jonb
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 82
๐๐ป 90
July 2014
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by jonb on Aug 3, 2014 18:32:35 GMT 1,
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
|
|
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Coach on Aug 5, 2014 12:15:31 GMT 1, Big respect for Baroness Warsi resigning from the government over it's stance on Gaza
Big respect for Baroness Warsi resigning from the government over it's stance on Gaza
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Aug 6, 2014 20:03:58 GMT 1, This coming Saturday, London.
This coming Saturday, London.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Aug 9, 2014 9:29:08 GMT 1, TODAY
ยฉliam_karma
TODAY
ยฉliam_karma
|
|
jonb
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 82
๐๐ป 90
July 2014
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by jonb on Aug 9, 2014 11:21:35 GMT 1, The only reason I am not there is my lack of mobility, but my spirit is marching today. If the cycle of violence is to be stopped the Palestinian voice must be heard. You cannot take a peoples land away silence them, brutalise them, and then blame them for being angry. This will never be solved with bombs. If Israel wants to survive as a moral society it has to admit the harm that was done and is being done in her name.
If the world stands back to allow this pogrom the world has no morality.
The only reason I am not there is my lack of mobility, but my spirit is marching today. If the cycle of violence is to be stopped the Palestinian voice must be heard. You cannot take a peoples land away silence them, brutalise them, and then blame them for being angry. This will never be solved with bombs. If Israel wants to survive as a moral society it has to admit the harm that was done and is being done in her name.
If the world stands back to allow this pogrom the world has no morality.
|
|
curiousgeorge
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,833
๐๐ป 1,091
March 2007
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by curiousgeorge on Aug 10, 2014 1:40:27 GMT 1, The only reason I am not there is my lack of mobility, but my spirit is marching today. If the cycle of violence is to be stopped the Palestinian voice must be heard. You cannot take a peoples land away silence them, brutalise them, and then blame them for being angry. This will never be solved with bombs. If Israel wants to survive as a moral society it has to admit the harm that was done and is being done in her name. If the world stands back to allow this pogrom the world has no morality. Agree with the sentiments but the conflict is an industry within itself, and multi-billion one at that.
Arms industry + governments(so closely linked it's creepy) = bunches of cnuts
The only reason I am not there is my lack of mobility, but my spirit is marching today. If the cycle of violence is to be stopped the Palestinian voice must be heard. You cannot take a peoples land away silence them, brutalise them, and then blame them for being angry. This will never be solved with bombs. If Israel wants to survive as a moral society it has to admit the harm that was done and is being done in her name. If the world stands back to allow this pogrom the world has no morality. Agree with the sentiments but the conflict is an industry within itself, and multi-billion one at that. Arms industry + governments(so closely linked it's creepy) = bunches of cnuts
|
|
jonb
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 82
๐๐ป 90
July 2014
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by jonb on Aug 10, 2014 4:34:50 GMT 1, I agree, it looks like a machine designed to divide and rule, as we are bounced about from one atrocity to another we are encouraged to take sides and see the others as evil, each side becoming more fundamental, more radical and less likely to challenge their own leaders.
How could a Palestinian be moderate, when there is no escape from the policing by bombing. Just to be near somebody with a gun is used by the government of Israel as a justification for your death.
And the fear of Islamic radicalism is used to justify more bombing, which produces more fundamentalism.
The media presents the same message over and over; to be anti what the Israeli government is doing is to be in some way anti Semitic, So most Jewish people find themselves feeling they have to justify the barbarism that is being done in their name. What I see is, our leaders benefiting from creating strife. We see the threat of war which encourages us to take sides, hold the line and not question those that crank up disputes who are our leaders. So we do not question them about how they have failed to deliver on all their other promises and we wrap ourselves in the flag.
This is an old method of control. Like in 1984 We are Oceania in a world of perpetual war. So we sit and watch our TVs ignoring the wrongs done to the other side and feeling the pain of those we identify with, until we hate enough to start cheering the hurt being done to 'them'. Caesars built arenas in just the same way, to distract and justify the violence they use.
That I would say this is the blueprint that those in control give away free to us, a vision of hate.
I agree, it looks like a machine designed to divide and rule, as we are bounced about from one atrocity to another we are encouraged to take sides and see the others as evil, each side becoming more fundamental, more radical and less likely to challenge their own leaders.
How could a Palestinian be moderate, when there is no escape from the policing by bombing. Just to be near somebody with a gun is used by the government of Israel as a justification for your death.
And the fear of Islamic radicalism is used to justify more bombing, which produces more fundamentalism.
The media presents the same message over and over; to be anti what the Israeli government is doing is to be in some way anti Semitic, So most Jewish people find themselves feeling they have to justify the barbarism that is being done in their name. What I see is, our leaders benefiting from creating strife. We see the threat of war which encourages us to take sides, hold the line and not question those that crank up disputes who are our leaders. So we do not question them about how they have failed to deliver on all their other promises and we wrap ourselves in the flag.
This is an old method of control. Like in 1984 We are Oceania in a world of perpetual war. So we sit and watch our TVs ignoring the wrongs done to the other side and feeling the pain of those we identify with, until we hate enough to start cheering the hurt being done to 'them'. Caesars built arenas in just the same way, to distract and justify the violence they use.
That I would say this is the blueprint that those in control give away free to us, a vision of hate.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Aug 10, 2014 11:11:26 GMT 1,
|
|
jonb
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 82
๐๐ป 90
July 2014
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by jonb on Aug 10, 2014 12:13:02 GMT 1, Now it is established that the medieval practice of walling a population into a city, and then bombarding them, and starving them into submission is Ok, (Yes a load of protests which are not reported, but most of the western population thinks it has nothing to do with them) look what is happening in the Ukraine.
Donetsk, is surrounded by government forces who are not allowing anything in or out of the city.
It was reported on the BBC world service last night
NATO has told Russia that they are not allowed to aid the rebels in any way, even with humanitarian aid.
Think about that the population of Donetsk are not even allowed food or medical help. While being shelled and bombed.
If you like me are a westerner, that is being done in your name, until we hold our governments to account we are the enemy.
Now it is established that the medieval practice of walling a population into a city, and then bombarding them, and starving them into submission is Ok, (Yes a load of protests which are not reported, but most of the western population thinks it has nothing to do with them) look what is happening in the Ukraine.
Donetsk, is surrounded by government forces who are not allowing anything in or out of the city.
It was reported on the BBC world service last night
NATO has told Russia that they are not allowed to aid the rebels in any way, even with humanitarian aid.
Think about that the population of Donetsk are not even allowed food or medical help. While being shelled and bombed.
If you like me are a westerner, that is being done in your name, until we hold our governments to account we are the enemy.
|
|
|
curiousgeorge
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,833
๐๐ป 1,091
March 2007
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by curiousgeorge on Aug 10, 2014 17:07:53 GMT 1, What we need is a Middle East peace envoy.We could go crazy and get one with the interests of humanity at heart!
What we need is a Middle East peace envoy.We could go crazy and get one with the interests of humanity at heart!
|
|
|
Feral Things
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,848
๐๐ป 3,654
January 2012
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Feral Things on Aug 10, 2014 17:17:37 GMT 1, What we need is a Middle East peace envoy.We could go crazy and get one with the interests of humanity at heart! Surely you're not trying to suggest that starting a war in the Middle East and having commercial links to despotic regimes in Egypt and the UAE somehow makes someone unsuitable to be a Middle East peace envoy are you? Crazy talk.
What we need is a Middle East peace envoy.We could go crazy and get one with the interests of humanity at heart! Surely you're not trying to suggest that starting a war in the Middle East and having commercial links to despotic regimes in Egypt and the UAE somehow makes someone unsuitable to be a Middle East peace envoy are you? Crazy talk.
|
|
Feral Things
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,848
๐๐ป 3,654
January 2012
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Feral Things on Aug 10, 2014 17:48:07 GMT 1, It looks like it was a fantastic turn out for the march in London yesterday and apparently the march in Cape Town was the country's largest since the end of Apartheid.
If anyone couldn't make a protest march yesterday and still wants to help the people of Gaza then the Disasters Emergency Committee (an umbrella group of 13 aid agencies like the Red Cross) have set up an appeal; details are here.
It looks like it was a fantastic turn out for the march in London yesterday and apparently the march in Cape Town was the country's largest since the end of Apartheid. If anyone couldn't make a protest march yesterday and still wants to help the people of Gaza then the Disasters Emergency Committee (an umbrella group of 13 aid agencies like the Red Cross) have set up an appeal; details are here.
|
|
curiousgeorge
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 5,833
๐๐ป 1,091
March 2007
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by curiousgeorge on Aug 10, 2014 17:57:18 GMT 1, What we need is a Middle East peace envoy.We could go crazy and get one with the interests of humanity at heart! Surely you're not trying to suggest that starting a war in the Middle East and having commercial links to despotic regimes in Egypt and the UAE somehow makes someone unsuitable to be a Middle East peace envoy are you? Crazy talk. Now hold on a minute! Are you trying to say we have a Middle East peace envoy? I know we've got a travelling salesman offering up the latest in "this is will fcku people up with pinpoint accuracy weaponry devastation guaranteed" So the same guy doing the touting is all also 'keeping the peace' conflict of interests?? Seems legit peopleโฆ.
Sorry in advance for misplaced sarcasm.It's either that orโฆthese cnuts make me rage..And that would get boring pretty quick.
What we need is a Middle East peace envoy.We could go crazy and get one with the interests of humanity at heart! Surely you're not trying to suggest that starting a war in the Middle East and having commercial links to despotic regimes in Egypt and the UAE somehow makes someone unsuitable to be a Middle East peace envoy are you? Crazy talk. Now hold on a minute! Are you trying to say we have a Middle East peace envoy? I know we've got a travelling salesman offering up the latest in "this is will fcku people up with pinpoint accuracy weaponry devastation guaranteed" So the same guy doing the touting is all also 'keeping the peace' conflict of interests?? Seems legit peopleโฆ. Sorry in advance for misplaced sarcasm.It's either that orโฆthese cnuts make me rage..And that would get boring pretty quick.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Aug 10, 2014 19:56:46 GMT 1, Surely you're not trying to suggest that starting a war in the Middle East and having commercial links to despotic regimes in Egypt and the UAE somehow makes someone unsuitable to be a Middle East peace envoy are you? Crazy talk. Now hold on a minute! Are you trying to say we have a Middle East peace envoy? I know we've got a travelling salesman offering up the latest in "this is will fcku people up with pinpoint accuracy weaponry devastation guaranteed" So the same guy doing the touting is all also 'keeping the peace' conflict of interests?? Seems legit peopleโฆ. Sorry in advance for misplaced sarcasm.It's either that orโฆthese cnuts make me rage..And that would get boring pretty quick. Are you implying he spends most of his time touring the U.S. delivering 'inspirational' lectures for vast sums of money rather than focusing on his brief? Shame on you.
Surely you're not trying to suggest that starting a war in the Middle East and having commercial links to despotic regimes in Egypt and the UAE somehow makes someone unsuitable to be a Middle East peace envoy are you? Crazy talk. Now hold on a minute! Are you trying to say we have a Middle East peace envoy? I know we've got a travelling salesman offering up the latest in "this is will fcku people up with pinpoint accuracy weaponry devastation guaranteed" So the same guy doing the touting is all also 'keeping the peace' conflict of interests?? Seems legit peopleโฆ. Sorry in advance for misplaced sarcasm.It's either that orโฆthese cnuts make me rage..And that would get boring pretty quick. Are you implying he spends most of his time touring the U.S. delivering 'inspirational' lectures for vast sums of money rather than focusing on his brief? Shame on you.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Aug 16, 2014 22:26:29 GMT 1, Whats the death toll so far?.
Whats the death toll so far?.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Aug 16, 2014 22:43:02 GMT 1, 2k - though 1 is too many
From my perspective, for the powers on both sides require this kind of activity for their respective political ends/ survival. As much as I detest the Israeli actions, it just seem that both sides are locked into some sick death spiral, too much is based on the machinations of history and no one seems to want to let go or move on.
2k - though 1 is too many
From my perspective, for the powers on both sides require this kind of activity for their respective political ends/ survival. As much as I detest the Israeli actions, it just seem that both sides are locked into some sick death spiral, too much is based on the machinations of history and no one seems to want to let go or move on.
|
|
Dr Plip
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 7,043
๐๐ป 8,981
August 2011
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Dr Plip on Aug 17, 2014 7:01:16 GMT 1, www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28814555
"A Dutchman honoured by Israel for hiding a Jewish child during World War Two has handed back his medal after six of his relatives were killed in an Israeli air strike on Gaza."
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28814555"A Dutchman honoured by Israel for hiding a Jewish child during World War Two has handed back his medal after six of his relatives were killed in an Israeli air strike on Gaza."
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Aug 24, 2014 16:37:56 GMT 1, "More than 300 Holocaust survivors and their descendants have issued a statement condemning what they call Israel's "genocide" in Gaza.
The International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network placed the statement as an advertisement in the New York Times..."
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28916761
"More than 300 Holocaust survivors and their descendants have issued a statement condemning what they call Israel's "genocide" in Gaza. The International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network placed the statement as an advertisement in the New York Times..." www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28916761
|
|
|
|
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Coach on Sept 6, 2014 0:11:55 GMT 1,
When so much land has been taken already!
When so much land has been taken already!
|
|
oxomo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 198
๐๐ป 113
May 2014
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by oxomo on Sept 6, 2014 2:06:20 GMT 1, I fear I am opening a can of worms here, but I think seeing as this is an open forum that I will share my thoughts on the conflict, regardless of whether I am heavily outnumbered or not.
I know this is an extremely sensitive subject, and one many people (including myself) feel passionately about, but I just want to share my opinions in a constructive manner without any hate or anger involved.
I am not condoning the way Israel has acted throughout the conflict, but Israel does have a long history of giving back land. Take Israel's return of Sanai to Egypt as a prime example of when both sides want peace it is achievable.
It is truly devastating the amount of innocent blood spilt on both sides, but there is very clear evidence that Israel does everything it can to try an minimise civilian casualties, whilst Hamas does everything they can to try and maximise them. Whilst this is not an attempt at an excuse - as I think Israel's response has been too great - Hamas fired 4,480 rockets at Israeli citizens in the last two months alone and have spent millions and millions of pounds/dollars of aid money building underground tunnel networks in an attempt to carry out terrorist attacks on Israeli soil. It would be foolish to think that any country who gained concrete intelligence about this would not do everything in their power to neutralise the threat in order to protect their civilians. Would you not expect the same from your country?
There are two key facts for me that make this conversation so hard sometimes. One, is that Hamas are a recognised terrorist organisation. And, two, it states in their charter that they want to destroy Israel.
Israel has proven that they can live side-by-side with arabs by the fact that there are well over a million living in Israel who are fully integrated into society, and have all the same rights as everyone else that lives there.
It is so unbelievably sad that the people from Gaza are clearly the ones who are losing in all of this, and it makes me feel sick every time I read about further civilian casualties. The violence must end from BOTH sides, not temporarily, but permanently, and the only solution is a two-state solution...but how can this be worked towards when the terrorist organisation who run Gaza are only interested in the destruction of Israel.
I fear that unfortunately, as long as Hamas are in charge, there can never be peace.
I fear I am opening a can of worms here, but I think seeing as this is an open forum that I will share my thoughts on the conflict, regardless of whether I am heavily outnumbered or not.
I know this is an extremely sensitive subject, and one many people (including myself) feel passionately about, but I just want to share my opinions in a constructive manner without any hate or anger involved.
I am not condoning the way Israel has acted throughout the conflict, but Israel does have a long history of giving back land. Take Israel's return of Sanai to Egypt as a prime example of when both sides want peace it is achievable.
It is truly devastating the amount of innocent blood spilt on both sides, but there is very clear evidence that Israel does everything it can to try an minimise civilian casualties, whilst Hamas does everything they can to try and maximise them. Whilst this is not an attempt at an excuse - as I think Israel's response has been too great - Hamas fired 4,480 rockets at Israeli citizens in the last two months alone and have spent millions and millions of pounds/dollars of aid money building underground tunnel networks in an attempt to carry out terrorist attacks on Israeli soil. It would be foolish to think that any country who gained concrete intelligence about this would not do everything in their power to neutralise the threat in order to protect their civilians. Would you not expect the same from your country?
There are two key facts for me that make this conversation so hard sometimes. One, is that Hamas are a recognised terrorist organisation. And, two, it states in their charter that they want to destroy Israel.
Israel has proven that they can live side-by-side with arabs by the fact that there are well over a million living in Israel who are fully integrated into society, and have all the same rights as everyone else that lives there.
It is so unbelievably sad that the people from Gaza are clearly the ones who are losing in all of this, and it makes me feel sick every time I read about further civilian casualties. The violence must end from BOTH sides, not temporarily, but permanently, and the only solution is a two-state solution...but how can this be worked towards when the terrorist organisation who run Gaza are only interested in the destruction of Israel.
I fear that unfortunately, as long as Hamas are in charge, there can never be peace.
|
|
Feral Things
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,848
๐๐ป 3,654
January 2012
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Feral Things on Sept 14, 2014 21:10:36 GMT 1, Thanks for sharing your thoughts, oxomo. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has a tendency to polarise opinion so let's hope this thread doesn't go the same way as other threads on here. While I agree with some of your points there are others I would want to pick up on:
I am not condoning the way Israel has acted throughout the conflict, but Israel does have a long history of giving back land. Take Israel's return of Sanai to Egypt as a prime example of when both sides want peace it is achievable. It's still hotly contested whether Israel entered into negotiations with Egypt out of a benevolent desire for peace or whether they were forced into doing so by the commercial and geopolitical situation they found themselves in at the time. In any case, since Israel withdrew from Sinai in 1982 the country has moved markedly to the right and is far more hawkish than it was back then. If Israel was serious about giving back occupied territory then they would not be building permanent settlements on Palestinian land. Fatah are not designated as a terrorist organisation and acknowledge the right of Israel to exist but Israel is still building settlements in the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem.
It is truly devastating the amount of innocent blood spilt on both sides, but there is very clear evidence that Israel does everything it can to try an minimise civilian casualties, whilst Hamas does everything they can to try and maximise them. Unfortunately, the evidence on the ground suggests that, much like Hamas, the Israeli Defense Force has done little to minimise civilian casualties. The vast majority of the over 2,000 Palestinian deaths were civilians and their targets included seven hospitals and four UN-run schools. At best this looks like a callous disregard for civilians and at worse looks like collective punishment of a civilian population.
I agree that Hamas is an obstacle to peace in the region but unfortunately the IDF's recent bombing of the Gaza Strip is the very best recruiting tool which Hamas could ever hope for.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, oxomo. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has a tendency to polarise opinion so let's hope this thread doesn't go the same way as other threads on here. While I agree with some of your points there are others I would want to pick up on: I am not condoning the way Israel has acted throughout the conflict, but Israel does have a long history of giving back land. Take Israel's return of Sanai to Egypt as a prime example of when both sides want peace it is achievable. It's still hotly contested whether Israel entered into negotiations with Egypt out of a benevolent desire for peace or whether they were forced into doing so by the commercial and geopolitical situation they found themselves in at the time. In any case, since Israel withdrew from Sinai in 1982 the country has moved markedly to the right and is far more hawkish than it was back then. If Israel was serious about giving back occupied territory then they would not be building permanent settlements on Palestinian land. Fatah are not designated as a terrorist organisation and acknowledge the right of Israel to exist but Israel is still building settlements in the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem. It is truly devastating the amount of innocent blood spilt on both sides, but there is very clear evidence that Israel does everything it can to try an minimise civilian casualties, whilst Hamas does everything they can to try and maximise them. Unfortunately, the evidence on the ground suggests that, much like Hamas, the Israeli Defense Force has done little to minimise civilian casualties. The vast majority of the over 2,000 Palestinian deaths were civilians and their targets included seven hospitals and four UN-run schools. At best this looks like a callous disregard for civilians and at worse looks like collective punishment of a civilian population. I agree that Hamas is an obstacle to peace in the region but unfortunately the IDF's recent bombing of the Gaza Strip is the very best recruiting tool which Hamas could ever hope for.
|
|
oxomo
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 198
๐๐ป 113
May 2014
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by oxomo on Sept 15, 2014 16:58:59 GMT 1, Thank you feralthings for your constructive response. Like you I agree with one of your points (the first), but unfortunately not the second.
Israel should not continue to build settlements, as it is a clear violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and is illegal. Unfortunately no country is perfect, and we can only hope that the deconstruction of these settlements happens in the near future.
However, lets not forget that Israel did dismantle 21 settlements in Gaza and 4 in the West Bank in 2005, so I believe there is still hope for those remaining.
With regard to your point about civilian casualties, I must rebut this point as there is significant evidence that implicates Hamas's disregard for civilian life.
Yes, you are correct that 7 hospitals and 4 UN-run schools were targeted, however I don't think that tells the whole story. Firstly, the IDF gives prior warning to any airstrike that is going to take place in a civilian populated area. They conduct this by sending flyers giving advanced warning to any civilians to evacuate the area. Then prior to the airstrike, they fire a warning shot, again to give warning of the impending strike. Only after this is the strike executed, with perfect precision. However, we must not simply look at what they are targeting, but why they are targeting it. There is absolute proof that Hamas stores weapons in hospitals and schools, as well as launching rockets from them. How can anyone defend a government who directly places its civilians in the firing line, and uses them as human shields. Hamas knows that civilian casualties is fantastic for their press. As you mentioned, the IDF's bombing have become a recruiting tool for Hamas.
In addition to this clear disregard for civilian life, Hamas aimlessly fires rockets into Israel hoping to hit anything and anyone. Imagine if Israel did not have the Iron Dome, just think how many causalities there would be. People look at the death toll, and come to the conclusion that Israel are the only bad guys, but they aren't. For example, around 10% of Hamas's rockets land inside Gaza resulting in the death of their own civilians. Further to this Hamas dress some of their soldiers in civilian clothing in order to increase the civilian death toll. Don't misunderstand this as a statement that I agree with what Israel have done, and how they have done it, but at least there is evidence that they try to minimise civilian casualties. Whereas on the other side, two of the most senior Hamas leaders appeared on Hamas TV saying that "Hamas loves death like Israelis love life". Not a particularly constructive starting point towards peace.
How anyone can believe Hamas has any legitimacy as a Government who can negotiate a settlement or ceasefire is unfortunately misguided. They are a terrorist organisation in the EU and US' eyes and have not attempted to hold an election since they seized power nearly 8 years ago.
I support Gaza, and I support Israel, but I do not, and can not support Hamas. Unfortunately, as you pointed out, Hamas is an obstacle to peace, and in my opinion the most prevalent one.
Thank you feralthings for your constructive response. Like you I agree with one of your points (the first), but unfortunately not the second.
Israel should not continue to build settlements, as it is a clear violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and is illegal. Unfortunately no country is perfect, and we can only hope that the deconstruction of these settlements happens in the near future.
However, lets not forget that Israel did dismantle 21 settlements in Gaza and 4 in the West Bank in 2005, so I believe there is still hope for those remaining.
With regard to your point about civilian casualties, I must rebut this point as there is significant evidence that implicates Hamas's disregard for civilian life.
Yes, you are correct that 7 hospitals and 4 UN-run schools were targeted, however I don't think that tells the whole story. Firstly, the IDF gives prior warning to any airstrike that is going to take place in a civilian populated area. They conduct this by sending flyers giving advanced warning to any civilians to evacuate the area. Then prior to the airstrike, they fire a warning shot, again to give warning of the impending strike. Only after this is the strike executed, with perfect precision. However, we must not simply look at what they are targeting, but why they are targeting it. There is absolute proof that Hamas stores weapons in hospitals and schools, as well as launching rockets from them. How can anyone defend a government who directly places its civilians in the firing line, and uses them as human shields. Hamas knows that civilian casualties is fantastic for their press. As you mentioned, the IDF's bombing have become a recruiting tool for Hamas.
In addition to this clear disregard for civilian life, Hamas aimlessly fires rockets into Israel hoping to hit anything and anyone. Imagine if Israel did not have the Iron Dome, just think how many causalities there would be. People look at the death toll, and come to the conclusion that Israel are the only bad guys, but they aren't. For example, around 10% of Hamas's rockets land inside Gaza resulting in the death of their own civilians. Further to this Hamas dress some of their soldiers in civilian clothing in order to increase the civilian death toll. Don't misunderstand this as a statement that I agree with what Israel have done, and how they have done it, but at least there is evidence that they try to minimise civilian casualties. Whereas on the other side, two of the most senior Hamas leaders appeared on Hamas TV saying that "Hamas loves death like Israelis love life". Not a particularly constructive starting point towards peace.
How anyone can believe Hamas has any legitimacy as a Government who can negotiate a settlement or ceasefire is unfortunately misguided. They are a terrorist organisation in the EU and US' eyes and have not attempted to hold an election since they seized power nearly 8 years ago.
I support Gaza, and I support Israel, but I do not, and can not support Hamas. Unfortunately, as you pointed out, Hamas is an obstacle to peace, and in my opinion the most prevalent one.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Sept 15, 2014 17:03:14 GMT 1, un-fucking-believeable.
un-fucking-believeable.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
FREE PRINT GIVEAWAY, by Deleted on Sept 15, 2014 17:03:32 GMT 1, Thank you feralthings for your constructive response. Like you I agree with one of your points (the first), but unfortunately not the second. Israel should not continue to build settlements, as it is a clear violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and is illegal. Unfortunately no country is perfect, and we can only hope that the deconstruction of these settlements happens in the near future. However, lets not forget that Israel did dismantle 21 settlements in Gaza and 4 in the West Bank in 2005, so I believe there is still hope for those remaining. With regard to your point about civilian casualties, I must rebut this point as there is significant evidence that implicates Hamas's disregard for civilian life. Yes, you are correct that 7 hospitals and 4 UN-run schools were targeted, however I don't think that tells the whole story. Firstly, the IDF gives prior warning to any airstrike that is going to take place in a civilian populated area. They conduct this by sending flyers giving advanced warning to any civilians to evacuate the area. Then prior to the airstrike, they fire a warning shot, again to give warning of the impending strike. Only after this is the strike executed, with perfect precision. However, we must not simply look at what they are targeting, but why they are targeting it. There is absolute proof that Hamas stores weapons in hospitals and schools, as well as launching rockets from them. How can anyone defend a government who directly places its civilians in the firing line, and uses them as human shields. Hamas knows that civilian casualties is fantastic for their press. As you mentioned, the IDF's bombing have become a recruiting tool for Hamas. In addition to this clear disregard for civilian life, Hamas aimlessly fires rockets into Israel hoping to hit anything and anyone. Imagine if Israel did not have the Iron Dome, just think how many causalities there would be. People look at the death toll, and come to the conclusion that Israel are the only bad guys, but they aren't. For example, around 10% of Hamas's rockets land inside Gaza resulting in the death of their own civilians. Further to this Hamas dress some of their soldiers in civilian clothing in order to increase the civilian death toll. Don't misunderstand this as a statement that I agree with what Israel have done, and how they have done it, but at least there is evidence that they try to minimise civilian casualties. Whereas on the other side, two of the most senior Hamas leaders appeared on Hamas TV saying that "Hamas loves death like Israelis love life". Not a particularly constructive starting point towards peace. How anyone can believe Hamas has any legitimacy as a Government who can negotiate a settlement or ceasefire is unfortunately misguided. They are a terrorist organisation in the EU and US' eyes and have not attempted to hold an election since they seized power nearly 8 years ago. I support Gaza, and I support Israel, but I do not, and can not support Hamas. Unfortunately, as you pointed out, Hamas is an obstacle to peace, and in my opinion the most prevalent one. My skin craws reading this god awful IDF propaganda.
Thank you feralthings for your constructive response. Like you I agree with one of your points (the first), but unfortunately not the second. Israel should not continue to build settlements, as it is a clear violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and is illegal. Unfortunately no country is perfect, and we can only hope that the deconstruction of these settlements happens in the near future. However, lets not forget that Israel did dismantle 21 settlements in Gaza and 4 in the West Bank in 2005, so I believe there is still hope for those remaining. With regard to your point about civilian casualties, I must rebut this point as there is significant evidence that implicates Hamas's disregard for civilian life. Yes, you are correct that 7 hospitals and 4 UN-run schools were targeted, however I don't think that tells the whole story. Firstly, the IDF gives prior warning to any airstrike that is going to take place in a civilian populated area. They conduct this by sending flyers giving advanced warning to any civilians to evacuate the area. Then prior to the airstrike, they fire a warning shot, again to give warning of the impending strike. Only after this is the strike executed, with perfect precision. However, we must not simply look at what they are targeting, but why they are targeting it. There is absolute proof that Hamas stores weapons in hospitals and schools, as well as launching rockets from them. How can anyone defend a government who directly places its civilians in the firing line, and uses them as human shields. Hamas knows that civilian casualties is fantastic for their press. As you mentioned, the IDF's bombing have become a recruiting tool for Hamas. In addition to this clear disregard for civilian life, Hamas aimlessly fires rockets into Israel hoping to hit anything and anyone. Imagine if Israel did not have the Iron Dome, just think how many causalities there would be. People look at the death toll, and come to the conclusion that Israel are the only bad guys, but they aren't. For example, around 10% of Hamas's rockets land inside Gaza resulting in the death of their own civilians. Further to this Hamas dress some of their soldiers in civilian clothing in order to increase the civilian death toll. Don't misunderstand this as a statement that I agree with what Israel have done, and how they have done it, but at least there is evidence that they try to minimise civilian casualties. Whereas on the other side, two of the most senior Hamas leaders appeared on Hamas TV saying that "Hamas loves death like Israelis love life". Not a particularly constructive starting point towards peace. How anyone can believe Hamas has any legitimacy as a Government who can negotiate a settlement or ceasefire is unfortunately misguided. They are a terrorist organisation in the EU and US' eyes and have not attempted to hold an election since they seized power nearly 8 years ago. I support Gaza, and I support Israel, but I do not, and can not support Hamas. Unfortunately, as you pointed out, Hamas is an obstacle to peace, and in my opinion the most prevalent one. My skin craws reading this god awful IDF propaganda.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
|
|