bojangles
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 129
๐๐ป 1
June 2009
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by bojangles on Aug 25, 2009 15:21:13 GMT 1, Does anybody know anything more about his London show? I can't find the location and date anywhere!
it hasn't been released yet as far as i know. Publically nobody knows. It is a "coming soon" sort of deal.
1 thing i'm sure of its brainwash so we won't get a subtle 'i'm having a show come along if you like' it'll be mass publicity
Does anybody know anything more about his London show? I can't find the location and date anywhere! it hasn't been released yet as far as i know. Publically nobody knows. It is a "coming soon" sort of deal. 1 thing i'm sure of its brainwash so we won't get a subtle 'i'm having a show come along if you like' it'll be mass publicity
|
|
raiden
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 512
๐๐ป 3
April 2008
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by raiden on Aug 26, 2009 7:18:01 GMT 1, 1) Stop attributing ideas to MBW that he doesn't have. Meet MBW, talk to him, then tell me he's some sort of profound genius. Even in his interviews, he comes across as a complete moron. Six months ago the same idiots who are saying "wow he's genius" because they bought his prints were saying "you don't get it, he's purposely an stupid and devoid of ideas because he's really Banksy's Tony Clifton." Seriously? Which is it?
Meanwhile, talk to Shep and you realize he knows exactly what he is doing. He's brilliant because he's fucking brilliant - in the classical sense. The guy exudes IQ and intelligence - I find myself often thinking "That's nice Shep, maybe you're over thinking this a bit"
For that matter, practically every other artists I've talked to is more "with it" and cohesive in thought than MBW, and its not like its just an act. He's just a bit dumb. Nice guy, but dumb.
2) Great, he's vogue and sells prints... what's your point??? I've said it 100 times... so was Thomas Kinkade. He duped a ton of unsophisticated art buyers to buy into him as the next great thing. He event went one step farther and got poor idiots to open mall galleries selling his crappie lithography nationwide. Now, a class action lawsuit later, and its all worthless junk that adorns your grandma's house in the Midwest. I won't say that MBW is as bad as Thomas Kinkade, but I will say he's the Thomas Kinkade of Urban Art.
If you for a second think that hype without substance is some sort of new movement, than I'm pegging you for an unsophisticated art buyer because hype has been inexorably tied to art well before Warhol's Soup Cans.
Fact is, hype and referential commentary regarding it has been the sole motivation for a number of artistic works in the 20th century, but its audacious to think it can be the sole thing holding up an entire career - and fallacious to think for a second hype itself can be a movement because it lacks any form of cohesiveness.
In actuality, parallel examples of artists similarly drawing their popularity solely on the house of cards of hype indicates that MBW may be a very short term phenomena - the word is FAD.
Now, I will still say Pork, that you probably purchased one of my top 5 fav MBW prints.
AS for this "Well he's got us all talking" as some sort of defense.... Put it in perspective.... He's got "us" talking about him, "us" on a board dedicated more often than not to the minut dissection of the going ons of the Urban Art world - is there any surprise? Even when nothing is happening, we're have pedantic discussions such as why Dolk has been quiet and whether it pertains to something larger in the art world.... in other words... this is but a nerdy microcosm within a fringe movement, within the otherwise stuffy and inaccessible world of modern art.
But all this invites the question for MBW adherents.... where does MBW really go from here??? Sure, he may have achieved his goal of hipster (as opposed to establishment) art fame and that was certainly his goal. But what of it? Having seen so many Peter Maxx prints at fractions of their original costs at garage sales in LA - an artists magnitudes more influential in his day, do you really think any of it really means a damn more than flash in a pan??
1) Stop attributing ideas to MBW that he doesn't have. Meet MBW, talk to him, then tell me he's some sort of profound genius. Even in his interviews, he comes across as a complete moron. Six months ago the same idiots who are saying "wow he's genius" because they bought his prints were saying "you don't get it, he's purposely an stupid and devoid of ideas because he's really Banksy's Tony Clifton." Seriously? Which is it?
Meanwhile, talk to Shep and you realize he knows exactly what he is doing. He's brilliant because he's fucking brilliant - in the classical sense. The guy exudes IQ and intelligence - I find myself often thinking "That's nice Shep, maybe you're over thinking this a bit"
For that matter, practically every other artists I've talked to is more "with it" and cohesive in thought than MBW, and its not like its just an act. He's just a bit dumb. Nice guy, but dumb.
2) Great, he's vogue and sells prints... what's your point??? I've said it 100 times... so was Thomas Kinkade. He duped a ton of unsophisticated art buyers to buy into him as the next great thing. He event went one step farther and got poor idiots to open mall galleries selling his crappie lithography nationwide. Now, a class action lawsuit later, and its all worthless junk that adorns your grandma's house in the Midwest. I won't say that MBW is as bad as Thomas Kinkade, but I will say he's the Thomas Kinkade of Urban Art.
If you for a second think that hype without substance is some sort of new movement, than I'm pegging you for an unsophisticated art buyer because hype has been inexorably tied to art well before Warhol's Soup Cans.
Fact is, hype and referential commentary regarding it has been the sole motivation for a number of artistic works in the 20th century, but its audacious to think it can be the sole thing holding up an entire career - and fallacious to think for a second hype itself can be a movement because it lacks any form of cohesiveness.
In actuality, parallel examples of artists similarly drawing their popularity solely on the house of cards of hype indicates that MBW may be a very short term phenomena - the word is FAD.
Now, I will still say Pork, that you probably purchased one of my top 5 fav MBW prints.
AS for this "Well he's got us all talking" as some sort of defense.... Put it in perspective.... He's got "us" talking about him, "us" on a board dedicated more often than not to the minut dissection of the going ons of the Urban Art world - is there any surprise? Even when nothing is happening, we're have pedantic discussions such as why Dolk has been quiet and whether it pertains to something larger in the art world.... in other words... this is but a nerdy microcosm within a fringe movement, within the otherwise stuffy and inaccessible world of modern art.
But all this invites the question for MBW adherents.... where does MBW really go from here??? Sure, he may have achieved his goal of hipster (as opposed to establishment) art fame and that was certainly his goal. But what of it? Having seen so many Peter Maxx prints at fractions of their original costs at garage sales in LA - an artists magnitudes more influential in his day, do you really think any of it really means a damn more than flash in a pan??
|
|
pointblank
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 518
๐๐ป 0
August 2008
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by pointblank on Aug 26, 2009 7:45:27 GMT 1, 1) Stop attributing ideas to MBW that he doesn't have. Meet MBW, talk to him, then tell me he's some sort of profound genius. Even in his interviews, he comes across as a complete moron. Six months ago the same idiots who are saying "wow he's genius" because they bought his prints were saying "you don't get it, he's purposely an stupid and devoid of ideas because he's really Banksy's Tony Clifton." Seriously? Which is it? Meanwhile, talk to Shep and you realize he knows exactly what he is doing. He's brilliant because he's f**king brilliant - in the classical sense. The guy exudes IQ and intelligence - I find myself often thinking "That's nice Shep, maybe you're over thinking this a bit" For that matter, practically every other artists I've talked to is more "with it" and cohesive in thought than MBW, and its not like its just an act. He's just a bit dumb. Nice guy, but dumb. 2) Great, he's vogue and sells prints... what's your point??? I've said it 100 times... so was Thomas Kinkade. He duped a ton of unsophisticated art buyers to buy into him as the next great thing. He event went one step farther and got poor idiots to open mall galleries selling his crappie lithography nationwide. Now, a class action lawsuit later, and its all worthless junk that adorns your grandma's house in the Midwest. I won't say that MBW is as bad as Thomas Kinkade, but I will say he's the Thomas Kinkade of Urban Art. If you for a second think that hype without substance is some sort of new movement, than I'm pegging you for an unsophisticated art buyer because hype has been inexorably tied to art well before Warhol's Soup Cans. Fact is, hype and referential commentary regarding it has been the sole motivation for a number of artistic works in the 20th century, but its audacious to think it can be the sole thing holding up an entire career - and fallacious to think for a second hype itself can be a movement because it lacks any form of cohesiveness. In actuality, parallel examples of artists similarly drawing their popularity solely on the house of cards of hype indicates that MBW may be a very short term phenomena - the word is FAD. Now, I will still say Pork, that you probably purchased one of my top 5 fav MBW prints. AS for this "Well he's got us all talking" as some sort of defense.... Put it in perspective.... He's got "us" talking about him, "us" on a board dedicated more often than not to the minut dissection of the going ons of the Urban Art world - is there any surprise? Even when nothing is happening, we're have pedantic discussions such as why Dolk has been quiet and whether it pertains to something larger in the art world.... in other words... this is but a nerdy microcosm within a fringe movement, within the otherwise stuffy and inaccessible world of modern art. But all this invites the question for MBW adherents.... where does MBW really go from here??? Sure, he may have achieved his goal of hipster (as opposed to establishment) art fame and that was certainly his goal. But what of it? Having seen so many Peter Maxx prints at fractions of their original costs at garage sales in LA - an artists magnitudes more influential in his day, do you really think any of it really means a damn more than flash in a pan??
Great post!
1) Stop attributing ideas to MBW that he doesn't have. Meet MBW, talk to him, then tell me he's some sort of profound genius. Even in his interviews, he comes across as a complete moron. Six months ago the same idiots who are saying "wow he's genius" because they bought his prints were saying "you don't get it, he's purposely an stupid and devoid of ideas because he's really Banksy's Tony Clifton." Seriously? Which is it? Meanwhile, talk to Shep and you realize he knows exactly what he is doing. He's brilliant because he's f**king brilliant - in the classical sense. The guy exudes IQ and intelligence - I find myself often thinking "That's nice Shep, maybe you're over thinking this a bit" For that matter, practically every other artists I've talked to is more "with it" and cohesive in thought than MBW, and its not like its just an act. He's just a bit dumb. Nice guy, but dumb. 2) Great, he's vogue and sells prints... what's your point??? I've said it 100 times... so was Thomas Kinkade. He duped a ton of unsophisticated art buyers to buy into him as the next great thing. He event went one step farther and got poor idiots to open mall galleries selling his crappie lithography nationwide. Now, a class action lawsuit later, and its all worthless junk that adorns your grandma's house in the Midwest. I won't say that MBW is as bad as Thomas Kinkade, but I will say he's the Thomas Kinkade of Urban Art. If you for a second think that hype without substance is some sort of new movement, than I'm pegging you for an unsophisticated art buyer because hype has been inexorably tied to art well before Warhol's Soup Cans. Fact is, hype and referential commentary regarding it has been the sole motivation for a number of artistic works in the 20th century, but its audacious to think it can be the sole thing holding up an entire career - and fallacious to think for a second hype itself can be a movement because it lacks any form of cohesiveness. In actuality, parallel examples of artists similarly drawing their popularity solely on the house of cards of hype indicates that MBW may be a very short term phenomena - the word is FAD. Now, I will still say Pork, that you probably purchased one of my top 5 fav MBW prints. AS for this "Well he's got us all talking" as some sort of defense.... Put it in perspective.... He's got "us" talking about him, "us" on a board dedicated more often than not to the minut dissection of the going ons of the Urban Art world - is there any surprise? Even when nothing is happening, we're have pedantic discussions such as why Dolk has been quiet and whether it pertains to something larger in the art world.... in other words... this is but a nerdy microcosm within a fringe movement, within the otherwise stuffy and inaccessible world of modern art. But all this invites the question for MBW adherents.... where does MBW really go from here??? Sure, he may have achieved his goal of hipster (as opposed to establishment) art fame and that was certainly his goal. But what of it? Having seen so many Peter Maxx prints at fractions of their original costs at garage sales in LA - an artists magnitudes more influential in his day, do you really think any of it really means a damn more than flash in a pan?? Great post!
|
|
Winter
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 7,155
๐๐ป 4,461
March 2007
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by Winter on Aug 26, 2009 19:41:27 GMT 1, Seen his latest edition has sold out
Seen his latest edition has sold out
|
|
superman
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 421
๐๐ป 21
January 2008
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by superman on Aug 26, 2009 22:47:24 GMT 1, MBW Marylin and legends are good.
MBW Marylin and legends are good.
|
|
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by snausages on Aug 27, 2009 0:45:25 GMT 1, I think this really has more to do with sociology than art myself. It's like the healthcare debate, people make and have allegiances and work backwards to prove their points.
It's just funny when people argue against MBW love artists who also steal imagery and ideas left and right. And love artists who also put out work whose concept is thinner than rice paper. It is a fine line though where MBW is. Is it plagerism, is it crap, is it good? Mostly it's crap, but so it arguably is with some other highly praised artists on this forum.
I think this really has more to do with sociology than art myself. It's like the healthcare debate, people make and have allegiances and work backwards to prove their points.
It's just funny when people argue against MBW love artists who also steal imagery and ideas left and right. And love artists who also put out work whose concept is thinner than rice paper. It is a fine line though where MBW is. Is it plagerism, is it crap, is it good? Mostly it's crap, but so it arguably is with some other highly praised artists on this forum.
|
|
|
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by bollockchops on Aug 27, 2009 1:14:00 GMT 1, I think this really has more to do with sociology than art myself. It's like the healthcare debate, people make and have allegiances and work backwards to prove their points. It's just funny when people argue against MBW love artists who also steal imagery and ideas left and right. And love artists who also put out work whose concept is thinner than rice paper. It is a fine line though where MBW is. Is it plagerism, is it crap, is it good? Mostly it's crap, but so it arguably is with some other highly praised artists on this forum.
It's really crap
I think this really has more to do with sociology than art myself. It's like the healthcare debate, people make and have allegiances and work backwards to prove their points. It's just funny when people argue against MBW love artists who also steal imagery and ideas left and right. And love artists who also put out work whose concept is thinner than rice paper. It is a fine line though where MBW is. Is it plagerism, is it crap, is it good? Mostly it's crap, but so it arguably is with some other highly praised artists on this forum. It's really crap
|
|
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by snausages on Aug 27, 2009 1:19:06 GMT 1, Mostly sure, but his best work puts a lot of other artists mentioned here to shame.
Mostly sure, but his best work puts a lot of other artists mentioned here to shame.
|
|
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by cashman on Aug 27, 2009 5:27:12 GMT 1, Mostly sure, but his best work puts a lot of other artists mentioned here to shame.
but a lot of the artists on here that are not as good, actually make there own work. MBW has the financial backing that would make any half arsed artist look good
Mostly sure, but his best work puts a lot of other artists mentioned here to shame. but a lot of the artists on here that are not as good, actually make there own work. MBW has the financial backing that would make any half arsed artist look good
|
|
Simococo
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,183
๐๐ป 401
April 2007
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by Simococo on Aug 27, 2009 5:43:55 GMT 1, Mostly sure, but his best work puts a lot of other artists mentioned here to shame.
who does he put to shame?
Mostly sure, but his best work puts a lot of other artists mentioned here to shame. who does he put to shame?
|
|
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by snausages on Aug 27, 2009 7:26:09 GMT 1, 1. You could throw a million pounds at many of these artists and they'll grandly flop.
2. I don't really want to name names and get drawn in a big debate about it but a few artists praised here (even some big names) put out some really uninspired work, with no wit and without a shred of a conceptual thought.
1. You could throw a million pounds at many of these artists and they'll grandly flop.
2. I don't really want to name names and get drawn in a big debate about it but a few artists praised here (even some big names) put out some really uninspired work, with no wit and without a shred of a conceptual thought.
|
|
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by robotbad on Aug 27, 2009 8:41:34 GMT 1, come on then Mr Sausages - name names
come on then Mr Sausages - name names
|
|
Simococo
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,183
๐๐ป 401
April 2007
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by Simococo on Aug 27, 2009 10:56:17 GMT 1, 1. You could throw a million pounds at many of these artists and they'll grandly flop. 2. I don't really want to name names and get drawn in a big debate about it but a few artists praised here (even some big names) put out some really uninspired work, with no wit and without a shred of a conceptual thought.
debates make this board worth visiting though?
1. You could throw a million pounds at many of these artists and they'll grandly flop. 2. I don't really want to name names and get drawn in a big debate about it but a few artists praised here (even some big names) put out some really uninspired work, with no wit and without a shred of a conceptual thought. debates make this board worth visiting though?
|
|
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by pork on Sept 4, 2009 8:44:06 GMT 1, Does anybody know anything more about his London show? I can't find the location and date anywhere!
The show is called ICONS, it's a 30,000 sqft solo show in London, that includes fine art and installations. Exhibit opens early December...
That's a fair space, anyone know the location?
Does anybody know anything more about his London show? I can't find the location and date anywhere! The show is called ICONS, it's a 30,000 sqft solo show in London, that includes fine art and installations. Exhibit opens early December... That's a fair space, anyone know the location?
|
|
|
daveart
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 940
๐๐ป 885
February 2008
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by daveart on Aug 18, 2015 23:13:10 GMT 1, cant believe i am posting a wanted thread for a brainwash... but looking for a Max Spray. thx
cant believe i am posting a wanted thread for a brainwash... but looking for a Max Spray. thx
|
|
tigerblood
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 790
๐๐ป 939
August 2011
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by tigerblood on Aug 19, 2015 3:34:44 GMT 1, OK in my book. I had the glossy poster hanging in my place for years until real prints pushed it off the walls. I'd be interested in a print on the offchance you have multiple offers after you have yours.
That one and the original Nike prints (not actual shoes) from circa 2009 or so were the two best prints he's done in my book. Both before ETTGS I believe.
OK in my book. I had the glossy poster hanging in my place for years until real prints pushed it off the walls. I'd be interested in a print on the offchance you have multiple offers after you have yours.
That one and the original Nike prints (not actual shoes) from circa 2009 or so were the two best prints he's done in my book. Both before ETTGS I believe.
|
|
boozerism
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 27
๐๐ป 6
April 2013
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by boozerism on Aug 19, 2015 8:09:40 GMT 1, I have a maxspray!! I'm based in Los Angeles.
I have a maxspray!! I'm based in Los Angeles.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
Mr Brainwash โข Max Spray Print, by Deleted on Aug 19, 2015 10:30:54 GMT 1, Please let me know if you or any other are interested in "Art Is Not A Crime" or "Art Cannot Be Critizised"..
Please let me know if you or any other are interested in "Art Is Not A Crime" or "Art Cannot Be Critizised"..
|
|