|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by grantb on Nov 27, 2008 17:49:48 GMT 1, you know, with all this bickering and bitterness, why should POW bother to offer anything to anyone - perhaps they should have made the print available to those who were prepared to make an effort for it, ie travel to Bethlehem or some far arsed place. Dont come back at me with, "well some of us don't have the time or money" crap, because those who do, have enough time to F5 for 3 days non stop or b**ch/complain for days on end about missing out. POW have acknowledged that they had some issues with duplicate prints - they have apologised, and let that be the end of it. Now someone please lock this thread!!!
i agree with that.
pow are very nice to offer people the next one. very fair imo.
you know, with all this bickering and bitterness, why should POW bother to offer anything to anyone - perhaps they should have made the print available to those who were prepared to make an effort for it, ie travel to Bethlehem or some far arsed place. Dont come back at me with, "well some of us don't have the time or money" crap, because those who do, have enough time to F5 for 3 days non stop or b**ch/complain for days on end about missing out. POW have acknowledged that they had some issues with duplicate prints - they have apologised, and let that be the end of it. Now someone please lock this thread!!! i agree with that. pow are very nice to offer people the next one. very fair imo. |
|
welshboy
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 322
๐๐ป 1
January 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by welshboy on Nov 27, 2008 18:03:32 GMT 1, The guy that had 5 of these on ebay sold 1@5000 and was offered 3 times 4000 and did not sell.now thats greed!
The guy that had 5 of these on ebay sold 1@5000 and was offered 3 times 4000 and did not sell.now thats greed!
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by rosstierney on Nov 27, 2008 18:07:12 GMT 1, it doesn't work like that welshboy, they could have been counter-offers by the seller which the buyer declined
misleading to say the least
it doesn't work like that welshboy, they could have been counter-offers by the seller which the buyer declined
misleading to say the least
|
|
welshboy
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 322
๐๐ป 1
January 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by welshboy on Nov 27, 2008 18:08:35 GMT 1, yes
yes
|
|
ยฉhief'
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,079
๐๐ป 47
October 2006
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by ยฉhief' on Nov 27, 2008 18:11:28 GMT 1, The guy that had 5 of these on ebay sold 1@5000 and was offered 3 times 4000 and did not sell.now thats greed!
I see the auction winner, the silent assassin meister, was another 0 feedback buyer.
Good!
The guy that had 5 of these on ebay sold 1@5000 and was offered 3 times 4000 and did not sell.now thats greed! I see the auction winner, the silent assassin meister, was another 0 feedback buyer. Good! |
|
thetongue
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 390
๐๐ป 0
August 2006
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by thetongue on Nov 27, 2008 18:14:32 GMT 1, At least looks like another Banksy before xmas then. Question is, where...
1) At the ghetto?
2) At the virtual ghetto?
3) At the POW open day?
4) Down your chimney xmas eve?
At least looks like another Banksy before xmas then. Question is, where... 1) At the ghetto? 2) At the virtual ghetto? 3) At the POW open day? 4) Down your chimney xmas eve? |
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by grantb on Nov 27, 2008 18:27:42 GMT 1, pow open day would seem unlikly. 2 prints in a matter of like a week. let alone this being his first release this year.
my guess a secret ghetto may be in line somewhere.
pow open day would seem unlikly. 2 prints in a matter of like a week. let alone this being his first release this year.
my guess a secret ghetto may be in line somewhere.
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by bigwilly on Nov 27, 2008 19:32:36 GMT 1, I would at least like a response from POW wtf?
first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet....
thursday buyer
I would at least like a response from POW wtf?
first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet....
thursday buyer
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by Happy Shopper on Nov 27, 2008 19:47:58 GMT 1, Seems likely for a release at, or coinciding with, the open day.
Can't wait to see what the print is!
Seems likely for a release at, or coinciding with, the open day.
Can't wait to see what the print is!
|
|
bristolboy
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 664
๐๐ป 37
September 2007
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by bristolboy on Nov 27, 2008 19:49:09 GMT 1, I would at least like a response from POW wtf? first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet.... thursday buyer
Wait patiently for the mailman.
I would at least like a response from POW wtf? first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet.... thursday buyer Wait patiently for the mailman. |
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by cashman on Nov 27, 2008 19:51:23 GMT 1, I would at least like a response from POW wtf? first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet.... thursday buyer
do you really think they have they time to respond to all the mail they are probably getting ??
I would at least like a response from POW wtf? first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet.... thursday buyer do you really think they have they time to respond to all the mail they are probably getting ?? |
|
gorgeous
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 30
๐๐ป 0
May 2007
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by gorgeous on Nov 27, 2008 19:53:09 GMT 1, Thursday buyer
got the same future release offer email
pow rocks
hope they can offer Friday buyers too
i understand how upset it is when you lost something which you think you already have
Thursday buyer
got the same future release offer email
pow rocks
hope they can offer Friday buyers too
i understand how upset it is when you lost something which you think you already have
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by bigwilly on Nov 27, 2008 20:12:49 GMT 1, I would at least like a response from POW wtf? first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet.... thursday buyer Wait patiently for the mailman.
been waiting over a week and nothing....
congrats to those who scored!
It's frustrating when I hear others getting responses and I get nada...
Oh well, maybe I'll have better luck next time, no sour grapes here
I'm glad at least some forum members were able to get a few, enjoy this one guys
HAPPY THANKSGIVING
going to burn some hashish and hydro and eat some turkey
Peace and be thankful for the ART you have on your walls
I would at least like a response from POW wtf? first time buyer and I haven't heard anything back yet.... thursday buyer Wait patiently for the mailman. been waiting over a week and nothing.... congrats to those who scored! It's frustrating when I hear others getting responses and I get nada... Oh well, maybe I'll have better luck next time, no sour grapes here I'm glad at least some forum members were able to get a few, enjoy this one guys HAPPY THANKSGIVING going to burn some hashish and hydro and eat some turkey Peace and be thankful for the ART you have on your walls |
|
thetruth55
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 414
๐๐ป 164
November 2007
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by thetruth55 on Nov 27, 2008 20:48:47 GMT 1, Wait patiently for the mailman. been waiting over a week and nothing.... congrats to those who scored! It's frustrating when I hear others getting responses and I get nada... Oh well, maybe I'll have better luck next time, no sour grapes here I'm glad at least some forum members were able to get a few, enjoy this one guys HAPPY THANKSGIVING going to burn some hashish and hydro and eat some turkey Peace and be thankful for the ART you have on your walls
what's up, Bee? i haven't read through this entire thread and haven't paid much attention for about the last week, but wasn't your order the one that had its payment rejected 3 times? if so, i highly doubt POW is going to offer you anything. the offer is only for people who actually made it through the checkout completely and had an order confirmation. i'm on your side, dude, and i wish you the best of luck. but i seriously wouldn't get your hopes up unless you DO have a physical order confirm.....the orders are not complete until you've made it through ProtX successfully.
happy thanksgiving!
Wait patiently for the mailman. been waiting over a week and nothing.... congrats to those who scored! It's frustrating when I hear others getting responses and I get nada... Oh well, maybe I'll have better luck next time, no sour grapes here I'm glad at least some forum members were able to get a few, enjoy this one guys HAPPY THANKSGIVING going to burn some hashish and hydro and eat some turkey Peace and be thankful for the ART you have on your walls what's up, Bee? i haven't read through this entire thread and haven't paid much attention for about the last week, but wasn't your order the one that had its payment rejected 3 times? if so, i highly doubt POW is going to offer you anything. the offer is only for people who actually made it through the checkout completely and had an order confirmation. i'm on your side, dude, and i wish you the best of luck. but i seriously wouldn't get your hopes up unless you DO have a physical order confirm.....the orders are not complete until you've made it through ProtX successfully. happy thanksgiving! |
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by veralynn on Nov 27, 2008 21:10:25 GMT 1, Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not.
This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost?
Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not.
This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost?
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by mammal2 on Nov 27, 2008 21:22:40 GMT 1, Have you or any of the other Thursday 'losers' had a offer from POW to buy the next print?? Dear Customer As you may already be aware a number of orders for Nola were duplicated by our database system. Unfortunately your order is one of those & because the database did not recognise your order we have had to refund it. Following some ebay refunds & Friday sales refunds we have still not been able to re-allocate you a print. I sincerely apologise for this. We would like to offer you the opportunity to buy the next Banksy print, the details of which will be known fairly soon. This offer will come by way of an email directing you to a payment page. If you do not want to be offered this chance please reply by return, otherwise you do not need to do anything. I would like to thank you for your understanding & continued support & apologize once again for the obvious disappointment at missing out on Nola. Kind Regards SIMON DURBAN MD
It doesn't get better than that! wow! no f5ing for you!
Have you or any of the other Thursday 'losers' had a offer from POW to buy the next print?? Dear Customer As you may already be aware a number of orders for Nola were duplicated by our database system. Unfortunately your order is one of those & because the database did not recognise your order we have had to refund it. Following some ebay refunds & Friday sales refunds we have still not been able to re-allocate you a print. I sincerely apologise for this. We would like to offer you the opportunity to buy the next Banksy print, the details of which will be known fairly soon. This offer will come by way of an email directing you to a payment page. If you do not want to be offered this chance please reply by return, otherwise you do not need to do anything. I would like to thank you for your understanding & continued support & apologize once again for the obvious disappointment at missing out on Nola. Kind Regards SIMON DURBAN MD It doesn't get better than that! wow! no f5ing for you! |
|
pfffffffffft
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,472
๐๐ป 1,017
July 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by pfffffffffft on Nov 27, 2008 21:24:07 GMT 1, Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not. This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost?
I've just taken a quick scan of the Unfair Contract Terms Act and you'll notice that the key word that is littered through the text is "reasonable"
Statute here:
www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Unfair+Contract+Terms+Act+&Year=1977&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&TYPE=QS&NavFrom=0&activeTextDocId=224526&PageNumber=1&SortAlpha=0
It is not unreasonable for POW to cancel duplicate orders. It is not unreasonable for POW to satisfy the orders that were canceled because of a faulty basket system. It is also not unreasonable to cancel the orders of those who purchased on Friday because there was no stock to fill them. It is also not unreasonable for POW to cancel orders of flippers. They only manner in which it would be unreasonable for them to cancel an order would be on the basis of race, gender, or religion as that would be discrimination.
But I suggest you go ahead and send the link to this statute to POW and see what they say. 
Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not. This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost? I've just taken a quick scan of the Unfair Contract Terms Act and you'll notice that the key word that is littered through the text is "reasonable" Statute here: www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Unfair+Contract+Terms+Act+&Year=1977&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&TYPE=QS&NavFrom=0&activeTextDocId=224526&PageNumber=1&SortAlpha=0It is not unreasonable for POW to cancel duplicate orders. It is not unreasonable for POW to satisfy the orders that were canceled because of a faulty basket system. It is also not unreasonable to cancel the orders of those who purchased on Friday because there was no stock to fill them. It is also not unreasonable for POW to cancel orders of flippers. They only manner in which it would be unreasonable for them to cancel an order would be on the basis of race, gender, or religion as that would be discrimination. But I suggest you go ahead and send the link to this statute to POW and see what they say. |
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by cashman on Nov 27, 2008 21:25:04 GMT 1, congrats trowel
congrats trowel
|
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by bigwilly on Nov 27, 2008 21:25:30 GMT 1, been waiting over a week and nothing.... congrats to those who scored! It's frustrating when I hear others getting responses and I get nada... Oh well, maybe I'll have better luck next time, no sour grapes here I'm glad at least some forum members were able to get a few, enjoy this one guys HAPPY THANKSGIVING going to burn some hashish and hydro and eat some turkey Peace and be thankful for the ART you have on your walls what's up, Bee? i haven't read through this entire thread and haven't paid much attention for about the last week, but wasn't your order the one that had its payment rejected 3 times? if so, i highly doubt POW is going to offer you anything. the offer is only for people who actually made it through the checkout completely and had an order confirmation. i'm on your side, dude, and i wish you the best of luck. but i seriously wouldn't get your hopes up unless you DO have a physical order confirm.....the orders are not complete until you've made it through ProtX successfully. happy thanksgiving!
the truth hurts sometimes!
all is well with me, hope all is well with everyone else
peace dudes
been waiting over a week and nothing.... congrats to those who scored! It's frustrating when I hear others getting responses and I get nada... Oh well, maybe I'll have better luck next time, no sour grapes here I'm glad at least some forum members were able to get a few, enjoy this one guys HAPPY THANKSGIVING going to burn some hashish and hydro and eat some turkey Peace and be thankful for the ART you have on your walls what's up, Bee? i haven't read through this entire thread and haven't paid much attention for about the last week, but wasn't your order the one that had its payment rejected 3 times? if so, i highly doubt POW is going to offer you anything. the offer is only for people who actually made it through the checkout completely and had an order confirmation. i'm on your side, dude, and i wish you the best of luck. but i seriously wouldn't get your hopes up unless you DO have a physical order confirm.....the orders are not complete until you've made it through ProtX successfully. happy thanksgiving! the truth hurts sometimes! all is well with me, hope all is well with everyone else peace dudes |
|
lastpost
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,960
๐๐ป 2
April 2007
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by lastpost on Nov 27, 2008 21:38:08 GMT 1, Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not. This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost? I've just taken a quick scan of the Unfair Contract Terms Act and you'll notice that the key word that is littered through the text is "reasonable" Statute here: www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Unfair+Contract+Terms+Act+&Year=1977&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&TYPE=QS&NavFrom=0&activeTextDocId=224526&PageNumber=1&SortAlpha=0It is not unreasonable for POW to cancel duplicate orders. It is not unreasonable for POW to satisfy the orders that were canceled because of a faulty basket system. It is also not unreasonable to cancel the orders of those who purchased on Friday because there was no stock to fill them. It is also not unreasonable for POW to cancel orders of flippers. They only manner in which it would be unreasonable for them to cancel an order would be on the basis of race, gender, or religion as that would be discrimination. But I suggest you go ahead and send the link to this statute to POW and see what they say.
Quit stirring this shit up...let the people have their moans 
Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not. This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost? I've just taken a quick scan of the Unfair Contract Terms Act and you'll notice that the key word that is littered through the text is "reasonable" Statute here: www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Unfair+Contract+Terms+Act+&Year=1977&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&TYPE=QS&NavFrom=0&activeTextDocId=224526&PageNumber=1&SortAlpha=0It is not unreasonable for POW to cancel duplicate orders. It is not unreasonable for POW to satisfy the orders that were canceled because of a faulty basket system. It is also not unreasonable to cancel the orders of those who purchased on Friday because there was no stock to fill them. It is also not unreasonable for POW to cancel orders of flippers. They only manner in which it would be unreasonable for them to cancel an order would be on the basis of race, gender, or religion as that would be discrimination. But I suggest you go ahead and send the link to this statute to POW and see what they say. Quit stirring this shit up...let the people have their moans |
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by veralynn on Nov 27, 2008 21:40:46 GMT 1, Are you a Judge fella? cos only then would you be in a position to decidee what is and isnt reasonable.
Are you a Judge fella? cos only then would you be in a position to decidee what is and isnt reasonable.
|
|
ยฉhief'
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,079
๐๐ป 47
October 2006
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by ยฉhief' on Nov 27, 2008 21:41:50 GMT 1, Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not. This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost? I've just taken a quick scan of the Unfair Contract Terms Act and you'll notice that the key word that is littered through the text is "reasonable" Statute here: www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Unfair+Contract+Terms+Act+&Year=1977&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&TYPE=QS&NavFrom=0&activeTextDocId=224526&PageNumber=1&SortAlpha=0It is not unreasonable for POW to cancel duplicate orders. It is not unreasonable for POW to satisfy the orders that were canceled because of a faulty basket system. It is also not unreasonable to cancel the orders of those who purchased on Friday because there was no stock to fill them. It is also not unreasonable for POW to cancel orders of flippers. They only manner in which it would be unreasonable for them to cancel an order would be on the basis of race, gender, or religion as that would be discrimination. But I suggest you go ahead and send the link to this statute to POW and see what they say.
Is it unreasonable to compensate the Thursday buyers and not those who bought on Friday morning? IMO Yes!
Anyone on here heard of the Unfair Contract Terms Act of 1977? It's statute and set up, to some extent, to protect people like me and you from organisations who might like to hide behind their 'terms and conditions', irrespective of whether 'we' have read them or not. This has been an absolute debacle and it's not of POW's making - their plans to hold an 'open weekend' in my view seriously underestimate the volume/interest. If their intention is to generate publicity and 'revive' the scene that will work but at what cost? I've just taken a quick scan of the Unfair Contract Terms Act and you'll notice that the key word that is littered through the text is "reasonable" Statute here: www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Unfair+Contract+Terms+Act+&Year=1977&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&TYPE=QS&NavFrom=0&activeTextDocId=224526&PageNumber=1&SortAlpha=0It is not unreasonable for POW to cancel duplicate orders. It is not unreasonable for POW to satisfy the orders that were canceled because of a faulty basket system. It is also not unreasonable to cancel the orders of those who purchased on Friday because there was no stock to fill them. It is also not unreasonable for POW to cancel orders of flippers. They only manner in which it would be unreasonable for them to cancel an order would be on the basis of race, gender, or religion as that would be discrimination. But I suggest you go ahead and send the link to this statute to POW and see what they say. Is it unreasonable to compensate the Thursday buyers and not those who bought on Friday morning? IMO Yes! |
|
|
|
funyoung
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,040
๐๐ป 20
February 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by funyoung on Nov 27, 2008 21:46:37 GMT 1, you know, with all this bickering and bitterness, why should POW bother to offer anything to anyone - perhaps they should have made the print available to those who were prepared to make an effort for it, ie travel to Bethlehem or some far arsed place. Dont come back at me with, "well some of us don't have the time or money" crap, because those who do, have enough time to F5 for 3 days non stop or b**ch/complain for days on end about missing out. POW have acknowledged that they had some issues with duplicate prints - they have apologised, and let that be the end of it. Now someone please lock this thread!!!
Lock it why?
Why don't you run along little alsababble.
Now.
I want first dibs on the next release too.
You see I missed out on both Thursday and Friday.
Mainly because I was at work but the thought was there.
you know, with all this bickering and bitterness, why should POW bother to offer anything to anyone - perhaps they should have made the print available to those who were prepared to make an effort for it, ie travel to Bethlehem or some far arsed place. Dont come back at me with, "well some of us don't have the time or money" crap, because those who do, have enough time to F5 for 3 days non stop or b**ch/complain for days on end about missing out. POW have acknowledged that they had some issues with duplicate prints - they have apologised, and let that be the end of it. Now someone please lock this thread!!! Lock it why? Why don't you run along little alsababble. Now. I want first dibs on the next release too. You see I missed out on both Thursday and Friday. Mainly because I was at work but the thought was there. |
|
|
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by veralynn on Nov 27, 2008 21:46:59 GMT 1, Cheers Chief, and I completely agree - how hard can this really be with a bit of application, its supposed to be a commercial organisation not a playground.
BTW Mr Pffffft, we also do age discrimination in this country now too and its a wonderful thing if you're old and you fancy a job advertised for someone between 18-25.
Also heard of a discrimination case where a firm unwisely advertised for a white van man and then when a black man applied for the job and didn't get it he sued them for racial discrimination and won, but I digress......
This thread should be locked however as I'm boring myself.
Cheers Chief, and I completely agree - how hard can this really be with a bit of application, its supposed to be a commercial organisation not a playground.
BTW Mr Pffffft, we also do age discrimination in this country now too and its a wonderful thing if you're old and you fancy a job advertised for someone between 18-25.
Also heard of a discrimination case where a firm unwisely advertised for a white van man and then when a black man applied for the job and didn't get it he sued them for racial discrimination and won, but I digress......
This thread should be locked however as I'm boring myself.
|
|
pfffffffffft
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,472
๐๐ป 1,017
July 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by pfffffffffft on Nov 27, 2008 21:47:47 GMT 1, Are you a Judge fella? cos only then would you be in a position to decidee what is and isnt reasonable.
It's pretty clear you didnt read the statute. The key word is reasonable but these are the things protected against.
Negligence. s2(1), liability for negligence occasioning death or personal injury cannot be excluded.
Manufacturers' guarantee. s5(1), loss arising from (a) defective goods or (b) negligence of distributor; cannot be excluded where goods are "of a type ordinarily supplied for private use or consumption.
Sale of Goods
* s6(1), implied terms as to title (Sale of Goods Act 1979 s12) cannot be excluded.
* s6(2), implied terms as to description, quality or sample (Sale of Goods Act 1979 ss13-15) cannot be excluded against a consumer.
There will be no death or personal injury if you dont get your print.
There are no defective goods here, you havent gotten your print.
And negligence of the distributor? What negligence? There is a term in US law called bona fide error. The prints Friday were released in error, not in some scheme to defraud you of your money, not in some scheme to cause you duress.
Would you all please stop this nonsense. Honestly.
Again, send this link over to POW and see what they say. Please, I beg you.
Are you a Judge fella? cos only then would you be in a position to decidee what is and isnt reasonable. It's pretty clear you didnt read the statute. The key word is reasonable but these are the things protected against. Negligence. s2(1), liability for negligence occasioning death or personal injury cannot be excluded. Manufacturers' guarantee. s5(1), loss arising from (a) defective goods or (b) negligence of distributor; cannot be excluded where goods are "of a type ordinarily supplied for private use or consumption. Sale of Goods * s6(1), implied terms as to title (Sale of Goods Act 1979 s12) cannot be excluded. * s6(2), implied terms as to description, quality or sample (Sale of Goods Act 1979 ss13-15) cannot be excluded against a consumer. There will be no death or personal injury if you dont get your print. There are no defective goods here, you havent gotten your print. And negligence of the distributor? What negligence? There is a term in US law called bona fide error. The prints Friday were released in error, not in some scheme to defraud you of your money, not in some scheme to cause you duress. Would you all please stop this nonsense. Honestly. Again, send this link over to POW and see what they say. Please, I beg you. |
|
pfffffffffft
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,472
๐๐ป 1,017
July 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by pfffffffffft on Nov 27, 2008 21:51:01 GMT 1, Is it unreasonable to compensate the Thursday buyers and not those who bought on Friday morning? IMO Yes!
The compensation pow is offering is a courtesy, not a right.
Is it unreasonable to compensate the Thursday buyers and not those who bought on Friday morning? IMO Yes! The compensation pow is offering is a courtesy, not a right. |
|
lastpost
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,960
๐๐ป 2
April 2007
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by lastpost on Nov 27, 2008 21:54:07 GMT 1, Would you all please stop this nonsense. Honestly.
I say there would be approximately 20 less pages of this nonsense - if you stopped inflaming the situation.
Why do you care so much for this subject?
Would you all please stop this nonsense. Honestly. I say there would be approximately 20 less pages of this nonsense - if you stopped inflaming the situation. Why do you care so much for this subject? |
|
funyoung
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,040
๐๐ป 20
February 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by funyoung on Nov 27, 2008 21:56:50 GMT 1, Is it unreasonable to compensate the Thursday buyers and not those who bought on Friday morning? IMO Yes! The compensation pow is offering is a courtesy, not a right.
Nice courtesy it is too.
Does anyone know how many (or few) Friday buyers there were?
Is it unreasonable to compensate the Thursday buyers and not those who bought on Friday morning? IMO Yes! The compensation pow is offering is a courtesy, not a right. Nice courtesy it is too. Does anyone know how many (or few) Friday buyers there were? |
|
pfffffffffft
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,472
๐๐ป 1,017
July 2008
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by pfffffffffft on Nov 27, 2008 22:00:05 GMT 1, Would you all please stop this nonsense. Honestly. I say there would be approximately 20 less pages of this nonsense - if you stopped inflaming the situation. Why do you care so much for this subject?
I would suggest those yammering on about lawyers are the ones inflaming the situation. Sorry, those making unreasonable demands, bringing lawyers into this are the ones being unreasonable here. Not me.
This is beyond ridiculous, I care about this subject because neither Banksy nor POW have to release Banksy prints yet they do, and at well under market value so those with lesser means can afford a Banksy.
POW was so generous in offering up some compensation yet people are still pitching fucking full on fits, it's bloody disgusting. People have the right to be disappointed but these attacks on POW are off the chart.
What's that saying, give an inch and they'll take a mile. Well there are some here looking to take a mile.
Would you all please stop this nonsense. Honestly. I say there would be approximately 20 less pages of this nonsense - if you stopped inflaming the situation. Why do you care so much for this subject? I would suggest those yammering on about lawyers are the ones inflaming the situation. Sorry, those making unreasonable demands, bringing lawyers into this are the ones being unreasonable here. Not me. This is beyond ridiculous, I care about this subject because neither Banksy nor POW have to release Banksy prints yet they do, and at well under market value so those with lesser means can afford a Banksy. POW was so generous in offering up some compensation yet people are still pitching fucking full on fits, it's bloody disgusting. People have the right to be disappointed but these attacks on POW are off the chart. What's that saying, give an inch and they'll take a mile. Well there are some here looking to take a mile. |
|
ยฉhief'
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,079
๐๐ป 47
October 2006
|
Banksy NOLA Print on POW, by ยฉhief' on Nov 27, 2008 22:00:35 GMT 1, The compensation pow is offering is a courtesy, not a right. Nice courtesy it is too. Does anyone know how many (or few) Friday buyers there were?
I know of 6
The compensation pow is offering is a courtesy, not a right. Nice courtesy it is too. Does anyone know how many (or few) Friday buyers there were? I know of 6 |
|
