mose
New Member
🗨️ 410
👍🏻 424
May 2017
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by mose on Apr 7, 2021 15:31:26 GMT 1, Yes I have. Many times in fact and it still escapes me. Fair enough.
I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it.
If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'.
Yes I have. Many times in fact and it still escapes me. Fair enough. I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'. |
|
|
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Coach on Apr 7, 2021 20:18:42 GMT 1, I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'.
I’d like to visit the Rothko Chapel one day
Caravaggio - now you’re talking!
I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'. I’d like to visit the Rothko Chapel one day Caravaggio - now you’re talking! |
|
Momo
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,034
👍🏻 601
March 2014
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Momo on Apr 8, 2021 1:27:29 GMT 1, I'd actually love someone to explain David Shrigley's work. Not criticising his work, just saying I'm befuddled by it, I just don't understand it yet loads of people love it.
I'd actually love someone to explain David Shrigley's work. Not criticising his work, just saying I'm befuddled by it, I just don't understand it yet loads of people love it.
|
|
Gurn
New Member
🗨️ 894
👍🏻 904
August 2007
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Gurn on Apr 8, 2021 7:00:55 GMT 1, I'd actually love someone to explain David Shrigley's work. Not criticising his work, just saying I'm befuddled by it, I just don't understand it yet loads of people love it.
Shrigley approaches art in a scattergun way. A series of apparently random, but personal thoughts on daily life. This approach results in bemusement for the majority looking upon a single image. However, because of it's specific/personal nature it will resonate highly with a minority. By producing such a large volume of work this specific hit rate increases, so each viewer feels involved at some point. Add to this a touch of everyday relevance, humour, surrealism, silliness and pretend naivety and voila!, global appeal.
I'd actually love someone to explain David Shrigley's work. Not criticising his work, just saying I'm befuddled by it, I just don't understand it yet loads of people love it. Shrigley approaches art in a scattergun way. A series of apparently random, but personal thoughts on daily life. This approach results in bemusement for the majority looking upon a single image. However, because of it's specific/personal nature it will resonate highly with a minority. By producing such a large volume of work this specific hit rate increases, so each viewer feels involved at some point. Add to this a touch of everyday relevance, humour, surrealism, silliness and pretend naivety and voila!, global appeal. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Deleted on Apr 8, 2021 7:44:33 GMT 1, In no way a comment that I think she's bad, just that I feel like I'm missing something, but I've never really got Bridget Riley. I don't find anything interesting in it, but I would like to as so many people are passionate about her.
That said, I've never been to a show of her work. There are plenty of artists who I didn't 'get' when I saw single works in isolation, but it made more sense as a collection when I could see their common themes, e.g. Damien Hirst, David Hockney, Oli Epp.
Plenty of artists I find uninteresting, like Martin Whatson, Pejac and Mr Brainwash, but I think of them as just producing decorative stuff to look nice on walls right now. Don't expect them to be remembered in 10-20 years. But I don't expect the Mark Drew or Nick Smith pieces on my walls to be of any artistic significance in 10-20 years either.
The one I just can't stand is Arsham, because he thinks he's incredibly good and important, but it's shallow nonsense.
In no way a comment that I think she's bad, just that I feel like I'm missing something, but I've never really got Bridget Riley. I don't find anything interesting in it, but I would like to as so many people are passionate about her.
That said, I've never been to a show of her work. There are plenty of artists who I didn't 'get' when I saw single works in isolation, but it made more sense as a collection when I could see their common themes, e.g. Damien Hirst, David Hockney, Oli Epp.
Plenty of artists I find uninteresting, like Martin Whatson, Pejac and Mr Brainwash, but I think of them as just producing decorative stuff to look nice on walls right now. Don't expect them to be remembered in 10-20 years. But I don't expect the Mark Drew or Nick Smith pieces on my walls to be of any artistic significance in 10-20 years either.
The one I just can't stand is Arsham, because he thinks he's incredibly good and important, but it's shallow nonsense.
|
|
lv90210
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,030
👍🏻 1,926
January 2018
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by lv90210 on Apr 8, 2021 7:46:14 GMT 1, In no way a comment that I think she's bad, just that I feel like I'm missing something, but I've never really got Bridget Riley. I don't find anything interesting in it, but I would like to as so many people are passionate about her. That said, I've never been to a show of her work. There are plenty of artists who I didn't 'get' when I saw single works in isolation, but it made more sense as a collection when I could see their common themes, e.g. Damien Hirst, David Hockney, Oli Epp. Plenty of artists I find uninteresting, like Martin Whatson, Pejac and Mr Brainwash, but I think of them as just producing decorative stuff to look nice on walls right now. Don't expect them to be remembered in 10-20 years. But I don't expect the Mark Drew or Nick Smith pieces on my walls to be of any artistic significance in 10-20 years either. The one I just can't stand is Arsham, because he thinks he's incredibly good and important, but it's shallow nonsense.
In no way a comment that I think she's bad, just that I feel like I'm missing something, but I've never really got Bridget Riley. I don't find anything interesting in it, but I would like to as so many people are passionate about her. That said, I've never been to a show of her work. There are plenty of artists who I didn't 'get' when I saw single works in isolation, but it made more sense as a collection when I could see their common themes, e.g. Damien Hirst, David Hockney, Oli Epp. Plenty of artists I find uninteresting, like Martin Whatson, Pejac and Mr Brainwash, but I think of them as just producing decorative stuff to look nice on walls right now. Don't expect them to be remembered in 10-20 years. But I don't expect the Mark Drew or Nick Smith pieces on my walls to be of any artistic significance in 10-20 years either. The one I just can't stand is Arsham, because he thinks he's incredibly good and important, but it's shallow nonsense. Not sure you can quote brainwashed and artist in the same sentence tbh. |
|
|
|
Woodey1001
New Member
🗨️ 662
👍🏻 265
September 2014
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Woodey1001 on Apr 8, 2021 7:57:08 GMT 1, I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'.
The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh.
I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'. The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh. |
|
Bram
Artist
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,820
👍🏻 296
November 2007
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Bram on Apr 8, 2021 8:56:23 GMT 1, I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'. The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh.
I didn’t get Rothko at all until I sat in that room for a while and the next minute I was in bits. My first mistake was trying to “read” him/them. Just sit in front of some and let them wash over you, Same to a certain extent with Richter, especially The Birkenau and alike.
2nd mistake, it’s not an eyebrow thing, you don’t need a 1st in art history to get it, just “be” in the room. Namaste.
I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'. The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh. I didn’t get Rothko at all until I sat in that room for a while and the next minute I was in bits. My first mistake was trying to “read” him/them. Just sit in front of some and let them wash over you, Same to a certain extent with Richter, especially The Birkenau and alike. 2nd mistake, it’s not an eyebrow thing, you don’t need a 1st in art history to get it, just “be” in the room. Namaste. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Deleted on Apr 8, 2021 10:39:28 GMT 1, In no way a comment that I think she's bad, just that I feel like I'm missing something, but I've never really got Bridget Riley. I don't find anything interesting in it, but I would like to as so many people are passionate about her. That said, I've never been to a show of her work. There are plenty of artists who I didn't 'get' when I saw single works in isolation, but it made more sense as a collection when I could see their common themes, e.g. Damien Hirst, David Hockney, Oli Epp. Plenty of artists I find uninteresting, like Martin Whatson, Pejac and Mr Brainwash, but I think of them as just producing decorative stuff to look nice on walls right now. Don't expect them to be remembered in 10-20 years. But I don't expect the Mark Drew or Nick Smith pieces on my walls to be of any artistic significance in 10-20 years either. The one I just can't stand is Arsham, because he thinks he's incredibly good and important, but it's shallow nonsense. Not sure you can quote brainwashed and artist in the same sentence tbh.
In no way a comment that I think she's bad, just that I feel like I'm missing something, but I've never really got Bridget Riley. I don't find anything interesting in it, but I would like to as so many people are passionate about her. That said, I've never been to a show of her work. There are plenty of artists who I didn't 'get' when I saw single works in isolation, but it made more sense as a collection when I could see their common themes, e.g. Damien Hirst, David Hockney, Oli Epp. Plenty of artists I find uninteresting, like Martin Whatson, Pejac and Mr Brainwash, but I think of them as just producing decorative stuff to look nice on walls right now. Don't expect them to be remembered in 10-20 years. But I don't expect the Mark Drew or Nick Smith pieces on my walls to be of any artistic significance in 10-20 years either. The one I just can't stand is Arsham, because he thinks he's incredibly good and important, but it's shallow nonsense. Not sure you can quote brainwashed and artist in the same sentence tbh. No arguments from me on that. |
|
|
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Coach on Apr 8, 2021 11:31:26 GMT 1, The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh. I didn’t get Rothko at all until I sat in that room for a while and the next minute I was in bits. My first mistake was trying to “read” him/them. Just sit in front of some and let them wash over you, Same to a certain extent with Richter, especially The Birkenau and alike. 2nd mistake, it’s not an eyebrow thing, you don’t need a 1st in art history to get it, just “be” in the room. Namaste.
Yes. This.
The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh. I didn’t get Rothko at all until I sat in that room for a while and the next minute I was in bits. My first mistake was trying to “read” him/them. Just sit in front of some and let them wash over you, Same to a certain extent with Richter, especially The Birkenau and alike. 2nd mistake, it’s not an eyebrow thing, you don’t need a 1st in art history to get it, just “be” in the room. Namaste. Yes. This. |
|
mose
New Member
🗨️ 410
👍🏻 424
May 2017
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by mose on Apr 8, 2021 14:46:19 GMT 1, I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'. The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh.
I've been to the DC one as well, and I agree. It's 'good', not A+. Seeing only that, I could understand why someone wouldn't feel the way I do about Rothko.
At the Phillips Collection, I prefer the Wolfgang Laib wax room.
I'll say, there is a decent stratification of Rothko works. I've probably seen a good 75 or so over the years, and out of that maybe 3 A+ works. The ones where everything clicks. Colors vibrate in front of your eyes, the fields float in and out of focus, and the whole work seems to have a pulse to it. If anyone wants a proper Rothko challenge, check out No. 3/No. 13 at MoMA. If that one doesn't do it for you after a good few minutes, yeah, Rothko is not for you. For me, it's my #2 all-time work behind Caravaggio's 'The Denial of Saint Peter'. The Rothko room in the Tate that does it for me. Although went to the one in Washington DC.. meh. I've been to the DC one as well, and I agree. It's 'good', not A+. Seeing only that, I could understand why someone wouldn't feel the way I do about Rothko. At the Phillips Collection, I prefer the Wolfgang Laib wax room. |
|
|
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by laziguezon on Apr 9, 2021 20:01:02 GMT 1, 1. Kaws
2. Invader
3. Banksy
4. D*Face
1. Kaws
2. Invader
3. Banksy
4. D*Face
|
|
bonesy
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,387
👍🏻 264
July 2006
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by bonesy on Apr 9, 2021 23:31:49 GMT 1, Invader (in a home setting)
Invader (in a home setting)
|
|
acaipride
New Member
🗨️ 906
👍🏻 447
April 2020
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by acaipride on Apr 10, 2021 23:47:34 GMT 1, Banksy - I genuinely hate his art work. His messages have all the subtlety of having someone stamp on your face. When I say the concepts in my head ‘so, there’s like parliament but then all the politicians are like replaced with, like, monkeys lmao’ - sounds like something an idiot first year student would come up with Stik - still pretty sure he’s a wind up that all the forum are in on apart from me Any artist with graffiti on something/another image/unusual setting Obey Sheeshh, what drove you to join a forum called URBAN ART ASSOCIATION ? If you were on a crypto page your comment would easily translate to: I love crypto but hate Bitcoin XRP Anything that has coin at the end of it ETHEREUM
I hope you r e a d into this particular post.
Banksy - I genuinely hate his art work. His messages have all the subtlety of having someone stamp on your face. When I say the concepts in my head ‘so, there’s like parliament but then all the politicians are like replaced with, like, monkeys lmao’ - sounds like something an idiot first year student would come up with Stik - still pretty sure he’s a wind up that all the forum are in on apart from me Any artist with graffiti on something/another image/unusual setting Obey Sheeshh, what drove you to join a forum called URBAN ART ASSOCIATION ? If you were on a crypto page your comment would easily translate to: I love crypto but hate Bitcoin XRP Anything that has coin at the end of it ETHEREUM I hope you r e a d into this particular post. |
|
|
|
acaipride
New Member
🗨️ 906
👍🏻 447
April 2020
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by acaipride on Apr 13, 2021 1:12:48 GMT 1, Sheeshh, what drove you to join a forum called URBAN ART ASSOCIATION ? If you were on a crypto page your comment would easily translate to: I love crypto but hate Bitcoin XRP Anything that has coin at the end of it ETHEREUM I hope you r e a d into this particular post.
Again, I hope ya read SUBSTANTIALLY into the comparison comment I made. And Yes I still do not own any of these, I can't.
(I say substantially because someone said there was no substance to anything I say🤷🏿♂️)
Sheeshh, what drove you to join a forum called URBAN ART ASSOCIATION ? If you were on a crypto page your comment would easily translate to: I love crypto but hate Bitcoin XRP Anything that has coin at the end of it ETHEREUM I hope you r e a d into this particular post. Again, I hope ya read SUBSTANTIALLY into the comparison comment I made. And Yes I still do not own any of these, I can't. (I say substantially because someone said there was no substance to anything I say🤷🏿♂️) |
|
fujiwara
New Member
🗨️ 13
👍🏻 1
April 2021
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by fujiwara on Apr 13, 2021 15:18:07 GMT 1, A lot of people are sleeping on Brainwash, he's operating at a meta level few understand tbh
A lot of people are sleeping on Brainwash, he's operating at a meta level few understand tbh
|
|
acaipride
New Member
🗨️ 906
👍🏻 447
April 2020
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by acaipride on May 4, 2021 4:27:10 GMT 1, I hope you r e a d into this particular post. Again, I hope ya read SUBSTANTIALLY into the comparison comment I made. And Yes I still do not own any of these, I can't. (I say substantially because someone said there was no substance to anything I say🤷🏿♂️)
So..ETH, people. I did receive some DMs with a nice shout-out , hope more listened in.
I hope you r e a d into this particular post. Again, I hope ya read SUBSTANTIALLY into the comparison comment I made. And Yes I still do not own any of these, I can't. (I say substantially because someone said there was no substance to anything I say🤷🏿♂️) So..ETH, people. I did receive some DMs with a nice shout-out , hope more listened in. |
|
ecudat
New Member
🗨️ 194
👍🏻 100
January 2020
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by ecudat on May 6, 2021 16:33:38 GMT 1, Shrigley!!!
Shrigley!!!
|
|
ecudat
New Member
🗨️ 194
👍🏻 100
January 2020
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by ecudat on May 6, 2021 16:36:43 GMT 1, I'd actually love someone to explain David Shrigley's work. Not criticising his work, just saying I'm befuddled by it, I just don't understand it yet loads of people love it. Shrigley approaches art in a scattergun way. A series of apparently random, but personal thoughts on daily life. This approach results in bemusement for the majority looking upon a single image. However, because of it's specific/personal nature it will resonate highly with a minority. By producing such a large volume of work this specific hit rate increases, so each viewer feels involved at some point. Add to this a touch of everyday relevance, humour, surrealism, silliness and pretend naivety and voila!, global appeal.
It's just mad. The images almost always don't relate to the actual text and vice versa. So it's just random pairings of things and words most of the time.
I'd actually love someone to explain David Shrigley's work. Not criticising his work, just saying I'm befuddled by it, I just don't understand it yet loads of people love it. Shrigley approaches art in a scattergun way. A series of apparently random, but personal thoughts on daily life. This approach results in bemusement for the majority looking upon a single image. However, because of it's specific/personal nature it will resonate highly with a minority. By producing such a large volume of work this specific hit rate increases, so each viewer feels involved at some point. Add to this a touch of everyday relevance, humour, surrealism, silliness and pretend naivety and voila!, global appeal. It's just mad. The images almost always don't relate to the actual text and vice versa. So it's just random pairings of things and words most of the time. |
|
Gurn
New Member
🗨️ 894
👍🏻 904
August 2007
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Gurn on May 6, 2021 16:41:46 GMT 1, Shrigley approaches art in a scattergun way. A series of apparently random, but personal thoughts on daily life. This approach results in bemusement for the majority looking upon a single image. However, because of it's specific/personal nature it will resonate highly with a minority. By producing such a large volume of work this specific hit rate increases, so each viewer feels involved at some point. Add to this a touch of everyday relevance, humour, surrealism, silliness and pretend naivety and voila!, global appeal. It's just mad. The images almost always don't relate to the actual text and vice versa. So it's just random pairings of things and words most of the time.
Shrigley approaches art in a scattergun way. A series of apparently random, but personal thoughts on daily life. This approach results in bemusement for the majority looking upon a single image. However, because of it's specific/personal nature it will resonate highly with a minority. By producing such a large volume of work this specific hit rate increases, so each viewer feels involved at some point. Add to this a touch of everyday relevance, humour, surrealism, silliness and pretend naivety and voila!, global appeal. It's just mad. The images almost always don't relate to the actual text and vice versa. So it's just random pairings of things and words most of the time. It's sometimes known as surrealism....The meanings are there, you just have to look a bit deeper. I think this is one of the biggest misunderstandings with Shrigley, that people often see it at face value. There is much more to Shrigley than first meets the eye. |
|
|
|
|
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Art Groupie NYC on May 7, 2021 13:10:22 GMT 1, Alec Monopoly
Alec Monopoly
|
|
|
|
|
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Schrödinger's Chat on May 13, 2021 20:15:18 GMT 1, It's just mad. The images almost always don't relate to the actual text and vice versa. So it's just random pairings of things and words most of the time. It's sometimes known as surrealism....The meanings are there, you just have to look a bit deeper. I think this is one of the biggest misunderstandings with Shrigley, that people often see it at face value. There is much more to Shrigley than first meets the eye.
It seems like you are not alone in understanding the appeal of Mr Shriggles, his launch of the new Piccadilly Circus poster in London today getting plenty of poor reviews
metro.co.uk/2021/05/12/new-piccadilly-circus-design-by-david-hockney-mocked-online-14568460/amp/
It's just mad. The images almost always don't relate to the actual text and vice versa. So it's just random pairings of things and words most of the time. It's sometimes known as surrealism....The meanings are there, you just have to look a bit deeper. I think this is one of the biggest misunderstandings with Shrigley, that people often see it at face value. There is much more to Shrigley than first meets the eye. It seems like you are not alone in understanding the appeal of Mr Shriggles, his launch of the new Piccadilly Circus poster in London today getting plenty of poor reviews metro.co.uk/2021/05/12/new-piccadilly-circus-design-by-david-hockney-mocked-online-14568460/amp/ |
|
|
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by dreadware on May 13, 2021 20:21:12 GMT 1, It's sometimes known as surrealism....The meanings are there, you just have to look a bit deeper. I think this is one of the biggest misunderstandings with Shrigley, that people often see it at face value. There is much more to Shrigley than first meets the eye. It seems like you are not alone in understanding the appeal of Mr Shriggles, his launch of the new Piccadilly Circus poster in London today getting plenty of poor reviews metro.co.uk/2021/05/12/new-piccadilly-circus-design-by-david-hockney-mocked-online-14568460/amp/
David Hockney
It's sometimes known as surrealism....The meanings are there, you just have to look a bit deeper. I think this is one of the biggest misunderstandings with Shrigley, that people often see it at face value. There is much more to Shrigley than first meets the eye. It seems like you are not alone in understanding the appeal of Mr Shriggles, his launch of the new Piccadilly Circus poster in London today getting plenty of poor reviews metro.co.uk/2021/05/12/new-piccadilly-circus-design-by-david-hockney-mocked-online-14568460/amp/David Hockney |
|
theclash
New Member
🗨️ 581
👍🏻 644
May 2020
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by theclash on May 13, 2021 20:21:57 GMT 1, It's sometimes known as surrealism....The meanings are there, you just have to look a bit deeper. I think this is one of the biggest misunderstandings with Shrigley, that people often see it at face value. There is much more to Shrigley than first meets the eye. It seems like you are not alone in understanding the appeal of Mr Shriggles, his launch of the new Piccadilly Circus poster in London today getting plenty of poor reviews metro.co.uk/2021/05/12/new-piccadilly-circus-design-by-david-hockney-mocked-online-14568460/amp/
I think you are referring to the wrong David? This was Hockney not Shrigley?
It's sometimes known as surrealism....The meanings are there, you just have to look a bit deeper. I think this is one of the biggest misunderstandings with Shrigley, that people often see it at face value. There is much more to Shrigley than first meets the eye. It seems like you are not alone in understanding the appeal of Mr Shriggles, his launch of the new Piccadilly Circus poster in London today getting plenty of poor reviews metro.co.uk/2021/05/12/new-piccadilly-circus-design-by-david-hockney-mocked-online-14568460/amp/I think you are referring to the wrong David? This was Hockney not Shrigley? |
|
|
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by Schrödinger's Chat on May 13, 2021 20:40:56 GMT 1, Sorry, my mistake I should have read it properly.
I think I saw the image and presupposed it was Shrigley as it had that look, like and he also has history with London Underground (London is open campaign).
Still, not very popular by the look of things
Sorry, my mistake I should have read it properly.
I think I saw the image and presupposed it was Shrigley as it had that look, like and he also has history with London Underground (London is open campaign).
Still, not very popular by the look of things
|
|
theclash
New Member
🗨️ 581
👍🏻 644
May 2020
|
the artist whose popularity you do not understand, by theclash on May 13, 2021 20:59:19 GMT 1, Sorry, my mistake I should have read it properly. I think I saw the image and presupposed it was Shrigley as it had that look, like and he also has history with London Underground (London is open campaign). Still, not very popular by the look of things
All good, I once referred to CJ Hendry as a bloke 😅
Sorry, my mistake I should have read it properly. I think I saw the image and presupposed it was Shrigley as it had that look, like and he also has history with London Underground (London is open campaign). Still, not very popular by the look of things All good, I once referred to CJ Hendry as a bloke 😅 |
|
