Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Brexit, by Chris JL on Sept 11, 2019 22:45:51 GMT 1,
Two clear things:
1. According to the optimists’ forecasts, it’s gonna be a disaster.
2. The level of preparedness of the government to deal with it is a joke (starting form the richness of details provided in this contingency plan).
Two clear things: 1. According to the optimists’ forecasts, it’s gonna be a disaster. 2. The level of preparedness of the government to deal with it is a joke (starting form the richness of details provided in this contingency plan).
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 11, 2019 22:50:35 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by Daylight Robber on Sept 11, 2019 22:50:35 GMT 1, Two clear things: 1. According to the optimists’ forecasts, it’s gonna be a disaster. 2. The level of preparedness of the government to deal with it is a joke (starting form the richness of details provided in this contingency plan).
If Johnson is seriously prepared to exit without a deal, knowing what he obviously knows, then I wouldn't shed a tear if he ended up in his ditch.
Two clear things: 1. According to the optimists’ forecasts, it’s gonna be a disaster. 2. The level of preparedness of the government to deal with it is a joke (starting form the richness of details provided in this contingency plan). If Johnson is seriously prepared to exit without a deal, knowing what he obviously knows, then I wouldn't shed a tear if he ended up in his ditch.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 7:52:38 GMT 1
Brexit, by Daniel Silk on Sept 12, 2019 7:52:38 GMT 1, So what do people think will happen now?
Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences.
So what do people think will happen now?
Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences.
|
|
nex
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,573
👍🏻 1,819
February 2009
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 8:00:17 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by nex on Sept 12, 2019 8:00:17 GMT 1, So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences.
no matter what he does?
How about just upholding the rule of law?
So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. no matter what he does? How about just upholding the rule of law?
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 9:51:40 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 12, 2019 9:51:40 GMT 1, So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that
A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country),
B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and
C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us.
And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus.
Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us.
So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country), B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us. And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus. Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 11:36:33 GMT 1
Brexit, by Daniel Silk on Sept 12, 2019 11:36:33 GMT 1, So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country), B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us. And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus. Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us. Don’t you think it sort of makes the role of PM pointless? If every decision can be taken to court and stopped by those who don’t agree.
So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country), B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us. And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus. Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us. Don’t you think it sort of makes the role of PM pointless? If every decision can be taken to court and stopped by those who don’t agree.
|
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 11:48:41 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 12, 2019 11:48:41 GMT 1, If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country), B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us. And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus. Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us. Don’t you think it sort of makes the role of PM pointless? If every decision can be taken to court and stopped by those who don’t agree. Isnt that the definition of a dictator?
If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country), B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us. And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus. Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us. Don’t you think it sort of makes the role of PM pointless? If every decision can be taken to court and stopped by those who don’t agree. Isnt that the definition of a dictator?
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 11:49:33 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 12, 2019 11:49:33 GMT 1, Is that you wondering what to do in a bit, after the EU confirm we can have an extension if we need one?
Is that you wondering what to do in a bit, after the EU confirm we can have an extension if we need one?
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 12:03:24 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 12, 2019 12:03:24 GMT 1, "W̶e̶ ̶w̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ ̶r̶u̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶i̶s̶k̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶E̶U̶ ̶r̶e̶f̶u̶s̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶u̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶e̶x̶t̶e̶n̶s̶i̶o̶n̶"
More wriggle room gone then. Poor bojo, life has him in so many sticky corners he must think he lives in a spiders web made of triangles.
"W̶e̶ ̶w̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ ̶r̶u̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶i̶s̶k̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶E̶U̶ ̶r̶e̶f̶u̶s̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶u̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶ ̶e̶x̶t̶e̶n̶s̶i̶o̶n̶"
More wriggle room gone then. Poor bojo, life has him in so many sticky corners he must think he lives in a spiders web made of triangles.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 12:51:54 GMT 1
Brexit, by Happy Shopper on Sept 12, 2019 12:51:54 GMT 1, So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. He has 2/3 choices:
1. Get the better deal he promised he could get. 2. Ask for an extension and call the election again.
OR, 3. (More controversial for the Tories) Hold a second referendum to decide between Teresa May's deal (if there's no other) and Remaining in the EU.
Simple really.
So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. He has 2/3 choices: 1. Get the better deal he promised he could get. 2. Ask for an extension and call the election again. OR, 3. (More controversial for the Tories) Hold a second referendum to decide between Teresa May's deal (if there's no other) and Remaining in the EU. Simple really.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 13:36:16 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by Coach on Sept 12, 2019 13:36:16 GMT 1, If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country), B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us. And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus. Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us. Don’t you think it sort of makes the role of PM pointless? If every decision can be taken to court and stopped by those who don’t agree.
It’s not every decision. And it’s not just because some people don’t agree. It’s a challenge as to whether an act was unlawful. Many decisions of the state are regularly subject to judicial review to ensure that they are not ultra vires, and rightly so. In this case the court will either say it’s a political decision over which they have no jurisdiction, or it’s not, in which case it will determine whether the act was lawful or not. I can’t see the concern with that.
If the courts decide they dont have the right to be involved, we will be shown that A, we have no democracy after all (its at the will of the guy running the country), B, we have no real rule of law other than for the proles, and C, that no one should ever vote conservative as they are a law unto themselves and not us. And since BOJO the clown has already managed to get consent from the same courts, to lie to us as he pleases because "its down to the electorate to decide if he is lying". Which brings us of course, back to A and B at the same time, so lets see if the elite win and the people go under the bus. Our future may well stand or fall on this one court ruling. If the clown wins, there is nothing else left to protect us. Don’t you think it sort of makes the role of PM pointless? If every decision can be taken to court and stopped by those who don’t agree. It’s not every decision. And it’s not just because some people don’t agree. It’s a challenge as to whether an act was unlawful. Many decisions of the state are regularly subject to judicial review to ensure that they are not ultra vires, and rightly so. In this case the court will either say it’s a political decision over which they have no jurisdiction, or it’s not, in which case it will determine whether the act was lawful or not. I can’t see the concern with that.
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 13:38:27 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 12, 2019 13:38:27 GMT 1, So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. He has 2/3 choices: 1. Get the better deal he promised he could get. 2. Ask for an extension and call the election again. OR, 3. (More controversial for the Tories) Hold a second referendum to decide between Teresa May's deal (if there's no other) and Remaining in the EU. Simple really. Spot on with the first 2. 3 is dodgy ground though. Any question going to the people would need parliamentary support, as they wouldnt pass mays deal, i doubt they would give it consent to be on the table.
So what do people think will happen now? Looks like a situation is being created with the PM breaking the law no matter what he does, and that’s gonna suit him perfectly so he can do the NO DEAL, and then accept any legal consequences. He has 2/3 choices: 1. Get the better deal he promised he could get. 2. Ask for an extension and call the election again. OR, 3. (More controversial for the Tories) Hold a second referendum to decide between Teresa May's deal (if there's no other) and Remaining in the EU. Simple really. Spot on with the first 2. 3 is dodgy ground though. Any question going to the people would need parliamentary support, as they wouldnt pass mays deal, i doubt they would give it consent to be on the table.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 14:02:36 GMT 1
Brexit, by Happy Shopper on Sept 12, 2019 14:02:36 GMT 1, He has 2/3 choices: 1. Get the better deal he promised he could get. 2. Ask for an extension and call the election again. OR, 3. (More controversial for the Tories) Hold a second referendum to decide between Teresa May's deal (if there's no other) and Remaining in the EU. Simple really. Spot on with the first 2. 3 is dodgy ground though. Any question going to the people would need parliamentary support, as they wouldnt pass mays deal, i doubt they would give it consent to be on the table. If the EU won't budge, and I can't see why they would, then you have to have a referendum on the options on the table.
You could make it a vote between Remain and No Deal, but I'm fairly certain most Leave supporters would flinch at actually voting for No Deal chaos... and they'd still have to agree what would happen with the Irish boarder.
He has 2/3 choices: 1. Get the better deal he promised he could get. 2. Ask for an extension and call the election again. OR, 3. (More controversial for the Tories) Hold a second referendum to decide between Teresa May's deal (if there's no other) and Remaining in the EU. Simple really. Spot on with the first 2. 3 is dodgy ground though. Any question going to the people would need parliamentary support, as they wouldnt pass mays deal, i doubt they would give it consent to be on the table. If the EU won't budge, and I can't see why they would, then you have to have a referendum on the options on the table. You could make it a vote between Remain and No Deal, but I'm fairly certain most Leave supporters would flinch at actually voting for No Deal chaos... and they'd still have to agree what would happen with the Irish boarder.
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 15:28:30 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 12, 2019 15:28:30 GMT 1, Spot on with the first 2. 3 is dodgy ground though. Any question going to the people would need parliamentary support, as they wouldnt pass mays deal, i doubt they would give it consent to be on the table. If the EU won't budge, and I can't see why they would, then you have to have a referendum on the options on the table. You could make it a vote between Remain and No Deal, but I'm fairly certain most Leave supporters would flinch at actually voting for No Deal chaos... and they'd still have to agree what would happen with the Irish boarder. Sounds like they are budging a bit. They have said an extension is ok. And that they would look at some stuff again if needed. So there should be some form of "other" deal on the table, i just dont think it will be mays.
Spot on with the first 2. 3 is dodgy ground though. Any question going to the people would need parliamentary support, as they wouldnt pass mays deal, i doubt they would give it consent to be on the table. If the EU won't budge, and I can't see why they would, then you have to have a referendum on the options on the table. You could make it a vote between Remain and No Deal, but I'm fairly certain most Leave supporters would flinch at actually voting for No Deal chaos... and they'd still have to agree what would happen with the Irish boarder. Sounds like they are budging a bit. They have said an extension is ok. And that they would look at some stuff again if needed. So there should be some form of "other" deal on the table, i just dont think it will be mays.
|
|
|
slevin
New Member
🗨️ 602
👍🏻 699
December 2015
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 18:42:13 GMT 1
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
🗨️ 9,841
👍🏻 9,462
December 2010
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 20:08:52 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by .dappy on Sept 12, 2019 20:08:52 GMT 1, ... John Lewis ... first loss in 155 years of trading ...
... British jobs for British people ...
... John Lewis ... first loss in 155 years of trading ...
... British jobs for British people ...
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 20:30:45 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 12, 2019 20:30:45 GMT 1, Good god! When online really isnt your thing, but the board bully you into it!
Good god! When online really isnt your thing, but the board bully you into it!
|
|
Masong
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,223
👍🏻 2,887
March 2017
|
Brexit
Sept 12, 2019 20:33:29 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by Masong on Sept 12, 2019 20:33:29 GMT 1,
No Harry, it’s Brexits fault, everything is Brexits fault, so please stand corrected. British jobs for British people
No Harry, it’s Brexits fault, everything is Brexits fault, so please stand corrected. British jobs for British people
|
|
dUKE
New Member
🗨️ 11
👍🏻 28
August 2019
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 10:48:36 GMT 1
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 14:52:56 GMT 1
Brexit, by Chris JL on Sept 13, 2019 14:52:56 GMT 1, warchet that post says all that there is to know about you.
enough said.
warchet that post says all that there is to know about you. enough said.
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 14:56:28 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 13, 2019 14:56:28 GMT 1, Aww bless, doesnt even understand how the UK works. Now theres a shock. Led by the nose like a fool again warchet.
Aww bless, doesnt even understand how the UK works. Now theres a shock. Led by the nose like a fool again warchet.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 15:11:10 GMT 1
Brexit, by Daylight Robber on Sept 13, 2019 15:11:10 GMT 1, This is just an extension of the 'we've had enough of experts' attitude. The concept that people in a professional capacity are able to carry out a job without being biased, is completely beyond a huge chunk of Leavers. Instead of requiring skills and ability (and sticking to the law) to deliver, we now just need belief.
And then they complain when they're labelled stupid!
This is just an extension of the 'we've had enough of experts' attitude. The concept that people in a professional capacity are able to carry out a job without being biased, is completely beyond a huge chunk of Leavers. Instead of requiring skills and ability (and sticking to the law) to deliver, we now just need belief. And then they complain when they're labelled stupid!
|
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
🗨️ 9,841
👍🏻 9,462
December 2010
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 15:40:50 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by .dappy on Sept 13, 2019 15:40:50 GMT 1, ... don't know if that is a photo of the Botswana judiciary, but they do seem to have a pretty good system ...
The Judiciary is established by the Constitution as one of the three arms of Government. Its pivotal role in the governance of the country is defined in the constitution as the adjudication of both civil and criminal cases involving citizens and the state. It comprises of the Court of Appeal and the High Court.
The Judiciary is independent from other arms of government; that is the executive and the legislature. To further reinforce the independence of the Judiciary and to ensure that it is insulated from interference from the other arms, the Constitution creates the Judicial Service Commission. The J SC’s responsibility is the assessment and recommendation of officers to be appointed for Judicial posts. Judicial appointments, although made by His Excellency the President, can only be made on the recommendations of the Judicial Service Commission, except the appointment of the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal. The powers and main functions of the Judiciary are defined under part VI, Section 95 of the Constitution as to hear and determine any civil and criminal cases under any law. An effective and efficient Judiciary will stop people from taking the law into their own hands and promote an amicable resolution of their dispute. Judicial Independence is a right that a citizen must demand and enjoy.
... don't know if that is a photo of the Botswana judiciary, but they do seem to have a pretty good system ...
The Judiciary is established by the Constitution as one of the three arms of Government. Its pivotal role in the governance of the country is defined in the constitution as the adjudication of both civil and criminal cases involving citizens and the state. It comprises of the Court of Appeal and the High Court.
The Judiciary is independent from other arms of government; that is the executive and the legislature. To further reinforce the independence of the Judiciary and to ensure that it is insulated from interference from the other arms, the Constitution creates the Judicial Service Commission. The J SC’s responsibility is the assessment and recommendation of officers to be appointed for Judicial posts. Judicial appointments, although made by His Excellency the President, can only be made on the recommendations of the Judicial Service Commission, except the appointment of the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal. The powers and main functions of the Judiciary are defined under part VI, Section 95 of the Constitution as to hear and determine any civil and criminal cases under any law. An effective and efficient Judiciary will stop people from taking the law into their own hands and promote an amicable resolution of their dispute. Judicial Independence is a right that a citizen must demand and enjoy.
|
|
dogstar
New Member
🗨️ 665
👍🏻 811
October 2017
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 15:46:53 GMT 1
Brexit, by dogstar on Sept 13, 2019 15:46:53 GMT 1, Bloody judges, they're all the same, completely biased against anyone who breaks the law.
Bloody judges, they're all the same, completely biased against anyone who breaks the law.
|
|
dogstar
New Member
🗨️ 665
👍🏻 811
October 2017
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 16:50:27 GMT 1
Brexit, by dogstar on Sept 13, 2019 16:50:27 GMT 1, The Times picture editor appears to have enjoyed working yesterday...
The Times picture editor appears to have enjoyed working yesterday...
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Brexit, by Chris JL on Sept 13, 2019 17:25:17 GMT 1, The Times picture editor appears to have enjoyed working yesterday...
🤣 brilliant, just brilliant 😂
The Times picture editor appears to have enjoyed working yesterday... 🤣 brilliant, just brilliant 😂
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,766
👍🏻 1,852
March 2017
|
Brexit, by Chris JL on Sept 13, 2019 17:31:58 GMT 1, Only the strongest will survive You lot are fucked 😂
Natural selection tends to favour cognitive ability.
You are doomed.
Only the strongest will survive You lot are fucked 😂 Natural selection tends to favour cognitive ability. You are doomed.
|
|
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 17:35:00 GMT 1
via mobile
Brexit, by Coach on Sept 13, 2019 17:35:00 GMT 1, Has the EU indicated that they will agree to an extension to allow time for a general election to take place?
Has the EU indicated that they will agree to an extension to allow time for a general election to take place?
|
|
rebate
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,050
👍🏻 961
January 2018
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 18:45:36 GMT 1
Brexit, by rebate on Sept 13, 2019 18:45:36 GMT 1, Only the strongest will survive You lot are fucked 😂 Natural selection tends to favour cognitive ability. You are doomed. Its also much easier to survive as a group, no way is old warchet there going to want to be involved at the roots of a socialist survival system! Such a shame.
Only the strongest will survive You lot are fucked 😂 Natural selection tends to favour cognitive ability. You are doomed. Its also much easier to survive as a group, no way is old warchet there going to want to be involved at the roots of a socialist survival system! Such a shame.
|
|
dogstar
New Member
🗨️ 665
👍🏻 811
October 2017
|
Brexit
Sept 13, 2019 18:59:41 GMT 1
Brexit, by dogstar on Sept 13, 2019 18:59:41 GMT 1, The Daily Mail has found some proper dirt on the treacherous Scottish judges who ruled prorogation to be unlawful.
It turns out one of the rotten bastards has a "passion for France."
Another traitor scumbag is a "jazz lover" who predicted Brexit would be "an onerous task."
Damning scandalous stuff!
The Daily Mail has found some proper dirt on the treacherous Scottish judges who ruled prorogation to be unlawful. It turns out one of the rotten bastards has a "passion for France." Another traitor scumbag is a "jazz lover" who predicted Brexit would be "an onerous task." Damning scandalous stuff!
|
|