Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Banksy in TIME, by Deleted on Oct 29, 2008 19:04:09 GMT 1, www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1854616,00.html
Banksy Defends His Guerrilla Graffiti Art By Liz Logan / London Wednesday, Oct. 29, 2008
Even though artwork by the British graffiti artist Banksy is popular with celebrities such as Angelina Jolie and Christina Aguilera, some regard the artist's street works to be vandalism, pure and simple. On Oct. 23, the Council of Westminster in London ordered the removal of a 23 ft (7 m) Banksy mural โ reportedly his largest work in central London โ claiming that it encourages graffiti.
In an exclusive statement to TIME, the mysterious guerrilla prankster has responded to the council's decision. "I don't know what next door is complaining about โ their building is so ugly the 'No Trespassing' sign reads like an insult," the statement reads, referring to Royal Mail, a tenant of the building that has sought the mural's removal. In light of several other recent controversies over Banksy's outdoor works, this removal is further indication of the challenges that can arise when a famous artist uses private property as his canvas.
While Banksy made his name โ or, rather, pseudonym โ painting stenciled political and satirical images out-of-doors, in recent years his commercial pieces, including drawings, paintings and installations, have sold at auction for hundreds of thousands of dollars. At the same time, Banksy continues to create the street artwork he's famous for. The Westminster piece depicts a child in a red, hooded sweatshirt on a ladder painting the slogan "One Nation Under CCTV" in large letters, as a U.S.-style police officer with a camera and a dog stand nearby. CCTV is Britain's system of closed-circuit public surveillance cameras. Ironically, Banksy completed the work with an actual CCTV camera overhead.
There is currently a dispute over who owns the wall: Royal Mail, which wants the mural removed, or the property investment firm Searchgrade, which filed papers to keep the mural, claiming it's an advertisement, according to councilor David Boothroyd, who served on the planning committee that decided the mural should go. The council denied Searchgrade's request and is working to determine the wall's true owner. If it turns out to be Searchgrade, the company may appeal the decision and, ultimately, the mural could stay. Boothroyd guesses that the process will take a few more months.
Even if it would save the artwork, Banksy, forever the contrarian rebel, doesn't want his art classified as an advertisement, and in his statement says he was "offended" by the suggestion. "Advertising makes people feel inadequate and worthless. Graffiti doesn't do that. Graffiti doesn't emotionally blackmail you, graffiti doesn't make you feel fat and graffiti doesn't make you rush out and buy things โ except maybe high-strength cleaning products," the statement reads.
If the work stays, there's a chance the wall's owners could profit in more ways than one. For starters, Banksy murals bring foot traffic. Crowds of admirers and photographers have invaded the Westminster block since the mural appeared in April. But not everyone likes the attention. According to Boothroyd, the crowds are Royal Mail's main complaint, as they block the mail vans from coming in and out of the parking lot.
Unlike most graffiti, Banksy's work, if it remains, is likely to add value to the property, not least because it's considered a valuable work of art. But attempting to sell Banksy's street works can be a risky business. Last month, five of the artist's street pieces failed to sell at auction because Banksy refused to verify their authenticity. In January, a wall Banksy painted received a final bid of over $400,000 in an eBay auction, but the sale was never finalized, according to Banksy's publicist. The organization that authenticates Banksy's artwork, Pest Control, refuses to approve street pieces because the artist prefers the work to remain in situ and "building owners tend to become irate when their doors go missing because of a stencil," the group's website states. Acoris Andipa, owner and director of the Andipa Gallery in London, which has sold Banksy's work, says that any "intelligent buyer" would not entertain the possibility of purchasing one of Banksy's street pieces. "It comes with too many question marks and a clear message from the artist that these works are not to be sold," he says.
This isn't the first time a council has taken a pass on Banksy. In Oct. 2007, the London council of Tower Hamlets ordered the removal of his work. A year earlier, the city council of Bristol, reportedly Banksy's hometown, had considered removing one of his murals, but in the end allowed it to remain, citing an outpouring of public support on an online forum.
Despite sometimes losing his work to whitewash or a power hose, Banksy's career seems to be continuing on its upward trajectory. His latest work is an installation called "The Village Pet Store and Charcoal Grill," a commentary on the human-animal relationship that features walking chicken nuggets, swimming fish sticks and hot dogs that slither like snakes. It has been captivating the New York City art scene this month and closes Oct. 31. Although he works undercover, it doesn't look like Banksy can escape the spotlight.
www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1854616,00.html Banksy Defends His Guerrilla Graffiti Art By Liz Logan / London Wednesday, Oct. 29, 2008 Even though artwork by the British graffiti artist Banksy is popular with celebrities such as Angelina Jolie and Christina Aguilera, some regard the artist's street works to be vandalism, pure and simple. On Oct. 23, the Council of Westminster in London ordered the removal of a 23 ft (7 m) Banksy mural โ reportedly his largest work in central London โ claiming that it encourages graffiti. In an exclusive statement to TIME, the mysterious guerrilla prankster has responded to the council's decision. "I don't know what next door is complaining about โ their building is so ugly the 'No Trespassing' sign reads like an insult," the statement reads, referring to Royal Mail, a tenant of the building that has sought the mural's removal. In light of several other recent controversies over Banksy's outdoor works, this removal is further indication of the challenges that can arise when a famous artist uses private property as his canvas. While Banksy made his name โ or, rather, pseudonym โ painting stenciled political and satirical images out-of-doors, in recent years his commercial pieces, including drawings, paintings and installations, have sold at auction for hundreds of thousands of dollars. At the same time, Banksy continues to create the street artwork he's famous for. The Westminster piece depicts a child in a red, hooded sweatshirt on a ladder painting the slogan "One Nation Under CCTV" in large letters, as a U.S.-style police officer with a camera and a dog stand nearby. CCTV is Britain's system of closed-circuit public surveillance cameras. Ironically, Banksy completed the work with an actual CCTV camera overhead. There is currently a dispute over who owns the wall: Royal Mail, which wants the mural removed, or the property investment firm Searchgrade, which filed papers to keep the mural, claiming it's an advertisement, according to councilor David Boothroyd, who served on the planning committee that decided the mural should go. The council denied Searchgrade's request and is working to determine the wall's true owner. If it turns out to be Searchgrade, the company may appeal the decision and, ultimately, the mural could stay. Boothroyd guesses that the process will take a few more months. Even if it would save the artwork, Banksy, forever the contrarian rebel, doesn't want his art classified as an advertisement, and in his statement says he was "offended" by the suggestion. "Advertising makes people feel inadequate and worthless. Graffiti doesn't do that. Graffiti doesn't emotionally blackmail you, graffiti doesn't make you feel fat and graffiti doesn't make you rush out and buy things โ except maybe high-strength cleaning products," the statement reads. If the work stays, there's a chance the wall's owners could profit in more ways than one. For starters, Banksy murals bring foot traffic. Crowds of admirers and photographers have invaded the Westminster block since the mural appeared in April. But not everyone likes the attention. According to Boothroyd, the crowds are Royal Mail's main complaint, as they block the mail vans from coming in and out of the parking lot. Unlike most graffiti, Banksy's work, if it remains, is likely to add value to the property, not least because it's considered a valuable work of art. But attempting to sell Banksy's street works can be a risky business. Last month, five of the artist's street pieces failed to sell at auction because Banksy refused to verify their authenticity. In January, a wall Banksy painted received a final bid of over $400,000 in an eBay auction, but the sale was never finalized, according to Banksy's publicist. The organization that authenticates Banksy's artwork, Pest Control, refuses to approve street pieces because the artist prefers the work to remain in situ and "building owners tend to become irate when their doors go missing because of a stencil," the group's website states. Acoris Andipa, owner and director of the Andipa Gallery in London, which has sold Banksy's work, says that any "intelligent buyer" would not entertain the possibility of purchasing one of Banksy's street pieces. "It comes with too many question marks and a clear message from the artist that these works are not to be sold," he says. This isn't the first time a council has taken a pass on Banksy. In Oct. 2007, the London council of Tower Hamlets ordered the removal of his work. A year earlier, the city council of Bristol, reportedly Banksy's hometown, had considered removing one of his murals, but in the end allowed it to remain, citing an outpouring of public support on an online forum. Despite sometimes losing his work to whitewash or a power hose, Banksy's career seems to be continuing on its upward trajectory. His latest work is an installation called "The Village Pet Store and Charcoal Grill," a commentary on the human-animal relationship that features walking chicken nuggets, swimming fish sticks and hot dogs that slither like snakes. It has been captivating the New York City art scene this month and closes Oct. 31. Although he works undercover, it doesn't look like Banksy can escape the spotlight.
|
|
rcab11
New Member
Posts โข 356
Likes โข 0
April 2008
|
Banksy in TIME, by rcab11 on Oct 29, 2008 19:10:50 GMT 1, Great read. Thanks for that Cartrain.
Great read. Thanks for that Cartrain.
|
|
Grubster
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,226
Likes โข 1
August 2008
|
Banksy in TIME, by Grubster on Oct 29, 2008 19:35:05 GMT 1, HELL YEA>>> SO MANY THINGS MENTIONED, RELATE TO THIS FORUM AT LEAST 2 or 3. GREAT READ!!!
sweet article and really stresses the facct that street work at auction houses and what not,will be seriously frowned upon! LOVE THAT.. so many great points in that article..prob the best 1 yet!
HELL YEA>>> SO MANY THINGS MENTIONED, RELATE TO THIS FORUM AT LEAST 2 or 3. GREAT READ!!!
sweet article and really stresses the facct that street work at auction houses and what not,will be seriously frowned upon! LOVE THAT.. so many great points in that article..prob the best 1 yet!
|
|
|
Banksy in TIME, by Daniel Silk on Oct 29, 2008 21:43:59 GMT 1, Interesting stuff ;D
I really cant see this piece going They would be crazy
Interesting stuff ;D I really cant see this piece going They would be crazy
|
|
dmandpenfold
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,466
Likes โข 10
December 2006
|
Banksy in TIME, by dmandpenfold on Oct 29, 2008 21:52:56 GMT 1, interesting to read, forum gets a mention too
interesting to read, forum gets a mention too
|
|
|
Banksy in TIME, by baileymontana on Oct 29, 2008 21:59:07 GMT 1, Nice post Cartrain. Good article, although I really look forward to the day when a Banksy article doesn't mention Angelina or Aguilera (almost seems to be compulsory).
Nice post Cartrain. Good article, although I really look forward to the day when a Banksy article doesn't mention Angelina or Aguilera (almost seems to be compulsory).
|
|
|
Banksy in TIME, by arcam on Oct 29, 2008 22:06:11 GMT 1, Cheers...nice article.
Cheers...nice article.
|
|
gerry
New Member
Posts โข 303
Likes โข 0
October 2007
|
Banksy in TIME, by gerry on Oct 29, 2008 22:10:23 GMT 1, interesting to read, forum gets a mention too
Think they're talking about the online poll Bristol City Council held about keeping the Park Street Banksy. It was a complete voodoo poll, but fair play to them, they stood by the decision all the same. Still see tourists taking photos of it to this day, so think they made the right choice.
interesting to read, forum gets a mention too Think they're talking about the online poll Bristol City Council held about keeping the Park Street Banksy. It was a complete voodoo poll, but fair play to them, they stood by the decision all the same. Still see tourists taking photos of it to this day, so think they made the right choice.
|
|
Winter
Junior Member
Posts โข 7,152
Likes โข 4,455
March 2007
|
Banksy in TIME, by Winter on Oct 29, 2008 22:31:59 GMT 1, Really great read, thanks for posting
Really great read, thanks for posting
|
|
|
Banksy in TIME, by doublehelix on Oct 30, 2008 10:47:53 GMT 1, "Graffiti doesn't emotionally blackmail you, graffiti doesn't make you feel fat and graffiti doesn't make you rush out and buy things โ except maybe high-strength cleaning products"
... er, and prints by the artist!
Great read, thanks for posting Cartrain.
"Graffiti doesn't emotionally blackmail you, graffiti doesn't make you feel fat and graffiti doesn't make you rush out and buy things โ except maybe high-strength cleaning products"
... er, and prints by the artist!
Great read, thanks for posting Cartrain.
|
|
G-Man
Junior Member
Posts โข 3,529
Likes โข 33
November 2007
|
Banksy in TIME, by G-Man on Oct 30, 2008 11:08:55 GMT 1, Ta great post
Ta great post
|
|