|
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Postal Pirate on Dec 27, 2021 12:45:58 GMT 1, £600 xxl
Free postage within the uk
comes with original receipt stamped pest control
Can post worldwide if postage covered
Might be interested in some trades
£600 xxl
Free postage within the uk
comes with original receipt stamped pest control
Can post worldwide if postage covered
Might be interested in some trades
|
|
|
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by urbanbro69 on Dec 27, 2021 13:40:39 GMT 1, Banksy Colston T shirts
One Small
One Medium
Message if interested
Open to offers
Banksy Colston T shirts
One Small
One Medium
Message if interested
Open to offers
|
|
|
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Postal Pirate on Dec 27, 2021 20:34:02 GMT 1, Banksy Colston T shirts One Small One Medium Message if interested Open to offers
Could you not have made your own thread 😂 bit rude
Banksy Colston T shirts One Small One Medium Message if interested Open to offers Could you not have made your own thread 😂 bit rude |
|
mojo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,188
👍🏻 3,713
May 2014
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by mojo on Jan 5, 2022 17:38:57 GMT 1, Well done Bristol 
BLM protesters cleared over toppling of Edward Colston statue
Three men and a woman have been found not guilty of criminal damage after toppling the statue of the slave trader Edward Colston during a Black Lives Matter protest in Bristol, an act of public dissent that reverberated around the world.
Rhian Graham, 30, Milo Ponsford, 26, and Sage Willoughby, 22, were accused, with “others unknown”, of helping to tie ropes around the statue’s neck and joining with others to pull it to the ground.
Jake Skuse, 33, was accused of helping to roll it to Bristol harbour where it was thrown into the River Avon.
In a 10-day trial at Bristol crown court, the four defendants did not contest their actions on 7 June 2020 but sought to argue they were justified, because the statue was so offensive.
Giving evidence in their own defence, each described being motivated out of sincere antiracist conviction, frustration that previous attempts to persuade the council to remove the statue had failed, and a belief that the statue was so offensive it constituted an indecent display or a hate crime.
The prosecution, however, argued that the fact Colston was a slave trader was “wholly irrelevant”. William Hughes QC, for the crown, said the case was about “cold hard facts” and the “rule of law”.
The prosecution showed jurors a CCTV video compilation capturing each of the four defendants playing roles in toppling Colston. Bristol council’s head of culture, Jon Finch, gave evidence of the damage caused to the statue, which lost a cane and part of a coattail. He confirmed £350 damage to the harbour railings and £2,400 damage to the pavement.
The Colston statue was approved by the council in 1895 and it had not given permission to anyone to alter, damage or remove the statue on 7 June, the trial heard.
But Liam Walker QC, representing Willoughby, said: “Each of these defendants were on the right side of history, and I submit, they were also on the right side of the law.
“Colston’s deeds may be historical but the continued veneration of him in this city was not. The continued veneration of him in a vibrant multicultural city was an act of abuse.”
Willoughby, who climbed the statue, told the court he targeted Colston “because he was a racist and a slave trader who murdered thousands and enslaved even more””
“I thought that a statue that celebrates a figure such as Colston was disgraceful, and offensive to the people of Bristol,” Ponsford told jurors. Graham, who also brought rope, said she acted out of “allyship and solidarity” with people of colour.
Skuse admitted helping roll Colston to Pero’s bridge, named for an enslaved man who lived in Bristol, where it was thrown into the water, “sentencing [Colston] to death”. “I knew I was in the right, I knew everyone wanted it down,” he said. “I knew Bristol wanted it, everyone wanted the same thing.”
Judge Peter Blair QC, the recorder of Bristol, allowed expert evidence from David Olusoga despite past comments by the historian and broadcaster that he “desperately” wanted to join protesters that day, which were raised as a sign of potential bias by the prosecution.
Olusoga described to the court the horrors of the slave trade, from “rape rooms” in slaver fortresses on the African coast to grotesque punishments meted out to rebellious slaves. Colston was “chief executive officer” of a company that branded children as young as nine, and which was eventually responsible for enslaving more Africans than any other in British history, Olusoga said.
The court heard from black Bristolians including a former lord mayor of the city, Cleo Lake, who had removed a portrait of Colston from her office. “He was the person responsible for brutalising my ancestors, taking away their humanity; and for me and my community experiencing the harm they still experience today,” Lake said.
The four defendants laughed with relief as the verdicts were returned and hugged the many supporters that were waiting outside of court when they were released from the dock.
Well done Bristol BLM protesters cleared over toppling of Edward Colston statue Three men and a woman have been found not guilty of criminal damage after toppling the statue of the slave trader Edward Colston during a Black Lives Matter protest in Bristol, an act of public dissent that reverberated around the world. Rhian Graham, 30, Milo Ponsford, 26, and Sage Willoughby, 22, were accused, with “others unknown”, of helping to tie ropes around the statue’s neck and joining with others to pull it to the ground. Jake Skuse, 33, was accused of helping to roll it to Bristol harbour where it was thrown into the River Avon. In a 10-day trial at Bristol crown court, the four defendants did not contest their actions on 7 June 2020 but sought to argue they were justified, because the statue was so offensive. Giving evidence in their own defence, each described being motivated out of sincere antiracist conviction, frustration that previous attempts to persuade the council to remove the statue had failed, and a belief that the statue was so offensive it constituted an indecent display or a hate crime. The prosecution, however, argued that the fact Colston was a slave trader was “wholly irrelevant”. William Hughes QC, for the crown, said the case was about “cold hard facts” and the “rule of law”. The prosecution showed jurors a CCTV video compilation capturing each of the four defendants playing roles in toppling Colston. Bristol council’s head of culture, Jon Finch, gave evidence of the damage caused to the statue, which lost a cane and part of a coattail. He confirmed £350 damage to the harbour railings and £2,400 damage to the pavement. The Colston statue was approved by the council in 1895 and it had not given permission to anyone to alter, damage or remove the statue on 7 June, the trial heard. But Liam Walker QC, representing Willoughby, said: “Each of these defendants were on the right side of history, and I submit, they were also on the right side of the law. “Colston’s deeds may be historical but the continued veneration of him in this city was not. The continued veneration of him in a vibrant multicultural city was an act of abuse.” Willoughby, who climbed the statue, told the court he targeted Colston “because he was a racist and a slave trader who murdered thousands and enslaved even more”” “I thought that a statue that celebrates a figure such as Colston was disgraceful, and offensive to the people of Bristol,” Ponsford told jurors. Graham, who also brought rope, said she acted out of “allyship and solidarity” with people of colour. Skuse admitted helping roll Colston to Pero’s bridge, named for an enslaved man who lived in Bristol, where it was thrown into the water, “sentencing [Colston] to death”. “I knew I was in the right, I knew everyone wanted it down,” he said. “I knew Bristol wanted it, everyone wanted the same thing.” Judge Peter Blair QC, the recorder of Bristol, allowed expert evidence from David Olusoga despite past comments by the historian and broadcaster that he “desperately” wanted to join protesters that day, which were raised as a sign of potential bias by the prosecution. Olusoga described to the court the horrors of the slave trade, from “rape rooms” in slaver fortresses on the African coast to grotesque punishments meted out to rebellious slaves. Colston was “chief executive officer” of a company that branded children as young as nine, and which was eventually responsible for enslaving more Africans than any other in British history, Olusoga said. The court heard from black Bristolians including a former lord mayor of the city, Cleo Lake, who had removed a portrait of Colston from her office. “He was the person responsible for brutalising my ancestors, taking away their humanity; and for me and my community experiencing the harm they still experience today,” Lake said. The four defendants laughed with relief as the verdicts were returned and hugged the many supporters that were waiting outside of court when they were released from the dock. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Deleted on Jan 5, 2022 19:25:31 GMT 1, Excellent result 
Excellent result |
|
Fairxat
New Member
🗨️ 464
👍🏻 127
May 2013
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Fairxat on Jan 6, 2022 0:16:29 GMT 1, Well done Bristol  BLM protesters cleared over toppling of Edward Colston statue Three men and a woman have been found not guilty of criminal damage after toppling the statue of the slave trader Edward Colston during a Black Lives Matter protest in Bristol, an act of public dissent that reverberated around the world. Rhian Graham, 30, Milo Ponsford, 26, and Sage Willoughby, 22, were accused, with “others unknown”, of helping to tie ropes around the statue’s neck and joining with others to pull it to the ground. Jake Skuse, 33, was accused of helping to roll it to Bristol harbour where it was thrown into the River Avon. In a 10-day trial at Bristol crown court, the four defendants did not contest their actions on 7 June 2020 but sought to argue they were justified, because the statue was so offensive. Giving evidence in their own defence, each described being motivated out of sincere antiracist conviction, frustration that previous attempts to persuade the council to remove the statue had failed, and a belief that the statue was so offensive it constituted an indecent display or a hate crime. The prosecution, however, argued that the fact Colston was a slave trader was “wholly irrelevant”. William Hughes QC, for the crown, said the case was about “cold hard facts” and the “rule of law”. The prosecution showed jurors a CCTV video compilation capturing each of the four defendants playing roles in toppling Colston. Bristol council’s head of culture, Jon Finch, gave evidence of the damage caused to the statue, which lost a cane and part of a coattail. He confirmed £350 damage to the harbour railings and £2,400 damage to the pavement. The Colston statue was approved by the council in 1895 and it had not given permission to anyone to alter, damage or remove the statue on 7 June, the trial heard. But Liam Walker QC, representing Willoughby, said: “Each of these defendants were on the right side of history, and I submit, they were also on the right side of the law. “Colston’s deeds may be historical but the continued veneration of him in this city was not. The continued veneration of him in a vibrant multicultural city was an act of abuse.” Willoughby, who climbed the statue, told the court he targeted Colston “because he was a racist and a slave trader who murdered thousands and enslaved even more”” “I thought that a statue that celebrates a figure such as Colston was disgraceful, and offensive to the people of Bristol,” Ponsford told jurors. Graham, who also brought rope, said she acted out of “allyship and solidarity” with people of colour. Skuse admitted helping roll Colston to Pero’s bridge, named for an enslaved man who lived in Bristol, where it was thrown into the water, “sentencing [Colston] to death”. “I knew I was in the right, I knew everyone wanted it down,” he said. “I knew Bristol wanted it, everyone wanted the same thing.” Judge Peter Blair QC, the recorder of Bristol, allowed expert evidence from David Olusoga despite past comments by the historian and broadcaster that he “desperately” wanted to join protesters that day, which were raised as a sign of potential bias by the prosecution. Olusoga described to the court the horrors of the slave trade, from “rape rooms” in slaver fortresses on the African coast to grotesque punishments meted out to rebellious slaves. Colston was “chief executive officer” of a company that branded children as young as nine, and which was eventually responsible for enslaving more Africans than any other in British history, Olusoga said. The court heard from black Bristolians including a former lord mayor of the city, Cleo Lake, who had removed a portrait of Colston from her office. “He was the person responsible for brutalising my ancestors, taking away their humanity; and for me and my community experiencing the harm they still experience today,” Lake said. The four defendants laughed with relief as the verdicts were returned and hugged the many supporters that were waiting outside of court when they were released from the dock. Beat me too it, was about to post the same. Awesome result! And the only right one. Just seen them all on the news, in their Banksy T’s.
Considering olusoga statements around the history of the statue, including what it represents and that it was noted numerous petitions were met over decades to remove the statue, I wonder what was the councils reasoning for not removing the offending statue?
Well done Bristol BLM protesters cleared over toppling of Edward Colston statue Three men and a woman have been found not guilty of criminal damage after toppling the statue of the slave trader Edward Colston during a Black Lives Matter protest in Bristol, an act of public dissent that reverberated around the world. Rhian Graham, 30, Milo Ponsford, 26, and Sage Willoughby, 22, were accused, with “others unknown”, of helping to tie ropes around the statue’s neck and joining with others to pull it to the ground. Jake Skuse, 33, was accused of helping to roll it to Bristol harbour where it was thrown into the River Avon. In a 10-day trial at Bristol crown court, the four defendants did not contest their actions on 7 June 2020 but sought to argue they were justified, because the statue was so offensive. Giving evidence in their own defence, each described being motivated out of sincere antiracist conviction, frustration that previous attempts to persuade the council to remove the statue had failed, and a belief that the statue was so offensive it constituted an indecent display or a hate crime. The prosecution, however, argued that the fact Colston was a slave trader was “wholly irrelevant”. William Hughes QC, for the crown, said the case was about “cold hard facts” and the “rule of law”. The prosecution showed jurors a CCTV video compilation capturing each of the four defendants playing roles in toppling Colston. Bristol council’s head of culture, Jon Finch, gave evidence of the damage caused to the statue, which lost a cane and part of a coattail. He confirmed £350 damage to the harbour railings and £2,400 damage to the pavement. The Colston statue was approved by the council in 1895 and it had not given permission to anyone to alter, damage or remove the statue on 7 June, the trial heard. But Liam Walker QC, representing Willoughby, said: “Each of these defendants were on the right side of history, and I submit, they were also on the right side of the law. “Colston’s deeds may be historical but the continued veneration of him in this city was not. The continued veneration of him in a vibrant multicultural city was an act of abuse.” Willoughby, who climbed the statue, told the court he targeted Colston “because he was a racist and a slave trader who murdered thousands and enslaved even more”” “I thought that a statue that celebrates a figure such as Colston was disgraceful, and offensive to the people of Bristol,” Ponsford told jurors. Graham, who also brought rope, said she acted out of “allyship and solidarity” with people of colour. Skuse admitted helping roll Colston to Pero’s bridge, named for an enslaved man who lived in Bristol, where it was thrown into the water, “sentencing [Colston] to death”. “I knew I was in the right, I knew everyone wanted it down,” he said. “I knew Bristol wanted it, everyone wanted the same thing.” Judge Peter Blair QC, the recorder of Bristol, allowed expert evidence from David Olusoga despite past comments by the historian and broadcaster that he “desperately” wanted to join protesters that day, which were raised as a sign of potential bias by the prosecution. Olusoga described to the court the horrors of the slave trade, from “rape rooms” in slaver fortresses on the African coast to grotesque punishments meted out to rebellious slaves. Colston was “chief executive officer” of a company that branded children as young as nine, and which was eventually responsible for enslaving more Africans than any other in British history, Olusoga said. The court heard from black Bristolians including a former lord mayor of the city, Cleo Lake, who had removed a portrait of Colston from her office. “He was the person responsible for brutalising my ancestors, taking away their humanity; and for me and my community experiencing the harm they still experience today,” Lake said. The four defendants laughed with relief as the verdicts were returned and hugged the many supporters that were waiting outside of court when they were released from the dock. Beat me too it, was about to post the same. Awesome result! And the only right one. Just seen them all on the news, in their Banksy T’s. Considering olusoga statements around the history of the statue, including what it represents and that it was noted numerous petitions were met over decades to remove the statue, I wonder what was the councils reasoning for not removing the offending statue? |
|
|
|
|
|
cuzzo
New Member
🗨️ 174
👍🏻 82
September 2014
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by cuzzo on Jan 6, 2022 15:16:58 GMT 1, At this point, I don't believe any of the shirts on their are legit anymore. For me, I bought one within the first hour. After that, it's a crap shoot
At this point, I don't believe any of the shirts on their are legit anymore. For me, I bought one within the first hour. After that, it's a crap shoot
|
|
cuzzo
New Member
🗨️ 174
👍🏻 82
September 2014
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by cuzzo on Jan 6, 2022 15:17:54 GMT 1, To be clear, that's just my belief, and I don't know anything
To be clear, that's just my belief, and I don't know anything
|
|
|
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Daniel Silk on Jan 6, 2022 15:24:35 GMT 1,
|
|
|
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Devizes /\_/\ on Jan 6, 2022 15:26:33 GMT 1, Crazy prices.
If anyone is interested I have a XXL for sale for a lot less than some of those crazy prices.
Bought from RoughTrade comes with original bag and proof of purchase if needed.
Only selling as I want funds for items for sale on here 🙈
Regards, John.
Crazy prices.
If anyone is interested I have a XXL for sale for a lot less than some of those crazy prices.
Bought from RoughTrade comes with original bag and proof of purchase if needed.
Only selling as I want funds for items for sale on here 🙈
Regards, John.
|
|
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,946
👍🏻 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Hairbland on Jan 7, 2022 11:55:35 GMT 1,
Looking at “Completed Bids”, an easy to find EBay function more realistic than asking prices, 420 quid (going for less in States, although someone trying to sell a framed one) seems to be the current average price, down from the mid-December prices.
Looking at “Completed Bids”, an easy to find EBay function more realistic than asking prices, 420 quid (going for less in States, although someone trying to sell a framed one) seems to be the current average price, down from the mid-December prices. |
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,946
👍🏻 2,740
November 2010
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Hairbland on Jan 7, 2022 11:59:18 GMT 1,
|
|
|
|
mojo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,188
👍🏻 3,713
May 2014
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by mojo on Jan 7, 2022 15:27:59 GMT 1, WHAT PART OF NOT WANTING A STATUE OF A MURDERER, RAPIST, CHILD ABUSER, PEOPLE TRAFFICKING VILE MONSTER IN YOUR CITY DO SUELLA & THE CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT NOT UNDERSTAND?
Suella Braverman announced she was contemplating what would be a highly unusual move after an outcry from Conservative MPs following the jury’s verdict on Wednesday. The former cabinet minister Robert Jenrick suggested the rule of law had been undermined, while Tom Hunt, a vice-chair of the parliamentary Common Sense Group, said he was “deeply concerned by the precedent set here”, despite jury decisions not setting legal precedents.
Writing on Twitter on Friday, Braverman said: “Trial by jury is an important guardian of liberty and must not be undermined. However, the decision in the Colston statue case is causing confusion.
“Without affecting the result of this case, as attorney general, I am able to refer matters to the court of appeal so that senior judges have the opportunity to clarify the law for future cases. I am carefully considering whether to do so.”
If the case does go to the court of appeal, the judges will not be able to rule on whether the jury’s decision was correct, only on whether there was an error in law in the directions that were given to the jury.
Juries have an absolute right to acquit, which they have exercised in the past for protesters against climate change and military action, even when defendants have admitted causing disruption or damage.
People who have used, grown or supplied cannabis for the purposes of alleviating pain have also been acquitted by juries in the past, as was Clive Ponting, a senior Ministry of Defence official, in 1985, who was tried under the Official Secrets Act for revealing to an MP that government ministers had misled parliament over the sinking of the Argentinian warship General Belgrano during the Falklands war.
WHAT PART OF NOT WANTING A STATUE OF A MURDERER, RAPIST, CHILD ABUSER, PEOPLE TRAFFICKING VILE MONSTER IN YOUR CITY DO SUELLA & THE CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT NOT UNDERSTAND? Suella Braverman announced she was contemplating what would be a highly unusual move after an outcry from Conservative MPs following the jury’s verdict on Wednesday. The former cabinet minister Robert Jenrick suggested the rule of law had been undermined, while Tom Hunt, a vice-chair of the parliamentary Common Sense Group, said he was “deeply concerned by the precedent set here”, despite jury decisions not setting legal precedents. Writing on Twitter on Friday, Braverman said: “Trial by jury is an important guardian of liberty and must not be undermined. However, the decision in the Colston statue case is causing confusion. “Without affecting the result of this case, as attorney general, I am able to refer matters to the court of appeal so that senior judges have the opportunity to clarify the law for future cases. I am carefully considering whether to do so.” If the case does go to the court of appeal, the judges will not be able to rule on whether the jury’s decision was correct, only on whether there was an error in law in the directions that were given to the jury. Juries have an absolute right to acquit, which they have exercised in the past for protesters against climate change and military action, even when defendants have admitted causing disruption or damage. People who have used, grown or supplied cannabis for the purposes of alleviating pain have also been acquitted by juries in the past, as was Clive Ponting, a senior Ministry of Defence official, in 1985, who was tried under the Official Secrets Act for revealing to an MP that government ministers had misled parliament over the sinking of the Argentinian warship General Belgrano during the Falklands war. |
|
mojo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,188
👍🏻 3,713
May 2014
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by mojo on Jan 7, 2022 16:33:52 GMT 1, WHAT PART OF NOT WANTING A STATUE OF A MURDERER, RAPIST, CHILD ABUSER, PEOPLE TRAFFICKING VILE MONSTER IN YOUR CITY DO SUELLA & THE CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT NOT UNDERSTAND? Suella Braverman announced she was contemplating what would be a highly unusual move after an outcry from Conservative MPs following the jury’s verdict on Wednesday. The former cabinet minister Robert Jenrick suggested the rule of law had been undermined, while Tom Hunt, a vice-chair of the parliamentary Common Sense Group, said he was “deeply concerned by the precedent set here”, despite jury decisions not setting legal precedents. Writing on Twitter on Friday, Braverman said: “Trial by jury is an important guardian of liberty and must not be undermined. However, the decision in the Colston statue case is causing confusion. “Without affecting the result of this case, as attorney general, I am able to refer matters to the court of appeal so that senior judges have the opportunity to clarify the law for future cases. I am carefully considering whether to do so.” If the case does go to the court of appeal, the judges will not be able to rule on whether the jury’s decision was correct, only on whether there was an error in law in the directions that were given to the jury. Juries have an absolute right to acquit, which they have exercised in the past for protesters against climate change and military action, even when defendants have admitted causing disruption or damage. People who have used, grown or supplied cannabis for the purposes of alleviating pain have also been acquitted by juries in the past, as was Clive Ponting, a senior Ministry of Defence official, in 1985, who was tried under the Official Secrets Act for revealing to an MP that government ministers had misled parliament over the sinking of the Argentinian warship General Belgrano during the Falklands war. I think you are missing the point. It's about the rule of law. People should not be given carte blanche to act as judge and executioner, regardless of if you agree with the culprits or not.
If they're so precious about him why don't they stick him in the house of commons as a Tory mascot to represent their collective values.
WHAT PART OF NOT WANTING A STATUE OF A MURDERER, RAPIST, CHILD ABUSER, PEOPLE TRAFFICKING VILE MONSTER IN YOUR CITY DO SUELLA & THE CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT NOT UNDERSTAND? Suella Braverman announced she was contemplating what would be a highly unusual move after an outcry from Conservative MPs following the jury’s verdict on Wednesday. The former cabinet minister Robert Jenrick suggested the rule of law had been undermined, while Tom Hunt, a vice-chair of the parliamentary Common Sense Group, said he was “deeply concerned by the precedent set here”, despite jury decisions not setting legal precedents. Writing on Twitter on Friday, Braverman said: “Trial by jury is an important guardian of liberty and must not be undermined. However, the decision in the Colston statue case is causing confusion. “Without affecting the result of this case, as attorney general, I am able to refer matters to the court of appeal so that senior judges have the opportunity to clarify the law for future cases. I am carefully considering whether to do so.” If the case does go to the court of appeal, the judges will not be able to rule on whether the jury’s decision was correct, only on whether there was an error in law in the directions that were given to the jury. Juries have an absolute right to acquit, which they have exercised in the past for protesters against climate change and military action, even when defendants have admitted causing disruption or damage. People who have used, grown or supplied cannabis for the purposes of alleviating pain have also been acquitted by juries in the past, as was Clive Ponting, a senior Ministry of Defence official, in 1985, who was tried under the Official Secrets Act for revealing to an MP that government ministers had misled parliament over the sinking of the Argentinian warship General Belgrano during the Falklands war. I think you are missing the point. It's about the rule of law. People should not be given carte blanche to act as judge and executioner, regardless of if you agree with the culprits or not. I think you'll find they've already had a fair trial in a Crown Court and have been acquitted by Judge & Jury. If they're so precious about him why don't they stick him in the house of commons as a Tory mascot to represent their collective values. |
|
Fairxat
New Member
🗨️ 464
👍🏻 127
May 2013
|
|
|
ajr
New Member
🗨️ 325
👍🏻 342
February 2018
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by ajr on Jan 18, 2022 16:20:21 GMT 1, Back on topic, I have seen what appears to be 2 different types of colours/shades for the printing. I have come across t-shirts where the printing is much darker/black compared to others that appear more of a dark grey shade. Has anyone else come across this? In particular it seems like the smaller sizes/kids ones were printed in a lighter shade.
Back on topic, I have seen what appears to be 2 different types of colours/shades for the printing. I have come across t-shirts where the printing is much darker/black compared to others that appear more of a dark grey shade. Has anyone else come across this? In particular it seems like the smaller sizes/kids ones were printed in a lighter shade.
|
|
|
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Crunchy Carrot on Jan 20, 2022 0:08:46 GMT 1, I have all sizes available for sale
I have all sizes available for sale
|
|
nick42
New Member
🗨️ 227
👍🏻 158
Member is Online
July 2020
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by nick42 on Feb 18, 2022 20:24:26 GMT 1, Looking for an authentic Banksy EZLN 'Liberdad el por Futbol' shirt too if anybody might have one, please. Thank you.
Looking for an authentic Banksy EZLN 'Liberdad el por Futbol' shirt too if anybody might have one, please. Thank you.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by moron on Feb 27, 2022 20:46:21 GMT 1, Beat me too it, was about to post the same. Awesome result! And the only right one. Just seen them all on the news, in their Banksy T’s. Considering olusoga statements around the history of the statue, including what it represents and that it was noted numerous petitions were met over decades to remove the statue, I wonder what was the councils reasoning for not removing the offending statue?
Colston was a Freemason. There is even a Colston lodge.
and as everyone knows, council planning departments have their fair share of Freemasons.
provinceofbristol.org.uk/craft-masonry/craft-lodges
Quite a few of these old statues contain masonic symbolism
Beat me too it, was about to post the same. Awesome result! And the only right one. Just seen them all on the news, in their Banksy T’s. Considering olusoga statements around the history of the statue, including what it represents and that it was noted numerous petitions were met over decades to remove the statue, I wonder what was the councils reasoning for not removing the offending statue? Colston was a Freemason. There is even a Colston lodge. and as everyone knows, council planning departments have their fair share of Freemasons. provinceofbristol.org.uk/craft-masonry/craft-lodges Quite a few of these old statues contain masonic symbolism |
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by moron on Feb 27, 2022 20:59:38 GMT 1, Demanding old statues are torn down is fine when everything else is taken into consideration.
White people are blamed for the slave trade and guilt tripped when in reality out of 27 European countries, only 6 at most had anything to do with the slave trade. African and Arab countries who took part in the slave trade are ignored for some reason.
How many universities in UK have benefited from Saudi donations?
Considering that the Arab slave trade has carried on right up to recent times. The video shows the inhumane treatment of Arab slavers crippling small African children they took as slaves. What's shocking is it happened very recently.
"""" “In the Arab world, the notion of the basic inferiority of Black people took deep root, which explains the acceptance of the ill-treatment of Black captives, and the means used to deny them any descendants. The result is that in our day they have almost disappeared in Turkey, Yemen, and Iraq; and very few survivors can be found in North Africa and Saudi Arabia.
“To learn about the heavy toll of that slave-trade, I compared the archives of these countries with the testimonies of explorers like Cameron, Stanley, Dr. Livingstone, and Mgrs. Lavigerie. I read as well, the horrific descriptions of the Arab slave-traders at the castration centers. I concluded that between 70% to 80% of the slaves perished. Combining the Trans-Saharan and East African trades, we arrive at a total of 17 million who were castrated. Some of them died or were brought alive to the Arab world and beyond.
The Arab-Muslim slave-trade was a veritable genocide of Black people. """"
www.unashamedofthegospel.org/the-veiled-genocide.cfm
Demanding old statues are torn down is fine when everything else is taken into consideration. White people are blamed for the slave trade and guilt tripped when in reality out of 27 European countries, only 6 at most had anything to do with the slave trade. African and Arab countries who took part in the slave trade are ignored for some reason. How many universities in UK have benefited from Saudi donations? Considering that the Arab slave trade has carried on right up to recent times. The video shows the inhumane treatment of Arab slavers crippling small African children they took as slaves. What's shocking is it happened very recently. """" “In the Arab world, the notion of the basic inferiority of Black people took deep root, which explains the acceptance of the ill-treatment of Black captives, and the means used to deny them any descendants. The result is that in our day they have almost disappeared in Turkey, Yemen, and Iraq; and very few survivors can be found in North Africa and Saudi Arabia. “To learn about the heavy toll of that slave-trade, I compared the archives of these countries with the testimonies of explorers like Cameron, Stanley, Dr. Livingstone, and Mgrs. Lavigerie. I read as well, the horrific descriptions of the Arab slave-traders at the castration centers. I concluded that between 70% to 80% of the slaves perished. Combining the Trans-Saharan and East African trades, we arrive at a total of 17 million who were castrated. Some of them died or were brought alive to the Arab world and beyond. The Arab-Muslim slave-trade was a veritable genocide of Black people. """" www.unashamedofthegospel.org/the-veiled-genocide.cfm |
|
|
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,711
👍🏻 1,051
September 2017
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by moron on Mar 1, 2022 15:56:56 GMT 1, Many people would like to see the statue head of that fat lazy racist t**t Karl Marx removed from Highgate cemetary.
Does this result mean that all statues that anyone does not like for any reason are fair game?
I don't like my neighbour's garden gnome so can I smash it and push it into his goldfish pond?
Many people would like to see the statue head of that fat lazy racist t**t Karl Marx removed from Highgate cemetary.
Does this result mean that all statues that anyone does not like for any reason are fair game?
I don't like my neighbour's garden gnome so can I smash it and push it into his goldfish pond?
|
|
JW
New Member
🗨️ 930
👍🏻 1,402
February 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Devizes /\_/\ on May 19, 2022 19:46:01 GMT 1, Oh sh*t just seen the estimate. What am I even looking at? It’s not even Fruit of the Loom.
🤣
Oh sh*t just seen the estimate. What am I even looking at? It’s not even Fruit of the Loom. 🤣 |
|
Skizz 82
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,085
👍🏻 1,114
November 2019
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by Skizz 82 on May 19, 2022 20:11:23 GMT 1, Not so strange....
for a signed and limited edition of Banksy
Not so strange....
for a signed and limited edition of Banksy
|
|
pranart
New Member
🗨️ 127
👍🏻 44
Location: London
July 2022
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by pranart on Aug 15, 2022 22:54:22 GMT 1, The first time slavery was racialised was in the case of chattel slavery. Mills
This is such a epistemologically weak argument; simple whataboutery doesn’t cut it.
We could talk about living in the UK as person of colour 57% more like to go to jail for commuting the same crimes, 7 times more likely to be stopped and search, Muslim sounding names have to apply for 70 % job With the same credentials, more likely to be excluded at school, underassessed and checked by ucas. But you know… what about …
The first time slavery was racialised was in the case of chattel slavery. Mills
This is such a epistemologically weak argument; simple whataboutery doesn’t cut it.
We could talk about living in the UK as person of colour 57% more like to go to jail for commuting the same crimes, 7 times more likely to be stopped and search, Muslim sounding names have to apply for 70 % job With the same credentials, more likely to be excluded at school, underassessed and checked by ucas. But you know… what about …
|
|
pranart
New Member
🗨️ 127
👍🏻 44
Location: London
July 2022
|
Banksy Bristol TShirt • Colston Four, by pranart on Aug 15, 2022 22:56:15 GMT 1, Hold on were these numbered? ive got one and I want to know it’s not fake! It has a pest control receipt … :/
Hold on were these numbered? ive got one and I want to know it’s not fake! It has a pest control receipt … :/
|
|
