agu
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 317
๐๐ป 332
February 2016
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by agu on Jul 17, 2016 5:15:13 GMT 1, You don't need to apologise, I know there's plenty of good people out there but it's just sometimes the idiots who can spoil your day. She said there was what looked like a 12 or 13 year old girl in the back so she's being taught that this sorted thing is alright. The sad thing is that she's got friends back in Poland who were talking of visiting us but all the abuse going on over here to immigrants is being reported in the Polish press and they've now said that they won't come as they don't feel welcome any more. That is terribly sad. I agree with Coach. Please extend my WARMEST welcome to you friends and family. I would love to see them here in the UK. For the nationalists out there, nearly 1 in 10 of the pilots who fought in the Battle of Britain where...yup POLISH! So you really are most welcome.
You don't need to apologise, I know there's plenty of good people out there but it's just sometimes the idiots who can spoil your day. She said there was what looked like a 12 or 13 year old girl in the back so she's being taught that this sorted thing is alright. The sad thing is that she's got friends back in Poland who were talking of visiting us but all the abuse going on over here to immigrants is being reported in the Polish press and they've now said that they won't come as they don't feel welcome any more. That is terribly sad. I agree with Coach. Please extend my WARMEST welcome to you friends and family. I would love to see them here in the UK. For the nationalists out there, nearly 1 in 10 of the pilots who fought in the Battle of Britain where...yup POLISH! So you really are most welcome.
|
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Coach on Aug 5, 2016 19:12:46 GMT 1,
It's not looking great. Fairly stark cautions from the Bank of England yesterday of huge job loses. That was my greatest concern.
It's not looking great. Fairly stark cautions from the Bank of England yesterday of huge job loses. That was my greatest concern.
|
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Cornish Crayon on Aug 5, 2016 19:16:23 GMT 1, I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about...........
I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about...........
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Coach on Aug 5, 2016 19:24:58 GMT 1, I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about...........
None of the reports I was reading suggested an overnight collapse.
I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about........... None of the reports I was reading suggested an overnight collapse.
|
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 19:33:24 GMT 1, I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about........... They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them. Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows?
The calm before the storm mate.
All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves.
But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about........... They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them. Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows? The calm before the storm mate. All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves. But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
|
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Cornish Crayon on Aug 5, 2016 20:28:40 GMT 1, Coach: I know we haven't left yet but the last 48 hours with banks losing profits is not from the brexit as the media are suggesting it's further back than that, also llyods closing branches.......... It was going to happen anyway........ Online banking is the future.
xxxxx : I don't blame anyone for not wanting to do sort it out, but I have to ask why is everyone worried for the outcome, David Cameron called the referendum, surely he was aware of the country he was so tuned into, was going to vote out, if anyone has to sort it David should........ But nope he has ran away, he created this mess, the individual that laid the foundations hasn't finished the job,
Yet people still want to dwell on it (media included) rather than except and move on, using the opportunity and maybe just maybe it was the right decision for the country regardless of people saying otherwise, I respect you and your rights to comment xxxxx but the calm before the storm is a bit strong........ Is this based over 1 year, 10 years, 25 ?
I only ask as we have as a country for the last few decades have gone up and down, up and down............ We might head down again but then we can only go one way, we are to strong as a nation to just get swallowed up by the earth.
I hate to use as an example but look at man Utd ........ Been shit for a few years......... They will be back, and everybody will let them.
Coach: I know we haven't left yet but the last 48 hours with banks losing profits is not from the brexit as the media are suggesting it's further back than that, also llyods closing branches.......... It was going to happen anyway........ Online banking is the future.
xxxxx : I don't blame anyone for not wanting to do sort it out, but I have to ask why is everyone worried for the outcome, David Cameron called the referendum, surely he was aware of the country he was so tuned into, was going to vote out, if anyone has to sort it David should........ But nope he has ran away, he created this mess, the individual that laid the foundations hasn't finished the job,
Yet people still want to dwell on it (media included) rather than except and move on, using the opportunity and maybe just maybe it was the right decision for the country regardless of people saying otherwise, I respect you and your rights to comment xxxxx but the calm before the storm is a bit strong........ Is this based over 1 year, 10 years, 25 ?
I only ask as we have as a country for the last few decades have gone up and down, up and down............ We might head down again but then we can only go one way, we are to strong as a nation to just get swallowed up by the earth.
I hate to use as an example but look at man Utd ........ Been shit for a few years......... They will be back, and everybody will let them.
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by offthehookbooks on Aug 5, 2016 20:42:56 GMT 1, I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about........... They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them. Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows? The calm before the storm mate. All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves. But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
Give it a rest xxxx you are such a whiny political pillock !
I still believe there is a lot of scaremongering going on in the media, due to the fact that there hasn't been the overnight collapse they all raved about........... They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them. Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows? The calm before the storm mate. All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves. But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
Give it a rest xxxx you are such a whiny political pillock !
|
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Cornish Crayon on Aug 5, 2016 20:45:13 GMT 1, They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them.ย Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows?ย The calm before the storm mate.ย All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves. But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
Give it a rest xxxx you are such aย whiny political pillock !ย
He has a point, do you ? lol
They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them.ย Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows?ย The calm before the storm mate.ย All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves. But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
Give it a rest xxxx you are such aย whiny political pillock !ย
He has a point, do you ? lol
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 20:56:35 GMT 1, Whether it's the right decision for the country only time will tell, and personally speaking I'm not that bothered which way it goes. Personally, I think it's sad that Britain has fallen for the lies that lead too the vote. I'm also very angry that those responsible for the Remain campaign were so incompetent that they couldn't sell the benefits.
But just think on these issues, as examples.
The EU provide some of the most stringent legislation on the protection of wildlife. For example, they pay farmers to maintain wild areas around their crops that allow wild life to flourish. Without this money, farmers will be forced to plough this land to maximise their crops.
Do you really think this govt will protect our wildlife? Leaving the EU puts all this at risk, and it's highly doubtful that our govt will see this as a priority, thus exposing our wildlife to exploitation.
It's all very well to say that we can negotiate our own free trade deals, but other country's are dependent on the EU as to what they can, or cannot, negotiate. To go against these deals, and create contracts with the UK will not happen.
It's all very well to say that leaving the EU will free us from the rules and regulations required. But if we don't adhere to those of other countries, then we're not going to trade.
Whether it's the right decision for the country only time will tell, and personally speaking I'm not that bothered which way it goes. Personally, I think it's sad that Britain has fallen for the lies that lead too the vote. I'm also very angry that those responsible for the Remain campaign were so incompetent that they couldn't sell the benefits. But just think on these issues, as examples. The EU provide some of the most stringent legislation on the protection of wildlife. For example, they pay farmers to maintain wild areas around their crops that allow wild life to flourish. Without this money, farmers will be forced to plough this land to maximise their crops. Do you really think this govt will protect our wildlife? Leaving the EU puts all this at risk, and it's highly doubtful that our govt will see this as a priority, thus exposing our wildlife to exploitation. It's all very well to say that we can negotiate our own free trade deals, but other country's are dependent on the EU as to what they can, or cannot, negotiate. To go against these deals, and create contracts with the UK will not happen. It's all very well to say that leaving the EU will free us from the rules and regulations required. But if we don't adhere to those of other countries, then we're not going to trade.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 20:58:43 GMT 1, They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them. Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows? The calm before the storm mate. All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves. But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
Give it a rest xxxx you are such a whiny political pillock !
Go f**k yourself you c*nt.
They're having problems recruiting people ( civil servants ) to do the negotiating. For a number of reasons - there aren't that many suitably qualified to deal with the subject matter, and to be experts on a lot of the issues involved; secondly, a lot of civil servants were against the leaving so don't want to get involved; thirdly, it'll involve a long time away for not much extra money; fourthly, if they cock it'll up it'll be held against them. Who'd want that job, with the responsibility that follows? The calm before the storm mate. All those responsible for the lies have run away. It's pure comedy, and this country gets what it deserves. But hey, we've got control....ah..wait a minute....
Give it a rest xxxx you are such a whiny political pillock !
Go f**k yourself you c*nt.
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Coach on Aug 5, 2016 21:02:58 GMT 1, Coach: I know we haven't left yet but the last 48 hours with banks losing profits is not from the brexit as the media are suggesting it's further back than that, also llyods closing branches.......... It was going to happen anyway........ Online banking is the future. xxxxx : I don't blame anyone for not wanting to do sort it out, but I have to ask why is everyone worried for the outcome, David Cameron called the referendum, surely he was aware of the country he was so tuned into, was going to vote out, if anyone has to sort it David should........ But nope he has ran away, he created this mess, the individual that laid the foundations hasn't finished the job, Yet people still want to dwell on it (media included) rather than except and move on, using the opportunity and maybe just maybe it was the right decision for the country regardless of people saying otherwise, I respect you and your rights to comment xxxxx but the calm before the storm is a bit strong........ Is this based over 1 year, 10 years, 25 ? I only ask as we have as a country for the last few decades have gone up and down, up and down............ We might head down again but then we can only go one way, we are to strong as a nation to just get swallowed up by the earth. I hate to use as an example but look at man Utd ........ Beens**t for a few years......... They will be back, and everybody will let them.
I don't want to get in to a lengthy debate about this, mostly because I don't think many people want the forum to be too political again, though I find it engaging. So I'll say my piece and leave it there. My commute is 3 hours a day, and so I'm listening to an awful lot of commentary about the economy at the moment. And it is sounding rather gloomy. The Bank of England has cut interest rates again, to an unprecedented level. They have warned of up to quarter of a million jobs lost. The recent reports of the manufacturing industry show a significant downturn. The reports of the service industry are just as bad, and that accounts for 80% of our economy I believe. Reports about recruitment suggest permanent employment has dropped significantly whereas temp jobs have risen. This suggests that we are heading for a recession. And yes I do blame it on the brexit vote. The economy was rising faster than expected in the months prior to the vote. I think it's easy to describe news we don't like as scaremongering. I don't think that that's what happening in the news I listen to. I think we have made a huge mistake. But it's done. My solace is that the banks prediction is of only a mild recession.
And, the personal insult thrown at xxxx is out of order. The day that someone on an urban art forum, that has its roots in politics, is insulted for being political is an odd day indeed.
There, done.
Coach: I know we haven't left yet but the last 48 hours with banks losing profits is not from the brexit as the media are suggesting it's further back than that, also llyods closing branches.......... It was going to happen anyway........ Online banking is the future. xxxxx : I don't blame anyone for not wanting to do sort it out, but I have to ask why is everyone worried for the outcome, David Cameron called the referendum, surely he was aware of the country he was so tuned into, was going to vote out, if anyone has to sort it David should........ But nope he has ran away, he created this mess, the individual that laid the foundations hasn't finished the job, Yet people still want to dwell on it (media included) rather than except and move on, using the opportunity and maybe just maybe it was the right decision for the country regardless of people saying otherwise, I respect you and your rights to comment xxxxx but the calm before the storm is a bit strong........ Is this based over 1 year, 10 years, 25 ? I only ask as we have as a country for the last few decades have gone up and down, up and down............ We might head down again but then we can only go one way, we are to strong as a nation to just get swallowed up by the earth. I hate to use as an example but look at man Utd ........ Beens**t for a few years......... They will be back, and everybody will let them. I don't want to get in to a lengthy debate about this, mostly because I don't think many people want the forum to be too political again, though I find it engaging. So I'll say my piece and leave it there. My commute is 3 hours a day, and so I'm listening to an awful lot of commentary about the economy at the moment. And it is sounding rather gloomy. The Bank of England has cut interest rates again, to an unprecedented level. They have warned of up to quarter of a million jobs lost. The recent reports of the manufacturing industry show a significant downturn. The reports of the service industry are just as bad, and that accounts for 80% of our economy I believe. Reports about recruitment suggest permanent employment has dropped significantly whereas temp jobs have risen. This suggests that we are heading for a recession. And yes I do blame it on the brexit vote. The economy was rising faster than expected in the months prior to the vote. I think it's easy to describe news we don't like as scaremongering. I don't think that that's what happening in the news I listen to. I think we have made a huge mistake. But it's done. My solace is that the banks prediction is of only a mild recession. And, the personal insult thrown at xxxx is out of order. The day that someone on an urban art forum, that has its roots in politics, is insulted for being political is an odd day indeed. There, done.
|
|
Harveyn
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 7,746
๐๐ป 4,900
July 2007
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Harveyn on Aug 5, 2016 21:07:18 GMT 1, At least 80% of my supply chain have increased their prices in the last 4 weeks as we source either directly or indirectly to a $USD or Euro based cost centre. Yes I export but that is a disproportionate amount by comparison.
Also my export customer's are now looking for a cost reduction.
I employ 120 people and anybody who thinks a weakening ยฃGDP is not a threat to jobs in the UK is a fool.
You can debate all you like but your wrong.
At least 80% of my supply chain have increased their prices in the last 4 weeks as we source either directly or indirectly to a $USD or Euro based cost centre. Yes I export but that is a disproportionate amount by comparison.
Also my export customer's are now looking for a cost reduction.
I employ 120 people and anybody who thinks a weakening ยฃGDP is not a threat to jobs in the UK is a fool.
You can debate all you like but your wrong.
|
|
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Cornish Crayon on Aug 5, 2016 21:11:35 GMT 1, Surely they have to adhere to our demands aswell, it's not one way traffic now because we are on our own, we might feel the smallest because we don't have the might of Europe on our shoulders , but financially we are were one of the strongest, with or without EU
As a natural lover of the outdoors I hope your not right and I would worry should this be true, once again it's only speculation, as a country are we going to except becoming one big soil carpark, the reason the farmers are being subbed in the first place is because of the EU demands ..........
I still predict many riots, protests and changes for the better.
Peace out just poured a single malt
Surely they have to adhere to our demands aswell, it's not one way traffic now because we are on our own, we might feel the smallest because we don't have the might of Europe on our shoulders , but financially we are were one of the strongest, with or without EU As a natural lover of the outdoors I hope your not right and I would worry should this be true, once again it's only speculation, as a country are we going to except becoming one big soil carpark, the reason the farmers are being subbed in the first place is because of the EU demands .......... I still predict many riots, protests and changes for the better. Peace out just poured a single malt
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Coach on Aug 5, 2016 21:13:33 GMT 1, Surely they have to adhere to our demands aswell, it's not one way traffic now because we are on our own, we might feel the smallest because we don't have the might of Europe on our shoulders , but financially we are were one of the strongest, with or without EU As a natural lover of the outdoors I hope your not right and I would worry should this be true, once again it's only speculation, as a country are we going to except becoming one big soil carpark, the reason the farmers are being subbed in the first place is because of the EU demands .......... I still predict many riots, protests and changes for the better. Peace out just poured a single malt
Enjoy the whiskey my friend. Just hit the wine!
Surely they have to adhere to our demands aswell, it's not one way traffic now because we are on our own, we might feel the smallest because we don't have the might of Europe on our shoulders , but financially we are were one of the strongest, with or without EU As a natural lover of the outdoors I hope your not right and I would worry should this be true, once again it's only speculation, as a country are we going to except becoming one big soil carpark, the reason the farmers are being subbed in the first place is because of the EU demands .......... I still predict many riots, protests and changes for the better. Peace out just poured a single malt Enjoy the whiskey my friend. Just hit the wine!
|
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Cornish Crayon on Aug 5, 2016 21:26:10 GMT 1, Final point: coach the job losses, is that the jobs that David Cameron has stood in the commons and claimed unemployment is down and more people are working.........
Zero hours contracts are higher than they have ever been, these people don't know what hours or income is from one day to the next, I have worked on a daily basis with these people and I feel sorry for them as they don't have full time contracts sick pay holidays, yet the government thinks they have been doing a good thing........ Getting people off the signing books, just to give us figures,
What the government don't tell us is, 16 hours is the most hours you can work before it starts affecting your taxes and benefits , the companies choosing to munipulate these rules as it benefits them also put these indivuals in a positions where they don't work enough hours for the company to pay for having that employee nor the time constraint for the government to back the individuals pay with benefits top up.
This is the real world.
Not personal, peace out
Final point: coach the job losses, is that the jobs that David Cameron has stood in the commons and claimed unemployment is down and more people are working......... Zero hours contracts are higher than they have ever been, these people don't know what hours or income is from one day to the next, I have worked on a daily basis with these people and I feel sorry for them as they don't have full time contracts sick pay holidays, yet the government thinks they have been doing a good thing........ Getting people off the signing books, just to give us figures, What the government don't tell us is, 16 hours is the most hours you can work before it starts affecting your taxes and benefits , the companies choosing to munipulate these rules as it benefits them also put these indivuals in a positions where they don't work enough hours for the company to pay for having that employee nor the time constraint for the government to back the individuals pay with benefits top up. This is the real world. Not personal, peace out
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 21:39:20 GMT 1, Its all bollocks
i don't like it
i blame Silky
Its all bollocks
i don't like it
i blame Silky
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,190
๐๐ป 8,545
May 2011
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by iamzero on Aug 5, 2016 21:48:37 GMT 1, I'm self employed. Have been for 25 years. I have no holiday pay, sick pay etc. It's also a zero hour contract. I have to painfully watch guys on the books rinse every penny out of employers by pulling sick days and making excuses why jobs can't be completed on time because they want to squeeze out some weekend work for overtime. The bosses hands are tied because they have to jump through hoops to terminate the employment of deadwood and idiots. Just saying what I see.
I'm self employed. Have been for 25 years. I have no holiday pay, sick pay etc. It's also a zero hour contract. I have to painfully watch guys on the books rinse every penny out of employers by pulling sick days and making excuses why jobs can't be completed on time because they want to squeeze out some weekend work for overtime. The bosses hands are tied because they have to jump through hoops to terminate the employment of deadwood and idiots. Just saying what I see.
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Coach on Aug 5, 2016 22:08:40 GMT 1, I'm self employed. Have been for 25 years. I have no holiday pay, sick pay etc. It's also a zero hour contract. I have to painfully watch guys on the books rinse every penny out of employers by pulling sick days and making excuses why jobs can't be completed on time because they want to squeeze out some weekend work for overtime. The bosses hands are tied because they have to jump through hoops to terminate the employment of deadwood and idiots. Just saying what I see.
Other side of the coin - they are employment rights, that have been systematically deroded by the torys. Employment rights should not be derided. They are essential.
I'm self employed. Have been for 25 years. I have no holiday pay, sick pay etc. It's also a zero hour contract. I have to painfully watch guys on the books rinse every penny out of employers by pulling sick days and making excuses why jobs can't be completed on time because they want to squeeze out some weekend work for overtime. The bosses hands are tied because they have to jump through hoops to terminate the employment of deadwood and idiots. Just saying what I see. Other side of the coin - they are employment rights, that have been systematically deroded by the torys. Employment rights should not be derided. They are essential.
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,190
๐๐ป 8,545
May 2011
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by iamzero on Aug 5, 2016 22:16:38 GMT 1, I guess we see it from different sides dude. I see bosses I work for frustrated that they fight an uphill battle with lead swinging employees because they have employment rights backing them. Completely unfair when you can't terminate someone's contract because they are taking the piss.
I guess we see it from different sides dude. I see bosses I work for frustrated that they fight an uphill battle with lead swinging employees because they have employment rights backing them. Completely unfair when you can't terminate someone's contract because they are taking the piss.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 23:22:34 GMT 1, I guess we see it from different sides dude. I see bosses I work for frustrated that they fight an uphill battle with lead swinging employees because they have employment rights backing them. Completely unfair when you can't terminate someone's contract because they are taking the piss.
i dont know what industry you are in?
reading what you have written makes it look to me like the bosses are to blame, maybe they should go on a 'how to be a good boss course' :-)
I guess we see it from different sides dude. I see bosses I work for frustrated that they fight an uphill battle with lead swinging employees because they have employment rights backing them. Completely unfair when you can't terminate someone's contract because they are taking the piss. i dont know what industry you are in? reading what you have written makes it look to me like the bosses are to blame, maybe they should go on a 'how to be a good boss course' :-)
|
|
|
Reader
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,272
๐๐ป 2,833
June 2016
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Reader on Aug 6, 2016 13:03:42 GMT 1, I guess we see it from different sides dude. I see bosses I work for frustrated that they fight an uphill battle with lead swinging employees because they have employment rights backing them. Completely unfair when you can't terminate someone's contract because they are taking the piss. Fuck the bosses, they'd have kids cleaning chimney's for sixpence a year given half the chance, a lot of working class people died fighting for the 5 day week, not to mention the 8 hour day alongside health and safety practices.
Before the Industrial Revolution and the introduction of mechanised manufacture, regulation of workplace relations was based on status, rather than contract or mediation through a system of trade unions. Serfdom was the prevailing status of the mass of people, except where artisans in towns could gain a measure of self-regulation through guilds. In 1740 save for the fly-shuttle the loom was as it had been since weaving had begun. The law of the land was, under the Act of Apprentices 1563, that wages in each district should be assessed by Justices of the Peace. From the middle of the 19th century, through Acts such as the Master and Servant Act 1867 and the Employers and Workmen Act 1875, there became growing recognition that greater protection was needed to promote the health and safety of workers, as well as preventing unfair practices in wage contracts.
I guess we see it from different sides dude. I see bosses I work for frustrated that they fight an uphill battle with lead swinging employees because they have employment rights backing them. Completely unfair when you can't terminate someone's contract because they are taking the piss. Fuck the bosses, they'd have kids cleaning chimney's for sixpence a year given half the chance, a lot of working class people died fighting for the 5 day week, not to mention the 8 hour day alongside health and safety practices. Before the Industrial Revolution and the introduction of mechanised manufacture, regulation of workplace relations was based on status, rather than contract or mediation through a system of trade unions. Serfdom was the prevailing status of the mass of people, except where artisans in towns could gain a measure of self-regulation through guilds. In 1740 save for the fly-shuttle the loom was as it had been since weaving had begun. The law of the land was, under the Act of Apprentices 1563, that wages in each district should be assessed by Justices of the Peace. From the middle of the 19th century, through Acts such as the Master and Servant Act 1867 and the Employers and Workmen Act 1875, there became growing recognition that greater protection was needed to promote the health and safety of workers, as well as preventing unfair practices in wage contracts.
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Daniel Silk on Aug 6, 2016 13:27:46 GMT 1, Surely they have to adhere to our demands aswell, it's not one way traffic now because we are on our own, we might feel the smallest because we don't have the might of Europe on our shoulders , but financially we are were one of the strongest, with or without EU As a natural lover of the outdoors I hope your not right and I would worry should this be true, once again it's only speculation, as a country are we going to except becoming one big soil carpark, the reason the farmers are being subbed in the first place is because of the EU demands .......... I still predict many riots, protests and changes for the better. Peace out just poured a single malt Enjoy the whiskey my friend. Just hit the wine!
Surely they have to adhere to our demands aswell, it's not one way traffic now because we are on our own, we might feel the smallest because we don't have the might of Europe on our shoulders , but financially we are were one of the strongest, with or without EU As a natural lover of the outdoors I hope your not right and I would worry should this be true, once again it's only speculation, as a country are we going to except becoming one big soil carpark, the reason the farmers are being subbed in the first place is because of the EU demands .......... I still predict many riots, protests and changes for the better. Peace out just poured a single malt Enjoy the whiskey my friend. Just hit the wine!
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Deleted on Aug 6, 2016 13:56:27 GMT 1, Enjoy the whiskey my friend. Just hit the wine!
Will the UK be better out than in Europe.
Only time will tell but the Brexit campaign and UKIP lied through their teeth.
Enjoy the whiskey my friend. Just hit the wine! Will the UK be better out than in Europe. Only time will tell but the Brexit campaign and UKIP lied through their teeth.
|
|
Reader
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,272
๐๐ป 2,833
June 2016
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Reader on Aug 6, 2016 20:32:14 GMT 1, In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals.
This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer.
If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390!
By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses.
In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals.
This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer.
If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390!
By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses.
|
|
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Coach on Aug 6, 2016 21:45:41 GMT 1, In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals. This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer. If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390! By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses.
No doubt there were a handful of spurious cases brought in the tribunals, by employees hoping to get a settlement out of their employer. A handful. However the introduction of fees led to a drop in claims to employment tribunals of over 70%. This was an unprecedented denial of access to justice.
In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals. This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer. If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390! By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses. No doubt there were a handful of spurious cases brought in the tribunals, by employees hoping to get a settlement out of their employer. A handful. However the introduction of fees led to a drop in claims to employment tribunals of over 70%. This was an unprecedented denial of access to justice.
|
|
RoboJ
Artist
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 1,202
๐๐ป 1,332
July 2015
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by RoboJ on Aug 7, 2016 12:07:42 GMT 1, In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals. This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer. If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390! By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses. I 100% agree with you on what you're saying. The only stipulation is yes anybody who is being accused of a crime, whether a thief or employer, should always be treated as innocent until proven guilty.
In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals. This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer. If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390! By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses. I 100% agree with you on what you're saying. The only stipulation is yes anybody who is being accused of a crime, whether a thief or employer, should always be treated as innocent until proven guilty.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
The UK's EU Referendum - 23rd June 2016., by Deleted on Aug 7, 2016 18:45:21 GMT 1, In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals. This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer. If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390! By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses. Why bother with fees.
Someone I know who was working in London in a restaurant quit her job because the owner was getting too fresh with her. The owner refused to pay her her wages. She told me. She got her wages without any problems.
In 2013 the Tory party launched a savage crackdown on workers' rights to legal redress when they are abused by bad bosses through the introduction of upfront fees for workers who want to take their bosses to employment tribunals. This Tory anti-worker legislation means that if your boss sacks you for your age, your gender, your sexual preferences, your trade union activities, your skin colour, your religious views, your pregnancy or even your refusal to suck his dick, then you have to pay ยฃ1,200 in upfront fees in order to seek justice. The assumption being that your boss is the innocent victim, and you're the malicious troublemaker guilty of trying to scam money out of your blameless employer. If your boss steals money out of your wages then you're also assumed to be the guilty party and forced to stump up a fee of ยฃ390 to take them to a tribunal for unlawful deduction of wages. This ยฃ390 fee applies even if the amount your employer stole from your wages was less than ยฃ390! By introducing such fees the Tories clearly made life a lot easier for unscrupulous bosses who unfairly sack their workers and/or pillage their wages, and a lot harder for employees with abusive or thieving bosses. Why bother with fees. Someone I know who was working in London in a restaurant quit her job because the owner was getting too fresh with her. The owner refused to pay her her wages. She told me. She got her wages without any problems.
|
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
|
|