Couple observations.

1. Regarding weight The Virtues are laminated prints on dibond whereas these are diasec mounted and will be heavier. Like early Heni/Hirst (H4, H5...) editions, a 3-5mm sheet of acrylic adhered to the front will add at least 3kg. Due to added weight the subframe on back I imagine will be more substantial too.

2. The size of the Rubik's cubes on the Marilyn piece are roughly 1:1 to a real cube which is a nice touch.

Couple questions.

1. Has anyone seen or know of the original Marilyn piece? There is another variation on Invader's insta.

2. Those who have seen these in gallery is the image quality/sharpness of Country Life the same as the others? I am guessing the original is privately owned and wonder if it was loaned to be photographed to the same standard as the other 3 for this edition or an older image sourced.

Imagined people visiting me and seeing these on the wall:
1) why so you have the photo of a Rubik's cube on the wall? Oh, right, the sticker. Cool, cool
3) what is this? OK, Invader, rings a bell. And that's the best example of his works? Interesting...
4) a photo of Marylin made our of Rubik's cubes? How original...

These four designs were only chosen by Heni as these were the ones that were all square at the MIMA exhibition.

That makes sense. Obviously nobody cases what on my walls so the previous post wants all that serious. 2 I couldn't come up with anything neat for it.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think Diasec is simply a trade name for the dibond process. i.e. they are exactly the same.   

They’re both trade names of the process/materials used. Dibond is a type of aluminum composite sheet.

Found this on a photography website:

Invented in 1969, Diasec is the preferred method of archival mounting across the globe.
A photograph is first printed onto a fine art paper and then face-mounted, image side up, to transparent acrylic glass using advanced mounting techniques and a series of chemicals. This leaves the print archivally sealed - dust and air free. The back of the print is then mounted onto Dibond - an aluminium and plastic composite sheet.
Sandwiched between the acrylic glass and Dibond, the print is left perfectly flat with a high-gloss finish.

There is a significant difference between diasec and cheaper versions of dibond.
The process might be the same. Only Diasec has the highest quality. Most museums prefer diasec too. Simply because the chance of color fading by light, is a bit smaller.
Simply said diasec has better uv filtering.

To be honest most of the negative is somewhat valid. These aren't particularly cheap, they re plan edition, the images could be much better and these are basically glorified photos of the artwork. The finish will be glossy.

That said, if I was after an invader print i would strongly consider one of these. 

Anyone have thoughts on whether this will push the prices of his other prints up?

I don’t see this release having any affect on his prices. Pretty much every print he’s released is in high demand and scarce; the guy rarely drops prints, so there’s always consumer demand for his work. Some could argue this would cause prices to drop because of a number of reasons(he’s a sell out etc), while others could argue his now working with Heni could cause his prices to rise. Imho it’s neither. 

Yeah, it's hard to love them really, i doubt these will be anyone's favorite prints. 
The chance heni will produce some more is high.  Whether that's gonna be an open edition it's hard to say. 

Lots of people are debating whether to get one of these. I don't blame them. I like Invader's work but, try as I may, I simply can't convince myself to buy one of these. Now he is involved with Heni, I will wait patiently for the next release which hopefully will be better than this one. And knowing the cash machine which is Heni, it wont be long before they release the next invader set of prints.