... you're not meant to walk around naked normally ...

... hope it wasn't you

... 🤦🏻‍♂️ ...

Bang on! Even he is confused!

Still waiting on your 'evidence' that proves you weren't chatting shit about Corbyn earlier.

Not quite sure what you didn't get here either. Position was quite clear, that any deal negotiated to go back to the people. Which is the right thing to do. Give people the chance to vote on something tangible.

Still waiting for evidence to prove you weren't lying.

And you were questioning Corbyn's stance on Marr. He gave one. You choose not to understand it.

Why was he wearing scales on his eyes?

Utter nonsense. Corbyn is the only party leader who has recognised how divisive the whole sorry mess of Brexit is and is trying to find a middle ground. He's suggesting that there is a deal possible which is less bad than the one currently on offer but that it should be put back to the populace for ratification. At the moment there are extremists on both sides who refuse to acknowledge the wishes of approximately 50% of the country. It's not ideal. None of it is, but it's an attempt to prevent what could be an irreconcilable fracture. That's better leadership than anyone else is currently offering.

I'm strongly in favour of remain, but I respect the fact people have a different view. However, pretty much no one, on either side, despite what they might say, was fully aware of what they were voting for. You only have to re-watch BBCQT in the run up to the referendum when every other comment was along the lines of 'we need more info'. Now people do know more, they ought to be given an opportunity to confirm it's what they thought they were voting for.

In regards to your AS accusations. You have failed to identify any Labour MPs have been antisemitic, let alone repeatedly, and any evidence of covering it up. You have lied to smear someone.

If you want to take the accusations of AS in general, I suggest you read the following from JVL.

    FROM THE MOMENT Jeremy Corbyn emerged as leader of the Labour Party a barrage of allegations of antisemitism was levelled at him and the party. These allegations have tarnished the party’s image and deflected it from promoting its core programme of anti-austerity and redistribution of wealth.



    Representing several hundred Jewish members of the party, Jewish Voice for Labour from the very start challenged the existence of this antisemitic wave. Never denying for a moment the existence of serious, isolated expressions of antisemitism, none of us – many with decades of party membership - experienced anything at all resembling such undercurrents. Why was Labour singled out for such interrogation, and was antisemitism really more prevalent in the party than elsewhere?



    The wave of allegations swamped the party machinery. After Jennie Formby became General Secretary, the implementation of some of the Chakrabarti recommendations and expansion of staffing levels, it is clear that this wave of reported allegations is being managed promptly, with only 24 cases outstanding.



    And a clear picture has finally emerged. Jennie Formby’s data confirms that the grounds for the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn and Labour have indeed been grossly exaggerated, and in some cases fabricated. Over the last ten months there were: » 1,106 referrals of antisemitism allegations; » 433 of these had nothing to do with party members, leaving 673 to be investigated; » 220 of these were dismissed entirely for lack of evidence; » this left 453 cases; » 453 is 0.08% of the party’s 540,000 members – that’s about 1/12th of 1%; » 96 of these resulted in suspensions - that’s 0.01%, or 1/100th of 1% of members; » there were twelve expulsions – that’s 0.002%, or 1/500th of 1% of members!



    By no stretch of the imagination can a 0.08% incidence support the claim of a ‘”rampant problem in Labour”. Of course, even one case of antisemitism is one too many. But these are vanishingly small statistics, especially when you consider that 2-5% of the general population are considered to be antisemitic.



    This is not a wave, it is not even a ripple. In nautical terms it’s almost a dead flat calm.



    Furthermore, there is no record of the thousands of abusive messages MPs like Ruth Smeeth claimed to have received, alleging most emanated from the Labour Party. The source of these might well have been traced to the ten fake twitter accounts masquerading as Labour Party members, unmasked by journalist Asa Winstanley. But to our knowledge, such numbers have never been submitted for investigation.



    Margaret Hodge MP was informed by Jennie Formby that of the 200 dossiers of cases of antisemitism she had submitted, only 20 were found to be by Labour Party members. In other words, her allegations of antisemitism in the party had been exaggerated tenfold. And single handedly she accounted for approaching one fifth of all referrals.



    Headlines proclaiming there was “no safe place for Jews in Corbyn’s Labour”, or that Labour needed, in the words of Marie van de Zyl, when vice-president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to “drain the cesspit of antisemitism”, have been shown to be contradicted by the evidence.



    When the Shami Chakrabarti inquiry was presented we learned that there was no evidence of widespread antisemitism in Labour, but there were some offensive comments often borne out of ignorance. In cases such as these 146 written warnings were issued.



    If the facts are at such odds with the accounts of leading politicians and mainstream media, there can be only one explanation – these accounts are driven by ulterior political agendas. Other forms of racism, for which manifestations in the UK are 70 times more prevalent than those for antisemitism, barely get a mention. At the last election Labour fell short of becoming the government by a few percentage points. The next election is predicted to be as close. The damage to the party inflicted by the allegations of antisemitism is calculated to impact on this tipping point – to keep the party out of office. Ironically, the Labour Party is the only party in western Europe which has both the programme and the potential to govern, and thus the power to address the economic and political causes of the very real rise of fascism across Europe. The stakes couldn’t be higher!

It's plain to see that there are many people with vested interests who are crapping themselves at the very distinct possibility of Corbyn becoming PM and it isn't because he's going to ruin the country. Its because when he is, he's not going to allow greed to prevail. 

I have no idea what "JVL" is but them saying most of the accusations against Corbyn and the Labour party are made up is absurd. There are hundreds of Jews within the Labour Party who have suffered huge amounts of abuse and intimidation. This has been widely documented in all the national newspapers for months now and is real. You can't dismiss this as people simply trying to discredit the Labour Party. When they say most anti-semitism has not come from party members they really mean most has come from the labour-affiliated "Momentum" which is, basically, Corbyn's fanbase thugs who intimidate and threaten anybody who dares to question his leadership. And as for Shami Chakrabarti, she was personally appointed by Jeremy Corbyn so it's no surprise that she sides with Corbyn in her conclusions that there is no large-scale antisemitism in the labour party despite the fact that Jews think otherwise. She is not exactly an impartial observer, is she. You may like to read this report from the well-known left-wing Guardian newspaper so you can hardly claim this is all right-wing slurs.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/31/observer-view-antisemitism-plaguing-labour-party-corbyn

Oh dear. You've had a mare here. Facts, stats and evidence presented by a Jewish body ignored because it doesn't suit your agenda.

What on earth are you talking about???  You really think Jewish MPs are making it all up?  Who should I believe?  Some group that hands out a press release based on their conclusions or what Jewish people themselves are saying about how they have been treated?  The next thing you will say is that The Guardian is a right-wing propaganda tool secretly funded by The Conservative party.  

Im clutching at straws lol. I didnt even bother to distinguish between left or right newspapers, the statement remains the same. They are NOT a reliable source of accurate information. But then we are getting to a point where people can really get to understand exactly how you have built "your opinion". Mass media bullshit. 

Strong and stable! 🤣😂