|
Sandra Chevrier, by Street Art Fan on Aug 19, 2013 22:44:41 GMT 1, I'm personally not a fan. But I think they would look nice in a hair salon. Ouch.
I'm personally not a fan. But I think they would look nice in a hair salon. Ouch.
|
|
danmuppet
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,637
👍🏻 163
February 2008
|
Sandra Chevrier, by danmuppet on Aug 19, 2013 22:54:25 GMT 1, I own hair salons. Not for me
I own hair salons. Not for me
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Sandra Chevrier, by natstan on Aug 20, 2013 12:19:02 GMT 1, A high class one, he meant.I'm personally not a fan. But I think they would look nice in a hair salon. Ouch.
A high class one, he meant. I'm personally not a fan. But I think they would look nice in a hair salon. Ouch.
|
|
|
Sandra Chevrier, by gironawatch on Aug 20, 2013 13:28:38 GMT 1, I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying!
I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying!
|
|
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Unlawful Art on Aug 20, 2013 13:39:54 GMT 1, Not bad, what do we think of Lora Zombie? Another artist that is currently being exhibited alongside Chevrier at the Phonebooth gallery: phoneboothgallery.com/pbg/exhibitions
|
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,233
👍🏻 2,471
March 2009
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Ottomatik on Aug 20, 2013 14:09:51 GMT 1, I really like Sandra's work. It has some Miss Bugs vibe. I've been after an OG for a few months, finally found the right one! Picked this up from POW! POW! @ PhoneBoothGallery. Thanks Gary!
I really like Sandra's work. It has some Miss Bugs vibe. I've been after an OG for a few months, finally found the right one! Picked this up from POW! POW! @ PhoneBoothGallery. Thanks Gary!
|
|
|
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Art Fan 2011 on Aug 20, 2013 14:34:15 GMT 1, Im not a fan of Sandra`s work, and dont understand the recent buying frenzy and price increases, but each to there own! I like Lora`s work and she is often over looked, some of her stuff can be a bit "out there" but she is certainly a talented artist with her own style, and her work is very accesable to us all. I purchased her recent print from Eyes on walls and it arrived last week, a real cracker in the flesh aswell as being huge!
Im not a fan of Sandra`s work, and dont understand the recent buying frenzy and price increases, but each to there own! I like Lora`s work and she is often over looked, some of her stuff can be a bit "out there" but she is certainly a talented artist with her own style, and her work is very accesable to us all. I purchased her recent print from Eyes on walls and it arrived last week, a real cracker in the flesh aswell as being huge!
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 17:11:40 GMT 1, I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying! I think that would be seriously overestimating the influence the forum has.
I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying! I think that would be seriously overestimating the influence the forum has.
|
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,233
👍🏻 2,471
March 2009
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Ottomatik on Aug 20, 2013 17:31:46 GMT 1, I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying!
Funny you would say this. YOU are a member that's all about the $/£. Looking over your recent posts, you are talking up Banksy CYW prices. Then seemed shocked when they sell at auction houses less than what you think they are worth. I wouldn't pay more than 1k USD for a CYW! (Not really a fan of it)
I am aware that we all like different things, but please keep your cost comments to yourself.
I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying! Funny you would say this. YOU are a member that's all about the $/£. Looking over your recent posts, you are talking up Banksy CYW prices. Then seemed shocked when they sell at auction houses less than what you think they are worth. I wouldn't pay more than 1k USD for a CYW! (Not really a fan of it) I am aware that we all like different things, but please keep your cost comments to yourself.
|
|
|
Sandra Chevrier, by gironawatch on Aug 20, 2013 17:40:07 GMT 1, I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying! Funny you would say this. YOU are a member that's all about the $/£. Looking over your recent posts, you are talking up Banksy CYW prices. Then seemed shocked when they sell at auction houses less than what you think they are worth. I wouldn't pay more than 1k USD for a CYW! (Not really a fan of it) I am aware that we all like different things, but please keep your cost comments to yourself.
This is my opinion! And this is what the forums are for! Is Much better artist and work for lest money out there.
I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying! Funny you would say this. YOU are a member that's all about the $/£. Looking over your recent posts, you are talking up Banksy CYW prices. Then seemed shocked when they sell at auction houses less than what you think they are worth. I wouldn't pay more than 1k USD for a CYW! (Not really a fan of it) I am aware that we all like different things, but please keep your cost comments to yourself. This is my opinion! And this is what the forums are for! Is Much better artist and work for lest money out there.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Deleted on Aug 20, 2013 19:43:10 GMT 1, I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying! I think that would be seriously overestimating the influence the forum has.
I agree with this comment. People need to sometimes remember that this is just an art forum and won't make or break an artist.
I will call this the power of the forum! I dont think those worth what peoples paying! I think that would be seriously overestimating the influence the forum has. I agree with this comment. People need to sometimes remember that this is just an art forum and won't make or break an artist.
|
|
gravity1
New Member
🗨️ 777
👍🏻 492
January 2013
|
Sandra Chevrier, by gravity1 on Aug 20, 2013 20:05:21 GMT 1, I have personally seen Sandra's pieces selling out, at her new pricing, by people who know nothing of this board. Even her last show here in Long Beach, Ca last week only has one piece left available. I have a few hanging myself and pretty much everyone who comes over spends more time in front of it then any other piece. People like what they like.... especially when they know nothing of price or artist history to sway them.
I think that would be seriously overestimating the influence the forum has. I agree with this comment. People need to sometimes remember that this is just an art forum and won't make or break an artist.
I have personally seen Sandra's pieces selling out, at her new pricing, by people who know nothing of this board. Even her last show here in Long Beach, Ca last week only has one piece left available. I have a few hanging myself and pretty much everyone who comes over spends more time in front of it then any other piece. People like what they like.... especially when they know nothing of price or artist history to sway them. I think that would be seriously overestimating the influence the forum has. I agree with this comment. People need to sometimes remember that this is just an art forum and won't make or break an artist.
|
|
nah
New Member
🗨️ 822
👍🏻 34
April 2009
|
Sandra Chevrier, by nah on Aug 20, 2013 21:12:37 GMT 1, is her work hyped on EB? seems like the sort of thing they'd go for
is her work hyped on EB? seems like the sort of thing they'd go for
|
|
thisisanton
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,053
👍🏻 1,008
November 2012
|
Sandra Chevrier, by thisisanton on Aug 20, 2013 23:01:06 GMT 1, is her work hyped on EB? seems like the sort of thing they'd go for You hear more about her on this forum. I really haven't seen much talk about Sandra on EB.
is her work hyped on EB? seems like the sort of thing they'd go for You hear more about her on this forum. I really haven't seen much talk about Sandra on EB.
|
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Sandra Chevrier, by natstan on Aug 21, 2013 5:43:36 GMT 1, I might be reading too much into her work, but I see her paintings as a reflection of a society where 'self performance and surpassing oneself' reign. And why superheroes and portraits of women?
The answer lies within. I try to read beyond a beautiful image.
.Can someone explain to me the enthusiasm for her work. Faces and comic books - is that it or am I missing something?
I might be reading too much into her work, but I see her paintings as a reflection of a society where 'self performance and surpassing oneself' reign. And why superheroes and portraits of women? The answer lies within. I try to read beyond a beautiful image. . Can someone explain to me the enthusiasm for her work. Faces and comic books - is that it or am I missing something?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Deleted on Aug 21, 2013 7:58:33 GMT 1, I might be reading too much into her work, but I see her paintings as a reflection of a society where 'self performance and surpassing oneself' reign. And why superheroes and portraits of women? The answer lies within. I try to read beyond a beautiful image. . Can someone explain to me the enthusiasm for her work. Faces and comic books - is that it or am I missing something? Not my text but pretty much what happened to me a few days after seeing them for the first time..didn't trust myself initially. Chicks and comics and no depth.. instant candy, what's not to like. But I loved them nevertheless.. so, I tried to dissect what this was. Why did I like them so much, what was underneath. And after a little research and chatting to Sandra, realised, like women themselves (or anything for that matter) there was much more to them than first meets the eye.
Art that, in the hunt and hysteria of discovering something new, magnetises the lustful viewer and numbs him to the artist’s hidden message imbued within. If you aren’t already numbed by the pretentiousness of that introduction, let me explain what I mean. Art works when art makes you fall in love with it for the wrong reasons. Not because its subject matter is evil, but because you – the mortal civilian – you fell for the trick of appearance. In an age saturated by image, the enchanting magic of what we see all too often leads us astray from the harsh reality of what is.
Whilst absent-mindedly wading through Juxtapoz in an attempt to track down my next artist for review, Montreal-based painter Sandra Chevrier caught my attention like she’d physically climbed through my MacBook monitor, wrenched out my eyeballs and escaped back into the vortex of the internet forever. If you’re aware of my own work which has veered more recently into the realm of mixed media collaged faces, you might understand why. Consumed in the moment by the enduring beauty of Chevrier’s work I was anaesthetised to what the work was actually trying to say. I was reminded of my own ability to fall for the trick of superficial illusions to which we all fall victim in today’s society. It was only after closer inspection, having thoroughly unpicked the meaning of Chevrier’s paintings, that I realised I had reacted purely at the sight of an artist whose work I thought might be deemed ‘cool’ – shoot me.
Now, I stick by that – Chevrier’s work is fucking cool. But her work is so aesthetically striking that it’s difficult to drag yourself away from the lure of the outer and get you hands dirty with the grit of the inner. Reminiscent of the arresting superhero aesthetic employed in previously covered artist, Lora Zombie, this is what makes this great art: Chevrier’s work demands to be dissected.
Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence.
It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity. There’s a sense of torturous struggle as the images encroach on the figure's ability to see. If the women aren’t blinded entirely by Chevrier's collage, their jailed stares are vacant – weak – defeatist; a quiet and tragic resigned acceptance perhaps, that their gendered identity goes no deeper than the image of society’s superficial, fetishized mask strapped to their faces.
The collage, which often features epic and dramatic battle scenes taken from real comic book magazines, is applied rather haphazardly, yet this somewhat incongruous style of application, with fictional characters that reaches an almost theatrical level, only enhances the message of the chaotic and farcical pressures placed upon women to perform superheroic deeds in society. It's a very astute angle from Chevrier, because in a cultureless society bent on teaching our young to aspire to the lie of celebrity, the artist perfectly satirises the ludicrousness of unrealistic expectations and unattainable dreams.
I might be reading too much into her work, but I see her paintings as a reflection of a society where 'self performance and surpassing oneself' reign. And why superheroes and portraits of women? The answer lies within. I try to read beyond a beautiful image. . Can someone explain to me the enthusiasm for her work. Faces and comic books - is that it or am I missing something? Not my text but pretty much what happened to me a few days after seeing them for the first time..didn't trust myself initially. Chicks and comics and no depth.. instant candy, what's not to like. But I loved them nevertheless.. so, I tried to dissect what this was. Why did I like them so much, what was underneath. And after a little research and chatting to Sandra, realised, like women themselves (or anything for that matter) there was much more to them than first meets the eye. Art that, in the hunt and hysteria of discovering something new, magnetises the lustful viewer and numbs him to the artist’s hidden message imbued within. If you aren’t already numbed by the pretentiousness of that introduction, let me explain what I mean. Art works when art makes you fall in love with it for the wrong reasons. Not because its subject matter is evil, but because you – the mortal civilian – you fell for the trick of appearance. In an age saturated by image, the enchanting magic of what we see all too often leads us astray from the harsh reality of what is. Whilst absent-mindedly wading through Juxtapoz in an attempt to track down my next artist for review, Montreal-based painter Sandra Chevrier caught my attention like she’d physically climbed through my MacBook monitor, wrenched out my eyeballs and escaped back into the vortex of the internet forever. If you’re aware of my own work which has veered more recently into the realm of mixed media collaged faces, you might understand why. Consumed in the moment by the enduring beauty of Chevrier’s work I was anaesthetised to what the work was actually trying to say. I was reminded of my own ability to fall for the trick of superficial illusions to which we all fall victim in today’s society. It was only after closer inspection, having thoroughly unpicked the meaning of Chevrier’s paintings, that I realised I had reacted purely at the sight of an artist whose work I thought might be deemed ‘cool’ – shoot me. Now, I stick by that – Chevrier’s work is fucking cool. But her work is so aesthetically striking that it’s difficult to drag yourself away from the lure of the outer and get you hands dirty with the grit of the inner. Reminiscent of the arresting superhero aesthetic employed in previously covered artist, Lora Zombie, this is what makes this great art: Chevrier’s work demands to be dissected. Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence. It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity. There’s a sense of torturous struggle as the images encroach on the figure's ability to see. If the women aren’t blinded entirely by Chevrier's collage, their jailed stares are vacant – weak – defeatist; a quiet and tragic resigned acceptance perhaps, that their gendered identity goes no deeper than the image of society’s superficial, fetishized mask strapped to their faces. The collage, which often features epic and dramatic battle scenes taken from real comic book magazines, is applied rather haphazardly, yet this somewhat incongruous style of application, with fictional characters that reaches an almost theatrical level, only enhances the message of the chaotic and farcical pressures placed upon women to perform superheroic deeds in society. It's a very astute angle from Chevrier, because in a cultureless society bent on teaching our young to aspire to the lie of celebrity, the artist perfectly satirises the ludicrousness of unrealistic expectations and unattainable dreams.
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Sandra Chevrier, by natstan on Aug 21, 2013 10:01:36 GMT 1, Looks like I'm not intepreting her works too differently from others!
I might be reading too much into her work, but I see her paintings as a reflection of a society where 'self performance and surpassing oneself' reign. And why superheroes and portraits of women? The answer lies within. I try to read beyond a beautiful image. . Not my text but pretty much what happened to me a few days after seeing them for the first time..didn't trust myself initially. Chicks and comics and no depth.. instant candy, what's not to like. But I loved them nevertheless.. so, I tried to dissect what this was. Why did I like them so much, what was underneath. And after a little research and chatting to Sandra, realised, like women themselves (or anything for that matter) there was much more to them than first meets the eye. Art that, in the hunt and hysteria of discovering something new, magnetises the lustful viewer and numbs him to the artist’s hidden message imbued within. If you aren’t already numbed by the pretentiousness of that introduction, let me explain what I mean. Art works when art makes you fall in love with it for the wrong reasons. Not because its subject matter is evil, but because you – the mortal civilian – you fell for the trick of appearance. In an age saturated by image, the enchanting magic of what we see all too often leads us astray from the harsh reality of what is. Whilst absent-mindedly wading through Juxtapoz in an attempt to track down my next artist for review, Montreal-based painter Sandra Chevrier caught my attention like she’d physically climbed through my MacBook monitor, wrenched out my eyeballs and escaped back into the vortex of the internet forever. If you’re aware of my own work which has veered more recently into the realm of mixed media collaged faces, you might understand why. Consumed in the moment by the enduring beauty of Chevrier’s work I was anaesthetised to what the work was actually trying to say. I was reminded of my own ability to fall for the trick of superficial illusions to which we all fall victim in today’s society. It was only after closer inspection, having thoroughly unpicked the meaning of Chevrier’s paintings, that I realised I had reacted purely at the sight of an artist whose work I thought might be deemed ‘cool’ – shoot me. Now, I stick by that – Chevrier’s work is f**king cool. But her work is so aesthetically striking that it’s difficult to drag yourself away from the lure of the outer and get you hands dirty with the grit of the inner. Reminiscent of the arresting superhero aesthetic employed in previously covered artist, Lora Zombie, this is what makes this great art: Chevrier’s work demands to be dissected. Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence. It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity. There’s a sense of torturous struggle as the images encroach on the figure's ability to see. If the women aren’t blinded entirely by Chevrier's collage, their jailed stares are vacant – weak – defeatist; a quiet and tragic resigned acceptance perhaps, that their gendered identity goes no deeper than the image of society’s superficial, fetishized mask strapped to their faces. The collage, which often features epic and dramatic battle scenes taken from real comic book magazines, is applied rather haphazardly, yet this somewhat incongruous style of application, with fictional characters that reaches an almost theatrical level, only enhances the message of the chaotic and farcical pressures placed upon women to perform superheroic deeds in society. It's a very astute angle from Chevrier, because in a cultureless society bent on teaching our young to aspire to the lie of celebrity, the artist perfectly satirises the ludicrousness of unrealistic expectations and unattainable dreams.
Looks like I'm not intepreting her works too differently from others! I might be reading too much into her work, but I see her paintings as a reflection of a society where 'self performance and surpassing oneself' reign. And why superheroes and portraits of women? The answer lies within. I try to read beyond a beautiful image. . Not my text but pretty much what happened to me a few days after seeing them for the first time..didn't trust myself initially. Chicks and comics and no depth.. instant candy, what's not to like. But I loved them nevertheless.. so, I tried to dissect what this was. Why did I like them so much, what was underneath. And after a little research and chatting to Sandra, realised, like women themselves (or anything for that matter) there was much more to them than first meets the eye. Art that, in the hunt and hysteria of discovering something new, magnetises the lustful viewer and numbs him to the artist’s hidden message imbued within. If you aren’t already numbed by the pretentiousness of that introduction, let me explain what I mean. Art works when art makes you fall in love with it for the wrong reasons. Not because its subject matter is evil, but because you – the mortal civilian – you fell for the trick of appearance. In an age saturated by image, the enchanting magic of what we see all too often leads us astray from the harsh reality of what is. Whilst absent-mindedly wading through Juxtapoz in an attempt to track down my next artist for review, Montreal-based painter Sandra Chevrier caught my attention like she’d physically climbed through my MacBook monitor, wrenched out my eyeballs and escaped back into the vortex of the internet forever. If you’re aware of my own work which has veered more recently into the realm of mixed media collaged faces, you might understand why. Consumed in the moment by the enduring beauty of Chevrier’s work I was anaesthetised to what the work was actually trying to say. I was reminded of my own ability to fall for the trick of superficial illusions to which we all fall victim in today’s society. It was only after closer inspection, having thoroughly unpicked the meaning of Chevrier’s paintings, that I realised I had reacted purely at the sight of an artist whose work I thought might be deemed ‘cool’ – shoot me. Now, I stick by that – Chevrier’s work is f**king cool. But her work is so aesthetically striking that it’s difficult to drag yourself away from the lure of the outer and get you hands dirty with the grit of the inner. Reminiscent of the arresting superhero aesthetic employed in previously covered artist, Lora Zombie, this is what makes this great art: Chevrier’s work demands to be dissected. Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence. It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity. There’s a sense of torturous struggle as the images encroach on the figure's ability to see. If the women aren’t blinded entirely by Chevrier's collage, their jailed stares are vacant – weak – defeatist; a quiet and tragic resigned acceptance perhaps, that their gendered identity goes no deeper than the image of society’s superficial, fetishized mask strapped to their faces. The collage, which often features epic and dramatic battle scenes taken from real comic book magazines, is applied rather haphazardly, yet this somewhat incongruous style of application, with fictional characters that reaches an almost theatrical level, only enhances the message of the chaotic and farcical pressures placed upon women to perform superheroic deeds in society. It's a very astute angle from Chevrier, because in a cultureless society bent on teaching our young to aspire to the lie of celebrity, the artist perfectly satirises the ludicrousness of unrealistic expectations and unattainable dreams.
|
|
misterx
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,433
👍🏻 539
December 2010
|
Sandra Chevrier, by misterx on Aug 21, 2013 11:11:25 GMT 1, Thats the kind of comment I wished I could write when DDawg would ask why I liked print x,y or z...
Instead I would just say I liked 'em.
Thats the kind of comment I wished I could write when DDawg would ask why I liked print x,y or z...
Instead I would just say I liked 'em.
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Sandra Chevrier, by natstan on Aug 21, 2013 12:13:29 GMT 1, You are not alone, I'm sure. Some art work based on just an impression to please the eyes. Sad to say, I can see many urban art nowadays that ride on trends (I'm not naming names) and the result is just that - an image aimed to please superficially. I also buy art that has no deeper meaning other than looking good on my walls and it makes me happy by just looking at them everyday. Afterall, art should cater to different people.
But it's deeper works like these that nourishes the soul (while pleasing the eyes) once you find the meaning behind. That differentiates the good and great artists.
Thats the kind of comment I wished I could write when DDawg would ask why I liked print x,y or z... Instead I would just say I liked 'em.
You are not alone, I'm sure. Some art work based on just an impression to please the eyes. Sad to say, I can see many urban art nowadays that ride on trends (I'm not naming names) and the result is just that - an image aimed to please superficially. I also buy art that has no deeper meaning other than looking good on my walls and it makes me happy by just looking at them everyday. Afterall, art should cater to different people. But it's deeper works like these that nourishes the soul (while pleasing the eyes) once you find the meaning behind. That differentiates the good and great artists. Thats the kind of comment I wished I could write when DDawg would ask why I liked print x,y or z... Instead I would just say I liked 'em.
|
|
Cocteau 101
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,508
👍🏻 1,227
January 2007
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Cocteau 101 on Aug 21, 2013 18:49:06 GMT 1, They are boring.
They are boring.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Deleted on Aug 21, 2013 19:06:37 GMT 1, Unlike that comment, which has got us all scratching our heads on how to match such a well thought out, composed, critical and informed contribution to the debate..cheers.. lol
Unlike that comment, which has got us all scratching our heads on how to match such a well thought out, composed, critical and informed contribution to the debate..cheers.. lol
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Sandra Chevrier, by natstan on Aug 21, 2013 21:37:15 GMT 1, Interested to hear what's not boring then so we can make a good-natured comparison, although we all know art is subjective. Probably everybody can learn something new from you what is good art.
Interested to hear what's not boring then so we can make a good-natured comparison, although we all know art is subjective. Probably everybody can learn something new from you what is good art.
|
|
|
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Graffiti Prints on Aug 21, 2013 22:58:05 GMT 1, Interested to hear what's not boring then so we can make a good-natured comparison, although we all know art is subjective. Probably everybody can learn something new from you what is good art.
Cocteau will have an amazing collection I have bought a few pieces from him and he showed other stuff I was just wow at.
If he thinks boring fair enough why does he have to justify it one mans gold and all that
I just got two originals on paper and some of her prints for the site
The originals I am struggling to list as I want them. I know u can say I am biased but there mega so are the originals on reed ESP the thin one with just the eyes!!!
Interested to hear what's not boring then so we can make a good-natured comparison, although we all know art is subjective. Probably everybody can learn something new from you what is good art. Cocteau will have an amazing collection I have bought a few pieces from him and he showed other stuff I was just wow at. If he thinks boring fair enough why does he have to justify it one mans gold and all that I just got two originals on paper and some of her prints for the site The originals I am struggling to list as I want them. I know u can say I am biased but there mega so are the originals on reed ESP the thin one with just the eyes!!!
|
|
Cocteau 101
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,508
👍🏻 1,227
January 2007
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Cocteau 101 on Aug 22, 2013 0:01:00 GMT 1, Unlike that comment, which has got us all scratching our heads on how to match such a well thought out, composed, critical and informed contribution to the debate..cheers.. lol
Martyn' Do you honestly believe that lengthy text you wrote or quoted or is she taking place in one of your future shows. I do find them boring both aesthetically and in concept. Whereas the concept may be of some merit to some the execution I find banal even if it is well executed. I'd like to hear or read something from her on her concept and portrayal but at the moment find everyone I've seen boring and merely decorative. Decoration is fine but it belongs in places like Ikea.
Unlike that comment, which has got us all scratching our heads on how to match such a well thought out, composed, critical and informed contribution to the debate..cheers.. lol Martyn' Do you honestly believe that lengthy text you wrote or quoted or is she taking place in one of your future shows. I do find them boring both aesthetically and in concept. Whereas the concept may be of some merit to some the execution I find banal even if it is well executed. I'd like to hear or read something from her on her concept and portrayal but at the moment find everyone I've seen boring and merely decorative. Decoration is fine but it belongs in places like Ikea.
|
|
natstan
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,807
👍🏻 1,128
March 2013
|
Sandra Chevrier, by natstan on Aug 22, 2013 1:15:48 GMT 1, That's precisely the point- I'm curious about the art that interests cocteau and see what are the pieces that he deem worthy to collect. But considering how lengthy nuart's 'dissection' was, I find a comment like 'That is boring' a little underwhelming. GP, it's you who thinks I'm trying to get Cocteau to justify his likings - I did not.
Cocteau, seriously no offence here...
Interested to hear what's not boring then so we can make a good-natured comparison, although we all know art is subjective. Probably everybody can learn something new from you what is good art. Cocteau will have an amazing collection I have bought a few pieces from him and he showed other stuff I was just wow at. If he thinks boring fair enough why does he have to justify it one mans gold and all that I just got two originals on paper and some of her prints for the site The originals I am struggling to list as I want them. I know u can say I am biased but there mega so are the originals on reed ESP the thin one with just the eyes!!!
That's precisely the point- I'm curious about the art that interests cocteau and see what are the pieces that he deem worthy to collect. But considering how lengthy nuart's 'dissection' was, I find a comment like 'That is boring' a little underwhelming. GP, it's you who thinks I'm trying to get Cocteau to justify his likings - I did not. Cocteau, seriously no offence here... Interested to hear what's not boring then so we can make a good-natured comparison, although we all know art is subjective. Probably everybody can learn something new from you what is good art. Cocteau will have an amazing collection I have bought a few pieces from him and he showed other stuff I was just wow at. If he thinks boring fair enough why does he have to justify it one mans gold and all that I just got two originals on paper and some of her prints for the site The originals I am struggling to list as I want them. I know u can say I am biased but there mega so are the originals on reed ESP the thin one with just the eyes!!!
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Deleted on Aug 22, 2013 8:02:43 GMT 1, Unlike that comment, which has got us all scratching our heads on how to match such a well thought out, composed, critical and informed contribution to the debate..cheers.. lol Martyn' Do you honestly believe that lengthy text you wrote or quoted or is she taking place in one of your future shows. I do find them boring both aesthetically and in concept. Whereas the concept may be of some merit to some the execution I find banal even if it is well executed. I'd like to hear or read something from her on her concept and portrayal but at the moment find everyone I've seen boring and merely decorative. Decoration is fine but it belongs in places like Ikea. Hello Cocteau, long time. Hope you're well mate. Re Chevrier, she would only be taking place in one of my future shows if I honestly believed in that text, I do, she is. If I didn't, she wouldn't. I presume it's the same for you and for example, James Kidd. I've spoken to Sandra a lot about her work, so you just have to trust me, she means it, she's an artist with depth. The "some" who find the concept has "some merit", would seem to be every woman that sees them. Not a bad start. Maybe it's just some empathy for women you're lacking. Not sure. And really, it's only in the field of Urban Art that you come across decorative chancers looking to make a quick buck from a stencil. Sandra's a studio artist and painter, people don't dedicate their lives to painting and exploring philosophical themes in order to produce mere decoration, why ? in the hope they can sell it. That's a myth. A few Urban Artists maybe, but otherwise no, you'd be hard pressed to find one outside of Urban Art, and even then, very rare.
So, if you see these as merely decoration, that's not a lack in the work, but a lack of your understanding of the work or sympathy for the subject matter. Maybe you find themes of women's role in a celebrity image based saturated society, where they are judged solely on appearance, boring. In which case fair enough. But If you get beyond the "aesthetic" and view these critically, they work. They have a lot to say, they make you think, have the power to make people reassess how they view a whole gender, explore themes of power and domination, submission through fashion and media, consumption and desire. And...like Joan of Arc herself, are executed beautifully.
Unlike that comment, which has got us all scratching our heads on how to match such a well thought out, composed, critical and informed contribution to the debate..cheers.. lol Martyn' Do you honestly believe that lengthy text you wrote or quoted or is she taking place in one of your future shows. I do find them boring both aesthetically and in concept. Whereas the concept may be of some merit to some the execution I find banal even if it is well executed. I'd like to hear or read something from her on her concept and portrayal but at the moment find everyone I've seen boring and merely decorative. Decoration is fine but it belongs in places like Ikea. Hello Cocteau, long time. Hope you're well mate. Re Chevrier, she would only be taking place in one of my future shows if I honestly believed in that text, I do, she is. If I didn't, she wouldn't. I presume it's the same for you and for example, James Kidd. I've spoken to Sandra a lot about her work, so you just have to trust me, she means it, she's an artist with depth. The "some" who find the concept has "some merit", would seem to be every woman that sees them. Not a bad start. Maybe it's just some empathy for women you're lacking. Not sure. And really, it's only in the field of Urban Art that you come across decorative chancers looking to make a quick buck from a stencil. Sandra's a studio artist and painter, people don't dedicate their lives to painting and exploring philosophical themes in order to produce mere decoration, why ? in the hope they can sell it. That's a myth. A few Urban Artists maybe, but otherwise no, you'd be hard pressed to find one outside of Urban Art, and even then, very rare. So, if you see these as merely decoration, that's not a lack in the work, but a lack of your understanding of the work or sympathy for the subject matter. Maybe you find themes of women's role in a celebrity image based saturated society, where they are judged solely on appearance, boring. In which case fair enough. But If you get beyond the "aesthetic" and view these critically, they work. They have a lot to say, they make you think, have the power to make people reassess how they view a whole gender, explore themes of power and domination, submission through fashion and media, consumption and desire. And...like Joan of Arc herself, are executed beautifully.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Sandra Chevrier, by Deleted on Aug 22, 2013 8:23:37 GMT 1, That's precisely the point- I'm curious about the art that interests cocteau and see what are the pieces that he deem worthy to collect. But considering how lengthy nuart's 'dissection' was, I find a comment like 'That is boring' a little underwhelming. GP, it's you who thinks I'm trying to get Cocteau to justify his likings - I did not. Cocteau, seriously no offence here... We likes what we likes and we dont likes what we dont likes. I dont care much for Sandra Chevrier works, they're pretty enough but nothing more to them IMO. Cocteau does indeed have an excellent collection.
That's precisely the point- I'm curious about the art that interests cocteau and see what are the pieces that he deem worthy to collect. But considering how lengthy nuart's 'dissection' was, I find a comment like 'That is boring' a little underwhelming. GP, it's you who thinks I'm trying to get Cocteau to justify his likings - I did not. Cocteau, seriously no offence here... We likes what we likes and we dont likes what we dont likes. I dont care much for Sandra Chevrier works, they're pretty enough but nothing more to them IMO. Cocteau does indeed have an excellent collection.
|
|
|
Sandra Chevrier, by urbanhangings on Aug 22, 2013 8:46:39 GMT 1, Looks like I'm not intepreting her works too differently from others! Not my text but pretty much what happened to me a few days after seeing them for the first time..didn't trust myself initially. Chicks and comics and no depth.. instant candy, what's not to like. But I loved them nevertheless.. so, I tried to dissect what this was. Why did I like them so much, what was underneath. And after a little research and chatting to Sandra, realised, like women themselves (or anything for that matter) there was much more to them than first meets the eye. Art that, in the hunt and hysteria of discovering something new, magnetises the lustful viewer and numbs him to the artist’s hidden message imbued within. If you aren’t already numbed by the pretentiousness of that introduction, let me explain what I mean. Art works when art makes you fall in love with it for the wrong reasons. Not because its subject matter is evil, but because you – the mortal civilian – you fell for the trick of appearance. In an age saturated by image, the enchanting magic of what we see all too often leads us astray from the harsh reality of what is. Whilst absent-mindedly wading through Juxtapoz in an attempt to track down my next artist for review, Montreal-based painter Sandra Chevrier caught my attention like she’d physically climbed through my MacBook monitor, wrenched out my eyeballs and escaped back into the vortex of the internet forever. If you’re aware of my own work which has veered more recently into the realm of mixed media collaged faces, you might understand why. Consumed in the moment by the enduring beauty of Chevrier’s work I was anaesthetised to what the work was actually trying to say. I was reminded of my own ability to fall for the trick of superficial illusions to which we all fall victim in today’s society. It was only after closer inspection, having thoroughly unpicked the meaning of Chevrier’s paintings, that I realised I had reacted purely at the sight of an artist whose work I thought might be deemed ‘cool’ – shoot me. Now, I stick by that – Chevrier’s work is f**king cool. But her work is so aesthetically striking that it’s difficult to drag yourself away from the lure of the outer and get you hands dirty with the grit of the inner. Reminiscent of the arresting superhero aesthetic employed in previously covered artist, Lora Zombie, this is what makes this great art: Chevrier’s work demands to be dissected. Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence. It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity. There’s a sense of torturous struggle as the images encroach on the figure's ability to see. If the women aren’t blinded entirely by Chevrier's collage, their jailed stares are vacant – weak – defeatist; a quiet and tragic resigned acceptance perhaps, that their gendered identity goes no deeper than the image of society’s superficial, fetishized mask strapped to their faces. The collage, which often features epic and dramatic battle scenes taken from real comic book magazines, is applied rather haphazardly, yet this somewhat incongruous style of application, with fictional characters that reaches an almost theatrical level, only enhances the message of the chaotic and farcical pressures placed upon women to perform superheroic deeds in society. It's a very astute angle from Chevrier, because in a cultureless society bent on teaching our young to aspire to the lie of celebrity, the artist perfectly satirises the ludicrousness of unrealistic expectations and unattainable dreams. What a load of pretentious chin stroking hogwash of a review.When this guy gets his own head out of his ass im gonna take my shoe off and give and him the biggest shoeing of his life. Elitist art review wank if u ask me. Other than that sandras work rocks.
Looks like I'm not intepreting her works too differently from others! Not my text but pretty much what happened to me a few days after seeing them for the first time..didn't trust myself initially. Chicks and comics and no depth.. instant candy, what's not to like. But I loved them nevertheless.. so, I tried to dissect what this was. Why did I like them so much, what was underneath. And after a little research and chatting to Sandra, realised, like women themselves (or anything for that matter) there was much more to them than first meets the eye. Art that, in the hunt and hysteria of discovering something new, magnetises the lustful viewer and numbs him to the artist’s hidden message imbued within. If you aren’t already numbed by the pretentiousness of that introduction, let me explain what I mean. Art works when art makes you fall in love with it for the wrong reasons. Not because its subject matter is evil, but because you – the mortal civilian – you fell for the trick of appearance. In an age saturated by image, the enchanting magic of what we see all too often leads us astray from the harsh reality of what is. Whilst absent-mindedly wading through Juxtapoz in an attempt to track down my next artist for review, Montreal-based painter Sandra Chevrier caught my attention like she’d physically climbed through my MacBook monitor, wrenched out my eyeballs and escaped back into the vortex of the internet forever. If you’re aware of my own work which has veered more recently into the realm of mixed media collaged faces, you might understand why. Consumed in the moment by the enduring beauty of Chevrier’s work I was anaesthetised to what the work was actually trying to say. I was reminded of my own ability to fall for the trick of superficial illusions to which we all fall victim in today’s society. It was only after closer inspection, having thoroughly unpicked the meaning of Chevrier’s paintings, that I realised I had reacted purely at the sight of an artist whose work I thought might be deemed ‘cool’ – shoot me. Now, I stick by that – Chevrier’s work is f**king cool. But her work is so aesthetically striking that it’s difficult to drag yourself away from the lure of the outer and get you hands dirty with the grit of the inner. Reminiscent of the arresting superhero aesthetic employed in previously covered artist, Lora Zombie, this is what makes this great art: Chevrier’s work demands to be dissected. Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence. It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity. There’s a sense of torturous struggle as the images encroach on the figure's ability to see. If the women aren’t blinded entirely by Chevrier's collage, their jailed stares are vacant – weak – defeatist; a quiet and tragic resigned acceptance perhaps, that their gendered identity goes no deeper than the image of society’s superficial, fetishized mask strapped to their faces. The collage, which often features epic and dramatic battle scenes taken from real comic book magazines, is applied rather haphazardly, yet this somewhat incongruous style of application, with fictional characters that reaches an almost theatrical level, only enhances the message of the chaotic and farcical pressures placed upon women to perform superheroic deeds in society. It's a very astute angle from Chevrier, because in a cultureless society bent on teaching our young to aspire to the lie of celebrity, the artist perfectly satirises the ludicrousness of unrealistic expectations and unattainable dreams. What a load of pretentious chin stroking hogwash of a review.When this guy gets his own head out of his ass im gonna take my shoe off and give and him the biggest shoeing of his life. Elitist art review wank if u ask me. Other than that sandras work rocks.
|
|
peggy
New Member
🗨️ 145
👍🏻 8
March 2010
|
Sandra Chevrier, by peggy on Aug 22, 2013 10:59:51 GMT 1, Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence. It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity.] PEGGY IS CURIOUS ABOUT THE OVERLY NEGATIVE OPINION ABOUT SOCIETY'S EXPECTATIONS AND 'THE UNDERLYING TRAGEDY OF OPPRESSED FEMALE IDENTITY.' PEGGY WONDERS IF THIS IS MISS SANDRA'S VIEW OR THAT OF A FAWNING JOURNALIST? PEGGY FEELS VERY SORRY FOR JUVENILE IDIOTS WHO ARE ONLY CAPABLE OF SEEING WOMEN 'THROUGH NOTHING BUT PORNOGRAPHIC EYES'. READING IT PEGGY CAN ONLY FEEL IT IS A PIECE OF WISHFUL LAZY JOURNALISM PLAYING ON OBVIOUS THEMES, WHILST BARELY SCRATCHING THE SURFACE AS TO WHAT UNDERPINS THOSE ASSERTIONS MADE. IF ALL OF ABOVE IS MISS SANDRA'S VIEWS PEGGY FEELS SYMPATHY FOR QUITE HOW ANGRY AND DISILLUSIONED WITH THE WORLD SHE IS. PEGGY HOPES SHE MEETS PEOPLE WHO CAN RESTORE HER FAITH IN PEOPLE. AS FOR HER ART NOT SOMETHING FOR PEGGY, PAINTED FACES WITH COMICS USED TO DECORATE FACE, DOUBLED WITH ABOVE ARTICLE FEELS ALL A LITTLE SIXTH FORM COLLAGE. PLEASE TRY HARDER
Chevrier’s collaged portraits are torn, quite literally, between the superimposed cuttings of fantastical comic book humour and the harsh, underlying tragedy of oppressed female identity. Chevrier imagines her female figures inside society’s incarcerating “Cages” of expectation that forces them to live up to a superheroic image. The comic-book collage, at once bold and alluring echo rather entertaining pop-art references, yet upon closer scrutiny we realise the bitter irony that these plastered female faces are silenced, blinded and smothered by the very images that seduce us into their existence. It’s a brilliant, deceptively simple device that speaks to our cyber-induced, brainwashed inability to view women through nothing but pornographic eyes; an agonising, paradoxical truth that both denies and validates female identity.] PEGGY IS CURIOUS ABOUT THE OVERLY NEGATIVE OPINION ABOUT SOCIETY'S EXPECTATIONS AND 'THE UNDERLYING TRAGEDY OF OPPRESSED FEMALE IDENTITY.' PEGGY WONDERS IF THIS IS MISS SANDRA'S VIEW OR THAT OF A FAWNING JOURNALIST? PEGGY FEELS VERY SORRY FOR JUVENILE IDIOTS WHO ARE ONLY CAPABLE OF SEEING WOMEN 'THROUGH NOTHING BUT PORNOGRAPHIC EYES'. READING IT PEGGY CAN ONLY FEEL IT IS A PIECE OF WISHFUL LAZY JOURNALISM PLAYING ON OBVIOUS THEMES, WHILST BARELY SCRATCHING THE SURFACE AS TO WHAT UNDERPINS THOSE ASSERTIONS MADE. IF ALL OF ABOVE IS MISS SANDRA'S VIEWS PEGGY FEELS SYMPATHY FOR QUITE HOW ANGRY AND DISILLUSIONED WITH THE WORLD SHE IS. PEGGY HOPES SHE MEETS PEOPLE WHO CAN RESTORE HER FAITH IN PEOPLE. AS FOR HER ART NOT SOMETHING FOR PEGGY, PAINTED FACES WITH COMICS USED TO DECORATE FACE, DOUBLED WITH ABOVE ARTICLE FEELS ALL A LITTLE SIXTH FORM COLLAGE. PLEASE TRY HARDER
|
|
maven
New Member
🗨️ 185
👍🏻 17
July 2011
|
Sandra Chevrier, by maven on Aug 22, 2013 11:50:30 GMT 1, It's cute but boring, another hyped up artist coz she's having a show a x or y gallery. Also didn't know she painted walls, why is she even talked about so extensively in here
It's cute but boring, another hyped up artist coz she's having a show a x or y gallery. Also didn't know she painted walls, why is she even talked about so extensively in here
|
|