass gatherings to combat the virus spreading.think more to do with the new laws staying in place long term, otherwise would not be supported by leading academics and a few mps
so what r they protesting about??? The UK government has brought in legislation to ban group protests in the street as a measure to combat the spread of the coronavirus...and people aren't happy. The Brits are a grumpy rebellious lot - nearly as bad as the yanks. If that was the case, the uk already has temporary laws in place to combat mass gatherings to combat the virus spreading.think more to do with the new laws staying in place long term, otherwise would not be supported by leading academics and a few mps
|
|
Reader
Junior Member
Posts • 1,206
Likes • 2,668
Member is Online
June 2016
|
Bristol protests, by Reader on Mar 28, 2021 13:53:15 GMT 1, Most protests in the uk start peaceful then the anarchist opportunist twats turn up and pretend there is police brutality at a peaceful demo. the peaceful protesters are all well gone by then. Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line.
Most protests in the uk start peaceful then the anarchist opportunist twats turn up and pretend there is police brutality at a peaceful demo. the peaceful protesters are all well gone by then. Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line.
|
|
tab1
Full Member
Posts • 8,519
Likes • 3,678
September 2011
|
Bristol protests, by tab1 on Mar 28, 2021 14:01:35 GMT 1, Yes, this is not a temporary c19 related thing. as seen here the facts are misconstrued and most would accept these new laws as presume they are helping to combat the pandemic and do not understand the wider consequences, these laws would be easily passed without the protests to raise awareness.sticky situation as we are in a pandemic so will have differing opinions regarding the protests
Yes, this is not a temporary c19 related thing. as seen here the facts are misconstrued and most would accept these new laws as presume they are helping to combat the pandemic and do not understand the wider consequences, these laws would be easily passed without the protests to raise awareness.sticky situation as we are in a pandemic so will have differing opinions regarding the protests
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
Posts • 8,248
Likes • 9,236
May 2013
|
Bristol protests, by FЯ on Mar 28, 2021 14:03:19 GMT 1, Most protests in the uk start peaceful then the anarchist opportunist twats turn up and pretend there is police brutality at a peaceful demo. the peaceful protesters are all well gone by then. Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line. all up for protests. just not you - the unwashed - turning up and stinking it out. intimidation and violence gets you nowhere.
Most protests in the uk start peaceful then the anarchist opportunist twats turn up and pretend there is police brutality at a peaceful demo. the peaceful protesters are all well gone by then. Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line. all up for protests. just not you - the unwashed - turning up and stinking it out. intimidation and violence gets you nowhere.
|
|
Reader
Junior Member
Posts • 1,206
Likes • 2,668
Member is Online
June 2016
|
Bristol protests, by Reader on Mar 28, 2021 14:07:14 GMT 1, Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line. all up for protests. just not you - the unwashed - turning up and stinking it out.
Who hurt you? Anyway, back to your Daily Mail you radical "all up for protests" type you.;-)
Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line. all up for protests. just not you - the unwashed - turning up and stinking it out. Who hurt you? Anyway, back to your Daily Mail you radical "all up for protests" type you.;-)
|
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
Posts • 8,248
Likes • 9,236
May 2013
|
Bristol protests, by FЯ on Mar 28, 2021 14:13:19 GMT 1, all up for protests. just not you - the unwashed - turning up and stinking it out. Who hurt you? Anarchist wankers turning up to the peaceful Sarah Everard memorial was frustrating. thats one of many.
all up for protests. just not you - the unwashed - turning up and stinking it out. Who hurt you? Anarchist wankers turning up to the peaceful Sarah Everard memorial was frustrating. thats one of many.
|
|
Reader
Junior Member
Posts • 1,206
Likes • 2,668
Member is Online
June 2016
|
Bristol protests, by Reader on Mar 28, 2021 14:14:11 GMT 1, Da fuck is the racist, anti-muslim, Trump supporting fascist Twitter Feed you posted? oh dear. Is that where your heads at ? As for the lad speaking, you're not better than him mate, far from it.
Da fuck is the racist, anti-muslim, Trump supporting fascist Twitter Feed you posted? oh dear. Is that where your heads at ? As for the lad speaking, you're not better than him mate, far from it.
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
Posts • 8,248
Likes • 9,236
May 2013
|
Bristol protests, by FЯ on Mar 28, 2021 14:21:00 GMT 1, Da fuck is the racist, anti-muslim, Trump supporting fascist Twitter Feed you posted? oh dear. Is that where your heads at ? As for the lad speaking, you're not better than him mate, far from it. dunno, i don’t follow the ‘feed’ (boomer). it was a trending video about the riot.
As was this...
Da fuck is the racist, anti-muslim, Trump supporting fascist Twitter Feed you posted? oh dear. Is that where your heads at ? As for the lad speaking, you're not better than him mate, far from it. dunno, i don’t follow the ‘feed’ (boomer). it was a trending video about the riot. As was this...
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
Posts • 8,248
Likes • 9,236
May 2013
|
Bristol protests, by FЯ on Mar 28, 2021 14:23:48 GMT 1, Anarchist wankers turning up to the peaceful Sarah Everard memorial was frustrating. thats one of many.
Anarchist wankers turning up to the peaceful Sarah Everard memorial was frustrating. thats one of many.
|
|
Reader
Junior Member
Posts • 1,206
Likes • 2,668
Member is Online
June 2016
|
Bristol protests, by Reader on Mar 28, 2021 14:25:38 GMT 1, Haha, you're even more right wing than you used to be, you've learned nothing in 15 years of surrounding yourself with counter cultural imagery and values. Oh well, nevermind, you have a good day being afraid Pickle, I'm sure the Police will come protect you when you need em ;-)
Haha, you're even more right wing than you used to be, you've learned nothing in 15 years of surrounding yourself with counter cultural imagery and values. Oh well, nevermind, you have a good day being afraid Pickle, I'm sure the Police will come protect you when you need em ;-)
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
Posts • 8,248
Likes • 9,236
May 2013
|
Bristol protests, by FЯ on Mar 28, 2021 14:32:09 GMT 1, Haha, you're even more right wing than you used to be, you've learned nothing in 15 years of surrounding yourself with counter cultural imagery and values. Oh well, nevermind, you have a good day being afraid Pickle, I'm sure the Police will come protect you when you need em ;-) i just dont condone turning up to peaceful protests with the sole intention of setting fire to or punching the police. I’m glad we have police so we don’t live in that kind of society. Call me old fashioned. i get people are bored but it will get better. Protest the right way, not like a t**t.
i highly doubt, despite his intentions that bansky truly wishes anyone gets hurt when he makes his political statements.
Haha, you're even more right wing than you used to be, you've learned nothing in 15 years of surrounding yourself with counter cultural imagery and values. Oh well, nevermind, you have a good day being afraid Pickle, I'm sure the Police will come protect you when you need em ;-) i just dont condone turning up to peaceful protests with the sole intention of setting fire to or punching the police. I’m glad we have police so we don’t live in that kind of society. Call me old fashioned. i get people are bored but it will get better. Protest the right way, not like a t**t. i highly doubt, despite his intentions that bansky truly wishes anyone gets hurt when he makes his political statements.
|
|
Reader
Junior Member
Posts • 1,206
Likes • 2,668
Member is Online
June 2016
|
Bristol protests, by Reader on Mar 28, 2021 14:45:34 GMT 1, Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line. So you think being violent against the police is the way forward? Really? You think we should praise these violent thugs? Full Body Armour, Riot Shields, Steel Batons, Attack Dogs, Pepper Spray and charges with horses. Against girls with dreads and students with djembe and clowns skateboards. I think you've got your idea of a "violent thug" a tad twisted.
Nonesense, usually spouted by middle class authoritarian boot lickers too far indoctrinated by a right-wing mediascape to think for themselves. You'd be working a 16 hour day with no weekends and your missues wouldn't have the vote if it wasn't for people willing to put their life and liberty on the line. So you think being violent against the police is the way forward? Really? You think we should praise these violent thugs? Full Body Armour, Riot Shields, Steel Batons, Attack Dogs, Pepper Spray and charges with horses. Against girls with dreads and students with djembe and clowns skateboards. I think you've got your idea of a "violent thug" a tad twisted.
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
Posts • 8,248
Likes • 9,236
May 2013
|
Bristol protests, by FЯ on Mar 28, 2021 14:51:02 GMT 1, So you think being violent against the police is the way forward? Really? You think we should praise these violent thugs? Full Body Armour, Riot Shields, Steel Batons, Attack Dogs, Pepper Spray and charges with horses. Against girls with dreads and students with djembe and clowns skateboards. I think you've got your idea of a "violent thug" a tad twisted. some of the police there are women who are getting pushed about and fireworks chucked at them. how does that make you feel big man. Damn straight they need armour.
So you think being violent against the police is the way forward? Really? You think we should praise these violent thugs? Full Body Armour, Riot Shields, Steel Batons, Attack Dogs, Pepper Spray and charges with horses. Against girls with dreads and students with djembe and clowns skateboards. I think you've got your idea of a "violent thug" a tad twisted. some of the police there are women who are getting pushed about and fireworks chucked at them. how does that make you feel big man. Damn straight they need armour.
|
|