|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 16:45:56 GMT 1, why should I start a thread to change an artist rating? my opinion will be ignored like you're doing right now when we're asking you to remove the rating stars. no one (apart from you) likes this idea, and it has been explained very well by many members why it shouldn't exist. and what did you say? "you don't expect everyone to agree with your opinion, so don't expect these ratings to change just to suit you personally." you should state clear to everyone that that they are YOURS personal ratings, that reflects YOURS ideas and they won't be removed because YOU like them.
Can you tell me what is says beside the stars please?
why should I start a thread to change an artist rating? my opinion will be ignored like you're doing right now when we're asking you to remove the rating stars. no one (apart from you) likes this idea, and it has been explained very well by many members why it shouldn't exist. and what did you say? "you don't expect everyone to agree with your opinion, so don't expect these ratings to change just to suit you personally." you should state clear to everyone that that they are YOURS personal ratings, that reflects YOURS ideas and they won't be removed because YOU like them. Can you tell me what is says beside the stars please? |
|
ilmambo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,336
👍🏻 244
March 2010
|
Artist stars, by ilmambo on Jan 20, 2012 16:50:29 GMT 1, "Urban Art Association Rating" ?
I thought that "Urban Art Association" = this forum and their members. am I right?
well looks like the the "Urban Art Association" never approved and is asking you again to remove the ratings.
maybe change ""Urban Art Association Rating" with "Daniel Silk Rating" ?
"Urban Art Association Rating" ?
I thought that "Urban Art Association" = this forum and their members. am I right?
well looks like the the "Urban Art Association" never approved and is asking you again to remove the ratings.
maybe change ""Urban Art Association Rating" with "Daniel Silk Rating" ?
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by They call me Stephen on Jan 20, 2012 16:54:09 GMT 1, I think we should keep the stars but instead of rating artists on suposed talent or popularity could rate them on looks - kind of a like a thinking mans 'hot or not'
I think we should keep the stars but instead of rating artists on suposed talent or popularity could rate them on looks - kind of a like a thinking mans 'hot or not'
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 16:55:35 GMT 1, "Urban Art Association Rating" ? I thought that "Urban Art Association" = this forum and their members. am I right? well looks like the the "Urban Art Association" never approved and is asking you again to remove the ratings. maybe change ""Urban Art Association Rating" with "Daniel Silk Rating" ?
If it said "Daniel Silk Rating" I would need to change a lot of the stars  coz it doesn't reflect my opinion.
"Urban Art Association Rating" ? I thought that "Urban Art Association" = this forum and their members. am I right? well looks like the the "Urban Art Association" never approved and is asking you again to remove the ratings. maybe change ""Urban Art Association Rating" with "Daniel Silk Rating" ? If it said "Daniel Silk Rating" I would need to change a lot of the stars coz it doesn't reflect my opinion. |
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 16:57:34 GMT 1, It was said before that after a few UrbanArtAwards the rating could maybe be set by the combined results.
It might be a bit complicated to work out, but its possible to do I think 
It was said before that after a few UrbanArtAwards the rating could maybe be set by the combined results. It might be a bit complicated to work out, but its possible to do I think |
|
ilmambo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,336
👍🏻 244
March 2010
|
Artist stars, by ilmambo on Jan 20, 2012 17:00:32 GMT 1, "Urban Art Association Rating" ? I thought that "Urban Art Association" = this forum and their members. am I right? well looks like the the "Urban Art Association" never approved and is asking you again to remove the ratings. maybe change ""Urban Art Association Rating" with "Daniel Silk Rating" ? If it said "Daniel Silk Rating" I would need to change a lot of the stars coz it doesn't reflect my opinion.
well now it doesn't reflect the forumites' opinions neither because we (forumites) DON'T WANT ANY RATING. this is our opinion, NO RATINGS.
"Urban Art Association Rating" ? I thought that "Urban Art Association" = this forum and their members. am I right? well looks like the the "Urban Art Association" never approved and is asking you again to remove the ratings. maybe change ""Urban Art Association Rating" with "Daniel Silk Rating" ? If it said "Daniel Silk Rating" I would need to change a lot of the stars coz it doesn't reflect my opinion. well now it doesn't reflect the forumites' opinions neither because we (forumites) DON'T WANT ANY RATING. this is our opinion, NO RATINGS. |
|
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:02:12 GMT 1, If it said "Daniel Silk Rating" I would need to change a lot of the stars coz it doesn't reflect my opinion. well now it doesn't reflect the forumites' opinions neither because we (forumites) DON'T WANT ANY RATING. this is our opinion, NO RATINGS.
Im sorry  I had no idea you speak for everyone
If it said "Daniel Silk Rating" I would need to change a lot of the stars coz it doesn't reflect my opinion. well now it doesn't reflect the forumites' opinions neither because we (forumites) DON'T WANT ANY RATING. this is our opinion, NO RATINGS. Im sorry I had no idea you speak for everyone |
|
ilmambo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,336
👍🏻 244
March 2010
|
Artist stars, by ilmambo on Jan 20, 2012 17:06:50 GMT 1, lol are you kidding?
others already expressed their opinions (asking you to remove the ratings), but looks like you are just ignoring and/or not reading them.
I give up.
lol are you kidding?
others already expressed their opinions (asking you to remove the ratings), but looks like you are just ignoring and/or not reading them.
I give up.
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Cedric Mnich on Jan 20, 2012 17:08:55 GMT 1, The poll results will speak by itself if people vote. For now, 22 people all agree. In a democracy, if you want your voice to be taken into consideration, you have to vote.
The poll results will speak by itself if people vote. For now, 22 people all agree. In a democracy, if you want your voice to be taken into consideration, you have to vote.
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:11:02 GMT 1, It was said before that after a few UrbanArtAwards the rating could maybe be set by the combined results. It might be a bit complicated to work out, but its possible to do I think
I think now we have the results from two years of Awards its worth working it all out like that Then you have ALL had the chance to vote, and you have decided the number of stars yourself
It was said before that after a few UrbanArtAwards the rating could maybe be set by the combined results. It might be a bit complicated to work out, but its possible to do I think I think now we have the results from two years of Awards its worth working it all out like that Then you have ALL had the chance to vote, and you have decided the number of stars yourself |
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:13:58 GMT 1, The poll results will speak by itself if people vote. For now, 22 people all agree. In a democracy, if you want your voice to be taken into consideration, you have to vote.
Exactly!
Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted.
The poll results will speak by itself if people vote. For now, 22 people all agree. In a democracy, if you want your voice to be taken into consideration, you have to vote. Exactly! Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted. |
|
|
|
Artist stars, by They call me Stephen on Jan 20, 2012 17:14:54 GMT 1, I've voted to rate artists on looks.
Banksy (doesn't show his face - must be hiding something) - 1 star
Eine (nice tats) - 4 stars
Sweetoof (must have rotting teeth) - 2 stars
Barry McGee (short) - 3 stars
Swoon (nice hair) - 4 stars
Grafter (has a car) - 3 stars
Faile (lovely eyes plus there's two fo them) - 6 stars
etc
I've voted to rate artists on looks.
Banksy (doesn't show his face - must be hiding something) - 1 star
Eine (nice tats) - 4 stars
Sweetoof (must have rotting teeth) - 2 stars
Barry McGee (short) - 3 stars
Swoon (nice hair) - 4 stars
Grafter (has a car) - 3 stars
Faile (lovely eyes plus there's two fo them) - 6 stars
etc
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by maumau93 on Jan 20, 2012 17:23:01 GMT 1, The poll results will speak by itself if people vote. For now, 22 people all agree. In a democracy, if you want your voice to be taken into consideration, you have to vote. Exactly! Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted.
so your saying if this comes out as an overwhelming majority of people vote to get rid of the stars you will?
The poll results will speak by itself if people vote. For now, 22 people all agree. In a democracy, if you want your voice to be taken into consideration, you have to vote. Exactly! Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted. so your saying if this comes out as an overwhelming majority of people vote to get rid of the stars you will? |
|
ilmambo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,336
👍🏻 244
March 2010
|
Artist stars, by ilmambo on Jan 20, 2012 17:26:31 GMT 1, I've voted to rate artists on looks. Banksy (doesn't show his face - must be hiding something) - 1 star Eine (nice tats) - 4 stars Sweetoof (must have rotting teeth) - 2 stars Barry McGee (short) - 3 stars Swoon (nice hair) - 4 stars Grafter (has a car) - 3 stars Faile (lovely eyes plus there's two fo them) - 6 stars etc
that made me laugh! ;D
I've voted to rate artists on looks. Banksy (doesn't show his face - must be hiding something) - 1 star Eine (nice tats) - 4 stars Sweetoof (must have rotting teeth) - 2 stars Barry McGee (short) - 3 stars Swoon (nice hair) - 4 stars Grafter (has a car) - 3 stars Faile (lovely eyes plus there's two fo them) - 6 stars etc that made me laugh! ;D |
|
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by manty on Jan 20, 2012 17:28:49 GMT 1, Exactly! Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted. so your saying if this comes out as an overwhelming majority of people vote to get rid of the stars you will?
Oh, here we go ;D
Exactly! Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted. so your saying if this comes out as an overwhelming majority of people vote to get rid of the stars you will? Oh, here we go ;D |
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:30:50 GMT 1, Exactly! Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted. so your saying if this comes out as an overwhelming majority of people vote to get rid of the stars you will?
It doesnt say that.
Its says the new rating will show the results of the Awards that you all had a chance to vote in.
Exactly! Everyone had the chance to vote in the Awards, and thats what the new rating will reflect The opinions of all those members who voted. so your saying if this comes out as an overwhelming majority of people vote to get rid of the stars you will? It doesnt say that. Its says the new rating will show the results of the Awards that you all had a chance to vote in. |
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:33:46 GMT 1, I guess it will mean some Artists who have never been nominated or voted for will not get any stars at all
I guess it will mean some Artists who have never been nominated or voted for will not get any stars at all |
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Cedric Mnich on Jan 20, 2012 17:35:23 GMT 1, I personnally see no reason to grant some artists several stars and some less, giving them a subjective rating which may differ necessarily from a person to another. I think the number of posts in artist dedicated threads speak for itself regarding the popularity (or controversy) of an artist. Hence my vote. You should either be rated artist or gallery or member (are there any other status ?).
Now, if you want to represent people's opinion, my suggestion would be to create a specific logo giving some artists a UAA award logo next instead of the red star, in order to represent the votes of members and showing real artists popularity here. A bit like the gold stars on soccer world championship polos... Banksy and Invader would have two golden UAA awards, second and third (like ROA and BLU) could have silver / bronze UAA awards etc. The risk is that it may look like Russian generals uniforms in the end but that's a possibility to consider ? Whaddayathink guys ?
Just my 2 cents / pennies.
I personnally see no reason to grant some artists several stars and some less, giving them a subjective rating which may differ necessarily from a person to another. I think the number of posts in artist dedicated threads speak for itself regarding the popularity (or controversy) of an artist. Hence my vote. You should either be rated artist or gallery or member (are there any other status ?).
Now, if you want to represent people's opinion, my suggestion would be to create a specific logo giving some artists a UAA award logo next instead of the red star, in order to represent the votes of members and showing real artists popularity here. A bit like the gold stars on soccer world championship polos... Banksy and Invader would have two golden UAA awards, second and third (like ROA and BLU) could have silver / bronze UAA awards etc. The risk is that it may look like Russian generals uniforms in the end but that's a possibility to consider ? Whaddayathink guys ?
Just my 2 cents / pennies.
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:35:37 GMT 1, It also brings in the possibility of having stars for the Galleries as well, as they also appear in the Awards results.
It also brings in the possibility of having stars for the Galleries as well, as they also appear in the Awards results.
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by manty on Jan 20, 2012 17:37:49 GMT 1, It also brings in the possibility of having stars for the Galleries as well, as they also appear in the Awards results.
Good news
It also brings in the possibility of having stars for the Galleries as well, as they also appear in the Awards results. Good news |
|
|
|
Artist stars, by manty on Jan 20, 2012 17:41:34 GMT 1, What would help me would be a moodometer
I have just spent 3 hours with my accountant, and feel a little headache coming on.
I'd like something that can show everyone how I feel
Also there are some real moody people on here, and a great amount of negativity against certain things
I would like to be able to like or not them
I like you by the way, who ever you are
Thanks for listening
What would help me would be a moodometer
I have just spent 3 hours with my accountant, and feel a little headache coming on.
I'd like something that can show everyone how I feel
Also there are some real moody people on here, and a great amount of negativity against certain things
I would like to be able to like or not them
I like you by the way, who ever you are
Thanks for listening
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:47:33 GMT 1, It was said before that after a few UrbanArtAwards the rating could maybe be set by the combined results. It might be a bit complicated to work out, but its possible to do I think How is it possible when South America was excluded from the awards? How were the stars allocated initially? That should be easy to answer. I know I want to do awards for South America, Australia and Asia in the end, but so far members just havent really shown interest in enough Artists from those areas to make it worth doing. The ratings were originaly done on what was felt was the general feeling towards those Artists across the forum, also taking into account things like the number of threads, posts about them. They have gone up and down over that time, and the original idea was to always change them in the end to reflect the results of the Awards.
It was said before that after a few UrbanArtAwards the rating could maybe be set by the combined results. It might be a bit complicated to work out, but its possible to do I think How is it possible when South America was excluded from the awards? How were the stars allocated initially? That should be easy to answer. I know I want to do awards for South America, Australia and Asia in the end, but so far members just havent really shown interest in enough Artists from those areas to make it worth doing. The ratings were originaly done on what was felt was the general feeling towards those Artists across the forum, also taking into account things like the number of threads, posts about them. They have gone up and down over that time, and the original idea was to always change them in the end to reflect the results of the Awards. |
|
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by hunter007 on Jan 20, 2012 17:48:52 GMT 1, Competition Time
Choose a number and allocate your name next to it and comprise a list below , The winner will be sent one of my stars ,all free of charge of course
1.
2.
3.
Competition Time
Choose a number and allocate your name next to it and comprise a list below , The winner will be sent one of my stars ,all free of charge of course
1.
2.
3.
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 20, 2012 17:54:16 GMT 1, Right
I will start a new locked thread.
I will posts up the results from the last two awards, and try to work out how they can be translated into a 5 star system.
You can keep an eye on the thread so you can see me working it all out ok.
Thanks!
Right I will start a new locked thread. I will posts up the results from the last two awards, and try to work out how they can be translated into a 5 star system. You can keep an eye on the thread so you can see me working it all out ok. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by maumau93 on Jan 20, 2012 18:33:56 GMT 1,
;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by boatyyy on Jan 20, 2012 19:18:37 GMT 1, just caught up on this - what a good friday fun thread...
thank god it's friday - they seem to be coming so fast these days...
just caught up on this - what a good friday fun thread...
thank god it's friday - they seem to be coming so fast these days...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artist stars, by Daniel Silk on Jan 21, 2012 17:55:50 GMT 1, I don't think I have the spread of stars right yet, I will keep looking at it to try and adjust it so the number of stars reflect the results as best as I can.
Maybe have less 5 stars and more on 3, 2 and 1.
I don't think I have the spread of stars right yet, I will keep looking at it to try and adjust it so the number of stars reflect the results as best as I can.
Maybe have less 5 stars and more on 3, 2 and 1.
|
|
johnnyh
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,492
👍🏻 2,102
March 2011
|
Artist stars, by johnnyh on Jan 21, 2012 18:03:52 GMT 1, Daniel your last comment is the problem.
There is no correct or fair way of doing this. They are artists not hotels.
The awards do not reflect accuirately members opinions as not every one votes.
Also when offered to vote as far as I know we dod not know it was star orientated.
I think your determination to inflict the system is both alienating artists and the members.
Would offer this as a compromise that you drop the stars till you come up with a system that is supported.
If you cannot come up with a fair system and I believe that there is none as artists should not be judged that way.
Naturally stars suggest better and worse which is not correct for artists.
Read the opinions on this thread and there is almost no positive ones for the system other than yours. That's not totally true
But a fair concensous of people who use the board.
Other things to consider in your awards is not everyone see's a lot odf street art and not everyone buys from galleries or knows many galleries
So you numbers are based on a small percentage which is not correct.
Similarly if you base on threads. Mr Brainwash has a lot of negative threads does that make him a higher star rating than a positive thread etc.
Would just ask on behalf of a lot of people who love this board forum to please reconsider.
I even gave as others have a way of doing earlier so that no one is judged please read and consider
Thx Johnny
Daniel your last comment is the problem.
There is no correct or fair way of doing this. They are artists not hotels.
The awards do not reflect accuirately members opinions as not every one votes.
Also when offered to vote as far as I know we dod not know it was star orientated.
I think your determination to inflict the system is both alienating artists and the members.
Would offer this as a compromise that you drop the stars till you come up with a system that is supported.
If you cannot come up with a fair system and I believe that there is none as artists should not be judged that way.
Naturally stars suggest better and worse which is not correct for artists.
Read the opinions on this thread and there is almost no positive ones for the system other than yours. That's not totally true
But a fair concensous of people who use the board.
Other things to consider in your awards is not everyone see's a lot odf street art and not everyone buys from galleries or knows many galleries
So you numbers are based on a small percentage which is not correct.
Similarly if you base on threads. Mr Brainwash has a lot of negative threads does that make him a higher star rating than a positive thread etc.
Would just ask on behalf of a lot of people who love this board forum to please reconsider.
I even gave as others have a way of doing earlier so that no one is judged please read and consider
Thx Johnny
|
|
coz it doesn't reflect my opinion.
I had no idea you speak for everyone 
