|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by giiiant on Nov 12, 2008 21:37:05 GMT 1, beaten
beaten
|
|
Grubster
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,226
ππ» 1
August 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Grubster on Nov 12, 2008 21:51:55 GMT 1, If Hirst has indeed purchased these artworks from Cartrain because he likes them, then I offer my sincere congratulations. It would certainly be a scoop and I can understand his desire to tell everyone on here. However, Cartrain has not actually said this. What he said was Hirst had "requested interested" (expressed an interest in?) the artworks and has now obtained them and they are in his possession. From what Ross and others said, I understand that these artworks (for the love of God) used DHs artwork in them - his diamond skull I presume. So, Cartrain, just for the record, please can you confirm that this "requested interest" and "deal" is actually a real sale and not DH claiming ownership of the artworks due to copyright infringement or something like that? You said he "obtained" them through a deal done with you and they are in his possession. But you didn't say he bought them. Again if this simply a case of DH buying Cartrain's work because he likes it then that is certainly something to be very proud of, but I can't help feeling that there is more to it than that.
This is exact;y what i was saying but in differ context... this does seem odd, i mean come on! one of his last post was a fake article link to a bbc article. how can you take this serious. I could be wwrong and in that case excuse me, but I found it very doubtful I'm not!
If Hirst has indeed purchased these artworks from Cartrain because he likes them, then I offer my sincere congratulations. It would certainly be a scoop and I can understand his desire to tell everyone on here. However, Cartrain has not actually said this. What he said was Hirst had "requested interested" (expressed an interest in?) the artworks and has now obtained them and they are in his possession. From what Ross and others said, I understand that these artworks (for the love of God) used DHs artwork in them - his diamond skull I presume. So, Cartrain, just for the record, please can you confirm that this "requested interest" and "deal" is actually a real sale and not DH claiming ownership of the artworks due to copyright infringement or something like that? You said he "obtained" them through a deal done with you and they are in his possession. But you didn't say he bought them. Again if this simply a case of DH buying Cartrain's work because he likes it then that is certainly something to be very proud of, but I can't help feeling that there is more to it than that. This is exact;y what i was saying but in differ context... this does seem odd, i mean come on! one of his last post was a fake article link to a bbc article. how can you take this serious. I could be wwrong and in that case excuse me, but I found it very doubtful I'm not! |
|
romanywg
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,093
ππ» 36
October 2006
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by romanywg on Nov 12, 2008 22:01:50 GMT 1, Remember the lady that made the fake diamond skull and took a great picture of it outside The White Cube Gallery? She had a visit from Hirsts 'team' and a deal was done too.
Remember the lady that made the fake diamond skull and took a great picture of it outside The White Cube Gallery? She had a visit from Hirsts 'team' and a deal was done too.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by junkieart on Nov 12, 2008 22:02:25 GMT 1, If this is so, well done mate, but this screams more of a PR stunt than actual facts.
If I'm wrong sorry, and well done.
What next...... Mr Saatchi will be a knocking.
If this is so, well done mate, but this screams more of a PR stunt than actual facts.
If I'm wrong sorry, and well done.
What next...... Mr Saatchi will be a knocking.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by junkieart on Nov 12, 2008 22:04:16 GMT 1, Hirst 'team' is beginning to sound like the mafioso! Good luck mate...
Hirst 'team' is beginning to sound like the mafioso! Good luck mate...
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Ron Goldsurfer on Nov 12, 2008 22:22:07 GMT 1, INMHO there must be either a blind twin brother to DH or some person walking around with a fake ID trying to impersonate DH. After seeing Cartrains stuff nothing else is possible/imaginable, rather strange no one else in this thread thought the same?!
INMHO there must be either a blind twin brother to DH or some person walking around with a fake ID trying to impersonate DH. After seeing Cartrains stuff nothing else is possible/imaginable, rather strange no one else in this thread thought the same?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by princeofdalston on Nov 12, 2008 22:27:32 GMT 1, good attention grabbing thread; either way well done
good attention grabbing thread; either way well done
|
|
Tiki
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,223
ππ» 157
May 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Tiki on Nov 12, 2008 22:53:55 GMT 1, Well done mate. It certainly allows you bragging rights. I'd have a mega phone if it was me ;D
Well done mate. It certainly allows you bragging rights. I'd have a mega phone if it was me ;D
|
|
Grubster
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,226
ππ» 1
August 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Grubster on Nov 12, 2008 22:58:46 GMT 1, read above charger...plenty of ppl agree
read above charger...plenty of ppl agree
|
|
afroken
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,018
ππ» 29
February 2009
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by afroken on Nov 12, 2008 23:03:55 GMT 1, Hang on a minute. First of all, congratulations for selling to a serious collector. But (and this is nothing personal) collectors of this particular caliber have a scatter gun approach to collecting. Hirst is a hoarder of contemporary art, following in the footsteps of Saatchi. His investment in an artist really means nothing to their career. In fact it can be a curse. But, congratulations nonetheless for being noticed and bought by Mr Hirst.
Hang on a minute. First of all, congratulations for selling to a serious collector. But (and this is nothing personal) collectors of this particular caliber have a scatter gun approach to collecting. Hirst is a hoarder of contemporary art, following in the footsteps of Saatchi. His investment in an artist really means nothing to their career. In fact it can be a curse. But, congratulations nonetheless for being noticed and bought by Mr Hirst.
|
|
Grubster
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,226
ππ» 1
August 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Grubster on Nov 12, 2008 23:08:50 GMT 1, It is not being read correctly, I don't think it was a sale but some sort of infringement hence being done through 100artwrks and the galleries rep on the line... why has this not been cleared up by Cartrain? If I'm wrong my appoligies but still no reply!100?
It is not being read correctly, I don't think it was a sale but some sort of infringement hence being done through 100artwrks and the galleries rep on the line... why has this not been cleared up by Cartrain? If I'm wrong my appoligies but still no reply!100?
|
|
jfury
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,084
ππ» 45
May 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by jfury on Nov 12, 2008 23:14:34 GMT 1, INMHO there must be either a blind twin brother to DH or some person walking around with a fake ID trying to impersonate DH. After seeing Cartrains stuff nothing else is possible/imaginable, rather strange no one else in this thread thought the same?!
not half as bad as this though......
"Wearable art.....The use of textile as a medium for art is new to Roger, who thereby finds opportunities to send messages in a new way"
INMHO there must be either a blind twin brother to DH or some person walking around with a fake ID trying to impersonate DH. After seeing Cartrains stuff nothing else is possible/imaginable, rather strange no one else in this thread thought the same?! not half as bad as this though...... "Wearable art.....The use of textile as a medium for art is new to Roger, who thereby finds opportunities to send messages in a new way" |
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Nov 12, 2008 23:18:00 GMT 1, Hey Wiz I wanted to send you a picture of my two new Hirsts - be well Dave enjoy the photos !   f**k are these by Cartrain Spooky or what!!!!
Hey Wiz I wanted to send you a picture of my two new Hirsts - be well Dave enjoy the photos ! f**k are these by Cartrain Spooky or what!!!! |
|
pfffffffffft
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,472
ππ» 1,017
July 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by pfffffffffft on Nov 12, 2008 23:24:31 GMT 1, If Hirst has indeed purchased these artworks from Cartrain because he likes them, then I offer my sincere congratulations. It would certainly be a scoop and I can understand his desire to tell everyone on here. However, Cartrain has not actually said this. What he said was Hirst had "requested interested" (expressed an interest in?) the artworks and has now obtained them and they are in his possession. From what Ross and others said, I understand that these artworks (for the love of God) used DHs artwork in them - his diamond skull I presume. So, Cartrain, just for the record, please can you confirm that this "requested interest" and "deal" is actually a real sale and not DH claiming ownership of the artworks due to copyright infringement or something like that? You said he "obtained" them through a deal done with you and they are in his possession. But you didn't say he bought them. Again if this simply a case of DH buying Cartrain's work because he likes it then that is certainly something to be very proud of, but I can't help feeling that there is more to it than that. This is exact;y what i was saying but in differ context... this does seem odd, i mean come on! one of his last post was a fake article link to a bbc article. how can you take this serious. I could be wrong and in that case excuse me, but I found it very doubtful I'm not!
I concur. A bit hard to take this seriously after the fake BBC article.
And for pete's sake, based on the wording used in Cartrain's original post, he could have just given Hirst the work for free.
If Hirst has indeed purchased these artworks from Cartrain because he likes them, then I offer my sincere congratulations. It would certainly be a scoop and I can understand his desire to tell everyone on here. However, Cartrain has not actually said this. What he said was Hirst had "requested interested" (expressed an interest in?) the artworks and has now obtained them and they are in his possession. From what Ross and others said, I understand that these artworks (for the love of God) used DHs artwork in them - his diamond skull I presume. So, Cartrain, just for the record, please can you confirm that this "requested interest" and "deal" is actually a real sale and not DH claiming ownership of the artworks due to copyright infringement or something like that? You said he "obtained" them through a deal done with you and they are in his possession. But you didn't say he bought them. Again if this simply a case of DH buying Cartrain's work because he likes it then that is certainly something to be very proud of, but I can't help feeling that there is more to it than that. This is exact;y what i was saying but in differ context... this does seem odd, i mean come on! one of his last post was a fake article link to a bbc article. how can you take this serious. I could be wrong and in that case excuse me, but I found it very doubtful I'm not! I concur. A bit hard to take this seriously after the fake BBC article. And for pete's sake, based on the wording used in Cartrain's original post, he could have just given Hirst the work for free. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by arcam on Nov 12, 2008 23:33:57 GMT 1, Was just a matter of time 
I hope by that wink you're taking the piss.
Was just a matter of time I hope by that wink you're taking the piss. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by mammal2 on Nov 12, 2008 23:39:14 GMT 1, Fair play if true. However, if this turns out to be bullshit, it could be a career ender for Cartrain. Banksy, Francis Bacon, Jeff Koons, Tracey Emin, Richard Prince, Andy Warhol and Cartrain. Thats quite a group to belong to. Cough!
Fair play if true. However, if this turns out to be bullshit, it could be a career ender for Cartrain. Banksy, Francis Bacon, Jeff Koons, Tracey Emin, Richard Prince, Andy Warhol and Cartrain. Thats quite a group to belong to. Cough!
|
|
pfffffffffft
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,472
ππ» 1,017
July 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by pfffffffffft on Nov 12, 2008 23:46:56 GMT 1, Fair play if true. However, if this turns out to be bulls**t, it could be a career ender for Cartrain. Banksy, Francis Bacon, Jeff Koons, Tracey Emin, Richard Prince, Andy Warhol and Cartrain. Thats quite a group to belong to. Cough!
I concur. It's a far better story to say, oh shit, my work's been confiscated by Damien Hirst rather than to insinuate that he acquired it out of admiration if the former is truly the case.
I hope Cartrain made it a point to be truthful in his presentation or my guess is most collectors will have a difficult time seeing him or his art in a serious light, the only thing left in people's minds will be him being a bit of a fibber.
Fair play if true. However, if this turns out to be bulls**t, it could be a career ender for Cartrain. Banksy, Francis Bacon, Jeff Koons, Tracey Emin, Richard Prince, Andy Warhol and Cartrain. Thats quite a group to belong to. Cough! I concur. It's a far better story to say, oh sh it, my work's been confiscated by Damien Hirst rather than to insinuate that he acquired it out of admiration if the former is truly the case. I hope Cartrain made it a point to be truthful in his presentation or my guess is most collectors will have a difficult time seeing him or his art in a serious light, the only thing left in people's minds will be him being a bit of a fibber. |
|
goffy
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,401
ππ» 0
November 2006
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by goffy on Nov 12, 2008 23:59:36 GMT 1, I have always said that Damien Hirst has no imagination.
I have always said that Damien Hirst has no imagination.
|
|
shaunyboy
New Member
π¨οΈ 559
ππ» 38
March 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by shaunyboy on Nov 13, 2008 0:02:09 GMT 1, I think Mr Hirst has just got his skull back.
I think Mr Hirst has just got his skull back.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by mammal2 on Nov 13, 2008 0:04:10 GMT 1, I have always said that Damien Hirst has no imagination.
Nah, he is a legend. He still states that he has only ever painted 5 spot paintings himself cause "I couldn't be fucking arsed doing it" and his were "shite". Genius, in my book.
I have always said that Damien Hirst has no imagination. Nah, he is a legend. He still states that he has only ever painted 5 spot paintings himself cause "I couldn't be fucking arsed doing it" and his were "shite". Genius, in my book. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by mammal2 on Nov 13, 2008 0:05:25 GMT 1, I read that he got an E at A-Level, so Cartrains work may appeal. Oi Oi
I read that he got an E at A-Level, so Cartrains work may appeal. Oi Oi
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Nov 13, 2008 0:08:18 GMT 1, Thanks for your faith in me ;D But Damien hirst did not punch me in the stomach and steal my sweets.
Watch this space
Thanks for your faith in me ;D But Damien hirst did not punch me in the stomach and steal my sweets.
Watch this space
|
|
Tiki
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,223
ππ» 157
May 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Tiki on Nov 13, 2008 0:10:27 GMT 1, Lol that is class lou! You've just gone up 2 rungs on my ladder of legends!
Lol that is class lou! You've just gone up 2 rungs on my ladder of legends!
|
|
fuzzed
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,446
ππ» 344
April 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by fuzzed on Nov 13, 2008 0:11:07 GMT 1, care to answer any of the questions people have asked in this thread?
care to answer any of the questions people have asked in this thread?
|
|
Grubster
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,226
ππ» 1
August 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Grubster on Nov 13, 2008 0:16:38 GMT 1, He is ONLINE ! I mean is says "congrats to all who got one before Hirst got involved" meaning confiscated?
Another funny coincidence is WEAROLOGY accidentally posted pics of his DH OG's on a CARTRAIN thread
He is ONLINE ! I mean is says "congrats to all who got one before Hirst got involved" meaning confiscated?
Another funny coincidence is WEAROLOGY accidentally posted pics of his DH OG's on a CARTRAIN thread
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by colonelkurtz on Nov 13, 2008 0:22:31 GMT 1, After reading this, i'm gonna buy a mackerel from the market and a jar of pickled eggs. Chuck the fish in the jar (sans eggs!), put for sale on a website for Β£250 and Hirst will send a goon to pick it up from me. Sweet. Don't think i'll get any money for it though, more like thrown into the hirst collection for him to ridicule in front of his mates. increasing his ego even more, as he necks champagne marvelling how 2nd rate artists are using his work to give theirs creditibilty. Mammal is right, the guy is a genius. Cartain sadly isn't but seems to be very keen! If he's been in contact you should do a joint venture? That i would like to see. Pickled Mickey anyone?
After reading this, i'm gonna buy a mackerel from the market and a jar of pickled eggs. Chuck the fish in the jar (sans eggs!), put for sale on a website for Β£250 and Hirst will send a goon to pick it up from me. Sweet. Don't think i'll get any money for it though, more like thrown into the hirst collection for him to ridicule in front of his mates. increasing his ego even more, as he necks champagne marvelling how 2nd rate artists are using his work to give theirs creditibilty. Mammal is right, the guy is a genius. Cartain sadly isn't but seems to be very keen! If he's been in contact you should do a joint venture? That i would like to see. Pickled Mickey anyone?
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Nov 13, 2008 0:38:44 GMT 1, I think Cartrain is cool. He is young and obviously cuts his own stencils, unlike some these day's. He is up in many a place so puts the hours in. One day something inspired will come. I have the faith.
I think Cartrain is cool. He is young and obviously cuts his own stencils, unlike some these day's. He is up in many a place so puts the hours in. One day something inspired will come. I have the faith.
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Nov 13, 2008 0:46:29 GMT 1,
Where is Wizbong, its been bugging me all day 
Where is Wizbong, its been bugging me all day |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by graeme501 on Nov 13, 2008 0:56:20 GMT 1, if hirst has bough some of ur work, then well done for attracting such a high profile client
however, it doesnt change that pretty much every single piece of cartain art i have seen has been poor, damien hirst buying work does not mean its good, and the fact he purchased the work that contained an image of his own work speaks volumes
if hirst has bough some of ur work, then well done for attracting such a high profile client
however, it doesnt change that pretty much every single piece of cartain art i have seen has been poor, damien hirst buying work does not mean its good, and the fact he purchased the work that contained an image of his own work speaks volumes
|
|
