|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Jalouse Rosemont on May 11, 2019 11:33:18 GMT 1, Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? It's the exact same signature in the exact same spot. There's not even 1mm difference. That clearly tells me that they are reproductions (fakes). Thats why the recent Not Not Banksy piece... "It's easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled" is sooooooo apt.
Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? It's the exact same signature in the exact same spot. There's not even 1mm difference. That clearly tells me that they are reproductions (fakes). Thats why the recent Not Not Banksy piece... "It's easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled" is sooooooo apt.
|
|
Easy-Z
New Member
Posts • 623
Likes • 751
January 2019
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Easy-Z on May 11, 2019 15:49:42 GMT 1, Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? It's the exact same signature in the exact same spot. There's not even 1mm difference. That clearly tells me that they are reproductions (fakes). I agree that is a red flag. Would that imply all fakes came from the same one note as they all have the same exact signature in same spot. Seems just as odd to me that all fakes would have come from the same original to all land exactly the same. Is it possible that is commonly where it fell on originals, so naturally where it falls on fakes as well? Do any of the ones people have from Laz fall there or are they all in different spots?
Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? It's the exact same signature in the exact same spot. There's not even 1mm difference. That clearly tells me that they are reproductions (fakes). I agree that is a red flag. Would that imply all fakes came from the same one note as they all have the same exact signature in same spot. Seems just as odd to me that all fakes would have come from the same original to all land exactly the same. Is it possible that is commonly where it fell on originals, so naturally where it falls on fakes as well? Do any of the ones people have from Laz fall there or are they all in different spots?
|
|
dogstar
New Member
Posts • 665
Likes • 811
October 2017
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by dogstar on May 11, 2019 16:00:01 GMT 1, I paid nothing for it. It was gifted for my efforts in protecting the Rain Girl in New Orleans. Could it be fake, I don't know. Though considering how I ended up with it, I would hope not. Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? I guarantee you it's fake. Even the note itself is fake, let alone the signature.
Which begs the question who gave it to you?
I paid nothing for it. It was gifted for my efforts in protecting the Rain Girl in New Orleans. Could it be fake, I don't know. Though considering how I ended up with it, I would hope not. Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? I guarantee you it's fake. Even the note itself is fake, let alone the signature.
Which begs the question who gave it to you?
|
|
Easy-Z
New Member
Posts • 623
Likes • 751
January 2019
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Easy-Z on May 11, 2019 16:11:55 GMT 1, This is the one that is mine. After one of the articles on on NOLA.com(I believe) about the Rain Girl and me taking care of her, I was contacted by an artist. Was asked for address and this was sent to me. Free of charge, and told it was real. So either it is real, or the sender had reason to believe it was real, or this person just wanted to make me feel good. Either way I was happy to get it. I will not say who sent it to me as I respect peoples privacy. This person is either connected to the source, or full of shit. Since it wasn't a purchase, I won't blow up their spot. Besides the placement of signature, do you see any other concerns on my bill? I read the whole other forum, But even in person close up I can not see the obvious tells.
image hosting api
This is the one that is mine. After one of the articles on on NOLA.com(I believe) about the Rain Girl and me taking care of her, I was contacted by an artist. Was asked for address and this was sent to me. Free of charge, and told it was real. So either it is real, or the sender had reason to believe it was real, or this person just wanted to make me feel good. Either way I was happy to get it. I will not say who sent it to me as I respect peoples privacy. This person is either connected to the source, or full of shit. Since it wasn't a purchase, I won't blow up their spot. Besides the placement of signature, do you see any other concerns on my bill? I read the whole other forum, But even in person close up I can not see the obvious tells. image hosting api
|
|
Pipes
Junior Member
Posts • 2,438
Likes • 2,883
January 2012
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Pipes on May 11, 2019 16:28:33 GMT 1, This is the one that is mine. After one of the articles on on NOLA.com(I believe) about the Rain Girl and me taking care of her, I was contacted by an artist. Was asked for address and this was sent to me. Free of charge, and told it was real. So either it is real, or the sender had reason to believe it was real, or this person just wanted to make me feel good. Either way I was happy to get it. I will not say who sent it to me as I respect peoples privacy. This person is either connected to the source, or full ofs**t. Since it wasn't a purchase, I won't blow up their spot. Besides the placement of signature, do you see any other concerns on my bill? I read the whole other forum, But even in person close up I can not see the obvious tells. image hosting api I'm no expert on these - but from a quick look the fact that the signature is exactly the same as the others I would think points to it being a fake I am afraid.
Signatures on the prints have slight variations - this looks exactly the same as mets examples.
This is the one that is mine. After one of the articles on on NOLA.com(I believe) about the Rain Girl and me taking care of her, I was contacted by an artist. Was asked for address and this was sent to me. Free of charge, and told it was real. So either it is real, or the sender had reason to believe it was real, or this person just wanted to make me feel good. Either way I was happy to get it. I will not say who sent it to me as I respect peoples privacy. This person is either connected to the source, or full ofs**t. Since it wasn't a purchase, I won't blow up their spot. Besides the placement of signature, do you see any other concerns on my bill? I read the whole other forum, But even in person close up I can not see the obvious tells. image hosting apiI'm no expert on these - but from a quick look the fact that the signature is exactly the same as the others I would think points to it being a fake I am afraid. Signatures on the prints have slight variations - this looks exactly the same as mets examples.
|
|
met
Junior Member
Posts • 2,782
Likes • 6,706
June 2009
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by met on May 11, 2019 20:44:53 GMT 1, I paid nothing for it. It was gifted for my efforts in protecting the Rain Girl in New Orleans. Could it be fake, I don't know. Though considering how I ended up with it, I would hope not. Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? I read the thread, thanks for the link. Not sure what I am missing. From cell phone camera and flashlight I can't see the obvious issue.
This is a follow-up to my earlier post and to comments since made by others including jay4077 and dogstar.
Signature
It's already been mentioned that the identical Banksy signature on multiple tenners is an issue. The same goes for the identical positioning of that signature on those tenners.
Where we might be in slight disagreement is in terms of the weight attributable to the above evidence. You refer to it being a red flag. I view it as more of a deafening alarm bell — indicating these are reproduction signatures, not hand signatures.
Separately, if your tenner is examined out of its frame in raking light, you'll see it lacks the subtle indentation on the paper / plastic substrate that would normally accompany a signature in ballpoint pen.
Di-Faced Tenner
Regarding the tenner itself, in order to spot a fake, one must know what to look for — elements that either should or should not be present if the tenner were authentic.
This requires being aware of (and familiar with) the printing method chosen to produce genuine tenners: Four-colour process printing using traditional offset lithography.
Each of the CMYK colours has its own plate, and each colour is separately printed in dots at a different screen angle. When done correctly, the overprinted dots form regular patterns, called rosettes.
See this example:
As previously referred to by Oski in his December 2014 thread, an authentic tenner will also have a clearly visible rosette pattern:
When magnified, it's even possible to see the individual dots in C (cyan), M (magenta), Y (yellow) and K (black).
Since fakes will have been produced by scanning genuine tenners (and then printing probably with an inkjet printer), they'll have much less detail. The rosette pattern will be fuzzy, blurred or non-existent.
Try removing your tenner from its frame and looking at it under a magnifying glass in natural light. Alternatively, take a close-up photo in high resolution and zoom in.
What you'll discover is that your tenner won't have the level of detail that a genuine Di-Faced Tenner should.
I paid nothing for it. It was gifted for my efforts in protecting the Rain Girl in New Orleans. Could it be fake, I don't know. Though considering how I ended up with it, I would hope not. Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? I read the thread, thanks for the link. Not sure what I am missing. From cell phone camera and flashlight I can't see the obvious issue. This is a follow-up to my earlier post and to comments since made by others including jay4077 and dogstar. SignatureIt's already been mentioned that the identical Banksy signature on multiple tenners is an issue. The same goes for the identical positioning of that signature on those tenners. Where we might be in slight disagreement is in terms of the weight attributable to the above evidence. You refer to it being a red flag. I view it as more of a deafening alarm bell — indicating these are reproduction signatures, not hand signatures. Separately, if your tenner is examined out of its frame in raking light, you'll see it lacks the subtle indentation on the paper / plastic substrate that would normally accompany a signature in ballpoint pen. Di-Faced TennerRegarding the tenner itself, in order to spot a fake, one must know what to look for — elements that either should or should not be present if the tenner were authentic. This requires being aware of (and familiar with) the printing method chosen to produce genuine tenners: Four-colour process printing using traditional offset lithography. Each of the CMYK colours has its own plate, and each colour is separately printed in dots at a different screen angle. When done correctly, the overprinted dots form regular patterns, called rosettes. See this example: As previously referred to by Oski in his December 2014 thread, an authentic tenner will also have a clearly visible rosette pattern: When magnified, it's even possible to see the individual dots in C (cyan), M (magenta), Y (yellow) and K (black). Since fakes will have been produced by scanning genuine tenners (and then printing probably with an inkjet printer), they'll have much less detail. The rosette pattern will be fuzzy, blurred or non-existent. Try removing your tenner from its frame and looking at it under a magnifying glass in natural light. Alternatively, take a close-up photo in high resolution and zoom in. What you'll discover is that your tenner won't have the level of detail that a genuine Di-Faced Tenner should.
|
|
|
Easy-Z
New Member
Posts • 623
Likes • 751
January 2019
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Easy-Z on May 11, 2019 20:50:36 GMT 1, Thanks for all the info guys. I appreciate the education opposed to the often ridicule you see on the threads. The flowers on back of my bill do look better with this picture than my previous post. But I see the other issues.
Thanks for all the info guys. I appreciate the education opposed to the often ridicule you see on the threads. The flowers on back of my bill do look better with this picture than my previous post. But I see the other issues.
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Deleted on May 12, 2019 9:04:15 GMT 1, I paid nothing for it. It was gifted for my efforts in protecting the Rain Girl in New Orleans. Could it be fake, I don't know. Though considering how I ended up with it, I would hope not. Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? I read the thread, thanks for the link. Not sure what I am missing. From cell phone camera and flashlight I can't see the obvious issue. This is a follow-up to my earlier post and to comments since made by others including jay4077 and dogstar. SignatureIt's already been mentioned that the identical Banksy signature on multiple tenners is an issue. The same goes for the identical positioning of that signature on those tenners. Where we might be in slight disagreement is in terms of the weight attributable to the above evidence. You refer to it being a red flag. I view it as more of a deafening alarm bell — indicating these are reproduction signatures, not hand signatures. Separately, if your tenner is examined out of its frame in raking light, you'll see it lacks the subtle indentation on the paper / plastic substrate that would normally accompany a signature in ballpoint pen. Di-Faced TennerRegarding the tenner itself, in order to spot a fake, one must know what to look for — elements that either should or should not be present if the tenner were authentic. This requires being aware of (and familiar with) the printing method chosen to produce genuine tenners: Four-colour process printing using traditional offset lithography. Each of the CMYK colours has its own plate, and each colour is separately printed in dots at a different screen angle. When done correctly, the overprinted dots form regular patterns, called rosettes. See this example: As previously referred to by Oski in his December 2014 thread, an authentic tenner will also have a clearly visible rosette pattern: When magnified, it's even possible to see the individual dots in C (cyan), M (magenta), Y (yellow) and K (black). Since fakes will have been produced by scanning genuine tenners (and then printing probably with an inkjet printer), they'll have much less detail. The rosette pattern will be fuzzy, blurred or non-existent. Try removing your tenner from its frame and looking at it under a magnifying glass in natural light. Alternatively, take a close-up photo in high resolution and zoom in. What you'll discover is that your tenner won't have the level of detail that a genuine Di-Faced Tenner should.
Spot on. Brilliant post.
I paid nothing for it. It was gifted for my efforts in protecting the Rain Girl in New Orleans. Could it be fake, I don't know. Though considering how I ended up with it, I would hope not. Truly curious and not being snarky, what gives you the impression it is scanned? And consistent placement of the lettering, is that truly a sign of fake or just where it fell with repetitive signing? I read the thread, thanks for the link. Not sure what I am missing. From cell phone camera and flashlight I can't see the obvious issue. This is a follow-up to my earlier post and to comments since made by others including jay4077 and dogstar. SignatureIt's already been mentioned that the identical Banksy signature on multiple tenners is an issue. The same goes for the identical positioning of that signature on those tenners. Where we might be in slight disagreement is in terms of the weight attributable to the above evidence. You refer to it being a red flag. I view it as more of a deafening alarm bell — indicating these are reproduction signatures, not hand signatures. Separately, if your tenner is examined out of its frame in raking light, you'll see it lacks the subtle indentation on the paper / plastic substrate that would normally accompany a signature in ballpoint pen. Di-Faced TennerRegarding the tenner itself, in order to spot a fake, one must know what to look for — elements that either should or should not be present if the tenner were authentic. This requires being aware of (and familiar with) the printing method chosen to produce genuine tenners: Four-colour process printing using traditional offset lithography. Each of the CMYK colours has its own plate, and each colour is separately printed in dots at a different screen angle. When done correctly, the overprinted dots form regular patterns, called rosettes. See this example: As previously referred to by Oski in his December 2014 thread, an authentic tenner will also have a clearly visible rosette pattern: When magnified, it's even possible to see the individual dots in C (cyan), M (magenta), Y (yellow) and K (black). Since fakes will have been produced by scanning genuine tenners (and then printing probably with an inkjet printer), they'll have much less detail. The rosette pattern will be fuzzy, blurred or non-existent. Try removing your tenner from its frame and looking at it under a magnifying glass in natural light. Alternatively, take a close-up photo in high resolution and zoom in. What you'll discover is that your tenner won't have the level of detail that a genuine Di-Faced Tenner should. Spot on. Brilliant post.
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
Posts • 9,841
Likes • 9,460
Member is Online
December 2010
|
|
|
sfnyc
Junior Member
Posts • 1,117
Likes • 1,127
August 2017
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by sfnyc on May 12, 2019 9:53:20 GMT 1, Met, spot on, i just checked mines with relief!! But should that info be available publicly?
Met, spot on, i just checked mines with relief!! But should that info be available publicly?
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Deleted on May 12, 2019 10:09:11 GMT 1, Met, spot on, i just checked mines with relief!! But should that info be available publicly? its ok for the likes of Met to provide valuable informatiom to give owners assurance but its not ok to provide it to prospective buyers who may buy a dud ?
Im glad you are relieved 😊
Met, spot on, i just checked mines with relief!! But should that info be available publicly? its ok for the likes of Met to provide valuable informatiom to give owners assurance but its not ok to provide it to prospective buyers who may buy a dud ? Im glad you are relieved 😊
|
|
sfnyc
Junior Member
Posts • 1,117
Likes • 1,127
August 2017
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by sfnyc on May 12, 2019 11:26:43 GMT 1, Met, spot on, i just checked mines with relief!! But should that info be available publicly? its ok for the likes of Met to provide valuable informatiom to give owners assurance but its not ok to provide it to prospective buyers who may buy a dud ? Im glad you are relieved 😊
Well maybe not googable, like in a section for registered users only?
Met, spot on, i just checked mines with relief!! But should that info be available publicly? its ok for the likes of Met to provide valuable informatiom to give owners assurance but its not ok to provide it to prospective buyers who may buy a dud ? Im glad you are relieved 😊 Well maybe not googable, like in a section for registered users only?
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Deleted on May 12, 2019 13:08:04 GMT 1, its ok for the likes of Met to provide valuable informatiom to give owners assurance but its not ok to provide it to prospective buyers who may buy a dud ? Im glad you are relieved 😊 Well maybe not googable, like in a section for registered users only?
Looking at balance of probabilities I’d say Mets post is more likely to assist an innocent prospective purchaser of a dud ten spot than assisting a top end faker.
You think that the registered members on here are all upstanding citizens of the community ?
its ok for the likes of Met to provide valuable informatiom to give owners assurance but its not ok to provide it to prospective buyers who may buy a dud ? Im glad you are relieved 😊 Well maybe not googable, like in a section for registered users only? Looking at balance of probabilities I’d say Mets post is more likely to assist an innocent prospective purchaser of a dud ten spot than assisting a top end faker. You think that the registered members on here are all upstanding citizens of the community ?
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Rouen Cathedral on May 13, 2019 1:19:32 GMT 1, Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out?
Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out?
|
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
Posts • 2,943
Likes • 2,733
November 2010
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Hairbland on May 13, 2019 2:40:27 GMT 1, Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out? Why don’t you pause for a second, take a deep breath, and then read what you posted.
Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out? Why don’t you pause for a second, take a deep breath, and then read what you posted.
|
|
Easy-Z
New Member
Posts • 623
Likes • 751
January 2019
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Easy-Z on May 13, 2019 3:53:54 GMT 1, Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out? One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying.
Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out? One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying.
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Rouen Cathedral on May 13, 2019 16:18:44 GMT 1, Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out? One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying.
Yes that’s what I’m implying.
I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them.
Who’s to say banks didn’t reproduce the signed ‘fake’ ones and send them out? One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying. Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them.
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Rouen Cathedral on May 13, 2019 16:48:07 GMT 1, Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. you are a strange herb I'll give you that
How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different?
Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. you are a strange herb I'll give you that How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different?
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
Posts • 9,841
Likes • 9,460
Member is Online
December 2010
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by .dappy on May 13, 2019 16:53:45 GMT 1, you are a strange herb I'll give you that How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different? ... I see you are back sea-lioning ...
you are a strange herb I'll give you that How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different? ... I see you are back sea-lioning ...
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Happy Shopper on May 13, 2019 16:55:40 GMT 1, One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying. Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. In a world of infinite possibilities, what else do you think Banksy could be responsible for?
Also, are you implying Team Banksy is just one person?
One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying. Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. In a world of infinite possibilities, what else do you think Banksy could be responsible for? Also, are you implying Team Banksy is just one person?
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Rouen Cathedral on May 13, 2019 17:10:01 GMT 1, How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different? ... I see you are back sea-lioning ...
I see you still just like to troll as a forum guardian.
I’ve made my point and backed it up. Can’t ask a question for someone else to do the same without your same old nonsense trying to troll. I thought maybe you’d moved on with the shtick
How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different? ... I see you are back sea-lioning ... I see you still just like to troll as a forum guardian. I’ve made my point and backed it up. Can’t ask a question for someone else to do the same without your same old nonsense trying to troll. I thought maybe you’d moved on with the shtick
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Rouen Cathedral on May 13, 2019 17:13:58 GMT 1, Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. In a world of infinite possibilities, what else do you think Banksy could be responsible for? Also, are you implying Team Banksy is just one person?
Not sure why you are hyperbolizing my simple statement and trying to imply I’m claiming banksy is responsible for landing on the moon or something.
Where are you inferring I’m saying Team Banksy is one person?
All I’ve said is banksy may be the responsible party for the reproduced signed note. Pretty simple hypothesis. In memorabilia collecting a facsimile signed photo is a fairly common thing. Often given out by the celebrity themselves.
Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. In a world of infinite possibilities, what else do you think Banksy could be responsible for? Also, are you implying Team Banksy is just one person? Not sure why you are hyperbolizing my simple statement and trying to imply I’m claiming banksy is responsible for landing on the moon or something. Where are you inferring I’m saying Team Banksy is one person? All I’ve said is banksy may be the responsible party for the reproduced signed note. Pretty simple hypothesis. In memorabilia collecting a facsimile signed photo is a fairly common thing. Often given out by the celebrity themselves.
|
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
Posts • 2,943
Likes • 2,733
November 2010
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Hairbland on May 13, 2019 19:16:14 GMT 1, ... I see you are back sea-lioning ... I see you still just like to troll as a forum guardian. I’ve made my point and backed it up. Can’t ask a question for someone else to do the same without your same old nonsense trying to troll. I thought maybe you’d moved on with the shtick From what I’ve observed the consensus seems to be that you are the troll, replacing the Blame Obama meme with Blame Banksy for your personal pleasure. Your recent absence in the assorted Banksy threads made them much more enjoyable, but it appears you have fallen off the wagon again.
Shame, it’s possible you have something to contribute to the scene, but you seem to bash Banksy in other artist threads that have nothing to do with Banksy. What’s your endgame?
... I see you are back sea-lioning ... I see you still just like to troll as a forum guardian. I’ve made my point and backed it up. Can’t ask a question for someone else to do the same without your same old nonsense trying to troll. I thought maybe you’d moved on with the shtick From what I’ve observed the consensus seems to be that you are the troll, replacing the Blame Obama meme with Blame Banksy for your personal pleasure. Your recent absence in the assorted Banksy threads made them much more enjoyable, but it appears you have fallen off the wagon again. Shame, it’s possible you have something to contribute to the scene, but you seem to bash Banksy in other artist threads that have nothing to do with Banksy. What’s your endgame?
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Rouen Cathedral on May 13, 2019 19:20:39 GMT 1, I see you still just like to troll as a forum guardian. I’ve made my point and backed it up. Can’t ask a question for someone else to do the same without your same old nonsense trying to troll. I thought maybe you’d moved on with the shtick From what I’ve observed the consensus seems to be that you are the troll, replacing the Blame Obama meme with Blame Banksy for your personal pleasure. Your recent absence in the assorted Banksy threads made them much more enjoyable, but it appears you have fallen off the wagon again. Shame, it’s possible you have something to contribute to the scene, but you seem to bash Banksy in other artist threads that have nothing to do with Banksy. What’s your endgame?
Where and how am I bashing banksy with my last comments on the possible origin of the notes?
I see you still just like to troll as a forum guardian. I’ve made my point and backed it up. Can’t ask a question for someone else to do the same without your same old nonsense trying to troll. I thought maybe you’d moved on with the shtick From what I’ve observed the consensus seems to be that you are the troll, replacing the Blame Obama meme with Blame Banksy for your personal pleasure. Your recent absence in the assorted Banksy threads made them much more enjoyable, but it appears you have fallen off the wagon again. Shame, it’s possible you have something to contribute to the scene, but you seem to bash Banksy in other artist threads that have nothing to do with Banksy. What’s your endgame? Where and how am I bashing banksy with my last comments on the possible origin of the notes?
|
|
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Rouen Cathedral on May 13, 2019 19:46:30 GMT 1, How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different? Because he hasn't f**kingreleased any that's why you silly cunt
How do you know?
Did you release them?
How is that strange. Banksy has released plenty of ‘worthless’ stuff at installations. How is a reproduced signed note any different? Because he hasn't f**kingreleased any that's why you silly cunt How do you know? Did you release them?
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
Posts • 2,943
Likes • 2,733
November 2010
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Hairbland on May 13, 2019 20:01:16 GMT 1, From what I’ve observed the consensus seems to be that you are the troll, replacing the Blame Obama meme with Blame Banksy for your personal pleasure. Your recent absence in the assorted Banksy threads made them much more enjoyable, but it appears you have fallen off the wagon again. Shame, it’s possible you have something to contribute to the scene, but you seem to bash Banksy in other artist threads that have nothing to do with Banksy. What’s your endgame? Where and how am I bashing banksy with my last comments on the possible origin of the notes? What’s your endgame? What do you stand for? Name some artists you DO LIKE, to put your Banksy fixation in perspective.
Waiting....
From what I’ve observed the consensus seems to be that you are the troll, replacing the Blame Obama meme with Blame Banksy for your personal pleasure. Your recent absence in the assorted Banksy threads made them much more enjoyable, but it appears you have fallen off the wagon again. Shame, it’s possible you have something to contribute to the scene, but you seem to bash Banksy in other artist threads that have nothing to do with Banksy. What’s your endgame? Where and how am I bashing banksy with my last comments on the possible origin of the notes? What’s your endgame? What do you stand for? Name some artists you DO LIKE, to put your Banksy fixation in perspective. Waiting....
|
|
Easy-Z
New Member
Posts • 623
Likes • 751
January 2019
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by Easy-Z on May 13, 2019 20:07:17 GMT 1, One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying. Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. I would be surprised if they are still being pumped out by Banksy as there are plenty of fresh fish to fry. But would not be surprised if all the signed ones came copied off of one sheet.
One could argue 1 sheet was singed, and the rest were copied if that was what you are implying. Yes that’s what I’m implying. I’m also implying that maybe banksy is the one that copies them and released them. I would be surprised if they are still being pumped out by Banksy as there are plenty of fresh fish to fry. But would not be surprised if all the signed ones came copied off of one sheet.
|
|
|
|
dogstar
New Member
Posts • 665
Likes • 811
October 2017
|
Banksy £10 • Di-Faced Tenner, by dogstar on May 13, 2019 20:33:28 GMT 1, I read the thread, thanks for the link. Not sure what I am missing. From cell phone camera and flashlight I can't see the obvious issue. Compare the back of your note... With this... Couple of genuine signed notes. I have another with a bigger signature done with a sharpie but fück knows where it is. Easy-Z, I don't know if you've seen my post and chosen to ignore it or perhaps you missed it but look at the image positioning on the back of your note, it's fake.
I read the thread, thanks for the link. Not sure what I am missing. From cell phone camera and flashlight I can't see the obvious issue. Compare the back of your note... With this... Couple of genuine signed notes. I have another with a bigger signature done with a sharpie but fück knows where it is. Easy-Z, I don't know if you've seen my post and chosen to ignore it or perhaps you missed it but look at the image positioning on the back of your note, it's fake.
|
|