baznyc
New Member
π¨οΈ 187
ππ» 0
October 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by baznyc on Jan 11, 2009 22:55:37 GMT 1, In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons, one, my first love is contemporary art, hence my liking for a lot of Hirst's work, the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter, the encounters that cartrain has had with hirst in the past, by taking one of Hirsts most recognisable works and turning it to his own advantage, is what art is all about, for that he should be applauded, I hasten to add that this is the first work by Cartrain that I can say this about.
Thanks for the response Lou, much appreciated.
I also like Hirst's work, but surely to god you're not comparing this to Valium or LSD, etc? There are key differences such as context and originality. Hirst said that his spot paintings are about interaction: while the colours are isolated from one another, they still manage to influence each other, interacting across the surrounding white space. Are we seriously to believe that cartrain had this in mind when he put this latest effort together. I am more inclined to believe another lazy and plagiarised attempt to make a few quid was the intention. Fair enough if your selling essays to students but c'mon shouldn't an artist be trying to do his own thing? Leaving his mark on the world and all that. If cartrain was an old git, then sure I could just about understand this, but if you're formative years are spent poncing off someone elses ideas without looking to stretch them, then that suggests a lack of talent and ambition.
Regarding cartrain's latest work being tight in context, Im not altogether sure I know what you mean?
In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons, one, my first love is contemporary art, hence my liking for a lot of Hirst's work, the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter, the encounters that cartrain has had with hirst in the past, by taking one of Hirsts most recognisable works and turning it to his own advantage, is what art is all about, for that he should be applauded, I hasten to add that this is the first work by Cartrain that I can say this about. Thanks for the response Lou, much appreciated. I also like Hirst's work, but surely to god you're not comparing this to Valium or LSD, etc? There are key differences such as context and originality. Hirst said that his spot paintings are about interaction: while the colours are isolated from one another, they still manage to influence each other, interacting across the surrounding white space. Are we seriously to believe that cartrain had this in mind when he put this latest effort together. I am more inclined to believe another lazy and plagiarised attempt to make a few quid was the intention. Fair enough if your selling essays to students but c'mon shouldn't an artist be trying to do his own thing? Leaving his mark on the world and all that. If cartrain was an old git, then sure I could just about understand this, but if you're formative years are spent poncing off someone elses ideas without looking to stretch them, then that suggests a lack of talent and ambition. Regarding cartrain's latest work being tight in context, Im not altogether sure I know what you mean? |
|
neale
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,585
ππ» 2
December 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by neale on Jan 11, 2009 22:59:45 GMT 1, thanks for the PEDANTIC correction Ross.. are you an english teacher... LOL
thanks for the PEDANTIC correction Ross.. are you an english teacher... LOL
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by spenie1975 on Jan 11, 2009 23:01:05 GMT 1, If the forum is taking a group order , i'll have two boxes and a Peyote. Best to save on the postage.
If the forum is taking a group order , i'll have two boxes and a Peyote. Best to save on the postage.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by a4mnt on Jan 11, 2009 23:02:22 GMT 1, Loucastel - looking forward to seeing pictures of your Cartrain canvas hanging on the wall.
sounds like a match made in heaven.
Loucastel - looking forward to seeing pictures of your Cartrain canvas hanging on the wall.
sounds like a match made in heaven.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by wiz on Jan 11, 2009 23:09:10 GMT 1, If the forum is taking a group order , i'll have two boxes and a Peyote. Best to save on the postage.
would that be the topiary versions spenie 
If the forum is taking a group order , i'll have two boxes and a Peyote. Best to save on the postage. would that be the topiary versions spenie |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by rosstierney on Jan 11, 2009 23:12:10 GMT 1, thanks for the PEDANTIC correction Ross.. are you an english teacher... LOL
nah, i'm just a brother of a schizophrenic who has never heard him argue over a personality
sorry, back to the joke in question
thanks for the PEDANTIC correction Ross.. are you an english teacher... LOL nah, i'm just a brother of a schizophrenic who has never heard him argue over a personality sorry, back to the joke in question |
|
|
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Jan 11, 2009 23:14:15 GMT 1, Loucastel - looking forward to seeing pictures of your Cartrain canvas hanging on the wall. sounds like a match made in heaven.
Oh look, here's another one, how is the brave little soldier today, come over to lob a few more well aimed grenades have we, why dont you just toddle off back with the other half of your double act, if you have nothing of interest to say which is usually the norm for you.
Loucastel - looking forward to seeing pictures of your Cartrain canvas hanging on the wall. sounds like a match made in heaven. Oh look, here's another one, how is the brave little soldier today, come over to lob a few more well aimed grenades have we, why dont you just toddle off back with the other half of your double act, if you have nothing of interest to say which is usually the norm for you. |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by cashman on Jan 11, 2009 23:15:17 GMT 1, Brilliant stuff! ;D ya gotta love threads like this  Watching people that have boycotted this forum for as long as they can, yet they they just cant hold back from a bit of Artist bashing ;D So funny watching them dig even bigger holes for themselves with embarrassingly childish posts ;D Quality! Sit back everyone and enjoy the entertainment ;D
ive just read through all the posts and its your comments that come across as childish 
Brilliant stuff! ;D ya gotta love threads like this Watching people that have boycotted this forum for as long as they can, yet they they just cant hold back from a bit of Artist bashing ;D So funny watching them dig even bigger holes for themselves with embarrassingly childish posts ;D Quality! Sit back everyone and enjoy the entertainment ;D ive just read through all the posts and its your comments that come across as childish |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by spenie1975 on Jan 11, 2009 23:22:26 GMT 1, If the forum is taking a group order , i'll have two boxes and a Peyote. Best to save on the postage. would that be the topiary versions spenie
If there on the menu. Yes 
If the forum is taking a group order , i'll have two boxes and a Peyote. Best to save on the postage. would that be the topiary versions spenie If there on the menu. Yes |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by a4mnt on Jan 11, 2009 23:29:01 GMT 1, Loucastel - you know me so well.
Anything I have to say would not be worth listening to after you'd laid down your artistic insight.
Loucastel - you know me so well.
Anything I have to say would not be worth listening to after you'd laid down your artistic insight.
|
|
carl
Blank Rank
π¨οΈ 0
ππ» 1
September 2011
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by carl on Jan 11, 2009 23:31:44 GMT 1,
Its good to see the Cracka avatar back
Its good to see the Cracka avatar back
|
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Jan 11, 2009 23:34:03 GMT 1, In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons, one, my first love is contemporary art, hence my liking for a lot of Hirst's work, the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter, the encounters that cartrain has had with hirst in the past, by taking one of Hirsts most recognisable works and turning it to his own advantage, is what art is all about, for that he should be applauded, I hasten to add that this is the first work by Cartrain that I can say this about. Thanks for the response Lou, much appreciated. I also like Hirst's work, but surely to god you're not comparing this to Valium or LSD, etc? There are key differences such as context and originality. Hirst said that his spot paintings are about interaction: while the colours are isolated from one another, they still manage to influence each other, interacting across the surrounding white space. Are we seriously to believe that cartrain had this in mind when he put this latest effort together. I am more inclined to believe another lazy and plagiarised attempt to make a few quid was the intention. Fair enough if your selling essays to students but c'mon shouldn't an artist be trying to do his own thing? Leaving his mark on the world and all that. If cartrain was an old git, then sure I could just about understand this, but if you're formative years are spent poncing off someone elses ideas without looking to stretch them, then that suggests a lack of talent and ambition. Regarding cartrain's latest work being tight in context, Im not altogether sure I know what you mean?
I am in no way comparing this work with say Valium etc, I think what Cartrain is doing ,as I said earlier, is using to his advantage the run in he had, and using a variation on a theme, In actual fact, Valium, alegedly was ripped off by Hirst from a drawing in an old Ladybird book, I think, It was to do with geometric design although done in black and white, and the original author of the design tried to sue Hirst but got nowhere, Hirst claiming that it was not an original idea, but a naturally occuring geometric pattern, so you cant copyright something which occurs naturally.
As for work being plagiarised that has happened throughout art history, how many takes has there been on the mona lisa,Mickey Mouse,loads of other cartoon characters,Marylin Monroe,Kate Moss, the list would go on and on, so would I be correct in thinking that anything after the original is a lazy attempt by the artist, whoever that artist may be?
By tight in context, I meant the circumstances from which the idea was born, i.e the earlier thing with hirst, sorry I should have explained myself better.
In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons, one, my first love is contemporary art, hence my liking for a lot of Hirst's work, the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter, the encounters that cartrain has had with hirst in the past, by taking one of Hirsts most recognisable works and turning it to his own advantage, is what art is all about, for that he should be applauded, I hasten to add that this is the first work by Cartrain that I can say this about. Thanks for the response Lou, much appreciated. I also like Hirst's work, but surely to god you're not comparing this to Valium or LSD, etc? There are key differences such as context and originality. Hirst said that his spot paintings are about interaction: while the colours are isolated from one another, they still manage to influence each other, interacting across the surrounding white space. Are we seriously to believe that cartrain had this in mind when he put this latest effort together. I am more inclined to believe another lazy and plagiarised attempt to make a few quid was the intention. Fair enough if your selling essays to students but c'mon shouldn't an artist be trying to do his own thing? Leaving his mark on the world and all that. If cartrain was an old git, then sure I could just about understand this, but if you're formative years are spent poncing off someone elses ideas without looking to stretch them, then that suggests a lack of talent and ambition. Regarding cartrain's latest work being tight in context, Im not altogether sure I know what you mean? I am in no way comparing this work with say Valium etc, I think what Cartrain is doing ,as I said earlier, is using to his advantage the run in he had, and using a variation on a theme, In actual fact, Valium, alegedly was ripped off by Hirst from a drawing in an old Ladybird book, I think, It was to do with geometric design although done in black and white, and the original author of the design tried to sue Hirst but got nowhere, Hirst claiming that it was not an original idea, but a naturally occuring geometric pattern, so you cant copyright something which occurs naturally. As for work being plagiarised that has happened throughout art history, how many takes has there been on the mona lisa,Mickey Mouse,loads of other cartoon characters,Marylin Monroe,Kate Moss, the list would go on and on, so would I be correct in thinking that anything after the original is a lazy attempt by the artist, whoever that artist may be? By tight in context, I meant the circumstances from which the idea was born, i.e the earlier thing with hirst, sorry I should have explained myself better. |
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Jan 11, 2009 23:34:58 GMT 1, Loucastel - you know me so well. Anything I have to say would not be worth listening to after you'd laid down your artistic insight.
Almost as good as yours ehh!!
Loucastel - you know me so well. Anything I have to say would not be worth listening to after you'd laid down your artistic insight. Almost as good as yours ehh!! |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Daniel Silk on Jan 12, 2009 13:45:09 GMT 1, simple question really, why hasnt he stenciled these? H
Yeah, I think I would have preferred it stencil on canvas  but lets wait and see what the print version comes out like.
Might have been a good idea to do some small cheaper stenciled canvases 9"x9" at about Β£50 each. Bit like how Eine does his letter canvases ;D
simple question really, why hasnt he stenciled these? H Yeah, I think I would have preferred it stencil on canvas but lets wait and see what the print version comes out like. Might have been a good idea to do some small cheaper stenciled canvases 9"x9" at about Β£50 each. Bit like how Eine does his letter canvases ;D |
|
|
|
baznyc
New Member
π¨οΈ 187
ππ» 0
October 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by baznyc on Jan 12, 2009 14:53:37 GMT 1, I'd like to clarify a couple of bits from your earlier post Lou.
I am in no way comparing this work with say Valium etc,
Then your previous point was perhaps poorly made. If I may quote you
' ...the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other [Hirst] spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter...'
This, to me at any rate, suggested a comparison to Hirst's spot paintings and as Valium is a spot painting you confused me.
As for work being plagiarised that has happened throughout art history, how many takes has there been on the mona lisa,Mickey Mouse,loads of other cartoon characters,Marylin Monroe,Kate Moss, the list would go on and on, so would I be correct in thinking that anything after the original is a lazy attempt by the artist, whoever that artist may be?
You would be wrong in assuming this automatically means the artist is lazy. However, taking one of your examples such as Kate Moss, Banksy adapted Warhol's image of Marylin as an icon of her time and developed the theme to a contemporary icon of our time - Kate Moss. Hardly lazy and in my opinion a very clever use of initiative. My point is that if the adaptation has a point to it and demonstrates a development of an original idea then the art should not be classed as idle plagiarism. This latest offering from cartrain doesn't strike me as offering anything related to development of a theme, rather a lazy pisstake that lacks humour or intelligence.
However, purely my opinion and thanks for offering yours as to why you like this work. It's good that you backed up your earlier comment of approval. Am I to take it that you will continue to back up your approval by buying this work to hang in your Maison then?
'In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons...'
I'd like to clarify a couple of bits from your earlier post Lou.
I am in no way comparing this work with say Valium etc,
Then your previous point was perhaps poorly made. If I may quote you
' ...the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other [Hirst] spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter...'
This, to me at any rate, suggested a comparison to Hirst's spot paintings and as Valium is a spot painting you confused me.
As for work being plagiarised that has happened throughout art history, how many takes has there been on the mona lisa,Mickey Mouse,loads of other cartoon characters,Marylin Monroe,Kate Moss, the list would go on and on, so would I be correct in thinking that anything after the original is a lazy attempt by the artist, whoever that artist may be?
You would be wrong in assuming this automatically means the artist is lazy. However, taking one of your examples such as Kate Moss, Banksy adapted Warhol's image of Marylin as an icon of her time and developed the theme to a contemporary icon of our time - Kate Moss. Hardly lazy and in my opinion a very clever use of initiative. My point is that if the adaptation has a point to it and demonstrates a development of an original idea then the art should not be classed as idle plagiarism. This latest offering from cartrain doesn't strike me as offering anything related to development of a theme, rather a lazy pisstake that lacks humour or intelligence.
However, purely my opinion and thanks for offering yours as to why you like this work. It's good that you backed up your earlier comment of approval. Am I to take it that you will continue to back up your approval by buying this work to hang in your Maison then?
'In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons...'
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Tower Art Gallery on Jan 12, 2009 15:16:48 GMT 1,
 A one off 57x49 inches Printed with high quality UV inks on Gloss Photographic paper to be released next week
A one off 57x49 inches Printed with high quality UV inks on Gloss Photographic paper to be released next week |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by a4mnt on Jan 12, 2009 15:25:50 GMT 1, Bet you're all online on monday to see how much it is though!!!! I will be!
I see its still available online.
Why don't you put your money where your mouth is.
Bet you're all online on monday to see how much it is though!!!! I will be! I see its still available online. Why don't you put your money where your mouth is. |
|
loucastel
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,551
ππ» 53
October 2007
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by loucastel on Jan 12, 2009 16:49:59 GMT 1, I'd like to clarify a couple of bits from your earlier post Lou. I am in no way comparing this work with say Valium etc, Then your previous point was perhaps poorly made. If I may quote you ' ...the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other [Hirst] spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter...' This, to me at any rate, suggested a comparison to Hirst's spot paintings and as Valium is a spot painting you confused me. As for work being plagiarised that has happened throughout art history, how many takes has there been on the mona lisa,Mickey Mouse,loads of other cartoon characters,Marylin Monroe,Kate Moss, the list would go on and on, so would I be correct in thinking that anything after the original is a lazy attempt by the artist, whoever that artist may be? You would be wrong in assuming this automatically means the artist is lazy. However, taking one of your examples such as Kate Moss, Banksy adapted Warhol's image of Marylin as an icon of her time and developed the theme to a contemporary icon of our time - Kate Moss. Hardly lazy and in my opinion a very clever use of initiative. My point is that if the adaptation has a point to it and demonstrates a development of an original idea then the art should not be classed as idle plagiarism. This latest offering from cartrain doesn't strike me as offering anything related to development of a theme, rather a lazy pisstake that lacks humour or intelligence. However, purely my opinion and thanks for offering yours as to why you like this work. It's good that you backed up your earlier comment of approval. Am I to take it that you will continue to back up your approval by buying this work to hang in your Maison then? 'In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons...'
"A developement of an original idea",surely that is open to interpretation by each and every individual, whether you think it is good or bad, it is a personal opinion, some of the rip offs of the mona image leave me cold, but yet you may like them, again, personal taste, and personal opinion,I am no proffessional art critic, and no wordsmith, but if you look at some of the art I have posted, you will get an idea of the stuff I like.
As for your last question, if I was to buy every piece of art I like I would be a poor man.
I'd like to clarify a couple of bits from your earlier post Lou. I am in no way comparing this work with say Valium etc, Then your previous point was perhaps poorly made. If I may quote you ' ...the similarity but also the dissimilarity between cartrains piece and the other [Hirst] spot paintings is tight in context and very much like myself, simple and uncomplicated, for me the colours work well, and also the subject matter...' This, to me at any rate, suggested a comparison to Hirst's spot paintings and as Valium is a spot painting you confused me. As for work being plagiarised that has happened throughout art history, how many takes has there been on the mona lisa,Mickey Mouse,loads of other cartoon characters,Marylin Monroe,Kate Moss, the list would go on and on, so would I be correct in thinking that anything after the original is a lazy attempt by the artist, whoever that artist may be? You would be wrong in assuming this automatically means the artist is lazy. However, taking one of your examples such as Kate Moss, Banksy adapted Warhol's image of Marylin as an icon of her time and developed the theme to a contemporary icon of our time - Kate Moss. Hardly lazy and in my opinion a very clever use of initiative. My point is that if the adaptation has a point to it and demonstrates a development of an original idea then the art should not be classed as idle plagiarism. This latest offering from cartrain doesn't strike me as offering anything related to development of a theme, rather a lazy pisstake that lacks humour or intelligence. However, purely my opinion and thanks for offering yours as to why you like this work. It's good that you backed up your earlier comment of approval. Am I to take it that you will continue to back up your approval by buying this work to hang in your Maison then? 'In answer to your question, Baznyc, yes I actually would hang this on my wall, for several reasons...'"A developement of an original idea",surely that is open to interpretation by each and every individual, whether you think it is good or bad, it is a personal opinion, some of the rip offs of the mona image leave me cold, but yet you may like them, again, personal taste, and personal opinion,I am no proffessional art critic, and no wordsmith, but if you look at some of the art I have posted, you will get an idea of the stuff I like. As for your last question, if I was to buy every piece of art I like I would be a poor man. |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Jan 12, 2009 16:50:32 GMT 1, I like Cartrains work because I feel sorry for him being buillied - awww poor diddums - c'mon guys u can try harder than this,give me ONE count then ONE reason why I shouldn't say this is a banal (altho not as banal as one lc's posts); derivative; poorly thought out; dull; piece of so called art. Could not care less about the conspiracy theories, just can't think of one piece of Cartrain's work that says 'I'm doing something worthwhile, i believe in'. Firstly, I must apologise if you found one of my posts banal, or in any way punitive, (note to self, must try harder next time). you can also say whatever you like about this thread, I for one have no intention or desire to convince you one way or another, I also dont see you deriding any other artrists on here, maybe you think they are all exceptional, ehh! perhaps you should go and do some more posting on the big brother thread!!! .
sorry Lou forgot to hit your criteria of saying worthwhile posts on every thread - my apologies - thus making any criticism I may have have null and void - duly noted
I like Cartrains work because I feel sorry for him being buillied - awww poor diddums - c'mon guys u can try harder than this,give me ONE count then ONE reason why I shouldn't say this is a banal (altho not as banal as one lc's posts); derivative; poorly thought out; dull; piece of so called art. Could not care less about the conspiracy theories, just can't think of one piece of Cartrain's work that says 'I'm doing something worthwhile, i believe in'. Firstly, I must apologise if you found one of my posts banal, or in any way punitive, (note to self, must try harder next time). you can also say whatever you like about this thread, I for one have no intention or desire to convince you one way or another, I also dont see you deriding any other artrists on here, maybe you think they are all exceptional, ehh! perhaps you should go and do some more posting on the big brother thread!!! . sorry Lou forgot to hit your criteria of saying worthwhile posts on every thread - my apologies - thus making any criticism I may have have null and void - duly noted |
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by slowmo on Jan 12, 2009 21:16:09 GMT 1, Limited edition of 1? Shouldn't that read original artwork?
Limited edition of 1? Shouldn't that read original artwork?
|
|
neale
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,585
ππ» 2
December 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by neale on Jan 12, 2009 21:20:31 GMT 1, Leftery, just looked at your picture again... is that an original Hirst roller blind in the background??
Leftery, just looked at your picture again... is that an original Hirst roller blind in the background??
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by hero on Jan 12, 2009 21:22:18 GMT 1, Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100!
450 is way too much 
H
Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100! 450 is way too much H |
|
|
|
fuzzed
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,446
ππ» 344
April 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by fuzzed on Jan 12, 2009 23:36:52 GMT 1, I just don't get the title?!
I just don't get the title?!
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Jan 12, 2009 23:37:27 GMT 1, Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100! 450 is way too much H
Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450
Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100! 450 is way too much H Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450 |
|
iAmCxxx
Artist
New Member
π¨οΈ 321
ππ» 12
March 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by iAmCxxx on Jan 12, 2009 23:40:15 GMT 1, Β£450 is a lot of cash.
Fact.
I offer no comment on your work mate. I like some of it. But saying that Β£450 is not a lot of money is naive and offensive.
EDIT: I am having a bad day and well stressed about money at the moment... No offence buddy.
Β£450 is a lot of cash.
Fact.
I offer no comment on your work mate. I like some of it. But saying that Β£450 is not a lot of money is naive and offensive.
EDIT: I am having a bad day and well stressed about money at the moment... No offence buddy.
|
|
|
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by slowmo on Jan 12, 2009 23:47:17 GMT 1, Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100! 450 is way too much H Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450
Have a little humility, don't let a bit of exposure go to your head too quickly.
Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100! 450 is way too much H Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450 Have a little humility, don't let a bit of exposure go to your head too quickly. |
|
bmjt
New Member
π¨οΈ 908
ππ» 7
April 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by bmjt on Jan 13, 2009 0:10:54 GMT 1, Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100! 450 is way too much H Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450
That says it all to me, what a abject little character you are. You are the manifestation of everything I hate about this scene. Talentless money grabber.
I can only hope this turns out to be one big joke.
Β£450....450!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ok, that is way too much, i thought it would be around 100! 450 is way too much H Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450 That says it all to me, what a abject little character you are. You are the manifestation of everything I hate about this scene. Talentless money grabber. I can only hope this turns out to be one big joke. |
|
Karl Read
Artist
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 3,569
ππ» 637
April 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Karl Read on Jan 13, 2009 0:20:29 GMT 1, [/quote]Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450[/quote]
No offence but i was suprised at that price, i mean it's not like you sell out on everyone of your releases. Thats quite a statement, "I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask..."
I think it's probably arrogant statements like that, that contribute to some of the negativity you receive on here.
Just wondering what has the title got to do with the image? BTW the guy that owns Magic Tree is a very rich man, hopefully he wont pull a Hirst on you.
[/quote]Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450[/quote] No offence but i was suprised at that price, i mean it's not like you sell out on everyone of your releases. Thats quite a statement, "I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask..." I think it's probably arrogant statements like that, that contribute to some of the negativity you receive on here. Just wondering what has the title got to do with the image? BTW the guy that owns Magic Tree is a very rich man, hopefully he wont pull a Hirst on you. |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Deleted on Jan 13, 2009 0:22:00 GMT 1, Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450 That says it all to me, what a abject little character you are. You are the manifestation of everything I hate about this scene. Talentless money grabber. I can only hope this turns out to be one big joke.
Thats a very unworthy comment coming from you. Its nothing to do with the money. i have a proven passion for my work regardless of any negative comments i may receive . you never receive comments from me suggesting you've put your petrol pumps to close to the car wash
Its not to expensive, most people pay more in yearly parking fines for which they get nothing. I'm offering Art that in years to come will be worth much more than the price i now ask... the time, effort and printing costs involved with this piece is well worth Β£450 That says it all to me, what a abject little character you are. You are the manifestation of everything I hate about this scene. Talentless money grabber. I can only hope this turns out to be one big joke. Thats a very unworthy comment coming from you. Its nothing to do with the money. i have a proven passion for my work regardless of any negative comments i may receive . you never receive comments from me suggesting you've put your petrol pumps to close to the car wash |
|
Grubster
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,226
ππ» 1
August 2008
|
Cartrain π¬π§ Tate Gallery β’ Damien Hirst β’ Gilbert & George, by Grubster on Jan 13, 2009 0:37:28 GMT 1, you are ridiculous, CARTRAIN! You can't compare parking fines and crappy art. Also, Since when did you become a Futures trader? Speculator? Art Finance specialist? "Will be worth more in years to come" Man; Stop; Take a look around you and breathe. Now do you notice how many other well respected artist on here say they art is worth much more in years to come? I feel sorry for you man. You have much to learn.
you are ridiculous, CARTRAIN! You can't compare parking fines and crappy art. Also, Since when did you become a Futures trader? Speculator? Art Finance specialist? "Will be worth more in years to come" Man; Stop; Take a look around you and breathe. Now do you notice how many other well respected artist on here say they art is worth much more in years to come? I feel sorry for you man. You have much to learn.
|
|
Watching people that have boycotted this forum for as long as they can, yet they they just cant hold back from a bit of Artist bashing ;D
