Grubster
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,226
ππ» 1
August 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Grubster on Nov 13, 2008 22:41:48 GMT 1, its obv!
its obv!
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wiz on Nov 13, 2008 23:03:40 GMT 1, Well that was an excellent read, if Hirst has purchased it Cartrain then well done and if not and he has acquired it for some other reason like ..... oh i dont know but say hes jealous or something! then its publicity for you anyhow at least and that cant be bad.
Well that was an excellent read, if Hirst has purchased it Cartrain then well done and if not and he has acquired it for some other reason like ..... oh i dont know but say hes jealous or something! then its publicity for you anyhow at least and that cant be bad.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by braken on Nov 14, 2008 4:12:40 GMT 1, yeah good on you cartrain .
yeah good on you cartrain .
|
|
dmf
New Member
π¨οΈ 341
ππ» 0
August 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by dmf on Nov 14, 2008 10:26:56 GMT 1, Did Hirst suggest you have a rib removed so you can suck your own cock too?
Did Hirst suggest you have a rib removed so you can suck your own cock too?
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by mammal2 on Nov 14, 2008 10:28:12 GMT 1, Whats good for Prince...
Whats good for Prince...
|
|
dmandpenfold
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,466
ππ» 10
December 2006
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by dmandpenfold on Nov 14, 2008 10:30:50 GMT 1, ...is good for the pauper...?
...is good for the pauper...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by stender on Nov 14, 2008 12:27:53 GMT 1, The silence is telling.
if your going to spin it do it properly.
The silence is telling.
if your going to spin it do it properly.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wiz on Nov 14, 2008 12:34:58 GMT 1, Well like i said earlier its been publicity so thats ok, and Cartrain has also recieved quite a few congratulatory comments which is also good. Bring on the Cartrain Spot paintings next please! i will have one.
Well like i said earlier its been publicity so thats ok, and Cartrain has also recieved quite a few congratulatory comments which is also good. Bring on the Cartrain Spot paintings next please! i will have one.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Nov 14, 2008 12:39:50 GMT 1, Well like i said earlier its been publicity so thats ok, and Cartrain has also recieved quite a few congratulatory comments which is also good. Bring on the Cartrain Spot paintings next please! i will have one.
Yep, I was just looking at the number of views on this thread compared to others 
Cartrain Hirst = 2,922
Gavin Turk = 2,141
Street Art Charity Auction = 1,036
Well like i said earlier its been publicity so thats ok, and Cartrain has also recieved quite a few congratulatory comments which is also good. Bring on the Cartrain Spot paintings next please! i will have one. Yep, I was just looking at the number of views on this thread compared to others Cartrain Hirst = 2,922 Gavin Turk = 2,141 Street Art Charity Auction = 1,036 |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Guest on Nov 14, 2008 12:42:53 GMT 1, eastenders
eastenders |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Nov 14, 2008 13:10:04 GMT 1, jeremy beadle did a good practical joke but I didn't want to buy any of his pictures
jeremy beadle did a good practical joke but I didn't want to buy any of his pictures
|
|
stickee
Artist
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,128
ππ» 1
June 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by stickee on Nov 14, 2008 13:21:09 GMT 1, jeremy beadle did a good practical joke but I didn't want to buy any of his pictures
that guy had a big hand in a lot of practicle jokes but then sometimes it was only a small hand
jeremy beadle did a good practical joke but I didn't want to buy any of his pictures that guy had a big hand in a lot of practicle jokes but then sometimes it was only a small hand |
|
skylarkin
New Member
π¨οΈ 283
ππ» 19
June 2006
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by skylarkin on Nov 14, 2008 13:24:52 GMT 1, Judging by the title of the post it seems obvious that Hirst has infact obtained Cartrain himself and is going to cut the ickle focker in half and pickle the bastard...
Judging by the title of the post it seems obvious that Hirst has infact obtained Cartrain himself and is going to cut the ickle focker in half and pickle the bastard...
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by baileymontana on Nov 14, 2008 18:39:09 GMT 1, Well like i said earlier its been publicity so thats ok, and Cartrain has also recieved quite a few congratulatory comments which is also good. Bring on the Cartrain Spot paintings next please! i will have one. Yep, I was just looking at the number of views on this thread compared to others Cartrain Hirst = 2,922 Gavin Turk = 2,141 Street Art Charity Auction = 1,036
Be interesting to know the real deal on it, if so many people are looking.
Didn't Banksy say he'd never knowingly sell a piece to Saatchi....I wonder if a new generation of street artists might say the same about Hirst if he is confiscating art made "inspired" by his own art pieces. I know it will change my perception of Hirst if he has confiscated it.
Come on please share the info. Either way it's good publicity (although I do agree maybe the way the thread was started was not that good).
Well like i said earlier its been publicity so thats ok, and Cartrain has also recieved quite a few congratulatory comments which is also good. Bring on the Cartrain Spot paintings next please! i will have one. Yep, I was just looking at the number of views on this thread compared to others Cartrain Hirst = 2,922 Gavin Turk = 2,141 Street Art Charity Auction = 1,036 Be interesting to know the real deal on it, if so many people are looking. Didn't Banksy say he'd never knowingly sell a piece to Saatchi....I wonder if a new generation of street artists might say the same about Hirst if he is confiscating art made "inspired" by his own art pieces. I know it will change my perception of Hirst if he has confiscated it. Come on please share the info. Either way it's good publicity (although I do agree maybe the way the thread was started was not that good). |
|
|
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Nov 14, 2008 18:54:23 GMT 1, I think it is irelevant whether the work was bought ,confiscated,or swaped for a pickled pig, If you dont like cartrain's work this isnt going to make people go out and buy it.
Just seems strange that cartrain has stayed quiet and not told the whole story, dont know what he hopes to gain by this!!!
I think it is irelevant whether the work was bought ,confiscated,or swaped for a pickled pig, If you dont like cartrain's work this isnt going to make people go out and buy it.
Just seems strange that cartrain has stayed quiet and not told the whole story, dont know what he hopes to gain by this!!!
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wiz on Nov 14, 2008 19:18:29 GMT 1, Hahaha. Like it!.
Hahaha. Like it!.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Nov 14, 2008 19:22:39 GMT 1,
The third one's mental ;D ;D ;D
The third one's mental ;D ;D ;D |
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Nov 14, 2008 19:22:57 GMT 1,
If these are the images that 100artworks were selling, then they must have endorsed them, just read the definition of endorsed!!!
If these are the images that 100artworks were selling, then they must have endorsed them, just read the definition of endorsed!!! |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Nov 14, 2008 19:24:29 GMT 1, If these are the images that 100artworks were selling, then they must have endorsed them, just read the definition of endorsed!!!
These are new as far as I can see.
If these are the images that 100artworks were selling, then they must have endorsed them, just read the definition of endorsed!!! These are new as far as I can see. |
|
gozgoz
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,617
ππ» 7
September 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by gozgoz on Nov 14, 2008 19:34:10 GMT 1, those are hilarious.... did the original skull look like it was doing some serious laughing or did cartrain edit/photoshop it?
i dont remember it laughing so hard when i saw it in whitecube....
those are hilarious.... did the original skull look like it was doing some serious laughing or did cartrain edit/photoshop it?
i dont remember it laughing so hard when i saw it in whitecube....
|
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Nov 14, 2008 19:42:04 GMT 1, If these are the images that 100artworks were selling, then they must have endorsed them, just read the definition of endorsed!!! These are new as far as I can see.
So all the pages on this thread was nothing more than hype for these!!!
If these are the images that 100artworks were selling, then they must have endorsed them, just read the definition of endorsed!!! These are new as far as I can see. So all the pages on this thread was nothing more than hype for these!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Nov 14, 2008 19:49:07 GMT 1, These are new as far as I can see. So all the pages on this thread was nothing more than hype for these!!!
ehhh?  I think you have got confused somewhere along the line.
These are new as far as I can see. So all the pages on this thread was nothing more than hype for these!!! ehhh? I think you have got confused somewhere along the line. |
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Nov 14, 2008 19:59:46 GMT 1, So all the pages on this thread was nothing more than hype for these!!! ehhh? I think you have got confused somewhere along the line.
Confused isnt the word mate!!
So all the pages on this thread was nothing more than hype for these!!! ehhh? I think you have got confused somewhere along the line. Confused isnt the word mate!! |
|
BK83
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,604
ππ» 10
October 2006
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by BK83 on Nov 14, 2008 20:00:41 GMT 1, Wow. This thread is going in circles. Is there any definitive information on what's happened here. I'm really interested to know if Hirst has issued a Black Helicopter censorship SWAT Team here. Fucking ironic if he is censoring it considering he has been called out for plagiarism on many occasions in the past. This is even more ironic because this isn't even a plagiarism issue -- Cartrain isn't copying anything, he is making reference to the skull as a pop culture icon. which is fine as far as I can tell and clearly falls within the rights of artistic freedom. He is in now way claiming it as his own work as far as I can see.
I'm so confused. did Hirst censor this shit or not?!
Wow. This thread is going in circles. Is there any definitive information on what's happened here. I'm really interested to know if Hirst has issued a Black Helicopter censorship SWAT Team here. Fucking ironic if he is censoring it considering he has been called out for plagiarism on many occasions in the past. This is even more ironic because this isn't even a plagiarism issue -- Cartrain isn't copying anything, he is making reference to the skull as a pop culture icon. which is fine as far as I can tell and clearly falls within the rights of artistic freedom. He is in now way claiming it as his own work as far as I can see.
I'm so confused. did Hirst censor this shit or not?!
|
|
Gurn
New Member
π¨οΈ 894
ππ» 904
August 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Gurn on Nov 14, 2008 20:06:25 GMT 1, It seems logical to me that Cartrains seller/gallery has had it's collar felt by the Hirst police for the previous images,it also seems logical that Cartrain has released the following images in response..no confusion in my eyes and fair play to him for milking it...if indeed this is the case.
It seems logical to me that Cartrains seller/gallery has had it's collar felt by the Hirst police for the previous images,it also seems logical that Cartrain has released the following images in response..no confusion in my eyes and fair play to him for milking it...if indeed this is the case.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Nov 14, 2008 20:06:28 GMT 1, Wow. This thread is going in circles. Is there any definitive information on what's happened here. I'm really interested to know if Hirst has issued a Black Helicopter censorship SWAT Team here. f**king ironic if he is censoring it considering he has been called out for plagiarism on many occasions in the past. This is even more ironic because this isn't even a plagiarism issue -- Cartrain isn't copying anything, he is making reference to the skull as a pop culture icon. which is fine as far as I can tell and clearly falls within the rights of artistic freedom. He is in now way claiming it as his own work as far as I can see. I'm so confused. did Hirst censor this s**t or not?!
Thats what I was thinkin as far as I can see all he has done is cut out pieces from magazines and stuck them on a piece of paper, aint that what Peter Blake does? No printing or copying was involved.
Wow. This thread is going in circles. Is there any definitive information on what's happened here. I'm really interested to know if Hirst has issued a Black Helicopter censorship SWAT Team here. f**king ironic if he is censoring it considering he has been called out for plagiarism on many occasions in the past. This is even more ironic because this isn't even a plagiarism issue -- Cartrain isn't copying anything, he is making reference to the skull as a pop culture icon. which is fine as far as I can tell and clearly falls within the rights of artistic freedom. He is in now way claiming it as his own work as far as I can see. I'm so confused. did Hirst censor this s**t or not?! Thats what I was thinkin as far as I can see all he has done is cut out pieces from magazines and stuck them on a piece of paper, aint that what Peter Blake does? No printing or copying was involved. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by arcam on Nov 14, 2008 20:14:25 GMT 1, It seems logical to me that Cartrains seller/gallery has had it's collar felt by the Hirst police for the previous images,it also seems logical that Cartrain has released the following images in response..
Sounds about right.
It seems logical to me that Cartrains seller/gallery has had it's collar felt by the Hirst police for the previous images,it also seems logical that Cartrain has released the following images in response.. Sounds about right. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by funkrye on Nov 14, 2008 20:18:00 GMT 1, Apart from being a young kid who does really bad art and is linked to 100 artworks i like these. If it is an actually responce to hirst stopping your work.
Telling the truth from the start without silky banging the drum on how great you would be far better than reading 3 pages of hype.
Apart from being a young kid who does really bad art and is linked to 100 artworks i like these. If it is an actually responce to hirst stopping your work.
Telling the truth from the start without silky banging the drum on how great you would be far better than reading 3 pages of hype.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Nov 14, 2008 20:21:26 GMT 1, I think Hirst will be after these too  In my opinion they are better than the others he has ;D
I think Hirst will be after these too In my opinion they are better than the others he has ;D |
|
I think you have got confused somewhere along the line.
In my opinion they are better than the others he has ;D
