|
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 13:17:23 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by Daylight Robber on May 24, 2019 13:17:23 GMT 1, Stating the issue was due to shortness of time is an admission of incompetence. If you don't have enough time, it's because you've not resourced it properly. If you've not resourced it properly you've probably not budgeted properly. It's been mismanaged. As you stated though, there was an entitlement that wasn't honoured and there were plenty of options available which didn't require significant increase in budget/resources. It was wilful. I think it is worth stopping for a moment and considering motive here. What would the government gain by prohibiting non-Brits from voting? They are probably sh*t scared of the Brexit Party hoovering up the majority of votes but what non-Brits living in the UK would vote for the Brexit Party? At a guess, I would say the answer is zero. In other words it would be to the government's advantage to have non-Brits voting en mass as that will inevitably dilute the Brexit Party vote. If it was 'wilful' that would simply be playing in to the hands of the Brexit Party who would gain an even bigger percentage of the votes.
Windrush. Go Home vans. Hostile environment. We all know what Treeza thinks of foreigners.
Stating the issue was due to shortness of time is an admission of incompetence. If you don't have enough time, it's because you've not resourced it properly. If you've not resourced it properly you've probably not budgeted properly. It's been mismanaged. As you stated though, there was an entitlement that wasn't honoured and there were plenty of options available which didn't require significant increase in budget/resources. It was wilful. I think it is worth stopping for a moment and considering motive here. What would the government gain by prohibiting non-Brits from voting? They are probably sh*t scared of the Brexit Party hoovering up the majority of votes but what non-Brits living in the UK would vote for the Brexit Party? At a guess, I would say the answer is zero. In other words it would be to the government's advantage to have non-Brits voting en mass as that will inevitably dilute the Brexit Party vote. If it was 'wilful' that would simply be playing in to the hands of the Brexit Party who would gain an even bigger percentage of the votes. Windrush. Go Home vans. Hostile environment. We all know what Treeza thinks of foreigners. |
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Brexit, by Chris JL on May 24, 2019 13:26:53 GMT 1, I think it is worth stopping for a moment and considering motive here. What would the government gain by prohibiting non-Brits from voting? They are probably sh*t scared of the Brexit Party hoovering up the majority of votes but what non-Brits living in the UK would vote for the Brexit Party? At a guess, I would say the answer is zero. In other words it would be to the government's advantage to have non-Brits voting en mass as that will inevitably dilute the Brexit Party vote. If it was 'wilful' that would simply be playing in to the hands of the Brexit Party who would gain an even bigger percentage of the votes. Windrush. Go Home vans. Hostile environment. We all know what Treeza thinks of foreigners.
And EU residents’ vote would have reduced even further the Tory vote share - 6% more would have gone to whoever is neither a Brexit cheerleader nor a wobbler.
I think it is worth stopping for a moment and considering motive here. What would the government gain by prohibiting non-Brits from voting? They are probably sh*t scared of the Brexit Party hoovering up the majority of votes but what non-Brits living in the UK would vote for the Brexit Party? At a guess, I would say the answer is zero. In other words it would be to the government's advantage to have non-Brits voting en mass as that will inevitably dilute the Brexit Party vote. If it was 'wilful' that would simply be playing in to the hands of the Brexit Party who would gain an even bigger percentage of the votes. Windrush. Go Home vans. Hostile environment. We all know what Treeza thinks of foreigners. And EU residents’ vote would have reduced even further the Tory vote share - 6% more would have gone to whoever is neither a Brexit cheerleader nor a wobbler. |
|
skAcid
New Member
🗨️ 862
👍🏻 917
October 2017
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 13:56:01 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by skAcid on May 24, 2019 13:56:01 GMT 1, Poor little Theresa.
She did her best which was a 100% fucking failure!
What she was good at was covering up the past.
theswamp.media/theresa-may-s-father
|
|
hibster
New Member
🗨️ 237
👍🏻 228
October 2013
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 14:06:37 GMT 1
Brexit, by hibster on May 24, 2019 14:06:37 GMT 1, So she is going then. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48395905Am I the only one who feels sorry for Theresa May? She did her best under impossible circumstances. We would have been in this mess regardless of who was in charge. If people think that a new Prime Minister (Boris Johnson?) will suddenly turn Brexit in to a walk in the park, then they are in for a very big shock. Changing PM changes nothing. i hope that answer to that question is yes you are the only one
look at what she's been in chare of & what's happened in her reign factor in what she was irresponsible for as home secretary & the tens of thousands of people far worse off & the only thing to be sorry for is her time as pm/ hs
hope the fields of wheat have a large ticket price to get in
So she is going then. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48395905Am I the only one who feels sorry for Theresa May? She did her best under impossible circumstances. We would have been in this mess regardless of who was in charge. If people think that a new Prime Minister (Boris Johnson?) will suddenly turn Brexit in to a walk in the park, then they are in for a very big shock. Changing PM changes nothing. i hope that answer to that question is yes you are the only one
look at what she's been in chare of & what's happened in her reign factor in what she was irresponsible for as home secretary & the tens of thousands of people far worse off & the only thing to be sorry for is her time as pm/ hs
hope the fields of wheat have a large ticket price to get in
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 14:49:42 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 24, 2019 14:49:42 GMT 1, I wonder if you will think the same in six months time. I can't help feeling it is a case of "out of the frying pan and in to the fire".
I wonder if you will think the same in six months time. I can't help feeling it is a case of "out of the frying pan and in to the fire". |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 14:52:15 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 24, 2019 14:52:15 GMT 1, I felt that her tears were just a display of self pity for a very very bruised ego, but maybe I'm just being heartless on this one. I do fear who the replacement will be, particularly if they decide the way to increase Tory popularity is to appeal even more to the Right.
2. Yes, the tories will now swing even further to the right. I can't see how they will not.
I hope all these May-haters are happy.
I felt that her tears were just a display of self pity for a very very bruised ego, but maybe I'm just being heartless on this one. I do fear who the replacement will be, particularly if they decide the way to increase Tory popularity is to appeal even more to the Right. 1. yes, you are been heartless. 2. Yes, the tories will now swing even further to the right. I can't see how they will not. I hope all these May-haters are happy. |
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 14:57:00 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 24, 2019 14:57:00 GMT 1, Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did?
What a ridiculous argument.
Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did? What a ridiculous argument. |
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 15:10:34 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 24, 2019 15:10:34 GMT 1, Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did? What a ridiculous argument.
Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did? What a ridiculous argument. She "lost" a whole bunch of files on peados too. |
|
|
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 15:18:25 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by Daylight Robber on May 24, 2019 15:18:25 GMT 1, Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did? What a ridiculous argument. She "lost" a whole bunch of files on peados too.
Not to mention sabotaged enquiries into child abuse by repeatedly appointing committee chairs with significant links to what the enquiry was set up to look in to.
Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did? What a ridiculous argument. She "lost" a whole bunch of files on peados too. Not to mention sabotaged enquiries into child abuse by repeatedly appointing committee chairs with significant links to what the enquiry was set up to look in to. |
|
skAcid
New Member
🗨️ 862
👍🏻 917
October 2017
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 15:19:23 GMT 1
Brexit, by skAcid on May 24, 2019 15:19:23 GMT 1, Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did? What a ridiculous argument.
No not at all. It's info most people don't know about hence her covering it up! 
Are you seriously suggesting that we are all responsible for what our parents did? What a ridiculous argument. No not at all. It's info most people don't know about hence her covering it up! |
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 19:47:03 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 24, 2019 19:47:03 GMT 1, Punked by Sainsburys!
Off she goes with a trumpety trump, trump trump trump. Well that was an unplanned convenience!
Punked by Sainsburys! Off she goes with a trumpety trump, trump trump trump. Well that was an unplanned convenience! |
|
.dappy
Full Member
🗨️ 9,841
👍🏻 9,462
December 2010
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 22:35:28 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by .dappy on May 24, 2019 22:35:28 GMT 1, ... rebate ... would you like to give us a prediction for the Labour vote which should be published on Sunday? 
... their percentage of the total vote?
... whether Labour finish in 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th place?
... rebate ... would you like to give us a prediction for the Labour vote which should be published on Sunday? ... their percentage of the total vote? ... whether Labour finish in 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th place? |
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 22:48:52 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 24, 2019 22:48:52 GMT 1, ... rebate ... would you like to give us a prediction for the Labour vote which should be published on Sunday? ... their percentage of the total vote? ... whether Labour finish in 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th place?
... rebate ... would you like to give us a prediction for the Labour vote which should be published on Sunday? ... their percentage of the total vote? ... whether Labour finish in 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th place? Nope. But i do predict the polls will be wrong again. |
|
.dappy
Full Member
🗨️ 9,841
👍🏻 9,462
December 2010
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 22:59:29 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by .dappy on May 24, 2019 22:59:29 GMT 1, ... rebate ... would you like to give us a prediction for the Labour vote which should be published on Sunday? ... their percentage of the total vote? ... whether Labour finish in 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th place? Nope. But i do predict the polls will be wrong again.
... what do the polls say? ... honestly haven't been following them other than Brexit Party will come 1st
... rebate ... would you like to give us a prediction for the Labour vote which should be published on Sunday? ... their percentage of the total vote? ... whether Labour finish in 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th place? Nope. But i do predict the polls will be wrong again. ... what do the polls say? ... honestly haven't been following them other than Brexit Party will come 1st |
|
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
🗨️ 9,841
👍🏻 9,462
December 2010
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 23:03:12 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by .dappy on May 24, 2019 23:03:12 GMT 1, ... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ...
... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ...
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 24, 2019 23:56:23 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 24, 2019 23:56:23 GMT 1, ... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ...
... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ... Its not that likely to happen. He has the party membership onside but not the MP's apparently. He has to get through the MP's to get to the members vote. So he is in theory pretty screwed. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 10:27:13 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 25, 2019 10:27:13 GMT 1, I wonder if you will think the same in six months time. I can't help feeling it is a case of "out of the frying pan and in to the fire". Wonder no more, because I can assure you right now I'll think exactly the same in six years time, let alone six months.
By what logic does something, or someone, become better/forgiven simply because what follows is worse?
I wonder if you will think the same in six months time. I can't help feeling it is a case of "out of the frying pan and in to the fire". Wonder no more, because I can assure you right now I'll think exactly the same in six years time, let alone six months.
By what logic does something, or someone, become better/forgiven simply because what follows is worse? Because that is what logic is all about, i.e. something that is "better" is better than something that is "worse". That's what the words mean! |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 10:34:07 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 25, 2019 10:34:07 GMT 1, ... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ...
... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ... Whoever becomes PM will fail. They will be in exactly the same position as Theresa May was in. I find it extraordinary that people think booting out Theresa May will achieve anything at all. The numbers in parliament are still the same. There is still no majority for any of the options on offer - and that's before you overcome the hurdle of trying to get the EU to agree to it. |
|
.dappy
Full Member
🗨️ 9,841
👍🏻 9,462
December 2010
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 10:53:19 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by .dappy on May 25, 2019 10:53:19 GMT 1, ... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ... Whoever becomes PM will fail. They will be in exactly the same position as Theresa May was in. I find it extraordinary that people think booting out Theresa May will achieve anything at all. The numbers in parliament are still the same. There is still no majority for any of the options on offer - and that's before you overcome the hurdle of trying to get the EU to agree to it.
... and we will therefore leave by default ...
... the only vote to pass (by 1 vote) was that we could not leave without an agreement, but if there is no punishment ... what would the punishment be ... cross statements made in parliament ... time passes on ...
... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ... Whoever becomes PM will fail. They will be in exactly the same position as Theresa May was in. I find it extraordinary that people think booting out Theresa May will achieve anything at all. The numbers in parliament are still the same. There is still no majority for any of the options on offer - and that's before you overcome the hurdle of trying to get the EU to agree to it. ... and we will therefore leave by default ... ... the only vote to pass (by 1 vote) was that we could not leave without an agreement, but if there is no punishment ... what would the punishment be ... cross statements made in parliament ... time passes on ... |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 11:09:42 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by Deleted on May 25, 2019 11:09:42 GMT 1, ... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ... Only today, he told a conference in Interlaken, Switzerland: “We will leave the EU on 31 October, deal or no deal.”
Noel Edmonds in the hot seat!
... is the only good thing with Boris becoming the next PM is that he will take the poison chalice and fail (and I don't mean not pushing through and leaving the EU)... and therefore his tenure won't be very long and he will never be re-elected ... Only today, he told a conference in Interlaken, Switzerland: “We will leave the EU on 31 October, deal or no deal.” Noel Edmonds in the hot seat! |
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 11:29:53 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 25, 2019 11:29:53 GMT 1, Wonder no more, because I can assure you right now I'll think exactly the same in six years time, let alone six months.
By what logic does something, or someone, become better/forgiven simply because what follows is worse? Because that is what logic is all about, i.e. something that is "better" is better than something that is "worse". That's what the words mean!
Wonder no more, because I can assure you right now I'll think exactly the same in six years time, let alone six months.
By what logic does something, or someone, become better/forgiven simply because what follows is worse? Because that is what logic is all about, i.e. something that is "better" is better than something that is "worse". That's what the words mean! You have a major issue with logic. In fact it may be your entire thought process! |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 11:59:23 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 25, 2019 11:59:23 GMT 1, Because that is what logic is all about, i.e. something that is "better" is better than something that is "worse". That's what the words mean! You have a major issue with logic. In fact it may be your entire thought process!
Because that is what logic is all about, i.e. something that is "better" is better than something that is "worse". That's what the words mean! You have a major issue with logic. In fact it may be your entire thought process! I think you need to brush up on logic - and perhaps buy yourself a dictionary. I studied logic as part of political philosophy at university. You don't seem to have the faintest idea what you are talking about. |
|
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 12:09:07 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 25, 2019 12:09:07 GMT 1, You have a major issue with logic. In fact it may be your entire thought process! I think you need to brush up on logic - and perhaps buy yourself a dictionary. I studied logic as part of political philosophy at university. You don't seem to have the faintest idea what you are talking about.
Calling bullshit on the degree too, big time.
You have a major issue with logic. In fact it may be your entire thought process! I think you need to brush up on logic - and perhaps buy yourself a dictionary. I studied logic as part of political philosophy at university. You don't seem to have the faintest idea what you are talking about. So your telling me the state of a future object changes the state of a previous one? get a f**kinggrip. Calling bullshit on the degree too, big time. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 14:00:39 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 25, 2019 14:00:39 GMT 1, I think you need to brush up on logic - and perhaps buy yourself a dictionary. I studied logic as part of political philosophy at university. You don't seem to have the faintest idea what you are talking about. So your telling me the state of a future object changes the state of a previous one? get a f**kinggrip. Calling bullshit on the degree too, big time.
I think you need to brush up on logic - and perhaps buy yourself a dictionary. I studied logic as part of political philosophy at university. You don't seem to have the faintest idea what you are talking about. So your telling me the state of a future object changes the state of a previous one? get a f**kinggrip. Calling bullshit on the degree too, big time. You still don't get it, do you. Something is better or worse regardless of the time it takes place in. The words 'better' and 'worse' are relative terms independent of time. It is perfectly correct to say Margaret Thatcher was better/worse than Winston Churchill. Or that Tony Blair was better/worse than Harold Wilson. What part of that do you not understand??? It's not rocket science. |
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 14:06:00 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 25, 2019 14:06:00 GMT 1, So your telling me the state of a future object changes the state of a previous one? get a f**kinggrip. Calling bullshit on the degree too, big time. You still don't get it, do you. Something is better or worse regardless of the time it takes place in. The words 'better' and 'worse' are relative terms independent of time. It is perfectly correct to say Margaret Thatcher was better/worse than Winston Churchill. Or that Tony Blair was better/worse than Harold Wilson. What part of that do you not understand??? It's not rocket science.
So your telling me the state of a future object changes the state of a previous one? get a f**kinggrip. Calling bullshit on the degree too, big time. You still don't get it, do you. Something is better or worse regardless of the time it takes place in. The words 'better' and 'worse' are relative terms independent of time. It is perfectly correct to say Margaret Thatcher was better/worse than Winston Churchill. Or that Tony Blair was better/worse than Harold Wilson. What part of that do you not understand??? It's not rocket science. Not true, if May is shit now and leaves today, she is still shit in ten years time. If boris the t**t takes over, he will be shit, then, May and boris will BOTH be shit. May will not be good because boris is also shit. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 14:44:52 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 25, 2019 14:44:52 GMT 1, You still don't get it, do you. Something is better or worse regardless of the time it takes place in. The words 'better' and 'worse' are relative terms independent of time. It is perfectly correct to say Margaret Thatcher was better/worse than Winston Churchill. Or that Tony Blair was better/worse than Harold Wilson. What part of that do you not understand??? It's not rocket science. Not true, if May iss**t now and leaves today, she is stills**t in ten years time. If boris the t**t takes over, he will bes**t, then, May and boris will BOTH bes**t. May will not be good because boris is alsos**t.
You still don't get it, do you. Something is better or worse regardless of the time it takes place in. The words 'better' and 'worse' are relative terms independent of time. It is perfectly correct to say Margaret Thatcher was better/worse than Winston Churchill. Or that Tony Blair was better/worse than Harold Wilson. What part of that do you not understand??? It's not rocket science. Not true, if May iss**t now and leaves today, she is stills**t in ten years time. If boris the t**t takes over, he will bes**t, then, May and boris will BOTH bes**t. May will not be good because boris is alsos**t. The question was not about being sh*t or otherwise. The question was about being better or worse than somebody else. To put it in more abstract terminology, "X is sh*t", does not mean X can not be better (or worse) than Y. |
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 15:18:20 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on May 25, 2019 15:18:20 GMT 1, Not true, if May iss**t now and leaves today, she is stills**t in ten years time. If boris the t**t takes over, he will bes**t, then, May and boris will BOTH bes**t. May will not be good because boris is alsos**t. The question was not about being sh*t or otherwise. The question was about being better or worse than somebody else. To put it in more abstract terminology, "X is sh*t", does not mean X can not be better (or worse) than Y.
Ill just sit back and watch the tory party disintegrate and the more than obvious labour government at the next GE. I said before she would achieve nothing, boris would take over and the party would collapse, she lasted longer than i expected.
Not true, if May iss**t now and leaves today, she is stills**t in ten years time. If boris the t**t takes over, he will bes**t, then, May and boris will BOTH bes**t. May will not be good because boris is alsos**t. The question was not about being sh*t or otherwise. The question was about being better or worse than somebody else. To put it in more abstract terminology, "X is sh*t", does not mean X can not be better (or worse) than Y. Cool. Ill just sit back and watch the tory party disintegrate and the more than obvious labour government at the next GE. I said before she would achieve nothing, boris would take over and the party would collapse, she lasted longer than i expected. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Brexit
May 25, 2019 16:28:05 GMT 1
Brexit, by Deleted on May 25, 2019 16:28:05 GMT 1, Boris would be dreadful. At least that's something we can both agree on.
Although, bizarrely, the front runner does not usually win leadership contests.
Boris would be dreadful. At least that's something we can both agree on.
Although, bizarrely, the front runner does not usually win leadership contests.
|
|
mojo
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,191
👍🏻 3,724
May 2014
|
Brexit
May 26, 2019 14:07:34 GMT 1
Brexit, by mojo on May 26, 2019 14:07:34 GMT 1, Brexit in a nutshell for anyone who still believes they are 'taking back control' ...the only thing being taken is the piss.
www.helpsavedemocracy.com/
Brexit in a nutshell for anyone who still believes they are 'taking back control' ...the only thing being taken is the piss. www.helpsavedemocracy.com/ |
|
.dappy
Full Member
🗨️ 9,841
👍🏻 9,462
December 2010
|
Brexit
May 26, 2019 16:42:30 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by .dappy on May 26, 2019 16:42:30 GMT 1, ... I'm backing Boris ...
... British jobs for British people (although Boris was born in NYC in the US)
http://instagram.com/p/Bx5pocIpXVV
|
|
